English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

Dawn: Pakistan lost diplomatic battle on Kishanganga dam

Published

on

Dawn: Pakistan lost diplomatic battle on Kishanganga dam

Islamabad receive no response for a meeting request by World Bank

Pakistan has virtually lost the diplomatic battle against India on Kishanganga dam controversy as it has missed opportunity to involve the World Bank, as it has not yet responded to Islamabad’s request for a meeting. Prime Minister Narendra Modi is to inaugurate the project within next few days.

Dawn, a leading Pakistani newspaper reports that Islamabad wants to send a high level delegation, headed by attorney general Asghar Ausaf Ali to Washington to share its concern with its President Jim Yong Kim about the dam.

A Pakistani journalist Anwar Iqbal based in Washington reports that the World Bank has accepted the Pakistani proposal but bank officials say that they are still trying to find an appropriate slot for the meeting because of chief’s busy schedule. Pakistan had hoped for the meeting in late April, when Ali was in New York for a UN meeting.

Read More: Pakistan asks World Bank to vouch India abiding IWT

The 1960 Indus Water Treaty (IWT) between the two countries recognizes the World Bank as an arbitrator in water disputes as it played key role in concluding the agreement.

On April 30, it was reported that PM Modi is set to inaugurate the Kishanganga Hydroelectric Project in northern Kashmir’s Gurez in the first week of May. The 330MW power project, which has been contested by Pakistan, was commissioned in stages in recent months.

The run-of-the-river project includes a 37 meter high concrete rock fill dam across the Kishanganga river, located just before it flows across the LoC in Pakistan occupied Kashmir (PoK). It diverts the water to an underground power house through a 23.25 km tunnel.

Dawn Pakistan lost diplomatic battle on Kishanganga dam1

According to National Hydroelectric Power Corporation (NHPC), the project will generate 1713 million units per annum. Jammu and Kashmir would be provided with 12 percent of the power generated by the project.

The project features three power generating units of 110 MW each, which were commissioned in early April this year.  All the three units have been synchronized with the grid and project has achieved full generation capacity.

The Kishanganga dam is located in the Gurez valley of Bandipora disctirct, north of Wular Lake, the site of another project that Pakistan has attempted to stop.

Read More: No agreement yet between India and Pak on Indus Waters Treaty: World Bank

In early April, Pakistan’s energy ministry had sent a fresh communiqué to the  World Bank, urging to endure that India abides by the treaty that gave Pakistan control over the water of the Chenab and the Jheelam rivers.

Pakistan has complained that KIshanganga project affects its own Neelam Jheelam Hydropower Plant. Kishanganga is called the Jheelam on the other side of the LoC.

Observing the developments along with no response from World Bank for the meeting request, Dawn was left scratching its head on Monday, acknowledging that Islamabad has apparently missed the opportunity to involve the World Bank in the Kishanganga dam dispute before it becomes operational.

Latest world news

Trump approves nearly $9 billion weapons sales to Israel, UAE and other allies amid Iran tensions

The US has fast-tracked nearly $9 billion in weapons sales to Israel, UAE and other allies as tensions linked to the Iran conflict continue despite a fragile ceasefire.

Published

on

Donald Trump statement

The United States has approved nearly $9 billion worth of weapons sales to key Middle Eastern allies, including Israel and the United Arab Emirates, amid ongoing tensions linked to the Iran conflict.

The decision, cleared by the administration of Donald Trump, includes expedited military transfers to Israel, the UAE, Qatar, and Kuwait. The approvals were granted under an emergency provision, allowing authorities to bypass the usual congressional review process.

Emergency clearance amid ongoing conflict

Officials said the move was necessary due to the evolving security situation in the region, particularly as the conflict involving Iran continues despite a fragile ceasefire. The war, which began earlier in 2026, has heightened instability across West Asia.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio invoked emergency powers to fast-track the deals, citing urgent defence requirements for allied nations.

