English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

‘Let Americans leave, we will liberate our land in one week’

Published

on

Syria, Syrian Amnbassador, Riad Kamel Abbas, US strikes, sarin

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]The recent US air strikes in Syria after the alleged use of chemical weapons by Bashar al-Assad regime, has triggered another crisis, which may result in escalation of the civil war that is already raging in the country.  The U.S. administration has accused the Assad regime for using chemical weapons against its own citizens, while Russia has defended Damascus saying that Syrian Army might have attacked rebels’ arms depot containing chemical weapons.

A chemical attack on Khan Sheikhoun, a town in Idlib province, killed about 89 people and injured more than 300. Following the attack, on April 6, the United States carried out a missile attack on a Syrian air base suspected to house chemical weapons.

Dr Riad Kamel Abbas, the Ambassador of Syria to India, in an exclusive interview with M.Ahmed Kazmi of APN, explained the Syrian position on various issues. Excerpts from the interview:

The situation seems to be grim after the American strikes. In fact who was behind chemical attack?

Two weeks before the attack our government sent verbal request to United Nations informing that rebels have brought 12 vehicles loaded with chemical weapons through Turkish border. We shared our concern that the rebels  may use chemical weapons against Syrian army and civilians. United Nations did take any action based on the information.

Now the attack has taken place. There is a possibility that Syrian army might have attacked rebels’ ammunition depot storing chemical weapons.  We don’t possess chemical weapons. We demand that UN should send its military monitors to investigate the chemical weapon attack on the civilians.

There are instances of UN monitors visiting Syria at the request of Damascus but they have not submitted any report. After rebels used chemical weapons in Ghouta city, located near Damascus airport, we approached the UN, asking for investigation. Surprisingly, they have not come up with any report yet.  In some cases, use of chemical weapons was confirmed but UN did not make it public.  After involvement of Qatar and Saudi Arabia was proved in helping ISIS, US removed Emir of Qatar Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa al-Thani in June 2013 and Bandar bin Sultan, the chief of Saudi spying agency in April 2014.

We will coordinate with our friendly countries, with BRICS states, Iran and others to tell the world about American support for terrorists in Syria.

Do you foresee the escalation of the crisis to international level?

At the moment we are in a very dangerous situation. America and its regional allies did not fulfill their commitment with Russia during Geneva and Astana peace talks.

Russia and Iran have recently announced that they were firmly standing behind Syria. We are not alone. We had earlier told that Syria is not Tunisia or Libya, it is different. The government in Syria enjoys mass support from its people.

The so-called opposition leaders participating in Geneva or Astana do not represent Syrian people. However, we will not leave any stone unturned for achieving peace. We understand that the opposition groups are not serious about restoring peace in Syria.

Islam is a religion of peace and they (ISIS) are doing everything but peace.

Has Damascus leadership reached out to friendly countries?

President Assad has spoken with his Iranian counterpart Hassan Rouhani. Our allies, including Russia and Iran, have decided that if America ventures to attack again, we will react immediately. The situation has entered a dangerous phase. It may lead to a regional or global war, or it may create a situation for a better understanding. We are constantly in touch with Russia and BRICS states.

How will the Idlib incident affect the future course of the war?

Idlib is close to Turkey border. We have chosen Idlib for the final assault against terrorists. Let them either get killed or move to Turkey. A large number of terrorists were foreigners and Turkey is their sponsor, let them go to Turkey.

Your government has been criticising US role in the Syrian crisis, while Washington claims to be leading anti-ISIS operations in the region.

We don’t need American help. Let them pull out and we will liberate our lands from ISIS and other terror groups within a week. They support the ISIS and were not hiding this fact. Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton publically admitted of creating ISIS for use against the Syrian army. John Kerry, another former U.S. Secretary of State had admitted the same fact. They use ISIS against any country which is not following Washington’s instructions.

We are fighting against the ISIS and the US is attacking Syrian army.This is sufficient proof of American support to ISIS and al-Nusra group on the ground.

