English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Supreme Court commutes death sentence to Santosh Mane, a driver who killed 9 people, to life term

Published

on

Supreme Court commutes death sentence to Santosh Mane, a driver who killed 9 people, to life term

Sentenced to death for crushing to death nine persons and injuring 27 with a bus he had hijacked, Santosh Mane’s life was spared by Supreme Court today (Thursday, Jan 10) which commuted his punishment to a life term on grounds of the convict being of unsound mind.

It was a very unsafe morning for Pune on January 25, 2012, as Santosh Mane, a state transport bus driver decided to hijack a bus at 7 am from Swargate depot and took off, ramming into everyone who came his way on the road. He mowed down 9 people and injured many who just set out from their homes early that morning. His 25 km run created a havoc in the city as he rammed into numerous cars causing massive accidents on the streets.

Eventually, the City Police caught hold of him and arrested him after an hour long chase.  He was finally taken down near Neelayam theatre with the help of citizens who kept the police informed about his whereabouts and surrounded him.

On April 3rd 2013, Santosh Mane was charged with section 302(murder) . 381 (theft of employers property), 307 (attempt to murder) and 325(voluntarily causing hurt by dangerous weapons or means) of the Indian Penal Code and hence was awarded Death Penalty by the Bombay High Court

“The accused has committed the murder of nine persons by moving the bus dangerously with the intention and knowledge that the act was so imminently dangerous that it will cause death or bodily harm,” the judge observed.

The Judge held that the accused did not dash the vehicle against any building on the roads but specifically just people. However, the defence lawyer said that his client would appeal against this sentence suggesting that Mane was not “mentally sound” or aware of his actions and its consequences while he was committing this grave crime.

Amit Chitali, who represented Mane at the Supreme Court stated how since the beginning, the defence’s plea was that at the time of committing this offence, Mane was not mentally stable so section 84 of the Indian Penal Code should have been applied .

IPC’s section 84 suggests that “nothing is an offence which is done by person who,at the time of doing it, by reason of unsoundness is incapable of knowing the act, or that he is doing what is either wrong or contrary to law” .  Today, The Supreme Court has commuted his Death Sentence to  lifetime imprisonment.

The detailed judgment is yet to come and will be debated further by the standing counsel for the State of Maharashtra in the Supreme Court.

India News

DU VC Prof Yogesh Singh entrusted with additional charge of AICTE Chairman

Published

on

By

Prof. Yogesh Singh, Vice Chancellor of the University of Delhi, has been entrusted with the additional charge of the post of Chairman, AICTE till the appointment of a Chairman of AICTE or until further orders, whichever is earlier.

It is noteworthy that AICTE Chairman Prof. TG Sitharam was relieved of his duties after his term ended on December 20, 2025. According to a letter issued by the Ministry of Education, Government of India, on Monday, Prof. Yogesh Singh’s appointment is until the appointment of a regular AICTE Chairman or until further orders whichever is earlier.

Prof. Yogesh Singh is a renowned academician with excellent administrative capabilities, who has been the Vice-Chancellor of University of Delhi since October 2021. He has also served as the Chairperson of the National Council for Teacher Education. In August 2023, he was also given the additional charge of Director of the School of Planning and Architecture (SPA).

Prof. Yogesh Singh served as the Vice-Chancellor of Delhi Technological University from 2015 to 2021; Director of Netaji Subhas Institute of Technology, Delhi from 2014 to 2017, and before that, he was the Vice-Chancellor of Maharaja Sayajirao University, Baroda (Gujarat) from 2011 to 2014. He holds a Ph.D. in Computer Engineering from the National Institute of Technology, Kurukshetra. He has a distinguished track record in quality teaching, innovation, and research in the field of software engineering.

Continue Reading

India News

Goa nightclub fire case: Court extends police custody of Luthra brothers by five days

A Goa court has extended the police custody of Saurabh and Gaurav Luthra, owners of the nightclub where a deadly fire killed 25 people, by five more days.

Published

on

Luthra brothers

A court in Goa on Monday extended the police custody of Saurabh Luthra and Gaurav Luthra, the owners of the Birch by Romeo Lane nightclub, by five more days in connection with the deadly fire incident that claimed 25 lives on December 6.

The order was passed as investigators sought additional time to question the two accused in the case linked to the blaze at the Anjuna-based nightclub.

Owners were deported after fleeing abroad

According to details placed before the court, the Luthra brothers had left the country following the incident and travelled to Thailand. They were subsequently deported and brought back to India on December 17, after which they were taken into police custody.

Advocate Vishnu Joshi, representing the families of the victims, confirmed that the court granted a five-day extension of police custody for both Saurabh and Gaurav Luthra.

Another co-owner sent to judicial custody

The court also remanded Ajay Gupta, another owner of the nightclub, to judicial custody. Police did not seek an extension of his custody, following which the court passed the order, the victims’ counsel said.

The Anjuna police have registered a case against the Luthra brothers for culpable homicide not amounting to murder along with other relevant offences related to the fire incident.

Continue Reading

India News

Delhi High Court issues notice to Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi in National Herald case

Delhi High Court has sought responses from Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi on the ED’s plea challenging a trial court order in the National Herald case.

Published

on

The Delhi High Court has sought responses from Congress leaders Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi on a petition filed by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in connection with the National Herald case. The petition challenges a trial court order that refused to take cognisance of the agency’s prosecution complaint.

Justice Ravinder Dudeja issued notices to the Gandhis and other accused on the main petition, as well as on the ED’s application seeking a stay on the trial court’s December 16 order. The high court has listed the matter for further hearing on March 12, 2026.

The trial court had ruled that taking cognisance of the ED’s complaint was “impermissible in law” because the investigation was not based on a registered First Information Report (FIR). It observed that the prosecution complaint under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) was not maintainable in the absence of an FIR for a scheduled offence.

According to the order, the ED’s probe originated from a private complaint rather than an FIR. The court further noted that since cognisance was declined on a legal question, it was not necessary to examine the merits of the allegations at that stage.

The trial court also referred to the complaint filed by BJP leader Subramanian Swamy and the summoning order issued in 2014, stating that despite these developments, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) did not register an FIR in relation to the alleged scheduled offence.

The ED has accused Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi, late Congress leaders Motilal Vora and Oscar Fernandes, Suman Dubey, Sam Pitroda, and a private company, Young Indian, of conspiracy and money laundering. The agency has alleged that properties worth around Rs 2,000 crore belonging to Associated Journals Limited (AJL), which publishes the National Herald newspaper, were acquired through Young Indian.

The agency further claimed that Sonia and Rahul Gandhi held a majority 76 per cent shareholding in Young Indian, which allegedly took over AJL’s assets in exchange for a Rs 90 crore loan.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com