In a move that has added to controversy, Justice Yashwant Varma was sworn in as a judge of the Allahabad High Court on Saturday, despite an ongoing in-house inquiry ordered by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sanjiv Khanna on March 22.
The inquiry, conducted by a panel of three High Court judges, was initiated to investigate serious allegations against Justice Varma following the discovery of large amounts of cash at his official residence in Delhi.
The controversy began on March 14 when a fire broke out at Justice Varma’s residence on Tughlak Road at 11:35 p.m. The Delhi Fire Services (DFS) swiftly controlled the blaze, but during the response, first responders reportedly found several semi-burnt sacks containing Indian currency notes in a storeroom.
At the time, Justice Varma, then a judge at the Delhi High Court, and his wife were in Bhopal. The shocking discovery raised questions about the source and purpose of the cash, triggering a storm of speculation and calls for accountability.
Justice Varma has vehemently denied any wrongdoing, labelling the allegations as a “conspiracy to malign” him, according to reports. However, the incident has cast a shadow over his judicial career, prompting the CJI to order a probe to uphold the integrity of the judiciary.
Despite the ongoing investigation, Justice Varma’s swearing-in ceremony at the Allahabad High Court was conducted on Saturday in what the High Court Bar Association (HCBA) described as a “clandestine” manner.
The lawyers’ body, which had previously opposed his repatriation to Allahabad, expressed outrage, questioning why the event was not publicly notified to the Bar.
In a letter dated April 5 addressed to Chief Justice of Allahabad High Court Arun Bhansali, HCBA Secretary Vikrant Pandey condemned the move, arguing that it further eroded public trust in the judicial system.
“The entire Bar Association is pained to learn about the secretive way in which Justice Yashwant Varma was administered the oath of office at Allahabad,” Pandey wrote.
He recalled that the CJI had assured Bar members during a meeting that steps would be taken to maintain the dignity of the judiciary. “We were told the process would be fair and transparent, but why was this oath not communicated to the Bar? This question once again shakes people’s faith in the system,” he added.
Pandey urged the Chief Justice not to assign any administrative or judicial duties to Justice Varma, asserting that “legally and traditionally, the oath administered to him is flawed and unacceptable.”
He emphasized that the swearing-in of a judge is a cornerstone event in the judicial system and should be conducted openly, with lawyers—whom he described as equal stakeholders—being informed and involved. “Keeping the lawyer fraternity in the dark may undermine their confidence in this institution,” he warned.
The HCBA passed a resolution declaring the oath “unconstitutional” and distanced itself from the process, arguing that it violated established norms. “We spoke openly about our concerns and even sent copies of our resolutions to everyone, including your lordship. Yet, this secretive oath leaves us bewildered,” Pandey stated.
No official statement has been issued by the Allahabad High Court regarding the swearing-in, adding to the mystery surrounding the event. The cash recovery incident has reignited debates about judicial accountability, with calls from various quarters for strict action to set a precedent and restore public confidence in the judiciary.
Justice Varma, for his part, has maintained that neither he nor his family had any knowledge of the cash found at their residence. However, the lack of transparency in his swearing-in has fueled accusations of favouritism and raised concerns about the judiciary’s commitment to fairness and openness.