English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest Politics News

Delhi court notice to ED on Christian Michel’s plea of chargesheet leak

Published

on

Delhi court notice to ED on Christian Michel’s plea of chargesheet leak

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

A Delhi court today (Saturday, April 6) issued notice to the Enforcement Directorate (ED) on plea of Christian Michel, alleged middleman arrested in the AgustaWestland VVIP chopper case, accusing the agency of politicising the case and leaking the chargesheet copy to the media even before the court took cognisance of it and before serving a copy to the accused.

The ED, on the other hand, sought an enquiry as to how the copy of the charge sheet was leaked to the media and asked for issuance of notice to a news organisation asking to explain how they accessed the document.

Issuing the notice to ED, special judge Arvind Kumar directed it to file a reply on Michel’s plea. Michel had stated in his plea that he had not named anybody in connection with the deal during investigation by the ED and that the agency had leaked the charge sheet, even though the court has not taken cognisance over the documents filed before it, in order to make the entire case a sensation again in the media,.

The court will take up the matter of leaking of the charge sheet copy on April 11.

The court also issued summons to Michel’s business partner and middleman David Nigel John Syms as accused in the case. Syms, named as accused in the charge sheet, will have to appear before court on May 9.

Senior Congress leader Ahmed Patel and one “Mrs Gandhi” are named in the ED chargesheet against Christian Michel filed before a court in Delhi on Thursday.

Michel yesterday challenged ED’s chargesheet, denying he had mentioned any names to ED.

The Enforcement Directorate chargesheet comes just days before the national election, for which campaigning is at its peak. The Congress alleges that the chopper investigation has been ramped up in an attempt to target its top leaders in election season, mainly to deflect attention from the Rafale deal controversy.

The BJP says the case could spell “serious trouble” for the “first family” of Congress, referring to its chief Rahul Gandhi and his mother Sonia Gandhi.

The BJP used the allegations in the ED chargesheet to mount an attack on Congress.

Targeting the Congress leadership, Modi told a rally in Dehradun: “You will recall that your chowkidar had brought back from Dubai some of the helicopter scam middlemen. The agencies questioned Italy’s Michel mama and other middlemen for several weeks, based on which a chargesheet has been filed in court. I saw in the media that among those the helicopter scam middlemen were said to have paid bribes, there was one AP, AP, and the second FAM, FAM. This chargesheet says AP means Ahmed Patel and FAM means family.”

Finance Minister Arun Jaitley was reported as having said that the Congress should respond as to who were mentioned as ‘RG’, ‘AP’ and ‘FAM’ in documents summoned by the ED in the AgustaWestland case. He added that Swiss police, in 2013, had also confiscated records carrying similar initials in its raids in connection with the case.

Jaitley, while targeting Congress president Rahul Gandhi, said “any diary is a written admission and is admissible against the writer, especially when there is corroborating evidence. It is also admissible against fellow accused if it was written at the same time as the conspiracy was being hatched. This law was passed by the Privy Council in the Mirza Akbar case”.

Jaitley did not take names but he was was referring to the ED claim of an entry ‘RG’ in a diary of Sushen Mohan Gupta, an accused in the chopper deal case who is in custody. The ED has told a Delhi court that “Sushen is not coming out with true and correct fact” in “identifying who the real ‘RG’ is” in the diary.

In tweets Friday, Jaitley said: “There is an erroneous belief among Indian politicians that a diary is never admissible as evidence. A diary constitutes an admission in writing and is admissible against the maker of that admission. It is admissible against the other co-conspirators as well.”

This, however, prompted a riposte from Congress which reminded Jaitley of the stand he and Modi government has been taking in other cases, like Sahara and Birla diaries and BS Yeddyurappa’s diary, claiming they were not evidence.

Diary aside, Modi government has not admitted that Rafala fighter jet deal merits probe despite official files and notings raising pertinent questions about the way the deal was negotiated.

Randeep Surjewala, Congress’s chief spokesperson, said that the Jaitely is showing immense trust in “diary entries” to level “bogus” charges, even as the BJP is “mute” on Yeddy and Sahara diaries.

