English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Top Stories

New JFK files reignite debate on CIA role in 1963 assassination

Declassified JFK files suggest the CIA may have overlooked warning signs before Kennedy’s assassination. New evidence challenges the official lone gunman theory.

Published

on

JFK assassination, CIA conspiracy, John F. Kennedy, Lee Harvey Oswald, second shooter, declassified files, Kennedy murder, US history, mafia and CIA, JFK conspiracy theories

The assassination of former US President John F. Kennedy in 1963 remains one of the most controversial political murders in history, and the release of new JFK files has once again put the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) under scrutiny. While the files do not directly implicate the CIA, they suggest that the agency may have overlooked significant red flags before Kennedy’s killing.

Was there a second shooter? New evidence challenges official findings

Kennedy was shot dead in Dallas, Texas while his motorcade was passing through Dealey Plaza. The official inquiry, known as the Warren Commission, concluded that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone in assassinating the president. However, newly released files challenge this narrative.

Ballistic reports and eyewitness testimonies suggest that a second shooter may have fired the fatal shot.

The bullet that killed Kennedy may have come from a grassy knoll, not from the Texas School Book Depository, where Oswald was stationed.

This contradicts the findings of the Warren Commission, fueling speculation that the assassination was more than just the act of a lone gunman.

Oswald’s connections with Soviet and Cuban embassies

Among the most explosive details in the declassified files is the revelation that Oswald had visited the Soviet and Cuban embassies in Mexico City weeks before the assassination.

The CIA had wiretapped communications in Mexico City from December 1962 to January 1963, keeping tabs on Soviet and Cuban embassies.

This has raised questions on whether the CIA had prior knowledge of Kennedy’s assassination but failed to act.

Internal rift between the CIA and the Kennedy administration

The files also highlight a deepening conflict between the CIA and President Kennedy. A memo from Arthur Schlesinger Jr., a close aide to Kennedy, warned that:

The CIA was overstepping its authority and interfering with the State Department’s operations.

Some CIA officials were allegedly trying to influence US allies, leading to tensions within the government.

This information supports previous theories that Kennedy’s strained relationship with the CIA may have played a role in his assassination.

Did the CIA silence one of its own? The Gary Underhill case

One of the most intriguing aspects of the JFK files is the mention of CIA agent Gary Underhill.

Underhill allegedly fled Washington after Kennedy’s assassination and took shelter at a friend’s house in New Jersey.

He reportedly told his friend that Kennedy was killed by a rogue faction within the CIA that was unhappy with the President.

Underhill also claimed that Oswald was framed for the assassination.

A few months later, he was found dead from gunshot wounds, with his death officially ruled as suicide.

Alleged Mafia involvement in JFK’s murder

Another shocking detail in the JFK files is the claim that the mafia may have collaborated with rogue CIA operatives to carry out the assassination.

Newly declassified documents link Chicago mob bosses to training Cuban militiamen, suggesting possible involvement in a larger conspiracy.

Wiretaps reportedly captured conversations hinting at a coordinated effort between organized crime and intelligence operatives.

The revelations from the JFK files have reignited debates and conspiracy theories surrounding one of the most shocking assassinations in US history. While the truth remains elusive, the new documents raise serious questions about the CIA’s role, internal conflicts, and the possibility of a larger conspiracy.

Continue Reading

India News

Rahul Gandhi alleges institutional bias, questions electoral system during Berlin address

Rahul Gandhi alleged that India’s institutions and electoral system have been weaponised to favour the BJP, remarks that sparked a strong political response.

Published

on

Rahul-Gandhi

Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi, has said that India’s institutional framework is facing a serious challenge and has been used to favour the ruling BJP. Speaking during an interaction at the Hertie School in Berlin, Gandhi questioned the functioning of key institutions and the electoral machinery, remarks that triggered a sharp political response from the BJP.

Gandhi said the Congress believes there is a problem with the electoral system and alleged that several institutions have been captured. Referring to investigative agencies, he claimed that bodies such as the CBI and the ED have been used as political tools. According to him, cases filed by these agencies overwhelmingly target those opposing the BJP, while leaders from the ruling party face none.

He also pointed to what he described as a stark financial imbalance between the BJP and the opposition, claiming a funding ratio of 30:1. Gandhi said this disparity reflects how institutions are being used to consolidate political power.

Opposition strategy and INDIA alliance

The Congress leader said merely pointing out problems in elections is not enough and stressed the need for the opposition to build a system of resistance that can effectively counter the ruling party. He added that the challenge now goes beyond electoral contests and is about presenting an alternative vision for the country.

On the INDIA alliance, Gandhi said the unity among opposition parties is rooted in their rejection of the ideological position of the RSS. While acknowledging that tactical contests between alliance partners will continue, he said they remain united when it comes to opposing laws they disagree with and working together in Parliament.

