English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest Politics News

In Chhattisgarh, a patient TS Singhdeo waits for his turn to be chief minister

In the given circumstances of Congress and the likelihood of it retaining voter confidence, he still remains the most capable person in Congress to hold that portfolio.

Published

on

By Neeraj Mishra

Sarguja has had one family rule for last several hundred years and TS Singhdeo is believed to be some 1025th in an unbroken line. One of the reasons could be that none of the empires from Ashoka and Chandragupta to the Mughals were really interested in conquering Ambikapur and surrounding areas which was mostly forest land. And even though the British recognised the Sarguja family as the only “Maharajas” in present day Chhattisgarh, it was only a protectorate state under the Raj, having accepted British suzerainty.

Then why would TS Singhdeo seek to become a chief minister when his entire family history is different ? His father MS Singhdeo, an IAS officer, was the chief secretary of MP under Arjun Singh and even though the latter referred to him as Maharaj, it was more out of Thakur pride and traditions. TS Baba as he is known had remained a small town, municipal-level leader for most of his life till by quirk of fate Ambikapur became a separate general assembly constituency in 2008 after a re-organisation of seats. He won his first Assembly elections.

In his first term as MLA, he learnt and then became the Leader of Opposition in 2013 in only his second term when fate intervened on his behalf again. The Congress had lost its entire senior leadership in the Naxalite attack in Jheeram, Bastar. By the time, the third win in 2018 happened he had thrown his gauntlet along with Bhupesh Baghel, a caste upstart from Durg district who was the PCC chief. They had run the election campaign together as Jai and Viru. Singhdeo says he was promised half the term as CM by Rahul Gandhi, the then Congress president. That didn’t happen because Baghel was too smart and had slowly entrenched himself in Priyanka Gandhi’s camp.

Now again, Singhdeo sits alone in his ministerial bungalow in Raipur, surrounded mostly by supplicants and acolytes giving out interviews to TV channels claiming it is his deepest desire to become CM. And if that does not happen, he will not contest another election. Strangely, there are not many MLAs or likely winners/candidates visiting him post polling day on November 17th. There could be several reasons but the prime one seems to be that Baghel is still in charge and leading the race and TS Baba’s own persona which remains regal.

So TS Baba wants to be CM but is he capable? Yes. In the given circumstances of Congress and the likelihood of it retaining voter confidence, he still remains the most capable person in Congress to hold that portfolio. His family background, his education, his hold over the bureaucracy and several other things point to his obvious capabilities to claim that office. He also has a legitimate claim within the party since the Gandhis have not kept their promise of giving him a shot at the top office.

So will he become the next CM in case of a Congress victory? That is the question and debate in every political gossip circle in the capital and beyond. It is unlikely that Baghel will let go of his position so easily. He didn’t even do so when Rahul asked him to after 2.5 years in the post. In fact, he has built an image of Congress’ boldest OBC face and a kisan leader in his time in office. So that’s the biggest and perhaps the only hurdle in Singhdeo’s path.

What else? There are several other minor hiccups. The Congress may want to replace Baghel with another OBC leader, then old Sahu warhorse Tamradhwaj remains the best bet. If Congress opts for a tribal face, then Deepak Baij or Markam may lay claim.

What can happen? If Congress wins with a thin majority like 50 then that may be Singhdeo’s best chance. A clear and major victory like 55 plus seats would mean Baghel has prevailed with his image and pro-farmer agenda.

India News

Mamata Banerjee urges women to resist if voter names are deleted during SIR review

At a Krishnagar rally, Mamata Banerjee alleged misuse of the SIR voter list review and urged women to stand firm if their names were removed.

Published

on

Mamata Banerjee

West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, sharpening her attack on the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of voter lists, called on women to stand up against any attempt to remove their names from the electoral roll. Addressing a gathering in Krishnagar, she alleged that the process was being misused to target voters ahead of elections.

Mamata accuses BJP of trying to intimidate women voters

Banerjee questioned the removal of names from the voter list under the SIR exercise, asserting that mothers and sisters of the state should not allow such actions to go unchecked. She said women possess the strength and the everyday tools used at home, urging them to be ready if their rights were undermined.

She alleged that attempts would be made to influence the electoral process by bringing police from outside the state and using fear tactics. Banerjee added that during elections, efforts were often made to divide people and misuse money power.

Reaffirming her stance on secularism, she said she wanted to see whether the women of Bengal or the BJP were “more powerful” in this fight.

