India News
Scholars question EPW Trust decisions on article on Adani, action against editor
Published
9 years agoon
By
[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]More than 150 members of the academic community and contributors to the EPW have written an open letter to the directors of Sameeksha Trust, which brings out the journal Economic and Political Weekly (EPW), questioning their decision to remove an article on the Adani Group from the EPW website and impose restrictions on the editor. They have asked the trustees to make an effort to engage with the larger community on recent events and restore the independent nature of the journal, questioning their decision to cow down to corporate pressure.
On July 18, Economic and Political Weekly (EPW) editor Paranjoy Guha Thakurta resigned from his position after directors of the Sameeksha Trust ordered that he take down an article on the Adani Group. The Adani Group had written to the board and Guha Thakurta saying that the article was defamatory and threatened to take them to court.
Guha Thakurta has said that, in addition to asking that the article be taken down, the board told him he could no longer publish articles with his by-line in the journal and would have to work with a co-editor in the future.
The board members, in their statement, have not denied this or questioned the factual nature of the original articles. They said instead that Guha Thakurta had “exceeded his brief” by responding to the Adani Group’s letter on his own and initiating legal process on behalf of the Sameeksha Trust “without informing, let alone obtaining approval of, the Trust”.
The Sameeksha Trust’s actions upset the wider community of scholars who have been part of the ‘EPW community’ as readers and writers. Their letter to Sameeksha Trust directors and the list of signatories is reproduced below:
Open letter to the board members of the Sameeksha Trust
As long-standing well-wishers and members of the intellectual community served by the EPW, we are appalled and dismayed by the recent events leading to the abrupt resignation of the editor, Paranjoy Guha Thakurta.
We are distressed that the board of the Sameeksha Trust has insisted that the editor retract an article published in the journal, and is preparing to introduce new norms for the board-editor relationship and appoint a co-editor. It is obvious that, taken together, these actions (mentioned by the editor in interviews to the press and not denied in the statement issued by the trust) would force any self-respecting editor to resign. By failing to distinguish between internal issues of procedural propriety in the board-editor relationship from the much larger question of the EPW’s public reputation for integrity, the board of the Sameeksha Trust has dealt a strong blow to the journal’s credibility.
Paranjoy Guha Thakurta’s professional reputation has been primarily that of an investigative journalist of several decades standing. His well-known past exposés have delved into the malpractices of large corporations and the frequent complicity of state institutions in such corrupt practices. That such journalism could provoke retaliation by those investigated may be expected. These facts must have been known to the board of trustees of the Sameeksha Trust when they appointed Guha Thakurta as editor just 15 months earlier. It is one thing to wonder if the editor may have erred in initiating legal action on behalf of the Trust without first consulting its board, and quite another to withdraw an already published article from the journal. If the board believes the article to be mistaken in its facts, it must issue a public apology and retraction. If it is only concerned that due deference was not shown to the board, it must publicly stand by the article. By forcing the editor’s resignation without clarifying its stand on the substance of the article, the board has diminished the institution that it is mandated to nurture.
The fact that a legal notice was sent to the editor and the publishers (Sameeksha Trust) of EPW, for an ongoing investigation on the tweaking of rules that have benefited the Adani Group, is not surprising. Legal notices have unfortunately become the standard means used to intimidate and suppress investigative journalism. When they translate into court cases that can extend over years, they obviously add to costs and further harassment of honest journalists. However, as long as all the published material can be adequately substantiated and verified, there is little reason to fear an adverse result from the judicial process. But publishers MUST stand behind and back their editors on this if the journals are to maintain their independence and credibility.
India is currently living through a dark period in which there are real concerns about freedom and independence of intellectual expression, both for academics and journalists, with significant corporate takeover of major media houses and increasing instances of overt and covert intimidation of independent thinking and debate. In this context, reports of what appears to be a capitulation by the board of trustees of Sameeksha Trust – removing the “offending” article from the EPW website and trying to impose humiliating terms on the editor – are alarming. The EPW has a long and distinguished tradition of promoting independent and critical thinking that is vital in a democracy. We expect the current trustees to be mindful of our inherited legacy that they hold in trust on behalf of us as scholars, analysts and activists in India and abroad, who have contributed to EPW over long decades. They need to take immediate steps to restore the prestige and credibility of the journal and the Sameeksha Trust. This letter is therefore also asking the Trust, which (regardless of its purely legal status) is in the nature of a body accountable to a larger public, to create channels of communication between the Trust and the EPW community so as to strengthen the autonomy and integrity of EPW.
