India on Friday expressed deep concern over U.S. President Donald Trump’s claim that the previous U.S. administration allocated $21 million to influence voter turnout in India, suggesting it amounted to meddling in India’s electoral process.
The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) responded to Trump’s remarks, calling them “deeply troubling” and stating that the matter is under review.
Addressing a press conference, MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said, “We have seen information put out by the U.S. administration regarding certain U.S. activities and funding. These are obviously very deeply troubling. This has led to concerns about foreign interference in India’s internal affairs.”
“Relevant departments and agencies are looking into this matter. It would be premature to make a public comment at this stage, so relevant authorities are looking into it, and hopefully, we can come up with an update on that subsequently,” Jaiswal added.
Trump made the comments during his speech at the FII PRIORITY Summit in Miami, where he criticized the funding decisions of the previous administration.
“Why do we need to spend $21 million on voter turnout in India? I guess they were trying to get somebody else elected. We have got to tell the Indian government… Because when we hear that Russia spent about two thousand dollars in our country, it was a big deal. They took some internet ads for two thousand dollars. This is a total breakthrough,” Trump said.
Despite expressing admiration for India and Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Trump questioned the rationale behind allocating such a significant amount for voter turnout efforts in another country.
“I have a lot of respect for India and for its prime minister, who just left two days ago. However, we are allocating $21 million to improve voter turnout in India. My question is, what about voter turnout here at home? I believe we have already addressed that; we allocated $500 million for it, which we referred to as the ‘lockboxes,'” the US President said.
Trump’s comments have sparked a debate over whether U.S. foreign aid should be used to influence democratic processes in other nations. Critics have raised concerns about the ethical implications of such actions.
The controversy highlights the sensitivity surrounding foreign interference in domestic electoral processes and underscores the need for transparency in international funding and aid. As Indian authorities continue to review the matter, the incident has added a new dimension to the ongoing discourse on global democratic integrity.