English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

North Korea criticize US for misleading and provocative move

Published

on

North Korea criticize US for misleading and provocative move

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Don’t miscalculate peace loving intention as weakness, says Pyongyang

Amidst preparations for a planned summit between US President Donald Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong-un, Pyongyang has criticized, what it called “misleading” claims that Trump’s policy of exerting maximum political pressure and sanctions have brought North to the negotiating table and called it a “provocation”.

According to North Korea Times, a spokesman  for the North Korean foreign ministry told the state run Korean Central News Agency (KCNA), “It would not be conducive to addressing the issue of the US miscalculates the peace loving intention of the DPRK (North Korea) as a sign of ‘weakness’ and continues to pursue its pressure and military threats.”

Read More: North and South come closer on Korean Peninsula

The spokesman also warned that the claims are a “dangerous attempt” to ruin a budding détente on the Korean Peninsula after Kim’s summit last month with South Korean President Moon Jae-in.

The North Korean official also alleged that US claims are misleading that Pyongyang is motivated by fear of US military strength and concerns about aggressive economic sanctions put in place because of North’s nuclear and missile programs.

North Korea has also described movement of US military assets in to the region as “a dangerous attempt to ruin the hard earned atmosphere of dialogue and bring the situation back to square one.”

Read More: South Korea divided on future of US forces presence

Earlier South Korea’s official Yonhap news agency had reported that US military assets including F-22 stealth fighter jets were recently sent to participate in the joint annual South Korea-US air training.

US President Donald Trump and other US senior officials have recently suggested repeatedly that Washington’s tough policy toward North, along with pressure on its main trading partner China have played a decisive role in turning around what had been an extremely tense situation.

They argue that just last year, as Kim was launching long-range missiles at a record pace and trading vulgar insults with Trump, it would have seemed unthinkable for the topic of denuclearization to be on the table.

Read More: US, China welcome N Korea halt on Nuclear, Missile tests

Prior to the US-North Korea summit, Washington is expecting the release of three Korean-Americans accused of anti-state activities. Trump has hinted in one of his tweets about the possible release of Kim dong-chul, Kim Hak-song and Tony Kim.[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][vc_column_text]Associated Press reports that there was no sign of an imminent release on Sunday, though the men had reportedly been moved to the capital Pyongyang.

Prior to his summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un, US President Donald Trump is scheduled to meet South Korean President Moon Jae-in at White House on May 22 “to continue their close coordination on developments regarding the Korean peninsula.”

During the landmark summit with Moon Jae-in, North Korean President Kim Jong-un had recently agreed to a number of measures aimed at improving North-South ties and indicated his willingness to discuss the denuclearization of the peninsula.

Observers believe that North Korea’s statement on Sunday seemed to be aimed at strengthening Kim’s position before going into his meeting with US President Donald Trump. Pyongyang claims that Kim himself is the driver of the current scenario.

Meanwhile, Seoul based The Korea Times has reported that Singapore has emerged as the most likely venue for the planned summit between the US President Donald Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong-un. Earlier the summit was expected to be held in demilitarized zone on the border between North and South Korea.

The daily, quoting multiple sources further reports that summit will likely take place between June 9 and 15, after Trump attends the G-7 Summit scheduled to be held on June 8 and 9 in Qubec, Canada.

Moreover, The Korea Times has published a report based on interaction with Seoul public praising US President Donald Trump for peace efforts. One of the respondent has reportedly said, “Trump may be less refined and often use coarse language, but it seems he is doing everything he can to resolve them. I did not like Trump at first, perhaps because how media represented him, but now I support him and his way of handling North Korea.”[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Latest world news

Israel-Lebanon ceasefire to begin within hours as Trump announces 10-day truce

Israel and Lebanon may begin a 10-day ceasefire within hours after a proposal announced by Donald Trump amid ongoing tensions.

Published

on

Donald Trump

A temporary halt in hostilities between Israel and Lebanon is expected to begin within hours after US President Donald Trump announced a proposed 10-day ceasefire between the two sides, amid ongoing tensions in the region.

According to his statement, the ceasefire is likely to take effect around 5 p.m. Eastern Time, although independent confirmation from both sides is still awaited.

The development follows discussions involving Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Lebanese President Joseph Aoun, with mediation efforts led by the United States.

