English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest Politics News

BJP short of majority, all eyes on Governor as JD(S) stakes claim with Congress support

Published

on

BJP short of majority, all eyes on Governor as JD(S) stakes claim with Congress support

As the BJP emerged as the single largest party by a wide margin in Karnataka but fell slightly short of 113 seats required for a simple majority, the Congress moved quickly to offer unconditional support to Janata Dal (Secular) to prevent the saffron party from forming a government in the southern state.

The JD(S) led by HD Kumaraswamy and Congress wrote to the Governor to stake claim to form government. Later, the BJP also approached the Governor and staked its claim.

Counting was in its final stages for 222 of 224 seats. Two of the seats, RR Nagar and Jayanagar, will have a repoll on May 28.

The tally, including leads, put the BJP at 104 seats, while the Congress at 78 and JD(S) at 37, together have 115. In what is an anomalous situation the Congress got the largest share of 37.9% of vote share, 1.7% than BJP’s 36.2%, but got 26 seats less. That again speaks of the poll management skills of the BJP and its president Amit Shah.

Hectic activity was on in Bengaluru. To start with, JD(S) has accepted the Congress offer, according to media reports. Not that the BJP has given up. News18 reported that BJP leader R Ashok was on his way to meet HD Deve Gowda. More lobbying and wooing was expected to take place.

All eyes are on Governor Vajubhai Vala, an old BJP hand.

While the Congress-JD(S) alliance has the numbers, it has the disadvantage of being a “post-poll alliance” and not a “pre-poll alliance”.

Technically, in the case of a “pre-poll alliance”, the governor would have been duty-bound to call the alliance partners first to prove majority.

That rule, however, was shelved in Manipur, Meghalaya and Goa where the BJP managed to enter into alliances to form government – and held on.

Going by rules, which in all likelihood would be enforced in Karnataka, the governor would call the single largest party – the BJP – for staking claim to form a government, and give it time to face a floor test and prove its majority. Only if loses the floor test can the governor give a chance to the alliance.

The intervening time between forming a government and the floor test provides the BJP to woo legislators and engineer splits or resignations while the alliance partners try to keep their lot together. It would be a no-hold barred situation.

JD(S)’s HD Kumaraswamy has sought appointment from the Governor of Karnataka. In a letter to the Governor, Kumaraswamy said: “This is to inform your good self that I have accepted the support extended by the Indian National Congress party for forming the government. In this regard, I seek your appointment today evening between 5.30 pm to 6 pm.”

BJP’s chief ministerial candidate BS Yeddyurappa said he will consult with Amit Shah and the national leadership to take the next step forward. He was reported to have approached the Governor and staked his claim.

Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah, who won Badami assembly seat, but lost in Chamundeshwari, tendered his resignation to the Governor, informing him about the Congress tie-up with Congress.

The alliance with JD(S) may help the Congress from completely losing the another state to the BJP which is already ruling 20 of India’s 29 states. The only other states with Congress are Punjab, Mizoram and Puducherry.

The Karnataka results mean a boost for the BJP for its Mission 2019.

While that is about the upper strata. what the results show about the politics on the ground was the effectiveness of BJP, especially its star campaigner Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s communication skill and the power of the ‘issues’ raised by the party.

The Congress failed to exploit dissatisfaction of the unemployed, the rising fuel prices and the farmers’ distress and any of the other failures attributed to the Modi government at the Centre. At the same time, it could not dispel whatever anti-incumbency there was against its own government in the state – though it still managed a higher vote share.

The ploy of wooing Lingayats by recommending that they be given minority status, a long-standing demand of the community – also failed to pay dividends as the Lingayats went with the BJP. Here, bringing in Yeddyurappa seems to have been decisive factor in favour of BJP.

This is evident from the results in last two elections. BJP lost to Congress in 2013 assembly polls when it had dumped Yeddyurappa over corruption charges. It then brought back Yeddyurappa and, in 2014 Lok Sabha, BJP won 17 of the 28 Lok Sabha seats.