- AR Vasavi, Independent researcher Bangalore
- Aabid Firdausi, Kerala University
- Abdi Seido, Dire Dawa University, Ethiopia
- Abhijit Banerjee, Professor, MIT
- Abhijit Sen, Retired Professor, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi
- Aditya Nigam, Professor, Centre for the Study of Developing Societies
- Akeel Bilgrami, Sidney Morgenbesser Professor of Philosophy, Columbia University
- Alicia Puyana Mutis, Professor, Flacso, Mexico City
- Amar Yumnam, Professor, Manipur University, India.
- Amita Baviskar, Professor, Institute of Economic Growth
- Amiya Kumar Bagchi, Emeritus Professor, Institute of Development Studies, Kolkata
- Anamitra Roychowdhury, JNU
- Anand Chakravarti, Retired Professor, University of Delhi
- Anandhi S., Professor, MIDS Chennai
- Andrew Cornford, Geneva Finance Observatory
- Anis Chowdhury, Professor, University of Western Sydney
- Anupam Mitra
- Arindam Sen, Editor, Liberation, Kolkata
- Ashish Rajadhyaksha, Independent researcher, Bangalore
- Ashok Chowdhury, All India Union of Forest Working People
- Ashwini Deshpande, Professor, Delhi School of Economics
- Avinash Kumar, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi
- Avnesh Kumar Gupta, World Forum of Economists
- Balwinder Singh Tiwana, Punjabi University
- Bina Agarwal, Professor, University of Manchester
- Bindu Oberoi, Indraprastha College for Women, Delhi University
- CP Chandrasekhar, Professor, Jawaharlal Nehru University
- Carol Upadhya, NIAS Bangalore
- Chandra Dutt, Director, COSTFORD, Kerala
- Collins Mtika, Director – Centre for Investigative Journalism – Malawi
- Dhruva Narayan, Centre for Social Development
- Dia Dacosta, University of Alberta
- Dipa Sinha, BR Ambedkar University, Delhi
- EAS Sarma, IAS Retd, Hyderabad
- Eleuterio Prado, Professor, São Paulo University, Brazil
- Farah Naqvi, Writer and activist, Delhi
- Geeta Kapur, Art scholar, Delhi
- Gita Chadha, University of Mumbai
- Gopi Kanta Ghosh, Independent researcher
- Hemant Adlakha, Jawaharlal Nehru University
- Himanshu, Jawaharlal Nehru University
- Itty Abraham, National University of Singapore
- J Devika, Centre for Development Studies, Kerala
- J George, (Rtd) Independent Researcher, DELHI
- Jai Sen, World Social Forum
- Janaki Abraham, Delhi School of Economics
- Janaki Nair, Jawaharlal Nehru University
- Jayati Ghosh, Professor, Jawaharlal Nehru University
- Jeemol Unni, University of Ahmedabad
- Jesim Pais, Society for Social and Economic Research
- Jomo Kwame Sundaram, Malaysia
- Joseph MT, University of Mumbai
- K Ramakrishnan, Chennai
- K Srivatsan, Anveshi Research Centre Hyderabad
- Kalpana Kannabiran, Council for Social Development, Hyderabad
- Kalyan Shankar Ray, Bhubaneswar
- Kannan Srinivasan, New York
- Kunibert Raffer, retired Professor, University of Vienna
- Kushankur Dey, Xavier University Bhubaneswar
- Kuttappan Vijayachandran, Industrial Research Services
- Lata Mani, Bangalore
- Laurence Cox, National University of Ireland and Fondation des Sciences des Hommes Paris
- Lawrence Shute, Prof Emeritus, California State Polytechnic University
- Laxmi Murthy, Bengaluru
- M Vijayabaskar, Professor, Madras Institute of Development Studies
- MS Bhatt, retired Professor, Jamia Millia Islamia
- MV Ramana, Professor, University of British Columbia, Canada
- Malancha Chakrabarty, Observer Research Foundation
- Mandeep Kaur, Dyal Singh College
- Mandira Sarma, Jawaharlal Nehru University
- Mani Kumar, Independent researcher
- Manoranjan Mohanty, retired Professor, Delhi University
- Mary E John, Professor, CWDS, New Delhi
- Martha Nussbaum, University of Chicago
- Matt Meyer, International Peace Research Association
- Meyer Brownstone, Professor Emeritus, University of Toronto
- Mohammad Konneh
- Mritunjoy Mohanty, Professor, IIM, Kolkata
- Mustafa Ozer, Anadolu University, Turkey
- N Krishnaji, retired, Centre for Development Studies
- N Mani, Erode College, Kerala
- Nandini Sundar, Professor, University of Delhi
- Navnita Behera, IRIIS
- Nayanjyoti, Research Scholar, Delhi University
