English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Bihar voter list revision: Supreme Court questions SIR’s timing and Aadhaar exclusion

Published

on

The Supreme Court of India heard multiple petitions challenging the Election Commission of India’s (ECI) Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar, on Thursday, 10 July. ECI described this move as constitutionally mandated and an eradication of “foreign illegal migrants.” The timing and exclusion of Aadhaar as a verification document has sparked significant political dispute.

Petitioners – Opposition leaders, activists, and NGOs- are arguing that the SIR is premature, ill-timed, and risks widespread disenfranchisement of citizens, particularly among marginalized communities.

A central issue is the exclusion of Aadhaar from the accepted list of identification documents, despite its widespread use. Petitioners have pointed out ECI’s decision to consider only 11 specific documents, many of which do not show date or place of birth, and an arbitrary 2003 cut-off date for proving citizenship.

Senior advocate Sankaranarayan raised concerns about the rushed 30-day completion period stating the last revision was in 2003 when Bihar’s population was 4 crore people. Now it is about 7.9 crore and about 10 elections have happened since, highlihting the timing of the exercise ahead of the state’s assembly elections scheduled for October-November 2025.

The petitioners assert that the ECI lacks jurisdiction to determine citizenship and that responsibility of proving non-citizenship rests with the state once an individual is on the electoral roll.

Justices Sudhanshu Dhulia and Joymalya Bagchi, have questioned the timing of the SIR and the exclusion of Aadhaar. Justice Dhulia noted that while the revision itself is not problematic, its timing could prevent individuals from appealing their exclusion before the elections. However, the Court also urged petitioners to refrain from labelling the ECI’s exercise as “artificial,” acknowledging that there is “logic” behind it.

The ECI emphasized that the revision is part of a broader effort to verify elector eligibility with participation of all political parties. The ECI told the Supreme Court that citizenship is one of the requirement for a person to qualify as a voter under Article 326 of the Constitution.

The Opposition, including figures like Rahul Gandhi and Tejashwi Yadav, have protested the SIR, alleging it is an attempt to “steal vote and future.” BJP on the other, has questioned the Opposition’s motives for calling a “Bihar bandh” on a judicial matter. Prashant Kishor of Jan Suraaj has also questioned the necessity of the revision so soon after the 2024 Lok Sabha elections.

India News

DU VC Prof Yogesh Singh entrusted with additional charge of AICTE Chairman

Published

on

By

Prof. Yogesh Singh, Vice Chancellor of the University of Delhi, has been entrusted with the additional charge of the post of Chairman, AICTE till the appointment of a Chairman of AICTE or until further orders, whichever is earlier.

It is noteworthy that AICTE Chairman Prof. TG Sitharam was relieved of his duties after his term ended on December 20, 2025. According to a letter issued by the Ministry of Education, Government of India, on Monday, Prof. Yogesh Singh’s appointment is until the appointment of a regular AICTE Chairman or until further orders whichever is earlier.

Prof. Yogesh Singh is a renowned academician with excellent administrative capabilities, who has been the Vice-Chancellor of University of Delhi since October 2021. He has also served as the Chairperson of the National Council for Teacher Education. In August 2023, he was also given the additional charge of Director of the School of Planning and Architecture (SPA).

Prof. Yogesh Singh served as the Vice-Chancellor of Delhi Technological University from 2015 to 2021; Director of Netaji Subhas Institute of Technology, Delhi from 2014 to 2017, and before that, he was the Vice-Chancellor of Maharaja Sayajirao University, Baroda (Gujarat) from 2011 to 2014. He holds a Ph.D. in Computer Engineering from the National Institute of Technology, Kurukshetra. He has a distinguished track record in quality teaching, innovation, and research in the field of software engineering.

Continue Reading

India News

Goa nightclub fire case: Court extends police custody of Luthra brothers by five days

A Goa court has extended the police custody of Saurabh and Gaurav Luthra, owners of the nightclub where a deadly fire killed 25 people, by five more days.

Published

on

Luthra brothers

A court in Goa on Monday extended the police custody of Saurabh Luthra and Gaurav Luthra, the owners of the Birch by Romeo Lane nightclub, by five more days in connection with the deadly fire incident that claimed 25 lives on December 6.

The order was passed as investigators sought additional time to question the two accused in the case linked to the blaze at the Anjuna-based nightclub.

Owners were deported after fleeing abroad

According to details placed before the court, the Luthra brothers had left the country following the incident and travelled to Thailand. They were subsequently deported and brought back to India on December 17, after which they were taken into police custody.

Advocate Vishnu Joshi, representing the families of the victims, confirmed that the court granted a five-day extension of police custody for both Saurabh and Gaurav Luthra.

Another co-owner sent to judicial custody

The court also remanded Ajay Gupta, another owner of the nightclub, to judicial custody. Police did not seek an extension of his custody, following which the court passed the order, the victims’ counsel said.

The Anjuna police have registered a case against the Luthra brothers for culpable homicide not amounting to murder along with other relevant offences related to the fire incident.

Continue Reading

India News

Delhi High Court issues notice to Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi in National Herald case

Delhi High Court has sought responses from Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi on the ED’s plea challenging a trial court order in the National Herald case.

Published

on

The Delhi High Court has sought responses from Congress leaders Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi on a petition filed by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in connection with the National Herald case. The petition challenges a trial court order that refused to take cognisance of the agency’s prosecution complaint.

Justice Ravinder Dudeja issued notices to the Gandhis and other accused on the main petition, as well as on the ED’s application seeking a stay on the trial court’s December 16 order. The high court has listed the matter for further hearing on March 12, 2026.

The trial court had ruled that taking cognisance of the ED’s complaint was “impermissible in law” because the investigation was not based on a registered First Information Report (FIR). It observed that the prosecution complaint under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) was not maintainable in the absence of an FIR for a scheduled offence.

According to the order, the ED’s probe originated from a private complaint rather than an FIR. The court further noted that since cognisance was declined on a legal question, it was not necessary to examine the merits of the allegations at that stage.

The trial court also referred to the complaint filed by BJP leader Subramanian Swamy and the summoning order issued in 2014, stating that despite these developments, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) did not register an FIR in relation to the alleged scheduled offence.

The ED has accused Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi, late Congress leaders Motilal Vora and Oscar Fernandes, Suman Dubey, Sam Pitroda, and a private company, Young Indian, of conspiracy and money laundering. The agency has alleged that properties worth around Rs 2,000 crore belonging to Associated Journals Limited (AJL), which publishes the National Herald newspaper, were acquired through Young Indian.

The agency further claimed that Sonia and Rahul Gandhi held a majority 76 per cent shareholding in Young Indian, which allegedly took over AJL’s assets in exchange for a Rs 90 crore loan.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com