Americans attacked Syrian army in Serta Mountain, killing our soldiers last year. It was followed by ISIS capturing the area almost immediately. There is plenty of evidence that America has been supporting ISIS by providing aid and weapons through parachutes.

Recently a delegation of important officials from Trump administration has visited Damascus, which will never be reported by their media.

Why do not the radical Islamists hit Israel?  Why do they target Syria, Egypt, Iraq and Yemen? Turkish intelligence was operating on the ground and Israel is behind all of them.

Why is the ISIS engaged in ‘jihad’ in Syria, a Muslim country, instead of attacking Israel which has been occupying Palestine? In fact, ISIS terrorists follow Wahabi ideology which is not Islam.

What about the spate of regime changes in the region in the last five years?

Americans don’t need friends in the region. They need slaves and followers. The US removed America-friendly rulers through Arab spring in Egypt, Tunisia, Libya and Yemen. They claimed that it was to improve security. If that is democracy, we don’t need such a democracy. Why doesn’t the UN investigate about the 12 vehicles which came from Turkey?  Earlier, Turkey had announced the arrest of 12 persons for holding sarin gas. But nobody debated that.

Our army was advancing for liberating several cities from ISIS. Suddenly America attacked us.

How do you assess India’s policy towards Syrian crisis?

We have been happy with the consistent Indian stand on the Syrian crisis. I am supposed to see the concerned (MEA) officials soon. India has been following a balanced position as a BRICS member-state.

Any country which is not part of the conspiracy against Syria is our friend. Most of the foreign governments and media have been hostile to Damascus. Our government is fighting against terrorism on behalf of the whole world.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Latest world news

India envoy Dinesh Trivedi meets PM Modi after talks with Bangladesh PM Tarique Rahman 

India’s High Commissioner to Bangladesh Dinesh Trivedi met PM Modi after talks with Bangladesh PM Tarique Rahman amid diplomatic tensions.

Published

on

India’s High Commissioner to Bangladesh Dinesh Trivedi met Prime Minister Narendra Modi in New Delhi on Tuesday, a day after his meeting with Bangladesh Prime Minister Tarique Rahman in Dhaka.

According to the High Commission of India in Bangladesh, Trivedi sought PM Modi’s guidance on further strengthening the bilateral relationship between India and Bangladesh through a constructive and people-centric approach.

The meeting came a day after Trivedi held discussions with Tarique Rahman on matters of mutual interest and ways to advance ties between the two neighbouring countries.

Dinesh Trivedi Meets Bangladesh PM

During his meeting with Tarique Rahman on Monday, Trivedi conveyed greetings from Prime Minister Modi and reiterated India’s commitment to working with the Bangladeshi administration and its people in a positive, constructive and forward-looking manner.

The two sides discussed issues of mutual interest and explored avenues for strengthening India-Bangladesh relations with a people-centric approach.

The engagement took place at the Prime Minister’s Office in the Cabinet Division at the Bangladesh Secretariat. Trivedi also shared his experience of serving in Dhaka over the previous two months.

Sheikh Hasina Extradition Request

The meeting assumed significance as Bangladesh has expressed hope that India will expedite the extradition process involving former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, who was ousted following a student-led uprising in 2024.

According to a statement issued by the Bangladesh Prime Minister’s Office, Dhaka also reiterated its request for India to return individuals it alleges were involved in the killing of Shahid Osman Hadi, a prominent figure associated with the July uprising who was shot on December 12, 2025.

Tarique Rahman stressed the need to create a suitable environment to take forward relations between Bangladesh and India.

Bangladesh Foreign Minister Khalilur Rahman, Prime Minister’s Foreign Affairs Adviser Humayun Kabir and other officials attended the meeting.

India-Bangladesh Ties Amid Diplomatic Friction

The latest high-level engagements come amid diplomatic tensions between the two countries following a virtual press interaction by Sheikh Hasina in New Delhi on August 5.

The event, organised by the Foreign Correspondents’ Club of South Asia to mark the second anniversary of her ouster, prompted strong objections from Dhaka.

