English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

Sushma Swaraj: India can’t talk when Pakistan promotes Terror

Published

on

Sushma Swaraj: India can’t talk when Pakistan promotes Terror

India denies its involvement in Peshawar school attack

India has alleged that Pakistan’s commitment to terrorism as an instrument of state policy has not been abated a bit and asked the world leaders how India can pursue talks with a country that “glorifies killers” and allow Mumbai attack mastermind Hafiz Saeed to roam free with impunity.

Minister of External Affairs Sushma Swaraj, while addressing the general debate at the  37th session of the  UN General Assembly on Saturday, said that India has made efforts to hold talks with Islamabad and the only reason New Delhi has called off dialogue is because of Pakistan’s behavior.

Sushma Swaraj, who earlier walked out of the SAARC ministerial meeting when her Pakistani counterpart Shah Mehmood Qureshi began his speech, said, “We are accused of sabotaging the process of talks. This is a complete lie. We believe that talks are the only rational means to resolve the most complex of disputes.”

Read More: Pakistan: War with India is not an option, dialogue is key

She said, “Talks with Pakistan have begun many times. If they stopped, it was only because of Pakistan’s behavior.”

While elaborating India’s decision to cancel bilateral foreign minister level meeting, she said that after assuming power, Pakistan’s new PM Imran Khan wrote to Narendra Modi suggesting a meeting between the two country’s foreign ministers  on the margins of UN General Assembly.

She further said that India accepted the proposal, but, within hours of its acceptance, news came that terrorists had killed three Indian soldiers. She questioned, “Does this indicate a desire for dialogue?”

She noted that various governments in India over the years have tried the peace option with Pakistan. She recalled that PM Modi had invited the Heads of SAARC nations to his swearing-in ceremony in 2014 and she visited Islamabad in 2016.

Read More: India Asks Pakistan to Postpone Inspection of Hydro-Projects In Kashmir

She further said, “But soon after Pakistan sponsored terrorists attacked out air force base in Pathankot on January 2. Please explain to me how we could pursue talks in the midst of terrorist bloodshed.”

Sushma Swaraj: India can’t talk when Pakistan promotes Terror

On Saturday (US time), Eenam Gambhir, the first secretary at India’s permanent mission at UN, took a strong stand at the UNGA, called out Pakistan after its foreign minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi alleged that New Delhi was involved in the Peshawar school terror attack in 2014. She rejected the allegation saying it was the “most outrageous and preposterous allegation.”

Gambhir exercised Right to Reply at the UNGA and said, “Let me recollect for Pakistan’s new government, the out pouring of sorrow and pain in India that followed the massacre of innocent school children. India’s parliament had expressed solidarity while paying respect to the memory of those killed. Schools all over India had observed two minutes silence in their memory.”

Indian official also dismissed Pakistan’s claim of fighting terrorism. She said, “Can Pakistan deny that it’s the host and patron of 132 of the Un designated terrorists, 22 terrorist entities sanctioned under the 1267 and 1988 UN Security Council Sanctions Regime as of today?”

Comprehensive talks between India and Pakistan remain suspended for Pakistan’s continuing support to terrorism, especially after terror attack at air force base in Pathankot and security forces in Uri in 2016. Earlier, Mumbai 2008 terror attacks disrupted the comprehensive talks between the two countries.

Latest world news

Trump approves nearly $9 billion weapons sales to Israel, UAE and other allies amid Iran tensions

The US has fast-tracked nearly $9 billion in weapons sales to Israel, UAE and other allies as tensions linked to the Iran conflict continue despite a fragile ceasefire.

Published

on

Donald Trump statement

The United States has approved nearly $9 billion worth of weapons sales to key Middle Eastern allies, including Israel and the United Arab Emirates, amid ongoing tensions linked to the Iran conflict.

The decision, cleared by the administration of Donald Trump, includes expedited military transfers to Israel, the UAE, Qatar, and Kuwait. The approvals were granted under an emergency provision, allowing authorities to bypass the usual congressional review process.

Emergency clearance amid ongoing conflict

Officials said the move was necessary due to the evolving security situation in the region, particularly as the conflict involving Iran continues despite a fragile ceasefire. The war, which began earlier in 2026, has heightened instability across West Asia.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio invoked emergency powers to fast-track the deals, citing urgent defence requirements for allied nations.

