English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

‘Let Americans leave, we will liberate our land in one week’

Published

on

Syria, Syrian Amnbassador, Riad Kamel Abbas, US strikes, sarin

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]The recent US air strikes in Syria after the alleged use of chemical weapons by Bashar al-Assad regime, has triggered another crisis, which may result in escalation of the civil war that is already raging in the country.  The U.S. administration has accused the Assad regime for using chemical weapons against its own citizens, while Russia has defended Damascus saying that Syrian Army might have attacked rebels’ arms depot containing chemical weapons.

A chemical attack on Khan Sheikhoun, a town in Idlib province, killed about 89 people and injured more than 300. Following the attack, on April 6, the United States carried out a missile attack on a Syrian air base suspected to house chemical weapons.

Dr Riad Kamel Abbas, the Ambassador of Syria to India, in an exclusive interview with M.Ahmed Kazmi of APN, explained the Syrian position on various issues. Excerpts from the interview:

The situation seems to be grim after the American strikes. In fact who was behind chemical attack?

Two weeks before the attack our government sent verbal request to United Nations informing that rebels have brought 12 vehicles loaded with chemical weapons through Turkish border. We shared our concern that the rebels  may use chemical weapons against Syrian army and civilians. United Nations did take any action based on the information.

Now the attack has taken place. There is a possibility that Syrian army might have attacked rebels’ ammunition depot storing chemical weapons.  We don’t possess chemical weapons. We demand that UN should send its military monitors to investigate the chemical weapon attack on the civilians.

There are instances of UN monitors visiting Syria at the request of Damascus but they have not submitted any report. After rebels used chemical weapons in Ghouta city, located near Damascus airport, we approached the UN, asking for investigation. Surprisingly, they have not come up with any report yet.  In some cases, use of chemical weapons was confirmed but UN did not make it public.  After involvement of Qatar and Saudi Arabia was proved in helping ISIS, US removed Emir of Qatar Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa al-Thani in June 2013 and Bandar bin Sultan, the chief of Saudi spying agency in April 2014.

We will coordinate with our friendly countries, with BRICS states, Iran and others to tell the world about American support for terrorists in Syria.

Do you foresee the escalation of the crisis to international level?

At the moment we are in a very dangerous situation. America and its regional allies did not fulfill their commitment with Russia during Geneva and Astana peace talks.

Russia and Iran have recently announced that they were firmly standing behind Syria. We are not alone. We had earlier told that Syria is not Tunisia or Libya, it is different. The government in Syria enjoys mass support from its people.

The so-called opposition leaders participating in Geneva or Astana do not represent Syrian people. However, we will not leave any stone unturned for achieving peace. We understand that the opposition groups are not serious about restoring peace in Syria.

Islam is a religion of peace and they (ISIS) are doing everything but peace.

Has Damascus leadership reached out to friendly countries?

President Assad has spoken with his Iranian counterpart Hassan Rouhani. Our allies, including Russia and Iran, have decided that if America ventures to attack again, we will react immediately. The situation has entered a dangerous phase. It may lead to a regional or global war, or it may create a situation for a better understanding. We are constantly in touch with Russia and BRICS states.

How will the Idlib incident affect the future course of the war?

Idlib is close to Turkey border. We have chosen Idlib for the final assault against terrorists. Let them either get killed or move to Turkey. A large number of terrorists were foreigners and Turkey is their sponsor, let them go to Turkey.

Your government has been criticising US role in the Syrian crisis, while Washington claims to be leading anti-ISIS operations in the region.

We don’t need American help. Let them pull out and we will liberate our lands from ISIS and other terror groups within a week. They support the ISIS and were not hiding this fact. Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton publically admitted of creating ISIS for use against the Syrian army. John Kerry, another former U.S. Secretary of State had admitted the same fact. They use ISIS against any country which is not following Washington’s instructions.

We are fighting against the ISIS and the US is attacking Syrian army.This is sufficient proof of American support to ISIS and al-Nusra group on the ground.

