English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

‘Let Americans leave, we will liberate our land in one week’

Published

on

Syria, Syrian Amnbassador, Riad Kamel Abbas, US strikes, sarin

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]The recent US air strikes in Syria after the alleged use of chemical weapons by Bashar al-Assad regime, has triggered another crisis, which may result in escalation of the civil war that is already raging in the country.  The U.S. administration has accused the Assad regime for using chemical weapons against its own citizens, while Russia has defended Damascus saying that Syrian Army might have attacked rebels’ arms depot containing chemical weapons.

A chemical attack on Khan Sheikhoun, a town in Idlib province, killed about 89 people and injured more than 300. Following the attack, on April 6, the United States carried out a missile attack on a Syrian air base suspected to house chemical weapons.

Dr Riad Kamel Abbas, the Ambassador of Syria to India, in an exclusive interview with M.Ahmed Kazmi of APN, explained the Syrian position on various issues. Excerpts from the interview:

The situation seems to be grim after the American strikes. In fact who was behind chemical attack?

Two weeks before the attack our government sent verbal request to United Nations informing that rebels have brought 12 vehicles loaded with chemical weapons through Turkish border. We shared our concern that the rebels  may use chemical weapons against Syrian army and civilians. United Nations did take any action based on the information.

Now the attack has taken place. There is a possibility that Syrian army might have attacked rebels’ ammunition depot storing chemical weapons.  We don’t possess chemical weapons. We demand that UN should send its military monitors to investigate the chemical weapon attack on the civilians.

There are instances of UN monitors visiting Syria at the request of Damascus but they have not submitted any report. After rebels used chemical weapons in Ghouta city, located near Damascus airport, we approached the UN, asking for investigation. Surprisingly, they have not come up with any report yet.  In some cases, use of chemical weapons was confirmed but UN did not make it public.  After involvement of Qatar and Saudi Arabia was proved in helping ISIS, US removed Emir of Qatar Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa al-Thani in June 2013 and Bandar bin Sultan, the chief of Saudi spying agency in April 2014.

We will coordinate with our friendly countries, with BRICS states, Iran and others to tell the world about American support for terrorists in Syria.

Do you foresee the escalation of the crisis to international level?

At the moment we are in a very dangerous situation. America and its regional allies did not fulfill their commitment with Russia during Geneva and Astana peace talks.

Russia and Iran have recently announced that they were firmly standing behind Syria. We are not alone. We had earlier told that Syria is not Tunisia or Libya, it is different. The government in Syria enjoys mass support from its people.

The so-called opposition leaders participating in Geneva or Astana do not represent Syrian people. However, we will not leave any stone unturned for achieving peace. We understand that the opposition groups are not serious about restoring peace in Syria.

Islam is a religion of peace and they (ISIS) are doing everything but peace.

Has Damascus leadership reached out to friendly countries?

President Assad has spoken with his Iranian counterpart Hassan Rouhani. Our allies, including Russia and Iran, have decided that if America ventures to attack again, we will react immediately. The situation has entered a dangerous phase. It may lead to a regional or global war, or it may create a situation for a better understanding. We are constantly in touch with Russia and BRICS states.

How will the Idlib incident affect the future course of the war?

Idlib is close to Turkey border. We have chosen Idlib for the final assault against terrorists. Let them either get killed or move to Turkey. A large number of terrorists were foreigners and Turkey is their sponsor, let them go to Turkey.

Your government has been criticising US role in the Syrian crisis, while Washington claims to be leading anti-ISIS operations in the region.

We don’t need American help. Let them pull out and we will liberate our lands from ISIS and other terror groups within a week. They support the ISIS and were not hiding this fact. Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton publically admitted of creating ISIS for use against the Syrian army. John Kerry, another former U.S. Secretary of State had admitted the same fact. They use ISIS against any country which is not following Washington’s instructions.

We are fighting against the ISIS and the US is attacking Syrian army.This is sufficient proof of American support to ISIS and al-Nusra group on the ground.

Americans attacked Syrian army in Serta Mountain, killing our soldiers last year. It was followed by ISIS capturing the area almost immediately. There is plenty of evidence that America has been supporting ISIS by providing aid and weapons through parachutes.

Recently a delegation of important officials from Trump administration has visited Damascus, which will never be reported by their media.

Why do not the radical Islamists hit Israel?  Why do they target Syria, Egypt, Iraq and Yemen? Turkish intelligence was operating on the ground and Israel is behind all of them.

Why is the ISIS engaged in ‘jihad’ in Syria, a Muslim country, instead of attacking Israel which has been occupying Palestine? In fact, ISIS terrorists follow Wahabi ideology which is not Islam.

