English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Ayodhya case: Decision on scheduling hearing put off to Jan 29 after judge recuses from Bench

Published

on

Ayodhya temple

Hearing of the eagerly awaited, politically sensitive Ram Janmabhoomi–Babri Masjid land title dispute in the Supreme Court was today (Thursday, Jan 10) put off till Jan 29 after Justice Uday U Lalit recused himself from the case for previously being a lawyer in a related case.

The court will now constitute a new bench for deciding the schedule of hearing the case on January 29.

Chief Justice of India (CJI) Ranjan Gogoi had set up a Constitution bench comprising himself and Justices SA Bobde, NV Ramana, UU Lalit, DY Chandrachud to decide the date when they will begin hearing the 14 appeals in the case.

However, Justice UU Lalit recused himself from the case after senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan, appearing for the Muslim side pointed out that he had once appeared as a lawyer for former Uttar Pradesh chief minister Kalyan Singh in another case related to the land dispute in 1994. Though Dhavan said he was not seeking Justice Lalit’s recusal, the judge opted out of the hearing in the matter.

The constitution bench will now have to be reconstituted when the matter comes up for hearing next on January 29.

As soon as the bench assembled this morning to hear the Ayodhya matter, the CJI clarified that the case had been listed on the day not for arguments but only to decide the schedule for the commencement of the proceedings.

On Tuesday, in a surprise move, CJI Ranjan Gogoi had formed a five-judge Constitution Bench, headed by him, to hear the case. Using his discretionary powers to list the matter before a Constitution Bench without a fresh reference being made in the case for such a request, the CJI had indicated that, although, his predecessor had declared that the case will be treated purely as a title dispute, the top court may now also be open to larger questions of constitutional relevance involved in the case.

When the matter was last taken up on January 4, there was no indication that the case would be referred to a Constitution bench as the apex court had simply said further orders in the matter would be passed on January 10 by “the appropriate bench, as may be constituted”.

Days before he demitted office, then Chief Justice Dipak Misra had, in September, while pronouncing a verdict in the Ismail Faruqui reference, said that the Ayodhya matter did not need to be heard by a bench of a larger composition than three judges. The verdict had also upheld a controversial observation in the Ismail Faruqui case of mid-1990s, which was linked with the main matter of the Ayodhya title suit, that stated “a mosque is not integral to Islam” and hence was not a perquisite for offering namaz.

The bench headed by Chief Justice Misra had then said that the hearing in the Ayodhya matter could resume from October 29 (by when Justice Gogoi would be elevated to the top post of the apex court). However, upon assuming office, Chief Justice Gogoi had earlier put off the hearing in the case till January this year, declaring that an “appropriate bench” would be constituted for adjudicating proceedings in the matter.

On Thursday, senior advocate Dhavan, appearing for the Muslim petitioners in the case, objected to the CJI’s decision of forming a Constitution Bench to hear the suit without any fresh reference being made for the purpose. However, the Bench, in unison, rejected Dhavan’s contention stating that the CJI had used his discretion and was permitted to do so as per the Supreme Court Rules.

The bench also overruled Dhavan’s claim that the Chief Justice had, in forming a Constitution Bench in the case, gone against an earlier verdict in the matter that said a three-judge bench was competent to adjudicate the pleas.

Dhavan also pointed out that the verdict in the title suit, delivered by the Allahabad High Court, runs into over 4300 pages and a large number of documents related to the case still need to be translated and circulated to all parties and their lawyers.

The bench then directed the Supreme Court registry to appoint official translators for the documents and also assess how much time it would take to complete the process of translations. The translations have to be made into English and Hindi from documents that are written in Arabic, Sanskrit and Gurmukhi, aside from some other vernacular languages.

The apex court said in its order that 113 issues are likely to be perused during the hearing. It also noted that 88 witnesses were examined and their statements recorded when the matter was before the Allahabad high court. It said the deposition of the witnesses runs into 2,886 pages and 257 documents were exhibited.

The apex court noted that the high court judgement itself is 4,304 pages; along with additional annexures it runs into 8,000 pages.

Fourteen appeals against the September 30, 2010 decision of the Allahabad High Court — which accepted that the disputed site was birthplace of Lord Ram and ordered a three-way division of the disputed 2.77 acres, giving a third each to the Nirmohi Akhara sect, the Sunni Central Wakf Board, UP, and Ramlalla Virajman — have been pending since December of that year.

Right-wing organisations, including the RSS, have been demanding an early decision on the dispute. Demands seeking an ordinance for construction of a Ram temple have also gained momentum.

India News

Indore voter deletions: 1.36 lakh names, but digital records not maintained

Replies to an RTI concerning 1,36,552 voter deletions in Indore in 2022 said several constituency offices had not maintained the requested digital records.

Published

on

MP High Court

RTI replies concerning 1,36,552 voter deletions in Indore in 2022 said several constituency offices had not maintained the requested digital records from Garud and ERO Net. 

The deletions took place between January 5 and October 15, 2022, and therefore predate the current Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise. However, the subsequent RTI correspondence has brought attention to how records related to those deletions were maintained.

RTI replies say digital records were not maintained 

The RTI application, filed by former Indore councillor Dilip Kaushal, sought information related to entries made through the Garud app and ERO Net, along with material concerning decisions taken by Electoral Registration Officers.

Several constituency election offices responded that the requested digital records had not been maintained.

The Depalpur election office said it had not maintained digital records relating to ERO Net or the Garud app used by Booth Level Officers. Similar responses came from officials in Indore-2, Indore-5, Rau and Sanwer.