Americans attacked Syrian army in Serta Mountain, killing our soldiers last year. It was followed by ISIS capturing the area almost immediately. There is plenty of evidence that America has been supporting ISIS by providing aid and weapons through parachutes.

Recently a delegation of important officials from Trump administration has visited Damascus, which will never be reported by their media.

Why do not the radical Islamists hit Israel?  Why do they target Syria, Egypt, Iraq and Yemen? Turkish intelligence was operating on the ground and Israel is behind all of them.

Why is the ISIS engaged in ‘jihad’ in Syria, a Muslim country, instead of attacking Israel which has been occupying Palestine? In fact, ISIS terrorists follow Wahabi ideology which is not Islam.

What about the spate of regime changes in the region in the last five years?

Americans don’t need friends in the region. They need slaves and followers. The US removed America-friendly rulers through Arab spring in Egypt, Tunisia, Libya and Yemen. They claimed that it was to improve security. If that is democracy, we don’t need such a democracy. Why doesn’t the UN investigate about the 12 vehicles which came from Turkey?  Earlier, Turkey had announced the arrest of 12 persons for holding sarin gas. But nobody debated that.

Our army was advancing for liberating several cities from ISIS. Suddenly America attacked us.

How do you assess India’s policy towards Syrian crisis?

We have been happy with the consistent Indian stand on the Syrian crisis. I am supposed to see the concerned (MEA) officials soon. India has been following a balanced position as a BRICS member-state.

Any country which is not part of the conspiracy against Syria is our friend. Most of the foreign governments and media have been hostile to Damascus. Our government is fighting against terrorism on behalf of the whole world.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Latest world news

Trump says Iran getting more serious in talks, no decision yet on major strikes

Donald Trump says Iran is becoming more serious in negotiations with the US but insists no decision has been taken on launching major military strikes against Tehran.

Published

on

Donald Trump

US President Donald Trump has said he has not yet decided whether to authorise major military strikes against Iran, stating that Tehran has become “more serious” in its negotiations with Washington even as tensions between the two countries remain high.

Speaking to reporters in the Oval Office on Friday, Trump said discussions with Iran were continuing and suggested diplomatic efforts were showing signs of progress.

“We’re talking to them right now. I think they’re getting more and more serious as the days go by,” Trump said, adding that no final decision had been taken on launching military action.

Trump says diplomacy remains an option

Trump said the United States remained prepared for military action if required but indicated that ongoing talks could still lead to an agreement.

“We’re locked and loaded and ready to go. But we’re talking to them, so I think while we’re talking, we’ll see what comes of it. I believe they’re very serious. They should be,” he said.

The US President also warned that Iran would face a “much higher level” of strikes if negotiations failed, while reiterating that preventing Tehran from developing a nuclear weapon remained his key red line.

The United States has said its military operations are aimed at preventing Iran from closing the strategically important Strait of Hormuz. Iran, meanwhile, has carried out retaliatory strikes on US bases, with four American service members reported killed.

Reports claim Trump discussed large-scale military operation

Trump’s remarks came after media reports suggested he met senior advisers to discuss the possibility of a large-scale military operation against Iran. Another report said he was considering a “massive attack”, although Trump did not confirm those reports during his interaction with journalists.

He also acknowledged that the prolonged conflict, which he had earlier expected to last only a few weeks, was approaching its fifth month and had become a political challenge ahead of the US midterm elections scheduled for November.

Trump issues warning over support for Iran

Trump also addressed reports claiming that Russia and China were providing intelligence or military support to Iran. He said both Chinese President Xi Jinping and Russian President Vladimir Putin had assured him they would not arm Tehran.

“I think they wouldn’t want to have me disappointed,” Trump said.

In a separate post on his Truth Social platform, Trump warned Moscow and Beijing against supplying weapons to Iran, saying such a move would not be in their interests.

He further stated that Xi had assured him during their meeting in Beijing in May that China would not provide weapons to Iran, while Putin had conveyed a similar position despite the ongoing war in Ukraine.