- Nirmalangshu Mukherji, Professor, Delhi University
- Nivedita Menon, Professor, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi
- Noam Chomsky, Professor, MIT
- Oishik Sirkar, Jindal Law University, Sonepat
- Padmini Swaminathan, retired Professor, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Hyderabad
- Paris Yeros, Professor, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Partha Chatterjee, Professor, Columbia University
- Partha Ray, IIM Calcutta
- Patrick Bond, Professor, University of Witwatersrand, South Africa
- Prabhu Mohapatra, University of Delhi
- Pradip Kumar Datta, JNU
- Pranab Bardhan, University of California Berkeley
- Praveen Jha, Professor, JNU
- Prem Chowdhry, Historian
- Pushpendra, Professor Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Patna
- R Nagaraj, IGIDR
- R Ramakumar, Professor, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai
- R Srivatsan, Anveshi Research Centre for Women’s Studies
- Radha D’Souza, University of Westminster
- Radhika Desai, Professor, University College, Manitoba
- Radhika Singha, Professor, Jawaharlal Nehru University
- Rajarshi Dasgupta, Journalist, Kolkata
- Rajender Singh Negi
- Rajni Palriwala, University of Delhi
- Rama Melkote, retired Professor, Osmania University
- Ramchandra Guha, Bengaluru
- Ranjini Mazumdar, Professor, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi
- Ravi K Tripathi, Université Pairs XIII – Sorbonne Paris
- Ravi Sundaram, CSDS, Delhi
- Rohit Azad, Jawaharlal Nehru University
- Rosa Abraham, Institute of Social and Economic Change, Bengaluru
- S Parasuraman, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai
- SV Narayanan, Independent Analyst
- Sabyasachi Bhattacharya, Professor Emeritus, JNU
- Sakuntala Narasimhan, Independent scholar
- Samuel H Daniel, Independent researcher USA
- Sanjay Srivastava, Institute of Economic Growth, Delhi
- Sashi Kumar, Chairman, Media Development Foundation, Chennai
- Satish Deshpande, Professor, Delhi University
- Seth Sandrowsky, Sacramento, California
- Shambhu Ghatak, Associate Fellow, Inclusive Media for Change
- Shipra Nigam, Research Scholar
- SK Godwin, SK, IIM Kolkata
- Sudeshna Banerji, Jadavpur University
- Sudip Chaudhuri, Professor IIM Kolkata
- Sumit Mazumdar, Institute of Public Health, Kalyani
- Sumit Sarkar, retired Professor, University of Delhi
- Sunanda Sen, retired Professor, Jawaharlal Nehru University
- Suneetha Achyuta, Coordinator, Anveshi Research Centre for Women’s Studies
- Sunil Khilnani, Professor, King’s College London
- Sunil Mani, Director, CDS Trivandrum
- Surajit C Mukhopadhyay, Seacom Skills University
- Sushil Khanna, Professor, IIM, Kolkata
- Susie Tharu, Professor Emerita, English and Foreign Languages University Swati Pillai, Watershed Organisation Trust Pune
- T M Thomas Isaac, Finance Minister, Government of Kerala
- Tanika Sarkar, retired Professor, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi
- Tejaswini Niranjana, Professor, Lingnan University, Hongkong
- Uma Chakravarti, retired historian, Delhi University
- Uma M Bhrugabanda, EFLU Hyderabad
- Uma Maheswari Bhrugubanda, EFL University
- V Geetha, Independent scholar, Chennai
- Veena Naregal, Institute of Economic Growth, Delhi University
- Veena Shatrugna, retired, National Institute of Nutrition Hyderabad
- Venkatesh Athreya, Professor of Economics (Retired), Bharathidasan University
- Vikas Rawal, Professor, Jawaharlal Nehru University
- Vipin Negi, University of Delhi
- Vishal Sarin, LP University
- Vivan Sundaram, Artist, Delhi
- Yılmaz Akyüz, Chief Economist, South Centre (Former director, UNCTAD)
- Zoya Hasan, Professor Emerita, Jawaharlal Nehru University
[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]
You may like
-
India calls US religious freedom body biased over RSS sanctions demand
-
US Senate passes Russia sanctions bill, India-China face 100% tariff risk
-
For second time, US strikes ship with Indian crew near Strait of Hormuz
-