What about the spate of regime changes in the region in the last five years?

Americans don’t need friends in the region. They need slaves and followers. The US removed America-friendly rulers through Arab spring in Egypt, Tunisia, Libya and Yemen. They claimed that it was to improve security. If that is democracy, we don’t need such a democracy. Why doesn’t the UN investigate about the 12 vehicles which came from Turkey?  Earlier, Turkey had announced the arrest of 12 persons for holding sarin gas. But nobody debated that.

Our army was advancing for liberating several cities from ISIS. Suddenly America attacked us.

How do you assess India’s policy towards Syrian crisis?

We have been happy with the consistent Indian stand on the Syrian crisis. I am supposed to see the concerned (MEA) officials soon. India has been following a balanced position as a BRICS member-state.

Any country which is not part of the conspiracy against Syria is our friend. Most of the foreign governments and media have been hostile to Damascus. Our government is fighting against terrorism on behalf of the whole world.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Latest world news

Pakistan faces domestic backlash after India secures lower tariffs in US trade deal

India’s US trade agreement has sparked criticism in Pakistan after Islamabad ended up with higher tariffs despite sustained outreach to Washington.

Published

on

PM Shehbaz Sharif

India’s recently concluded trade agreement with the United States has triggered strong domestic criticism in Pakistan, where opposition leaders, journalists and commentators are questioning Islamabad’s diplomatic strategy after the country ended up with higher tariffs than India.

Under the agreement announced on February 2, US tariffs on Indian exports have been set at 18 per cent, while Pakistani goods will face a 19 per cent rate. The outcome has drawn sharp reactions in Pakistan, especially given what critics describe as sustained efforts by its leadership to engage Washington in recent months.

New Delhi, by contrast, is widely seen as having resisted pressure from US President Donald Trump and negotiated from a position of economic leverage rather than personal diplomacy.

Social media reactions highlight public anger

Following the announcement, Trump shared images related to India, including India Gate and a magazine cover featuring Prime Minister Narendra Modi alongside himself, before confirming the revised tariff rate for Indian goods. The optics did not go unnoticed in Pakistan, where social media users questioned why India secured better terms without overt displays of political deference.

One widely circulated post by Pakistan-based X user Umar Ali used sharp language and imagery to criticise Pakistan’s approach, reflecting growing frustration among sections of the public over what they see as an unequal outcome despite extensive outreach efforts.

Opposition leaders question foreign policy approach

Former Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf minister Hammad Azhar described the outcome as a failure of strategy rather than circumstance. He argued that modern foreign policy depends on economic strength, market access and tariffs, not symbolic gestures or personal relationships, pointing to India’s recent trade agreements with both the US and the European Union as examples.

Other opposition figures echoed similar views, saying India negotiated with “strategic autonomy” while Pakistan relied too heavily on personal engagement with US leadership.

Journalists warn of economic consequences

Journalists in Pakistan also weighed in, warning that the tariff decision could deepen the country’s existing economic challenges. Concerns were raised about declining exports, falling foreign investment and reduced bargaining power on the global stage.

Commentator Imran Riaz Khan criticised what he termed a failed lobbying strategy, arguing that symbolic gestures cannot replace economic leverage in international negotiations. Digital creator Wajahat Khan similarly framed the outcome as a reflection of unequal negotiating positions, stating that India approached the talks as a partner, while Pakistan did not.

India’s trade deals expected to boost exports

India’s back-to-back trade agreements with the European Union and the United States are expected to provide a significant boost to exports. Estimates suggest these deals could add up to $150 billion in exports over the next decade, strengthening India’s economic standing and reinforcing its negotiating position in future global trade talks.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

New Delhi free to buy oil from any source, Russia says amid US deal claims

Russia has said India is free to purchase oil from any country, dismissing claims that New Delhi has agreed to stop buying Russian crude under a US trade deal.

Published

on

New Delhi free to buy oil from any source, Russia says amid US deal claims

Russia has said that India is free to purchase crude oil from any country, responding to claims by US President Donald Trump that New Delhi has agreed to stop buying Russian oil as part of a recent trade deal with Washington.

The Kremlin said Russia is not India’s only energy supplier and noted that India has long sourced crude oil from multiple countries. It added that there is nothing new in India’s efforts to diversify its oil imports.

Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said that energy experts are well aware that India purchases oil and petroleum products from various global suppliers. He added that Moscow does not see any change in India’s approach to sourcing crude.

No official word from India on halting imports

A day earlier, Peskov said Russia has not received any official statement from India regarding the cessation of Russian oil purchases. Russia’s Foreign Ministry echoed the view, saying the hydrocarbon trade between the two countries remains mutually beneficial.

Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova said India’s purchase of Russian hydrocarbons contributes to stability in the global energy market and that Moscow remains ready to continue close cooperation with New Delhi in the energy sector.

Russian media also noted that, unlike the US president, Prime Minister Narendra Modi has not made any public statement indicating an agreement to stop Russian oil imports.

India’s oil imports from Russia

India has continued to import Russian crude even after the US imposed tariffs on Indian goods. According to global trade data provider Kpler, India has been importing around 1.5 million barrels of Russian crude per day, making it the second-largest buyer of Russian oil and accounting for more than one-third of India’s total crude imports.

India buys about 88 per cent of its crude oil needs from overseas, with roughly one-third sourced from Russia. At its peak, imports from Russia crossed 2 million barrels per day, before falling to around 1.3 million barrels per day in December. The volume is expected to remain broadly stable in the near term.

However, imports declined further to about 1.1 million barrels per day in the first three weeks of January following higher tariffs imposed by the US, including levies linked to purchases of Russian energy.

Complete switch unlikely, experts say

Energy experts believe Indian refiners cannot fully replace Russian crude with American oil. Igor Yushkov of the National Energy Security Fund said US shale oil is lighter in grade, while Russian Urals crude is heavier and contains more sulphur.

He explained that replacing Russian oil would require blending different grades, increasing costs for refiners. He added that the US is unlikely to be able to supply the volume currently exported by Russia to India.

Yushkov also recalled that when Russia redirected its oil exports from Western markets to India in 2022, it reduced production by about one million barrels per day, contributing to a sharp rise in global oil prices and record fuel prices in the US.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Moscow says no word from India on stopping Russian oil purchases

Russia says it has received no confirmation from India on stopping Russian oil purchases, despite Donald Trump’s claim that the move was part of a new India-US trade deal.

Published

on

Vladimir Putin

The Kremlin on Tuesday said it has not received any official communication from India regarding a halt in Russian oil purchases, following claims by US President Donald Trump that New Delhi had agreed to stop buying Russian crude as part of a trade agreement with Washington.

Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov told reporters that Moscow had not heard any confirmation from Indian authorities on the matter.

“So far, we haven’t heard any statements from New Delhi on this matter,” Peskov said, responding to Trump’s remarks linking reduced US tariffs on Indian goods to an alleged commitment by India to end Russian oil imports.

Russia stresses importance of ties with India

Peskov said Russia respects bilateral relations between India and the United States but underlined the strategic importance of ties between Moscow and New Delhi.

“We respect bilateral US-Indian relations,” he said, adding that Russia places equal importance on its strategic partnership with India.
“This is the most important thing for us, and we intend to further develop our bilateral relations with Delhi.”

What Trump claimed

Trump announced the India-US trade deal on Monday, stating that tariffs on Indian goods had been reduced from 50 per cent to 18 per cent. He claimed the reduction was linked to India agreeing to stop purchasing Russian oil.

According to Trump, India would instead buy more oil from the United States and potentially from Venezuela. He also suggested that the move would help bring an end to the war in Ukraine.

“He agreed to stop buying Russian oil and to buy much more from the United States and, potentially, Venezuela,” Trump said, referring to Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

India’s reliance on Russian crude

India has emerged as one of the largest buyers of Russian crude since the start of the Ukraine conflict. It currently imports around 1.5 million barrels of Russian oil per day, accounting for more than one-third of its total oil imports, according to global trade data.

India is the second-largest purchaser of Russian crude globally. Even after earlier US tariff measures on Indian goods, New Delhi continued its Russian oil imports, citing energy security concerns.

The Indian government has consistently maintained that securing affordable energy supplies is critical, given the country’s heavy dependence on oil imports.

Shift in energy ties after Ukraine war

Historically, India’s relationship with Russia was centred more on defence cooperation than energy trade, with Russia supplying a majority of India’s military equipment while contributing only a small share of its oil imports.

After the invasion of Ukraine, India significantly increased purchases of discounted Russian oil. The move helped India boost energy supplies while providing Russia with much-needed revenue amid Western sanctions.

As recently as December 2025, Russian President Vladimir Putin said during a visit to New Delhi that Moscow was ready to ensure uninterrupted fuel supplies to India despite pressure from the United States.

Earlier US push for Indian energy imports

Trump had earlier said, following a meeting with Prime Minister Modi in February last year, that India would begin buying more American oil and natural gas. However, those discussions did not lead to a major shift in India’s energy sourcing.

Subsequent US tariff measures also failed to significantly alter India’s stance on Russian oil imports.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com