Surjewala tweeted, “Suddenly, FM shows immense faith in ‘Diary entries’ to make Bogus Allegations! What’s good for the goose is good for the gander!”

He added, “Why is PM Modi & BJP silent on Sahara Diaries? Why is PM Modi & BJP are mute on Yeddy Diaries? Duplicity & Doublespeak is ingrained in BJP’s DNA.”

The purported Sahara diaries were recovered following raids conducted in November 2014. Reportedly, the Sahara diaries listed alleged pay-offs to politicians. The Yeddy diaries refer to former Karnataka chief minister BS Yeddyurappa’s alleged diary which, according to Congress, had accounts of ‘bribes’ given to BJP leaders. The PM Modi’s government had dismissed all such accusations.

Congress leader and former Union Minister Kapil Sibal tweeted:

“ED lies as Michel denies … But BJP says

Birla Diaries : ” Gujarat CM – Rs 25 crores .12 paid . 13 ? ”

Sahara Diaries : ” cash given at Ahmedabad , Modi ji ” ” cash given to CM Gujarat ”

40 crores to Modi ji .

Yediyurappa Diary : 1800 cr to BJP leaders

Not evidence[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Congress leader Ahmed Patel, in a series of tweets, said: “It is election season and the rain of rhetoric has started. There is a shower of baseless and hilarious allegations. We have full faith in the judiciary that the truth can never be hushed up. Milk and water will be sifted. Looks like ED is now an integral ally in the NDA. But such tactics will not work. You cannot escape from real issues like unemployment, farm distress and traders’ problems. It is clear that the Modi government is rattled… the middlemen of Rafale and demonetisation cannot escape. You must have heard the saying that a thief thinks everyone is a thief.”[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

Yogi Adityanath’s do namoone remark sparks Akhilesh Yadav’s jab on BJP infighting

Yogi Adityanath’s ‘do namoone’ comment in the UP Assembly has been countered by Akhilesh Yadav, who termed it a confession of BJP’s internal power struggle.

Published

on

Yogi Adityanath

Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath’s recent “do namoone” comment in the state Assembly has triggered a sharp political exchange, with Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav turning the remark into an attack on the Bharatiya Janata Party’s alleged internal discord.

The comment was made during a heated Assembly discussion on allegations of codeine cough syrup smuggling in Uttar Pradesh. Opposition members had accused the state government of inaction, claiming that timely steps could have saved the lives of several children. Rejecting the allegation outright, Adityanath said that no child in the state had died due to consumption of the cough syrup.

While responding to the opposition benches, the Chief Minister made an indirect jibe, saying there were “two namoone”, one in Delhi and one in Lucknow. Without naming anyone, he added that one of them leaves the country whenever there is a national debate, and suggested that a similar pattern applied to the Samajwadi Party leadership. The remark was widely interpreted as being aimed at Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi and Akhilesh Yadav, a former Uttar Pradesh chief minister and current Lok Sabha MP

Akhilesh Yadav calls remark a ‘confession’

Akhilesh Yadav responded swiftly on social media, calling Adityanath’s statement a “confession” that exposed an alleged power struggle within the BJP. He said that those holding constitutional posts should maintain decorum and accused the ruling party of bringing its internal disputes into the public domain. Yadav posted his response shortly after the Chief Minister shared a video clip of the Assembly remarks online.

The Samajwadi Party has, on several occasions, claimed that there is a tussle between the Uttar Pradesh government and the BJP’s central leadership. Party leaders have cited the appointment of deputy chief ministers and certain bureaucratic decisions as evidence of attempts to curtail the Chief Minister’s authority.

Adityanath has consistently dismissed these claims, maintaining that he holds the post because of the party’s trust in him. The latest exchange has once again brought the narrative of BJP infighting into political focus, even as both sides continue to trade barbs ahead of key electoral contests

Continue Reading

India News

Sonia Gandhi calls weakening of MGNREGA a collective moral failure, targets Centre in op-ed

Sonia Gandhi has accused the Centre of weakening MGNREGA, calling it a collective moral failure with serious consequences for crores of working people.