Continue Reading

India News

Rahul Gandhi attacks Centre ahead of Vladimir Putin’s India visit

Rahul Gandhi alleged that the government discourages visiting foreign dignitaries from meeting Opposition leaders, calling it a sign of “insecurity,” hours before Russian President Vladimir Putin arrives in Delhi.

Published

on

Rahul Gandhi

As Russian President Vladimir Putin arrives in Delhi today for the India-Russia Annual Summit, Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi has renewed his charge that the Centre discourages visiting foreign leaders from meeting Opposition representatives. He called it a sign of “insecurity” within the government.

Rahul Gandhi alleges break in long-followed tradition

Speaking outside Parliament, Rahul Gandhi said that it has traditionally been the norm for visiting foreign leaders to meet the Leader of the Opposition, a practice he claims continued during the tenures of Atal Bihari Vajpayee and Manmohan Singh.

He alleged that the present government advises foreign dignitaries against such meetings. “When foreign leaders come, the government suggests they should not meet the Leader of the Opposition. This is their policy,” Gandhi said. He added that a meeting with the Opposition offers visiting leaders a broader perspective, as “we too represent India.”

Gandhi further stated that this approach reflects the government’s reluctance to allow engagement between the Opposition and foreign guests.

Former Foreign Secretary counters Gandhi’s remarks

Responding to Gandhi’s allegations, former Foreign Secretary and Rajya Sabha MP Harsh Vardhan Shringla said visiting leaders operate on very tight schedules and there is no protocol mandating a meeting with the Leader of the Opposition. He stressed that such interactions depend entirely on the guest’s time and preference, noting that the required meetings are those with the President and the Prime Minister.

Putin’s schedule packed with bilateral engagements

Russian President Vladimir Putin is set to land in Delhi this evening on Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s invitation. His itinerary includes:

  • A private dinner with PM Modi
  • Visit to Mahatma Gandhi’s memorial at Raj Ghat
  • Engagements at Bharat Mandapam and Hyderabad House
  • A banquet hosted by President Droupadi Murmu

The visit forms part of the 23rd India-Russia Annual Summit.

Continue Reading

India News

TMC MLA Humayun Kabir suspended after Babri Mosque replica proposal sparks row

TMC suspended MLA Humayun Kabir after he proposed building a Babri mosque replica in Murshidabad, a move that drew criticism from the party and sparked political tension.

Published

on

Trinamool Congress on Thursday suspended MLA Humayun Kabir after he publicly announced plans to construct a replica of the Babri Masjid in West Bengal’s Murshidabad district. Party leaders said Kabir had earlier been cautioned for making such statements but continued to push ahead with the controversial proposal.

Kolkata Mayor Firhad Hakim said the MLA’s remarks were unacceptable, stressing that the party stood firmly by its secular stance. “We noticed that one of our MLAs suddenly declared he would build the Babri masjid. We had warned him before. As per the party’s decision, we are suspending him,” he said.

Kabir vows to continue project, may form new party

Kabir had planned to lay the foundation stone for the mosque replica in Beldanga on December 6. Sources indicated he is likely to resign from Trinamool on Friday and float a new party while continuing with the project.

The choice of date and nature of the project drew sharp criticism from the Trinamool leadership. Hakim alleged the move reflected a “divisional politics” strategy aligned with the BJP. “Why December 6? He could build a school or college. This is divisional politics,” he said.

Sources also said Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee was “hugely annoyed” by Kabir’s remarks and informed him that the party would not support or associate with such activities.

Governor raises concerns, administration on alert

West Bengal Governor Ananda Bose questioned why action was not being taken if the MLA’s statements risked creating a law-and-order issue. He said intelligence inputs suggested attempts to turn Murshidabad into a “hub of scandal,” adding that authorities would not remain silent if communal tensions were provoked.

Officials confirmed that while Kabir has permission to hold the December 6 event, the administration is maintaining a high-level alert in Murshidabad.

Minutes after his suspension, Kabir withdrew from Mamata Banerjee’s rally in the India–Bangladesh border district, where she was protesting against the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of voter lists.

BJP attacks Kabir over remarks

BJP spokesperson Pratul Shah Deo condemned Kabir’s comments, claiming they were intended to “create communal tensions.” He said any attempt to raise structures linked to historical rulers would trigger disputes similar to the Babri Masjid conflict.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com