The charge of corruption, then, did not seem to have put the people off BJP as they ignored the taint on him as well as the Reddy brothers of mining scam infamy to bring them back convincingly.

Prime Minister Modi campaigned exhaustively in Karnataka in the final leg of the election to ensure his party reclaimed the southern state. His rallies, initially slated to number around 15, were scaled up to 27 later. In each of these rallies, Modi had speeches tailored to the region, paying deference to local cultural icons, and speaking of the party’s commitment to addressing local needs.

The jibes of the BJP and the PM against Congress leaders, especially Rahul Gandhi and Sonia Gandhi do not seem to have been deemed unpalatable by the people.

On corruption, Modi helped get BJP out of its defensiveness due to Yeddyurappa and the Reddy brothers. Considered clean himself, Modi made it a point to say he was fighting against black money and the corrupt; that those who had looted the poor would have to return money; and that moves such as demonetisation were geared towards this end and that is why the Congress opposed it.

He went on the offensive against Congress itself, telling people at a rally in Hubli that Sonia and Rahul Gandhi were out on bail in the National Herald case. He also kept up attacks on Siddarammiah and Congress’s culture of ‘deals’ and alleging it sold tickets.

While Karnataka’s record on social indices wasn’t bad and Siddaramaiah’s selling point was the welfare schemes he had initiated, Modi projected vigorously his own record on welfare and pro-poor initiatives: gas connections, electrifying rural India, toilet construction, health benefits, housing for the poor, opening bank accounts, etc.

The biggest, it would seem, was the Hindu card. The BJP sought to portray the Congress as anti Hindu and pro-minorities. Modi repeatedly alleged that under the Congress government, BJP workers were killed with no action against perpetrators. He pointed out that the Congress was out to divide Hindus and ‘make brother fight brother’, in a reference to the move to grant Lingayats separate a religious status. This ploy seems to have worked here just as it did in some states in the north.

As for the Congress, led by Rahul Gandhi, the party failed to exploit dissatisfaction over a lack of jobs for young people and rising fuel prices along with farmer unrest.

Siddaramaiah was noted for a coalition “AHINDA”, which wove together minorities including Muslims, backward castes and Dalits. However, Scheduled Castes and Tribes (SC/STs), who decide as many as 62 of 224 seats, have broken with the Congress to go to the JDS, in part due to its alliance with Mayawati, a Dalit icon.

The Congress’ hopes belied, it may draw some solace from the fact that in a three-and-a-half-decade trend in Karnataka’s politics, the governments have consistently been voted out.

A last word about the voting percentages. While the Congress tally was way below BJP, it still managed to improve its vote share from 36.6% by 1.3% to 37.9%. The BJP’s increase was larger. In 2013, it polled 19.8% and, adding the votes polled by the Yeddyurappa and Sriramulu factions which are now with the BJP, its vote share five years ago was 32.4%. In the latest election, the Modi-Shah-Yeddyurappa trio have managed to boost that by 3.8% to touch 36.2%

The JD(S) has seen a decline in vote share from 20.2% to 18.4%.

India News

Election Commission clarifies Form 6 rules for existing voters under SIR

The Election Commission has clarified that voters previously enrolled in electoral rolls can submit Form 6 for inclusion if their names are missing from draft lists published during the Special Intensive Revision (SIR).

Published

on

Election Commission of India

The Election Commission of India (ECI) has clarified that voters whose names appeared in earlier electoral rolls but are missing from draft lists published during the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) can submit Form 6 to seek inclusion in the final electoral roll.

In a communication issued on November 3 to the Chief Electoral Officers (CEOs) of all states and Union Territories, the poll body addressed concerns among previously registered voters who were hesitant to submit the form because of the declaration required alongside it.

The Commission clarified that submitting Form 6 in such circumstances would not, by itself, amount to making a false declaration merely because the applicant had been enrolled as a voter previously.

It also stated that no action under Section 31 of the Representation of the People Act, 1950, would be initiated against such applicants solely on the ground of their previous enrolment.

However, this protection applies provided the applicant is not already registered in another Parliamentary or Assembly constituency and the declaration submitted is otherwise in accordance with the law.