Continue Reading

India News

For second time, US strikes ship with Indian crew near Strait of Hormuz

Published

on

By

Strait of Hormuz

The United States Central Command (CENTCOM) has said that an oil tanker carrying Indian crew was drifting with its engine switched off near the Strait of Hormuz before it was struck by US forces.

A CENTCOM spokesperson said the vessel had stopped due to engine failure and was drifting after its crew repeatedly sought additional time to carry out repairs. US officials said the tanker was struck only after it failed to comply with directives issued by US forces enforcing a blockade on vessels allegedly transporting Iranian oil. The military said the strike was aimed at disabling the ship by targeting its engine room rather than sinking it.

The incident involved a tanker carrying Indian seafarers near the Gulf of Oman, close to the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s busiest maritime trade routes. The strike triggered a fire onboard, prompting rescue efforts by Omani authorities and maritime agencies. Indian authorities closely monitored the situation and coordinated with local officials regarding the welfare of the crew members.

The incident has drawn concern in India, with the government emphasising the safety of Indian nationals working aboard commercial vessels in the conflict-hit region. The Ministry of External Affairs has remained in touch with the authorities concerned as tensions between the United States and Iran continue to pose risks to international shipping.

In June, three Indian sailors were killed in a US strike on another oil tanker. The Strait of Hormuz handles a significant share of the word’s oil trade, and the latest incident has renewed concerns over the security of merchant vessels operating in the region. Maritime experts have warned that escalating hostilities could further disrupt commercial shipping and endanger civilian crews navigating one of the world’s most strategically important waterways.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Trump announces phased tariff of up to 200% on generic drug imports, India may face impact

US President Donald Trump has announced a phased tariff plan on imported generic medicines, raising duties to 200% after three years, a move that could affect India’s pharmaceutical exports.

Published

on

Donald Trump

The United States has announced a phased tariff plan for imported generic medicines that could have implications for pharmaceutical exporters, including India. US President Donald Trump said the policy is intended to encourage companies to shift generic drug manufacturing to the United States by imposing steep tariffs after a two-year transition period.

The announcement is particularly important for India, one of the world’s largest suppliers of affordable generic medicines and a major exporter to the US market.

Trump outlines phased tariff plan

In a post on his Truth Social platform, President Trump said the new policy will take effect from August 1, 2026. Under the plan, imported generic medicines will continue to attract zero tariffs for the first two years.

Beginning in the third year, the tariff will increase to 100%, before rising further to 200% thereafter.

Trump said the measure is designed to encourage pharmaceutical companies to establish manufacturing facilities in the United States instead of relying on imports.

He added that companies choosing not to invest in US-based production during the transition period would face the higher tariff rates. According to Trump, the existing policy governing patented, branded and innovative medicines will remain unchanged.

Why India could be affected

India is widely regarded as the “pharmacy of the world” because of its large-scale production and export of generic medicines.

Indian generic drugs account for nearly 40% of the US generic medicine market by volume. According to a Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI) report, India exported pharmaceutical products worth USD 9.7 billion to the United States during the 2024-25 financial year, representing around 38% of the country’s total pharmaceutical exports of USD 25.8 billion.

However, the immediate impact of the newly announced tariff policy on Indian pharmaceutical companies remains uncertain.

Existing trade agreement and industry concerns

India and the United States struck a trade pact in February that states India would receive negotiated outcomes regarding generic pharmaceuticals and pharmaceutical ingredients.

Despite that provision, previous tariff threats by Trump had already raised concerns within the pharmaceutical industry over the future of affordable medicine exports from India.

Indian pharmaceutical companies supply a wide range of generic medicines used to treat conditions including hypertension, diabetes, depression, cancer, infectious diseases and mental health disorders.

According to a Financial Post report cited in the source material, around 65% of birth control pill prescriptions in the United States during 2024 were manufactured by two India-based companies — Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and Lupin Ltd.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com