English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest Politics News

BJP short of majority, all eyes on Governor as JD(S) stakes claim with Congress support

Published

on

BJP short of majority, all eyes on Governor as JD(S) stakes claim with Congress support

As the BJP emerged as the single largest party by a wide margin in Karnataka but fell slightly short of 113 seats required for a simple majority, the Congress moved quickly to offer unconditional support to Janata Dal (Secular) to prevent the saffron party from forming a government in the southern state.

The JD(S) led by HD Kumaraswamy and Congress wrote to the Governor to stake claim to form government. Later, the BJP also approached the Governor and staked its claim.

Counting was in its final stages for 222 of 224 seats. Two of the seats, RR Nagar and Jayanagar, will have a repoll on May 28.

The tally, including leads, put the BJP at 104 seats, while the Congress at 78 and JD(S) at 37, together have 115. In what is an anomalous situation the Congress got the largest share of 37.9% of vote share, 1.7% than BJP’s 36.2%, but got 26 seats less. That again speaks of the poll management skills of the BJP and its president Amit Shah.

Hectic activity was on in Bengaluru. To start with, JD(S) has accepted the Congress offer, according to media reports. Not that the BJP has given up. News18 reported that BJP leader R Ashok was on his way to meet HD Deve Gowda. More lobbying and wooing was expected to take place.

All eyes are on Governor Vajubhai Vala, an old BJP hand.

While the Congress-JD(S) alliance has the numbers, it has the disadvantage of being a “post-poll alliance” and not a “pre-poll alliance”.

Technically, in the case of a “pre-poll alliance”, the governor would have been duty-bound to call the alliance partners first to prove majority.

That rule, however, was shelved in Manipur, Meghalaya and Goa where the BJP managed to enter into alliances to form government – and held on.

Going by rules, which in all likelihood would be enforced in Karnataka, the governor would call the single largest party – the BJP – for staking claim to form a government, and give it time to face a floor test and prove its majority. Only if loses the floor test can the governor give a chance to the alliance.

The intervening time between forming a government and the floor test provides the BJP to woo legislators and engineer splits or resignations while the alliance partners try to keep their lot together. It would be a no-hold barred situation.

JD(S)’s HD Kumaraswamy has sought appointment from the Governor of Karnataka. In a letter to the Governor, Kumaraswamy said: “This is to inform your good self that I have accepted the support extended by the Indian National Congress party for forming the government. In this regard, I seek your appointment today evening between 5.30 pm to 6 pm.”

BJP’s chief ministerial candidate BS Yeddyurappa said he will consult with Amit Shah and the national leadership to take the next step forward. He was reported to have approached the Governor and staked his claim.

Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah, who won Badami assembly seat, but lost in Chamundeshwari, tendered his resignation to the Governor, informing him about the Congress tie-up with Congress.

The alliance with JD(S) may help the Congress from completely losing the another state to the BJP which is already ruling 20 of India’s 29 states. The only other states with Congress are Punjab, Mizoram and Puducherry.

The Karnataka results mean a boost for the BJP for its Mission 2019.

While that is about the upper strata. what the results show about the politics on the ground was the effectiveness of BJP, especially its star campaigner Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s communication skill and the power of the ‘issues’ raised by the party.

The Congress failed to exploit dissatisfaction of the unemployed, the rising fuel prices and the farmers’ distress and any of the other failures attributed to the Modi government at the Centre. At the same time, it could not dispel whatever anti-incumbency there was against its own government in the state – though it still managed a higher vote share.

The ploy of wooing Lingayats by recommending that they be given minority status, a long-standing demand of the community – also failed to pay dividends as the Lingayats went with the BJP. Here, bringing in Yeddyurappa seems to have been decisive factor in favour of BJP.

This is evident from the results in last two elections. BJP lost to Congress in 2013 assembly polls when it had dumped Yeddyurappa over corruption charges. It then brought back Yeddyurappa and, in 2014 Lok Sabha, BJP won 17 of the 28 Lok Sabha seats.