What the arms package includes

The approved package includes a mix of advanced defence systems and precision weapons:

  • Patriot missile defence replenishments worth over $4 billion for Qatar
  • Precision-guided weapon systems for multiple countries
  • Integrated battle command systems for Kuwait
  • Additional advanced weapons support for Israel and the UAE

The total value of these deals is estimated at over $8.6 billion, often rounded to nearly $9 billion.

Timing linked to iran war

The approval comes nearly nine weeks into the conflict involving the US, Israel, and Iran, with tensions still high despite a ceasefire that has been in place for several weeks.

Analysts note that the move signals continued US military backing for its regional allies, particularly in strengthening air defence and precision strike capabilities during uncertain conditions.

Criticism and concerns

The decision to bypass congressional oversight has drawn criticism from some quarters, particularly over transparency and the broader implications of increasing arms supplies in a conflict-prone region.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Trump and Putin hold over 90-minute call, discuss Iran war and Ukraine conflict

Trump and Putin held a 90-minute call focusing on Iran tensions and the Ukraine conflict, with warnings over escalation and talks of ceasefire.

Published

on

Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump

US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin held a phone conversation lasting more than 90 minutes, focusing on escalating tensions in the Middle East and the ongoing war in Ukraine.

According to official statements, the discussion was described as “frank and businesslike,” with both leaders addressing key global security concerns. A major part of the conversation centred on the situation involving Iran and developments in the Persian Gulf.

Putin supported Trump’s decision to extend the ceasefire related to Iran, suggesting that continued restraint could create space for negotiations and help stabilise the region. However, he also issued a strong warning, stating that renewed military action by the United States or Israel could lead to “extremely damaging consequences” not only for Iran but for the wider international community.

Ukraine conflict also discussed

The leaders also discussed the ongoing war in Ukraine, which has continued for several years since Russia’s invasion in 2022. During the call, there were indications of potential efforts toward a temporary ceasefire, although no final agreement has been confirmed.

Reports suggest that the idea of a short-term pause in hostilities was explored, possibly linked to upcoming symbolic dates, but significant differences between the parties remain unresolved.

Focus on diplomacy amid global tensions

The call highlights ongoing diplomatic engagement between Washington and Moscow at a time of heightened geopolitical tensions involving both the Middle East and Eastern Europe.

While both sides acknowledged the importance of dialogue, the situation on the ground in both conflict zones remains complex, with no immediate resolution in sight.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Trump rejects Iran peace plan as tensions rise, Tehran signals military readiness

Trump rejects Iran’s peace plan, keeping focus on nuclear concerns as Tehran signals readiness and tensions continue to rise.

Published

on

Donald Trump statement

U.S. President Donald Trump has rejected a proposal from Iran aimed at easing ongoing tensions, signaling a continued deadlock between the two countries.

The proposal reportedly included steps linked to easing restrictions around the Strait of Hormuz, a key global oil route. However, the United States declined the offer, maintaining that any agreement must address concerns related to Iran’s nuclear programme.

Washington has made it clear that resolving nuclear issues remains a priority and that partial measures without broader commitments will not be accepted.

Nuclear issue remains central

The U.S. position continues to focus on preventing Iran from advancing its nuclear capabilities. Officials believe that without a comprehensive agreement, temporary arrangements could delay a long-term resolution.

The rejection of the proposal indicates that negotiations remain stalled, with both sides holding firm on key demands.

Iran issues warning

Following the rejection, Iranian officials have issued strong statements, indicating readiness to respond if pressure from the U.S. continues.

Reports suggest that Iran has asserted its military preparedness, warning that any escalation could lead to serious consequences. The remarks reflect growing tensions as diplomatic efforts struggle to produce results.

Rising geopolitical tension

The situation remains volatile, with both countries engaged in a prolonged standoff. Measures such as restrictions on trade routes and strategic pressure points continue to impact the broader region.

The Strait of Hormuz remains a critical factor in the conflict, given its importance for global energy supplies.

Outlook uncertain

With no immediate breakthrough in sight, tensions between the United States and Iran are expected to persist. The lack of agreement on key issues, particularly the nuclear programme, continues to hinder progress toward de-escalation.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com