The Bharatiya Janata Party has criticised West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee over her remarks against Prime Minister Narendra Modi, with a party leader saying such statements make her unfit to hold a constitutional post.

The controversy began after Mamata Banerjee, while addressing an Eid gathering in Kolkata, criticised the prime minister’s policies and accused him of targeting minorities. During her speech, she also accused the prime minister of calling certain people infiltrators and alleged that names were being deleted.

Reacting to the remarks, BJP leader Shishir Bajoria said that anyone who calls the prime minister an infiltrator does not have the right to occupy a constitutional position. He also alleged that the chief minister’s comments reflected fear of losing the upcoming election.

The BJP has been raising the issue of illegal infiltration from Bangladesh ahead of the West Bengal Assembly elections and has accused the Trinamool Congress government of allowing infiltration. The Trinamool Congress has rejected the allegations, stating that border security is controlled by central forces under the Union Home Ministry.

At the Eid event in Kolkata, Mamata Banerjee was joined by Trinamool Congress National General Secretary Abhishek Banerjee. The Trinamool leadership also criticised the Election Commission’s special intensive revision exercise, alleging that it targets certain communities.

Abhishek Banerjee said that while political narratives are being built around religion, the real issue is that the entire country is in danger and people should not view issues only through a religious lens.

The political exchange comes amid rising tensions between the BJP and the Trinamool Congress ahead of the state elections, with both parties accusing each other over issues related to infiltration, minority rights and voter lists.

A reported attempt by Iran to target the US-UK military base at Diego Garcia, located roughly 4,000 km away, has raised fresh questions about Tehran’s actual missile capabilities. Iran has publicly maintained that its ballistic missile range is limited to around 2,000 km, but the attempted strike at double that distance suggests the possibility of undeclared long-range systems.

According to reports, two intermediate-range ballistic missiles were launched toward the base in the Indian Ocean. One missile reportedly failed, while the other may have been intercepted. However, analysts say the attempt itself is strategically significant regardless of the technical outcome.

Strategic implications for US and allies

Diego Garcia is considered a high-value military facility used by the United States and the United Kingdom for long-range bomber operations, logistics, and surveillance missions. Any attempt to target the base indicates a potential expansion of the conflict theatre beyond the Middle East into the Indian Ocean region.

If Iran is indeed testing missiles closer to true intermediate-range ballistic missile capability, it could potentially reach deeper into the Indian Ocean and parts of southern Europe. Such uncertainty over actual missile range creates strategic ambiguity, complicating defence planning for the US and its allies, including Israel and Gulf countries.

Political signalling more significant than outcome

Experts suggest the political and strategic messaging behind the attempt may matter more than whether the strike succeeded. By attempting to target a distant base like Diego Garcia, Iran may be signalling that no US military facility is beyond its reach.

Reports also indicated that the US may have used an SM-3 interceptor in response, though the outcome remains unclear. Even the use of high-end missile defence systems can be seen as a strategic win for Iran in signalling its extended reach and forcing the deployment of advanced interception resources.

Overall, the attempted strike has shifted attention toward Iran’s potential undeclared missile capabilities and added a new dimension to regional and global security calculations.

Donald Trump has indicated that the United States may consider scaling down its military operations against Iran, saying the country is “getting very close” to achieving its objectives in the ongoing conflict in West Asia.

In a post on Truth Social, Trump highlighted the progress made by US forces and suggested that a potential wind-down of operations could be under consideration. His remarks are among the clearest signals so far that Washington may be looking at reducing its military engagement.

The statement comes at a time when the US has temporarily eased restrictions on Iranian oil shipments. The move is aimed at addressing concerns over global supply disruptions and stabilising rising oil prices amid continued tensions in the region.

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said the administration had anticipated a timeline of around four to six weeks for the operation. With the conflict now entering its third week, she noted that developments were being closely monitored.

Oil markets in focus

Global oil markets have come under pressure due to the ongoing tensions. The temporary relaxation allows certain Iranian oil shipments that were already in transit to reach markets, helping ease supply concerns.

The situation has contributed to volatility in oil prices, with investors closely watching developments in the Middle East for further signals on supply stability.

Rising regional tensions

The conflict continues to see exchanges of attacks in parts of the region. Iran has carried out drone and missile strikes targeting Israel and Saudi Arabia, contributing to the escalation.

At the same time, concerns remain high over the security of key energy routes.

Strait of Hormuz concerns

The Strait of Hormuz, a crucial global oil transit route, remains a focal point of concern. A significant portion of the world’s oil supply passes through the strait, making it highly sensitive to any disruption.

Trump suggested that countries dependent on the route should also take responsibility for its security, while indicating that the US could assist if required.

No ceasefire signal

Despite hinting at a possible wind-down of operations, Trump said he is not currently seeking a ceasefire, indicating that the US position remains firm as the situation evolves.

The developments highlight the close link between geopolitical tensions, global energy markets, and the broader economic outlook.