What the arms package includes

The approved package includes a mix of advanced defence systems and precision weapons:

  • Patriot missile defence replenishments worth over $4 billion for Qatar
  • Precision-guided weapon systems for multiple countries
  • Integrated battle command systems for Kuwait
  • Additional advanced weapons support for Israel and the UAE

The total value of these deals is estimated at over $8.6 billion, often rounded to nearly $9 billion.

Timing linked to iran war

The approval comes nearly nine weeks into the conflict involving the US, Israel, and Iran, with tensions still high despite a ceasefire that has been in place for several weeks.

Analysts note that the move signals continued US military backing for its regional allies, particularly in strengthening air defence and precision strike capabilities during uncertain conditions.

Criticism and concerns

The decision to bypass congressional oversight has drawn criticism from some quarters, particularly over transparency and the broader implications of increasing arms supplies in a conflict-prone region.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Trump and Putin hold over 90-minute call, discuss Iran war and Ukraine conflict

Trump and Putin held a 90-minute call focusing on Iran tensions and the Ukraine conflict, with warnings over escalation and talks of ceasefire.

Published

on

Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump

US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin held a phone conversation lasting more than 90 minutes, focusing on escalating tensions in the Middle East and the ongoing war in Ukraine.

According to official statements, the discussion was described as “frank and businesslike,” with both leaders addressing key global security concerns. A major part of the conversation centred on the situation involving Iran and developments in the Persian Gulf.

Putin supported Trump’s decision to extend the ceasefire related to Iran, suggesting that continued restraint could create space for negotiations and help stabilise the region. However, he also issued a strong warning, stating that renewed military action by the United States or Israel could lead to “extremely damaging consequences” not only for Iran but for the wider international community.

Ukraine conflict also discussed

The leaders also discussed the ongoing war in Ukraine, which has continued for several years since Russia’s invasion in 2022. During the call, there were indications of potential efforts toward a temporary ceasefire, although no final agreement has been confirmed.

Reports suggest that the idea of a short-term pause in hostilities was explored, possibly linked to upcoming symbolic dates, but significant differences between the parties remain unresolved.

Focus on diplomacy amid global tensions

The call highlights ongoing diplomatic engagement between Washington and Moscow at a time of heightened geopolitical tensions involving both the Middle East and Eastern Europe.

While both sides acknowledged the importance of dialogue, the situation on the ground in both conflict zones remains complex, with no immediate resolution in sight.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Trump rejects Iran peace plan as tensions rise, Tehran signals military readiness

Trump rejects Iran’s peace plan, keeping focus on nuclear concerns as Tehran signals readiness and tensions continue to rise.

Published

on

Donald Trump statement

U.S. President Donald Trump has rejected a proposal from Iran aimed at easing ongoing tensions, signaling a continued deadlock between the two countries.

The proposal reportedly included steps linked to easing restrictions around the Strait of Hormuz, a key global oil route. However, the United States declined the offer, maintaining that any agreement must address concerns related to Iran’s nuclear programme.

Washington has made it clear that resolving nuclear issues remains a priority and that partial measures without broader commitments will not be accepted.

Nuclear issue remains central

The U.S. position continues to focus on preventing Iran from advancing its nuclear capabilities. Officials believe that without a comprehensive agreement, temporary arrangements could delay a long-term resolution.

The rejection of the proposal indicates that negotiations remain stalled, with both sides holding firm on key demands.

Iran issues warning

Following the rejection, Iranian officials have issued strong statements, indicating readiness to respond if pressure from the U.S. continues.

Reports suggest that Iran has asserted its military preparedness, warning that any escalation could lead to serious consequences. The remarks reflect growing tensions as diplomatic efforts struggle to produce results.

Rising geopolitical tension

The situation remains volatile, with both countries engaged in a prolonged standoff. Measures such as restrictions on trade routes and strategic pressure points continue to impact the broader region.

The Strait of Hormuz remains a critical factor in the conflict, given its importance for global energy supplies.

Outlook uncertain

With no immediate breakthrough in sight, tensions between the United States and Iran are expected to persist. The lack of agreement on key issues, particularly the nuclear programme, continues to hinder progress toward de-escalation.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com