During the interaction, Hasina said she remained determined to return to Bangladesh in December and restore democracy, while acknowledging the possibility of imprisonment or a death sentence upon her return.

Bangladesh’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs subsequently registered a strong protest and said the development had affected public sentiment and complicated efforts to strengthen bilateral cooperation.

India has said the government had no involvement in the event. Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said it was organised by a private media entity and clarified that New Delhi did not endorse views expressed at the forum.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Trump, PM Modi will resolve tariff issue over Russian oil trade, says US official

White House Trade Adviser Peter Navarro said Donald Trump and Prime Minister Narendra Modi will resolve the issue over US tariff threats linked to India’s Russian oil trade.

Published

on

Modi trump

US President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Narendra Modi will resolve the issue surrounding the threat of US tariffs linked to India’s purchase of Russian oil, White House Trade Adviser Peter Navarro said on Tuesday.

Navarro’s remarks came days after the US Senate passed a bill authorising the US President to impose tariffs of up to 100 per cent on the top five purchasers of Russian oil. The measure argues that such purchases directly contribute to financing Russia’s war in Ukraine.

Navarro comments on India’s Russian oil trade

Speaking to reporters at the White House, Navarro said India was not involved in the oil trade with Russia before the Ukraine war began in 2022.

He alleged that India became heavily involved in the trade after Russia’s invasion and sold refined products on behalf of Russia, which he said helped support the Russian war effort.

“Prior to the Russian invasion of Ukraine, India was not involved in the oil trade with Russia, but afterwards it got heavily involved,” Navarro said.

The White House adviser also claimed that the issue had since been resolved and attributed some of the shift in India’s Russian oil trade to an opinion article he recently wrote in the Financial Times.

Trump and Modi will resolve issue, Navarro says

Navarro said the relationship between Trump and Modi would help address the tariff-related issue.

“The president and your prime minister have a very good working relationship. They are going to work that out amongst themselves,” he said, adding that it was not his place to intervene.

His comments come amid US concerns over countries purchasing Russian oil and proposed measures aimed at imposing additional tariffs on major buyers.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

US Senate passes Russia sanctions bill, India-China face 100% tariff risk

The US Senate has passed a Russia sanctions bill that could allow 100% tariffs on major buyers of Russian oil and gas, including India and China.

Published

on

Donald Trump

The US Senate has approved a bipartisan Russia sanctions bill that could allow President Donald Trump to impose tariffs of up to 100% on major buyers of Russian oil or natural gas, including India and China.

The legislation was passed by an 86-11 vote and will now move to the US House of Representatives, which is scheduled to reconvene on August 31.

The bill is named in honour of Republican Senator Lindsey Graham, a strong supporter of Ukraine who died on July 11. Graham had pushed for tougher sanctions against Russia over its war in Ukraine.

India and China among major Russian energy buyers

The legislation gives the US president the power to impose tariffs on the world’s top five purchasers of Russian oil or natural gas.

India and China are among those countries, along with Azerbaijan, Hungary and Slovakia.

The bill also contains an exception for countries importing less than 15% of their natural gas from Russia and taking steps to reduce their dependence on Russian supplies.

What does the Russia sanctions bill contain?

Apart from the proposed tariffs, the legislation includes sanctions targeting Russian President Vladimir Putin, senior Russian political and military officials, financial institutions and energy projects.

The bill would also expand US sanctions to older and reflagged oil tankers allegedly used by Moscow to bypass existing restrictions on Russian oil and energy revenues.

At the same time, the White House would have the option to waive sanctions or restrictions if the president certifies to Congress that doing so is in the national interest.

Bill also extends Iran sanctions law

The legislation also contains a provision related to Iran. It would extend the expiration date of the Iran Sanctions Act of 1996 until 2031.

The law penalises companies that invest in Iran’s energy sector.

The bill’s passage in the Senate marks the next step in the US legislative process, but it still needs approval from the House of Representatives before it can move forward.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com