60 US Senators back bill proposing 100% tariffs on countries buying Russian oil, including India
-
India launches official campaign for UN Security Council 2028-29 seat with SHANTI initiative
-
Centre reiterates correct pronunciation, text for National Anthem and Vande Mataram
India News
MK Stalin announces major DMK organisational Changes in Tamil Nadu
MK Stalin has announced a major DMK organisational overhaul, introducing age and term limits and expanding party districts from 77 to 110.
Published
1 day agoon
August 22, 2026By
APNLive Desk
DMK chief MK Stalin has announced a major overhaul of the party’s organisational structure, months after the party lost the Tamil Nadu assembly election.
Acknowledging the defeat, Stalin said the party must openly recognise its mistakes. He also pointed to the functioning of party office-bearers as one of the factors behind the electoral loss.
“Although there are several reasons for our defeat, the functioning of our party office-bearers is also one of them,” Stalin said, stressing that the party must acknowledge its shortcomings and ensure better performance at every level.
Stalin also described the DMK as a “specialist” in making comebacks and said the party would return stronger.
Age and term limits for party posts
Among the major changes announced by Stalin are age and tenure limits for party positions.
Stalin said the changes would involve a significant restructuring of the DMK’s administrative system, with priority being given to new faces. He said the measures were intended to make the party sustainable for the next 100 years and help restore the trust of young people and women.
Under the new rules, branch secretaries must be aged 45 or below and can hold the position for a maximum of two terms.
District secretaries, meanwhile, must be below 70 years of age and can serve for a maximum of three terms.
DMK to increase party districts from 77 to 110
The DMK executive committee has approved increasing the number of party districts from 77 to 110.
The expansion will be implemented as part of the party’s 16th organisational elections. Revenue districts will generally be reorganised so that each party district covers two assembly constituencies.
Where only one constituency remains after the reorganisation, it will be attached to another suitable party district within the same revenue district as a third constituency.
Stalin has been authorised to determine and announce the constituencies that will form the 110 party districts.
New branch structure planned in urban areas
The DMK will also introduce a new branch-level structure in urban areas, along with the post of branch secretary.
The new system will initially be implemented in Chennai, Coimbatore, Madurai, Tiruchirappalli and Salem. It may subsequently be extended to other corporations.
Once the new party districts are announced, district executive committees will have to meet and establish the union, city, area, town, ward and branch-level units within 15 days.
The organisational changes come as the DMK seeks to restructure its party machinery and prepare for its political comeback following its assembly election defeat.
India News
PM Modi says India’s political stability makes India a bright spot for growth
PM Modi said India’s political stability and policy continuity are helping make the country a bright spot of growth amid global concerns.
Published
2 days agoon
August 22, 2026By
APNLive Desk
Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Friday said India has political stability and continuity in its policies, describing the country as a bright spot of growth and hope amid global concerns over economic growth.
Addressing the Economic Times World Leaders Forum, PM Modi said India is continuing to push reforms across sectors to maintain its growth momentum. He said reforms remain a key commitment of his government.
The Prime Minister said the NDA government has a clear roadmap for reforms, with a strong focus on governance. He also said the government is using incentives to encourage higher production.