Why existing voters were hesitant to submit Form 6

The clarification follows concerns that some previously enrolled voters were reluctant to apply for inclusion in the electoral roll after finding their names missing from the draft lists published during the SIR exercise.

Form 6 requires applicants to furnish a declaration stating that their names are being included in the electoral roll for the first time.

This created apprehensions among previously registered voters, who feared that submitting the form despite their earlier enrolment could be treated as a false declaration and expose them to prosecution under Section 31 of the Representation of the People Act, 1950.

The Election Commission has now clarified that earlier registration does not prevent an eligible voter from submitting Form 6 again when their name does not appear in the draft electoral roll.

Election Commission refers to Delhi High Court order

In its communication, the Commission also referred to the Delhi High Court’s October 14 order in the case of Nilotpal Datta and another versus the Election Commission of India and others.

The case concerned an applicant who had previously been enrolled as a voter but was apprehensive about submitting Form 6 because of the declaration that the name was being included in the electoral roll for the first time.

The High Court observed that the petitioners’ apprehension was misplaced and allowed them to submit Form 6, if they wished, for processing in accordance with the law.

The Election Commission’s latest clarification is in line with this judicial observation.

EC asks states and UTs to publicise clarification

The poll body has asked Chief Electoral Officers across all states and Union Territories to ensure that the clarification reaches concerned voters.

It has also requested officials to publicise the information widely through available media platforms and in local languages so that eligible voters are aware of the procedure for seeking inclusion in the electoral roll.

The clarification comes amid ongoing concerns and legal challenges surrounding the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls and the process of re-enrolling voters whose names do not appear in draft lists.

Continue Reading

India News

Rahul Gandhi accuses Modi of foreign backing, BJP hits back with UK clip

Rahul Gandhi alleged that foreign forces helped Narendra Modi become Prime Minister and continue in power. The Congress leader also challenged Modi to an open debate, while the BJP responded by sharing an old video of his remarks during a UK visit.

Published

on

Rahul Gandhi

A fresh political confrontation has erupted between the Congress and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) after Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi accused Prime Minister Narendra Modi of becoming and remaining in power with foreign assistance.

Gandhi also challenged the Prime Minister to an open debate on the issue, saying he was ready to face him on any platform and at any time.

The BJP responded by bringing up an old video of Gandhi from his visit to the United Kingdom, reviving the controversy surrounding his remarks about India’s democratic institutions and the role of foreign countries.

What Rahul Gandhi said about PM Modi

Gandhi’s remarks came in response to Modi’s recent comments targeting the Opposition during his address at the Rashtriya Ekta Diwas celebrations in Gujarat on October 31.

In a post on X on Monday, Gandhi accused the Prime Minister of relying on foreign support to attain and retain power.

“Mr Modi, stop lying to this nation. You became PM because of foreign help. You remain PM because of foreign help,” Gandhi wrote.

He further alleged that India’s financial system was fully controlled and supported by foreign entities and claimed that foreign social media platforms backed the Prime Minister.

The Congress leader also challenged Modi to discuss the allegations publicly.

“I challenge you to an open debate about this. Any stage, any time. Come if you have the guts,” he said, adding that the Prime Minister would not accept the challenge because of what Gandhi claimed to know about him.

Why PM Modi criticised the Opposition

Gandhi’s response followed Modi’s address at the Rashtriya Ekta Diwas event in Ekta Nagar, Gujarat, marking the 151st birth anniversary of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel.

During his speech, the Prime Minister accused the Opposition of moving away from its democratic responsibility of questioning the government and instead becoming an obstructionist force.

Modi described the Opposition as an “Avrodh Paksh” rather than a “Virodh Paksh”, alleging that it was creating obstacles to the country’s development.

Without directly naming Gandhi, the Prime Minister also raised questions about the foreign visits of certain political leaders and their alleged connections with forces opposed to India.

“Who is secretly meeting whom abroad? Whom are the anti-India forces supporting? Who is speaking the language of India’s enemies?” Modi asked.