The charge of corruption, then, did not seem to have put the people off BJP as they ignored the taint on him as well as the Reddy brothers of mining scam infamy to bring them back convincingly.

Prime Minister Modi campaigned exhaustively in Karnataka in the final leg of the election to ensure his party reclaimed the southern state. His rallies, initially slated to number around 15, were scaled up to 27 later. In each of these rallies, Modi had speeches tailored to the region, paying deference to local cultural icons, and speaking of the party’s commitment to addressing local needs.

The jibes of the BJP and the PM against Congress leaders, especially Rahul Gandhi and Sonia Gandhi do not seem to have been deemed unpalatable by the people.

On corruption, Modi helped get BJP out of its defensiveness due to Yeddyurappa and the Reddy brothers. Considered clean himself, Modi made it a point to say he was fighting against black money and the corrupt; that those who had looted the poor would have to return money; and that moves such as demonetisation were geared towards this end and that is why the Congress opposed it.

He went on the offensive against Congress itself, telling people at a rally in Hubli that Sonia and Rahul Gandhi were out on bail in the National Herald case. He also kept up attacks on Siddarammiah and Congress’s culture of ‘deals’ and alleging it sold tickets.

While Karnataka’s record on social indices wasn’t bad and Siddaramaiah’s selling point was the welfare schemes he had initiated, Modi projected vigorously his own record on welfare and pro-poor initiatives: gas connections, electrifying rural India, toilet construction, health benefits, housing for the poor, opening bank accounts, etc.

The biggest, it would seem, was the Hindu card. The BJP sought to portray the Congress as anti Hindu and pro-minorities. Modi repeatedly alleged that under the Congress government, BJP workers were killed with no action against perpetrators. He pointed out that the Congress was out to divide Hindus and ‘make brother fight brother’, in a reference to the move to grant Lingayats separate a religious status. This ploy seems to have worked here just as it did in some states in the north.

As for the Congress, led by Rahul Gandhi, the party failed to exploit dissatisfaction over a lack of jobs for young people and rising fuel prices along with farmer unrest.

Siddaramaiah was noted for a coalition “AHINDA”, which wove together minorities including Muslims, backward castes and Dalits. However, Scheduled Castes and Tribes (SC/STs), who decide as many as 62 of 224 seats, have broken with the Congress to go to the JDS, in part due to its alliance with Mayawati, a Dalit icon.

The Congress’ hopes belied, it may draw some solace from the fact that in a three-and-a-half-decade trend in Karnataka’s politics, the governments have consistently been voted out.

A last word about the voting percentages. While the Congress tally was way below BJP, it still managed to improve its vote share from 36.6% by 1.3% to 37.9%. The BJP’s increase was larger. In 2013, it polled 19.8% and, adding the votes polled by the Yeddyurappa and Sriramulu factions which are now with the BJP, its vote share five years ago was 32.4%. In the latest election, the Modi-Shah-Yeddyurappa trio have managed to boost that by 3.8% to touch 36.2%

The JD(S) has seen a decline in vote share from 20.2% to 18.4%.

India News

Nagaland Assembly urges Centre to withdraw Protected Area Permit regime

Nagaland Assembly unanimously passed a resolution urging the Centre to withdraw the Protected Area Permit regime, citing concerns over tourism, investment and international engagement.

Published

on

The Nagaland Legislative Assembly has unanimously passed a resolution urging the Centre to withdraw the Protected Area Permit (PAP) regime in the state, arguing that the restrictions are affecting tourism, investment, international engagement and economic opportunities.

The resolution was moved by Deputy Chief Minister and Home Minister Yanthungo Patton and was adopted through a voice vote.

PAP regime was reimposed in 2024

The Protected Area Permit regulates the entry of foreign nationals into notified areas. The regime had been relaxed in Nagaland in 2011 but was reimposed on December 17, 2024.