BJP hits back at remarks abroad

Gandhi’s comments delivered overseas drew a strong reaction from the BJP. Party president and Union minister JP Nadda accused him of speaking against India while Parliament is in session and claimed that he was undermining the country’s image at a time when the Prime Minister is receiving global recognition.

BJP spokesperson Shehzad Poonawalla also criticised Gandhi, alleging that he routinely travels abroad to defame India. He accused the Congress leader of making misleading claims about the country’s institutions and economic activity while praising China.

Continue Reading

India News

Sonia Gandhi calls weakening of MGNREGA a collective moral failure, targets Centre in op-ed

Sonia Gandhi has accused the Centre of weakening MGNREGA, calling it a collective moral failure with serious consequences for crores of working people.

Published

on

Sonia Gandhi

Congress Parliamentary Party chairperson Sonia Gandhi has sharply criticised the Central government over what she described as the steady dismantling of rights-based legislation, with a particular focus on the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA).

In a recent opinion article published in a leading English daily, Sonia Gandhi argued that MGNREGA was envisioned as more than a welfare measure. She said the rural employment scheme gave legal backing to the constitutional right to work and was rooted in Mahatma Gandhi’s idea of Sarvodaya, or welfare for all.

Calling its weakening a serious failure, she wrote that the decline of MGNREGA represents a “collective moral failure” that will have lasting financial and human consequences for crores of working people across India. She stressed that safeguarding such rights-based frameworks is crucial at a time when, according to her, multiple protections are under strain.

Concerns raised over education, environment and land laws

Sonia Gandhi also flagged concerns beyond rural employment. Referring to education policy, she claimed that the Right to Education has been undermined following the National Education Policy 2020, alleging that it has led to the closure of around one lakh primary schools across the country.

On environmental and land-related legislation, she stated that the Forest Rights Act, 2006, was weakened through the Forest (Conservation) Rules, 2022. According to her, these changes removed the role of the gram sabha in decisions related to the diversion of forest land.

She further alleged that the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act has been significantly diluted, while adding that the National Green Tribunal has seen its authority reduced over the years.

Warning on agriculture and food security laws

Touching upon agriculture reforms, Sonia Gandhi referred to the now-repealed three farm laws, claiming they were an attempt to deny farmers the right to a minimum support price. She also cautioned that the National Food Security Act, 2013, could face similar threats in the future.

Reiterating her central argument, she urged unity to protect statutory rights, stating that the erosion of such laws has implications that extend well beyond policy, affecting livelihoods and dignity on the ground.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

H-1B visa renewal delays leave hundreds of Indian workers stranded amid US social media checks

Hundreds of Indian H-1B visa holders remain stranded after US consular interviews were delayed due to enhanced social media screening.

Published

on

visa apply

Hundreds of Indian professionals holding H-1B visas are facing unexpected uncertainty after travelling to India for routine visa renewals, only to find their US consular interviews postponed to next year due to a new social media vetting policy introduced by the US administration

Many of these workers had scheduled appointments between December 15 and 26, a window that coincided with the US holiday season. However, interviews planned for mid to late December have now reportedly been pushed to as late as March, leaving employees unable to return to their jobs in the United States.

Appointments postponed without clarity

Immigration law firms say they are dealing with a large number of affected clients. Some attorneys have described the situation as unprecedented, highlighting the lack of clarity around how long the delays may last. Workers who travelled for personal reasons, including family events, now face the risk of prolonged stays in India while their employment continues overseas.

In one reported case, a US-based professional who returned to India this month had two consular appointments scheduled in December, both of which have since expired. Experts have raised concerns over how long US employers may be willing to wait for employees whose return timelines remain uncertain.

US embassy advisory and vetting policy

Earlier this month, the US Embassy in India issued an advisory stating that applicants who arrive at a consulate on a previously scheduled interview date, after being informed of a reschedule, will not be allowed entry. Applicants have been asked to wait for their new appointment dates.

According to official communication, the delays are linked to enhanced social media screening. The policy requires visa applicants to keep their social media profiles public so authorities can assess whether any applicant poses a risk to national security or public safety. While such scrutiny earlier applied to students and exchange visitors, it has now been extended to H-1B and dependent H-4 visa applicants.

Impact on Indian professionals and tech firms

India accounts for nearly three-fourths of all H-1B visa holders, according to data released earlier this year by US immigration authorities. The current delays therefore have a disproportionate impact on Indian professionals working in the US technology and services sectors.

Some US-based technology companies have reportedly cautioned employees against international travel after learning that visa re-entry processing delays at American embassies and consulates could stretch for several months. Legal advisers have warned that overseas travel at this stage could result in extended stays outside the US.

Growing scrutiny of the H-1B programme

The social media vetting requirement is part of a broader tightening of the H-1B programme under the Donald Trump administration. The skilled worker visa pathway has faced increased scrutiny in recent months, including the imposition of a one-time fee on new H-1B visas. The US has also paused certain immigration applications from select countries following security-related concerns.

For now, affected workers and their employers are left waiting, as uncertainty continues over when regular visa processing timelines will resume.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com