He also expressed concern over the use of social media to spread rumours and attempts to damage India’s image.

BJP brings back Rahul Gandhi’s old UK remarks

The BJP responded to Gandhi’s allegations by sharing an old video from his UK visit, bringing attention back to his earlier comments about India’s democratic institutions and the involvement of foreign countries.

During an interaction at Chatham House in London in March 2023, Gandhi had alleged that several Indian institutions, including the Press, judiciary, Parliament and Election Commission, were under threat.

He had also questioned why Europe and the United States were not doing enough to raise concerns about what he described as threats to democracy in India.

The remarks had triggered a political controversy at the time, with the BJP accusing Gandhi of seeking foreign intervention in India’s internal affairs.

BJP leaders had demanded an apology from the Congress leader over his comments during the UK visit.

The resurfacing of the old video has brought those earlier remarks back into the political debate as the Congress and BJP trade accusations over alleged foreign backing.

Political confrontation intensifies

The latest exchange comes amid an ongoing confrontation between the ruling BJP and the Opposition over several issues, including allegations of electoral irregularities and the role of constitutional institutions.

Gandhi’s challenge to Modi for an open debate has added another dimension to the political dispute, with both parties questioning each other’s alleged connections with foreign forces.

While Gandhi has accused the Prime Minister of benefiting from foreign support, the BJP has repeatedly questioned the Congress leader’s overseas remarks and alleged attempts to involve foreign countries in India’s internal political matters.

Neither side’s allegations about foreign backing should be treated as established facts without supporting evidence.

Continue Reading

India News

Kiren Rijiju mocks Congress over AI-generated Ramlila Maidan crowd photo

Union Minister Kiren Rijiju took a swipe at Congress over an alleged AI-generated photograph showing a massive crowd at the INDIA bloc’s Ramlila Maidan rally, questioning the authenticity of the image.

Published

on

Union Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju has taken a dig at the Congress over an alleged AI-generated photograph showing a massive gathering at the INDIA bloc’s rally at Delhi’s Ramlila Maidan.

In a post on X on Sunday, Rijiju accused the Congress of sharing an artificially generated image to create the impression that the venue was packed with supporters. Taking a swipe at the party, he suggested that even the purported AI-generated photograph had not been created properly.

“Even the fake AI photo to show that Ramlila ground was full is not done properly by the fake narrative team of Congress Party!” Rijiju wrote.

His remarks came after the INDIA bloc organised a rally at Ramlila Maidan on November 1, bringing together several Opposition leaders to protest against alleged irregularities in electoral rolls and the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise.

BJP questions Congress’s claim of 10 lakh attendees

The controversy over the photograph came amid a political dispute between the BJP and Congress over the number of people who attended the Opposition rally.

Ahead of the gathering, the INDIA bloc had projected an attendance of around 10 lakh people. However, BJP leaders questioned the claim following the event.

BJP MP Sambit Patra alleged that a significant portion of Ramlila Maidan remained vacant during the rally. He claimed that around 5,000 to 7,000 chairs out of the 28,000 at the venue were unoccupied between 3:30 pm and 4 pm.

Patra also claimed that approximately 40 per cent of the ground was empty, questioning the Opposition’s projected attendance figure.

These claims formed part of the BJP’s criticism of the rally’s turnout.

INDIA bloc rally targeted Election Commission

The November 1 gathering was organised by the INDIA bloc to protest against alleged irregularities in the functioning of the Election Commission and the SIR exercise.

The Opposition’s demands included accountability over the electoral roll revision process and the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar.

Several prominent Opposition leaders attended the gathering, including Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, party president Mallikarjun Kharge, Trinamool Congress chief Mamata Banerjee and Samajwadi Party president Akhilesh Yadav.

During his address, Rahul Gandhi accused the Chief Election Commissioner of facilitating alleged vote theft and said the Opposition would continue its fight to protect the Constitution through peaceful and democratic means.

The rally and the subsequent exchanges between BJP and Congress leaders brought the dispute over electoral rolls and crowd attendance into sharper political focus.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com