During the Assembly discussion, Patton said Nagaland had emerged as a peaceful destination for tourism, culture, investment, entrepreneurship and international engagement. He said these sectors were increasingly contributing to employment and livelihood opportunities, particularly for young people.

The resolution also highlighted events and initiatives such as the Hornbill Festival and the “Land of Festivals” initiative, saying they had helped showcase Nagaland and India’s cultural diversity internationally while generating economic opportunities for local communities and entrepreneurs.

Assembly links PAP restrictions to economic concerns

The state government argued that the return of the PAP regime has complicated efforts to expand international tourism, business and investment.

The Assembly resolution said the regime was creating difficulties for international tourism, business and investment, along with cultural exchanges and overseas partnerships.

However, the state maintained that relaxing the permit regime would not mean compromising national security.

The resolution assured the Centre that foreign nationals could continue to be registered, regulated and monitored through technology-based and institutional mechanisms in coordination with central agencies.

Neiphiu Rio backs review of PAP regime

Chief Minister Neiphiu Rio also participated in the debate along with Tourism and Higher Education Minister Temjen Imna Along, Industries and Commerce Advisor Hekani Jakhalu and MLA Naiba Konyak.

The legislators maintained that Nagaland’s present circumstances warranted a different approach, stressing that the state was peaceful and seeking greater opportunities in tourism, investment and other sectors.

Rio linked the demand to Nagaland’s economic aspirations and the need to create more opportunities for young people while maintaining the state’s commitment to national security.

“Security and development can go together,” Rio said.

The resolution further argued that regulations that have outlived their developmental relevance should not become barriers to employment, economic activity and Nagaland’s participation in the wider national and global economy.

Continue Reading

India News

Mayawati says Akash Anand needs more maturity, rules out major BSP role

BSP chief Mayawati says nephew Akash Anand needs greater political maturity before taking on a major responsibility in the party.

Published

on

Akash Anand

Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) chief Mayawati on Thursday said her nephew Akash Anand needs to gain greater political maturity before he can be entrusted with any major responsibility in the party.

Addressing a national-level meeting of BSP office-bearers, Mayawati said she had allowed Akash Anand to continue working within the organisation but felt that he was not yet ready to handle a significant party responsibility.

“I have allowed Akash Anand to work in the party, which is before all of you, but Akash Anand still needs to become more mature. Till then, it would not be appropriate to give him a major responsibility in the party,” Mayawati said.

Mayawati also made it clear that Akash Anand, who is the BSP’s national coordinator, would continue working in the party. However, he will not be entrusted with any major responsibility for the time being.

Mayawati refers to Kanshi Ram’s principles

Explaining her position, Mayawati referred to the principles of BSP founder Kanshi Ram.

She said Kanshi Ram had permitted members of his family and other relatives to assist with party work, but was against giving them election tickets or positions after the party came to power.

Mayawati said she was also committed to following that principle. According to her, maintaining this approach was important to protect the BSP from tactics allegedly employed by political opponents during elections.

BSP to contest elections alone

During the meeting, Mayawati also announced a major political decision concerning the BSP’s electoral strategy.

She said the party had decided to contest all elections across the country on its own, irrespective of whether they were small or major elections.

Targeting the Congress, Mayawati described it as a “strongly anti-Dalit and anti-Ambedkar” party and said the BSP would therefore fight elections independently rather than depend on other parties.

The decision was announced as Mayawati reviewed the BSP’s organisational work and discussed shortcomings with party office-bearers.

She instructed leaders at different levels to implement the party’s annual organisational activities with complete honesty and dedication.

Mayawati attacks RSS over minority rights

Mayawati also criticised the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), referring to comments made by its chief Mohan Bhagwat during his recent visit to the United States.

Bhagwat had said that a Hindu who believes there should be no Muslims in Bharat would not remain a Hindu. He had also spoken about Hindu philosophy accepting that different faiths can lead to the same truth and emphasised the idea of unity in diversity.