Officials indicated that the proposed truce is aimed at creating a limited window to reduce violence and potentially pave the way for broader diplomatic engagement. The situation along the Israel-Lebanon border has remained tense in recent weeks, with escalation linked to the activities of Hezbollah.

Diplomatic efforts have intensified in recent days, with discussions facilitated by the United States, including the involvement of US Secretary of State Marco Rubio. However, details of the agreement and the extent of coordination between the parties remain unclear.

The situation remains fluid, and the success of the ceasefire will depend on adherence by all sides involved. The conflict has already led to significant humanitarian and geopolitical consequences, including displacement and disruption in affected areas.

While the proposed ceasefire is being seen as an important step toward de-escalation, broader negotiations involving regional stakeholders are expected to be necessary for any lasting resolution.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

US ends oil sanctions waiver for Iran and Russia, impact likely on India’s energy imports

The US decision to end the Iran and Russia oil waiver may impact India’s oil imports, fuel prices and global energy markets.

Published

on

US oil tanker

The United States has decided not to extend a temporary sanctions waiver that allowed limited trade in Iranian and Russian oil, marking a shift towards stricter enforcement of economic restrictions.

The waiver, introduced in March 2026, had permitted the sale of oil already loaded on ships to stabilise global supply during heightened geopolitical tensions. However, it is now set to expire around mid-April without renewal.

US officials have indicated that the move is part of a broader strategy to increase pressure on both Iran and Russia amid ongoing conflicts and geopolitical tensions.

What the waiver did and why it mattered

The short-term waiver allowed millions of barrels of oil—estimated at around 140 million barrels—to enter global markets, helping ease supply shortages and prevent sharp price spikes.

It also enabled countries like India to purchase discounted crude oil from Russia and resume limited imports from Iran after years of restrictions.

Impact on India

India, one of the world’s largest oil importers, is expected to feel the impact of the decision in several ways:

  • Reduced access to discounted oil
    India had been buying cheaper Russian crude and recently resumed Iranian imports under the waiver. Its end may limit these options.
  • Potential rise in fuel costs
    With fewer discounted supplies available, India may need to rely more on costlier sources, which could increase domestic fuel prices.
  • Supply diversification pressure
    India may need to explore alternative suppliers in the Middle East, Africa, or the US to maintain energy security.
  • Geopolitical balancing challenge
    The move adds pressure on India to align with US sanctions while managing its own economic interests.

Global energy market concerns

The end of the waiver comes at a time when global oil markets are already under stress due to conflict in West Asia and disruptions in key routes like the Strait of Hormuz.

Analysts warn that tightening sanctions could:

  • Reduce global oil supply
  • Increase price volatility
  • Intensify competition among major buyers like India and China

Bigger picture

The US decision reflects a broader shift from temporary relief measures to stricter enforcement of sanctions, even if it risks tightening global energy markets.

For India, the development highlights a recurring challenge—balancing affordable energy access with geopolitical realities.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Sanctioned tanker fails to breach US blockade, turns back near Strait of Hormuz

A US-sanctioned tanker failed to cross the Hormuz blockade and turned back, underscoring rising tensions and disruption in global shipping routes.

Published

on

A US-sanctioned oil tanker failed to break through a newly imposed American naval blockade and was forced to turn back near the Strait of Hormuz, highlighting growing tensions in the region.

The vessel, identified as the Rich Starry, reversed its course after attempting to exit the Gulf, according to shipping data. The development comes just days after the United States enforced restrictions on ships linked to Iranian ports.

The blockade was announced by Donald Trump following the collapse of recent diplomatic talks with Iran. The move aims to restrict maritime traffic associated with Iranian trade.

Officials said that during the first 24 hours of enforcement, no vessel successfully crossed the blockade. Several ships, including the sanctioned tanker, complied with instructions from US forces and turned back toward regional waters.

The tanker is reported to be linked to a Chinese company previously sanctioned for dealing with Iran. It was carrying a cargo of methanol loaded from the United Arab Emirates at the time of the incident.

The situation underscores the rising risks in one of the world’s most critical oil transit routes. The Strait of Hormuz typically handles a significant share of global energy shipments, but traffic has sharply declined due to ongoing geopolitical tensions.

The blockade, which applies specifically to vessels travelling to or from Iranian ports, has added further uncertainty for shipping companies, insurers and global energy markets.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com