The Indore-1 and Indore-3 offices said requested digital material, including video and other copies, had not been maintained because there were no Election Commission instructions to preserve such records at the time.

The Indore-4 office said the deletion process through Garud and ERO Net was routine work carried out under Election Commission instructions, but the constituency office had not maintained the digital material sought in the RTI application.

1.36 lakh deletions across Indore constituencies

The 1,36,552 deletions cited in the application were spread across several Assembly constituencies.

Indore-4 accounted for 28,391 deletions, while Indore-5 recorded 28,091. Rau had 21,346 deletions.

The application also listed 19,983 deletions in Indore-2, 12,102 in Indore-1 and 8,107 in Indore-3. Sanwer accounted for 8,531 deletions and Depalpur for 2,214.

Together, Indore-4 and Indore-5 accounted for 56,482 deletions, while adding Rau’s figure took the combined total to 77,828.

Madhya Pradesh High Court directs action on RTI appeal

Kaushal pursued the matter after receiving the replies and filed a second appeal before the State Information Commission.

The Madhya Pradesh High Court has now directed the State Information Commission to decide the pending appeal on its merits and in accordance with law.

Justice Sandeep N Bhatt’s September 17 order asked the authority to decide the matter as expeditiously as possible, preferably within 45 days of receiving a certified copy of the order, and communicate the outcome to Kaushal.

The appeal had been pending since January 30, 2026.

Kaushal had also raised the issue with Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi, and the Madhya Pradesh Chief Electoral Officer in July 2025.

The RTI trail relates to voter deletions carried out in 2022 and does not itself establish that the deletions were part of the current SIR exercise.

Continue Reading

India News

Yogi Adityanath transfers over Rs. 148 crore to 4.60 lakh students

Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath transferred over Rs. 148 crore to the bank accounts of more than 4.60 lakh students under the state’s scholarship and fee reimbursement programme.

Published

on

Yogi Adityanath

Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath transferred more than Rs. 148 crore in scholarship and fee reimbursement funds to over 4.60 lakh students on Saturday, according to the report.

The funds were transferred to students through their bank accounts as part of the state’s scholarship and fee reimbursement programme.

The initiative covers students from different social and economic categories and is aimed at ensuring that financial difficulties do not prevent them from continuing their education.

Yogi Adityanath’s message to students

During the programme, the Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister said that no student should have to discontinue education because of a lack of funds.

He stressed the government’s commitment to providing students with equal opportunities to pursue their education and move forward in life.

The scholarship and fee reimbursement support is intended to provide financial assistance to eligible students while helping them continue their studies.

Scholarship support for UP students

The latest transfer covers more than 4.60 lakh students and involves over Rs. 148 crore in financial assistance. The programme includes scholarship and fee reimbursement support for eligible students.

Other reports on the October 3 distribution said the amount covered students belonging to the Other Backward Classes, Scheduled Castes, general category and minority communities.

The Uttar Pradesh government has also highlighted the use of automation in the scholarship distribution process, saying it has improved transparency and helped ensure timely payments to students.

Continue Reading

India News

Tariffs, export controls increasingly used for strategic purposes, says PM’s Principal Secretary

PM’s Principal Secretary P K Mishra said tariffs, export controls and other restrictions are increasingly being used for strategic purposes amid growing global economic uncertainty.

Published

on

PM’s Principal Secretary P K Mishra has said tariffs, export controls and other restrictions are increasingly being deployed for strategic purposes as countries deal with greater economic uncertainty and disruptions to global supply chains.

Speaking at the Kautilya Economic Conclave in New Delhi on Saturday, Mr Mishra highlighted the changing nature of economic risks and the need for countries to build resilience without withdrawing from the global economy.

He said the distinction between conventional risks and uncertainty has become increasingly important for economic decision-making. While risks can generally be assessed in terms of probability, uncertainty makes it more difficult to determine the likelihood of different outcomes.

Tariffs and restrictions becoming strategic tools

Mr Mishra said economic disruptions are no longer limited to traditional market risks. Wars, interruptions to shipping routes and geographical choke points can affect food, energy and supply chains across countries.

Referring to such developments, he said tariffs can sometimes become instruments of weaponisation, while other restrictions are increasingly being used for strategic purposes.

He also said export restrictions, sanctions and tariffs can serve purposes beyond conventional commercial objectives, bringing geopolitical considerations more prominently into economic policymaking.

The comments came against the backdrop of discussions on economic resilience at the fifth Kautilya Economic Conclave, whose theme focuses on dealing with global shocks while preserving growth and openness.

India focuses on economic resilience

Mr Mishra said India’s economic strength is supported by its macroeconomic fundamentals and that the country has maintained a high level of growth despite global uncertainty.

He argued that resilience does not require choosing between complete self-sufficiency and globalisation. Instead, countries need to build domestic capabilities in strategically vulnerable areas, diversify sources of supply where concentration creates risks and remain open where global integration supports productivity and competitiveness.

India’s electronics sector, along with pharmaceuticals and semiconductors, provides examples of areas where domestic capabilities can help reduce vulnerability while remaining connected to global markets, he said.

Geography becomes an economic factor

Mr Mishra also pointed to the impact of disruptions around major shipping routes. He said geographical choke points can become sources of vulnerability, particularly for a country such as India that is a major energy importer.

He said India’s response has included maintaining stocks, increasing domestic production where possible and diversifying procurement and supply routes.

The broader issue, according to Mr Mishra, is how economies can preserve the gains of globalisation while becoming less vulnerable to shocks and excessive concentration in particular suppliers or geographical regions.

He said building resilience carries an economic cost, meaning governments need to assess where investment in resilience is justified by the potential economic and social impact of a disruption.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com