Mayawati, however, said there was a significant difference between the RSS’s statements and its actions.

She argued that the organisation lacked credibility when it came to issues concerning the interests and welfare of the Bahujan Samaj, reservation as a constitutional right, and the safety, dignity and religious freedom of women, Muslims and other religious minorities.

She further said that despite its long existence, the RSS had not received the recognition and respect it sought.

Mayawati invokes Ambedkar’s Constitution

The BSP chief also challenged the RSS to demonstrate its commitment to the Constitution drafted under the leadership of Babasaheb Dr Bhimrao Ambedkar.

Mayawati said that if the RSS genuinely had faith in a humanitarian, welfare-oriented and egalitarian Constitution, it should follow its principles honestly and ensure that its members did the same.

BSP reiterates focus on Bahujan Samaj

At the national meeting, Mayawati reviewed the BSP’s organisational activities, assessed its shortcomings and gave directions to office-bearers regarding the party’s future work.

She reiterated that protecting the interests of the Bahujan Samaj and bringing exploited and deprived sections to political power remained the BSP’s central mission.

Mayawati maintained that achieving political power was necessary for the party to fulfil these objectives.

Her latest remarks on Akash Anand indicate that while her nephew will remain associated with the BSP and continue working for the organisation, he will not receive a major party responsibility until she believes he has attained the required political maturity.

Continue Reading

India News

Raghav Chadha marked as shifted in Punjab draft voter rolls, alleges AAP vendetta

Raghav Chadha has alleged political vendetta after his name was marked “shifted” in Punjab’s draft electoral rolls during the SIR exercise.

Published

on

Raghav Chadha

BJP Rajya Sabha MP Raghav Chadha has raised questions after his name was marked as “shifted” in Punjab’s draft electoral rolls prepared during the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of voter lists.

Chadha, who remains a Rajya Sabha member from Punjab and has his voter registration in Mohali, alleged that the classification was not a routine clerical error and accused the Aam Aadmi Party-led Punjab government of political vendetta.

The electoral rolls currently under discussion are draft lists, with the final rolls scheduled to be published in October 2026.

Raghav Chadha questions voter list classification

Chadha said he was surprised to find his name classified as “shifted” despite being a sitting MP from Punjab.

He questioned how such a classification was made and pointed to the involvement of officials at different stages of the electoral roll revision process. According to Chadha, Booth Level Officers, Assistant Electoral Registration Officers, Electoral Registration Officers and District Election Officers are part of the process.

He alleged that these officials could potentially face political pressure because their transfers and postings are controlled by the state government.

Chadha also referred to Paragraph 4(d) of the Election Commission of India’s SIR guidelines. He said the provision requires public representatives, including MPs and MLAs, whose names are flagged in the electoral database to be included in the draft rolls so that they can participate in the claims and objections process.

He alleged that this provision was not followed in his case.

Punjab CEO seeks report on Chadha’s voter status

Punjab Chief Electoral Officer Anindita Mitra told that she was not aware of any deletion of Chadha’s name from the electoral rolls.

She said a detailed report would be sought from the district election authorities to determine whether his name had actually been deleted and, if so, the reason for the action.

Mitra also pointed out that the claims and objections process is currently underway. September 13 is the deadline for filing appeals over changes or discrepancies in the electoral rolls.

AAP rejects political vendetta allegation

The controversy has also drawn a response from the Aam Aadmi Party.

AAP leader Neel Garg rejected Chadha’s allegation, saying the party had no interest in deleting the vote of any individual. He instead alleged that the issue was being raised by the BJP and referred to the SIR exercises in Bihar and West Bengal.

Chadha joined the BJP in April 2026 along with six other AAP Rajya Sabha MPs.

The dispute comes as Punjab’s electoral rolls undergo revision ahead of the 2027 Assembly elections. Since the claims and objections process is still open, the status of Chadha’s name is subject to the ongoing electoral process.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com