PM Modi highlights shift in regulatory approach
PM Modi said his government is changing the country’s regulatory framework and moving away from what he described as a “prohibited-unless-permitted” approach.
He said the government believes there should be no regulation for an activity that has not been explicitly prohibited under law. According to him, the aim is to bring next-generation reforms at the policy and governance levels while improving ease of living.
He also contrasted the current Production Linked Incentive (PLI) model with what he described as a “Production Linked Punishment” approach followed by previous governments.
Focus on infrastructure and manufacturing
PM Modi cited changes in areas including the Indian Railways, Delhi Metro and Namo Rapid Rail as examples of reforms reflecting India’s changing needs.
He also said the government has changed the approach towards border infrastructure, which he described as a strength rather than a weakness.
The Prime Minister further highlighted India’s affordable data services and domestic mobile-phone manufacturing while discussing the country’s economic transformation.
India seen as a growth bright spot
PM Modi said the world is facing several concerns related to growth, including the weaponisation of resources, but India is being viewed as a bright spot of growth.
He said India’s political stability, policy continuity and reform efforts are helping sustain the country’s growth momentum.
India News
Jharkhand students, JMM workers clash over Hemant Soren effigy burning
Clashes broke out in Ranchi, Hazaribag and Giridih as protesting students attempted to burn effigies of Hemant Soren and Rahul Gandhi.
Published
2 days agoon
August 22, 2026By
APNLive Desk
Clashes broke out between protesting students and police in Ranchi and several other parts of Jharkhand on Friday evening as students attempted to burn effigies of Chief Minister Hemant Soren and Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, officials said.
Similar incidents were reported in Hazaribag and Giridih, where workers of the ruling Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM) clashed with students who were trying to burn effigies of Soren.
The protesting students are affiliated with the JPSC-JSSC Reforms Manch. They have accused the Jharkhand government of deceiving and betraying job aspirants following the High Court’s intervention in cases concerning recruitment examinations and appointments.
In Ranchi, a large number of students gathered at Albert Chowk to burn the effigies. Police said a scuffle broke out when they tried to control the situation.
Ranchi DSP KV Raman said the protesters changed the designated route of their march and went towards the JPSC office, where traffic was brought to a halt.
According to Raman, police repeatedly asked the protesters to follow the designated route for the march and effigy burning, but the students did not comply.
Student leaders, however, alleged that police and JMM workers attempted to prevent them from holding a peaceful march.
“They cannot stop us from holding peaceful and democratic protests,” JPSC-JSSC Reforms Manch leader Ravindra Paswan said.
Another student leader, Piyush Kumar Singh, alleged that a core committee member of the Manch, Kunal, was detained by police. He claimed that Kunal fainted and was subsequently taken to Sadar Hospital.
The protesters also alleged that female participants were assaulted by JMM workers during the scuffle.
Why are Jharkhand students protesting?
The students had earlier called off their agitation after the Hemant Soren government decided to cancel JPSC examinations where irregularities had been alleged.
However, the Jharkhand High Court subsequently intervened in several matters related to the recruitment process.
On Friday, the court stayed notifications cancelling the appointments of Child Development Project Officers (CDPOs) and those recruited through the JSSC-CGL examination.
A day earlier, the court had stayed notifications cancelling the 11th and 13th JPSC examinations. It had also stayed the order cancelling the appointments of food safety officers.
The developments have renewed the students’ concerns over the government’s handling of recruitment-related cases.
JLKM announces recruitment reforms yatra
Meanwhile, JLKM leader Devendra Nath Mahto announced that his party would launch a ‘Recruitment System Reforms Yatra’ from August 24.
Mahto alleged that the Jharkhand government was not strongly defending cases concerning the cancellation of several recruitment examinations before the High Court.
He warned that if the government failed to effectively present its case before the Jharkhand High Court on September 15, when the matters are scheduled for hearing, they would plan to gherao the Chief Minister’s residence.
Vivo V80 Lite with 10,000mAh battery set for global launch on September 3
MK Stalin announces major DMK organisational Changes in Tamil Nadu
PM Modi says India’s political stability makes India a bright spot for growth
India calls US religious freedom body biased over RSS sanctions demand