Published

on

Sonia Gandhi

Congress Parliamentary Party chairperson Sonia Gandhi has sharply criticised the Central government over what she described as the steady dismantling of rights-based legislation, with a particular focus on the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA).

In a recent opinion article published in a leading English daily, Sonia Gandhi argued that MGNREGA was envisioned as more than a welfare measure. She said the rural employment scheme gave legal backing to the constitutional right to work and was rooted in Mahatma Gandhi’s idea of Sarvodaya, or welfare for all.

Calling its weakening a serious failure, she wrote that the decline of MGNREGA represents a “collective moral failure” that will have lasting financial and human consequences for crores of working people across India. She stressed that safeguarding such rights-based frameworks is crucial at a time when, according to her, multiple protections are under strain.

Concerns raised over education, environment and land laws

Sonia Gandhi also flagged concerns beyond rural employment. Referring to education policy, she claimed that the Right to Education has been undermined following the National Education Policy 2020, alleging that it has led to the closure of around one lakh primary schools across the country.

On environmental and land-related legislation, she stated that the Forest Rights Act, 2006, was weakened through the Forest (Conservation) Rules, 2022. According to her, these changes removed the role of the gram sabha in decisions related to the diversion of forest land.

She further alleged that the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act has been significantly diluted, while adding that the National Green Tribunal has seen its authority reduced over the years.

Warning on agriculture and food security laws

Touching upon agriculture reforms, Sonia Gandhi referred to the now-repealed three farm laws, claiming they were an attempt to deny farmers the right to a minimum support price. She also cautioned that the National Food Security Act, 2013, could face similar threats in the future.

Reiterating her central argument, she urged unity to protect statutory rights, stating that the erosion of such laws has implications that extend well beyond policy, affecting livelihoods and dignity on the ground.

Continue Reading

India News

Renaming MGNREGA removes core spirit of rural employment law, says Shashi Tharoor

Published

on

Shashi Tharoor

Congress MP Shashi Tharoor has strongly criticised the renaming of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), saying the move strips the rural employment programme of its core essence. His remarks came after Parliament cleared the Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) Bill, also referred to as the VB-G RAM G Bill.

Speaking to media, Tharoor said the decision to remove Mahatma Gandhi’s name from the scheme “takes out the heart” of the rural employment programme that has been in place for years. He noted that the identity and philosophy associated with Mahatma Gandhi were central to the original law.

Tharoor also objected to the way the new name was framed, arguing that it unnecessarily combined multiple languages. He pointed out that the Constitution envisages the use of one language in legislation, while the Bill’s title mixes English and Hindi terms such as “Guarantee”, “Rozgar” and “Ajeevika”, along with the conjunction “and”.

‘Disrespect to both names’

The Congress leader said that inserting the word “Ram” while dropping Mahatma Gandhi’s name amounted to disrespecting both. Referring to Mahatma Gandhi’s ideas, Tharoor said that for Gandhi, the concepts of Gram Swaraj and Ram Rajya were inseparable, and removing his name from a rural employment law went against that vision.

He added that the name of Lord Ram could be used in many contexts, but questioned the rationale behind excluding Mahatma Gandhi from a programme closely linked to his philosophy of village self-rule.

Protests over passage of the Bill

The VB-G RAM G Bill was passed by the Lok Sabha on December 18 and cleared by the Rajya Sabha in the early hours of December 19 amid protests from Opposition members. Several MPs opposed the manner in which the legislation was pushed through, with scenes of sloganeering and tearing of papers in the House.

Outside Parliament, members of the Trinamool Congress staged a sit-in protest near Samvidhan Sadan against the passage of the Bill. Congress also announced nationwide protests earlier this week, accusing the government of weakening rights-based welfare schemes.

Despite opposition criticism, the government has maintained that the new law will strengthen rural employment and livelihood security. The Bill raises the guaranteed employment from 100 days to 125 days per rural household and outlines a 60:40 cost-sharing formula between the Centre and states, with a higher central share for northeastern, Himalayan states and certain Union Territories.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com