English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

Trump deploys 700 Marines to Los Angeles as immigration protests grow, California files legal challenge

As immigration protests intensify in Los Angeles, President Trump orders 700 Marines to the city, triggering a legal challenge from California over federal overreach.

Published

on

Donald Trump

U.S. President Donald Trump has ordered the deployment of approximately 700 active-duty Marines to Los Angeles, following four consecutive days of intense protests against his immigration policies. The decision has ignited a legal battle, with the state of California filing a lawsuit against the federal government, arguing that the move violates federal law and encroaches on state sovereignty.

California Governor Gavin Newsom has strongly objected to the decision, stating that the federal government cannot override the state’s rights. He also revealed that the White House plans to dispatch an additional 2,000 National Guard troops to the city, bringing the total number of deployed personnel to over 4,000.

Escalating protests and police response

Protesters gathered outside a federal detention center in downtown Los Angeles, chanting slogans such as “Shame!” and confronting officers with chants like “Pigs go home!” Some protestors were seen hitting unmarked police vehicles as they passed through containment lines.

Authorities responded by using flash-bang grenades and rubber bullets to disperse the crowds. The Los Angeles Police Department reported minor injuries to five officers, and confirmed that some demonstrators had thrown concrete and bottles at law enforcement.

Incidents of property damage have also been reported, including the torching of several self-driving Waymo vehicles. Protests have now spread to at least nine other cities including New York, San Francisco, and Philadelphia.

Military’s limited domestic role

According to U.S. law, the President can deploy military forces domestically under limited conditions, such as rebellion or insurrection. However, without invoking the Insurrection Act, the role of the Marines will remain restricted to protecting federal buildings and personnel, rather than engaging in civilian law enforcement.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth defended the deployment, citing increased threats to federal officers and facilities. “We have an obligation to defend federal law enforcement officers—even if California’s leadership refuses to cooperate,” he posted on social media.

Legal and operational challenges

The state of California’s lawsuit seeks to halt the deployment, claiming it violates legal limits on federal intervention. Los Angeles Police Chief Jim McDonnell noted that his department had not received official notice about the Marines’ arrival and raised concerns about the logistical complexities of accommodating military personnel in urban operations.

This marks a rare use of U.S. military personnel in domestic protest management. The last major domestic deployment under the Insurrection Act occurred in 1992, during the Los Angeles riots following the acquittal of police officers involved in the beating of Rodney King.

Nationwide implications

The Trump administration argues that Democratic-led states are obstructing immigration enforcement and allowing undocumented immigrants to remain. Trump has pledged to significantly increase daily deportations, setting a target of 3,000 arrests per day.

As protests intensify across the country, the situation in Los Angeles remains the epicenter of national attention, with legal, political, and humanitarian implications still unfolding.

Latest world news

Israel-Lebanon ceasefire to begin within hours as Trump announces 10-day truce

Israel and Lebanon may begin a 10-day ceasefire within hours after a proposal announced by Donald Trump amid ongoing tensions.

Published

on

Donald Trump

A temporary halt in hostilities between Israel and Lebanon is expected to begin within hours after US President Donald Trump announced a proposed 10-day ceasefire between the two sides, amid ongoing tensions in the region.

According to his statement, the ceasefire is likely to take effect around 5 p.m. Eastern Time, although independent confirmation from both sides is still awaited.

The development follows discussions involving Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Lebanese President Joseph Aoun, with mediation efforts led by the United States.

Officials indicated that the proposed truce is aimed at creating a limited window to reduce violence and potentially pave the way for broader diplomatic engagement. The situation along the Israel-Lebanon border has remained tense in recent weeks, with escalation linked to the activities of Hezbollah.

Diplomatic efforts have intensified in recent days, with discussions facilitated by the United States, including the involvement of US Secretary of State Marco Rubio. However, details of the agreement and the extent of coordination between the parties remain unclear.

The situation remains fluid, and the success of the ceasefire will depend on adherence by all sides involved. The conflict has already led to significant humanitarian and geopolitical consequences, including displacement and disruption in affected areas.

While the proposed ceasefire is being seen as an important step toward de-escalation, broader negotiations involving regional stakeholders are expected to be necessary for any lasting resolution.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

US ends oil sanctions waiver for Iran and Russia, impact likely on India’s energy imports

The US decision to end the Iran and Russia oil waiver may impact India’s oil imports, fuel prices and global energy markets.

Published

on

US oil tanker

The United States has decided not to extend a temporary sanctions waiver that allowed limited trade in Iranian and Russian oil, marking a shift towards stricter enforcement of economic restrictions.

The waiver, introduced in March 2026, had permitted the sale of oil already loaded on ships to stabilise global supply during heightened geopolitical tensions. However, it is now set to expire around mid-April without renewal.

US officials have indicated that the move is part of a broader strategy to increase pressure on both Iran and Russia amid ongoing conflicts and geopolitical tensions.

What the waiver did and why it mattered

The short-term waiver allowed millions of barrels of oil—estimated at around 140 million barrels—to enter global markets, helping ease supply shortages and prevent sharp price spikes.

It also enabled countries like India to purchase discounted crude oil from Russia and resume limited imports from Iran after years of restrictions.

Impact on India

India, one of the world’s largest oil importers, is expected to feel the impact of the decision in several ways:

  • Reduced access to discounted oil
    India had been buying cheaper Russian crude and recently resumed Iranian imports under the waiver. Its end may limit these options.
  • Potential rise in fuel costs
    With fewer discounted supplies available, India may need to rely more on costlier sources, which could increase domestic fuel prices.
  • Supply diversification pressure
    India may need to explore alternative suppliers in the Middle East, Africa, or the US to maintain energy security.
  • Geopolitical balancing challenge
    The move adds pressure on India to align with US sanctions while managing its own economic interests.

Global energy market concerns

The end of the waiver comes at a time when global oil markets are already under stress due to conflict in West Asia and disruptions in key routes like the Strait of Hormuz.

Analysts warn that tightening sanctions could:

  • Reduce global oil supply
  • Increase price volatility
  • Intensify competition among major buyers like India and China

Bigger picture

The US decision reflects a broader shift from temporary relief measures to stricter enforcement of sanctions, even if it risks tightening global energy markets.

For India, the development highlights a recurring challenge—balancing affordable energy access with geopolitical realities.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Sanctioned tanker fails to breach US blockade, turns back near Strait of Hormuz

A US-sanctioned tanker failed to cross the Hormuz blockade and turned back, underscoring rising tensions and disruption in global shipping routes.

Published

on

A US-sanctioned oil tanker failed to break through a newly imposed American naval blockade and was forced to turn back near the Strait of Hormuz, highlighting growing tensions in the region.

The vessel, identified as the Rich Starry, reversed its course after attempting to exit the Gulf, according to shipping data. The development comes just days after the United States enforced restrictions on ships linked to Iranian ports.

The blockade was announced by Donald Trump following the collapse of recent diplomatic talks with Iran. The move aims to restrict maritime traffic associated with Iranian trade.

Officials said that during the first 24 hours of enforcement, no vessel successfully crossed the blockade. Several ships, including the sanctioned tanker, complied with instructions from US forces and turned back toward regional waters.

The tanker is reported to be linked to a Chinese company previously sanctioned for dealing with Iran. It was carrying a cargo of methanol loaded from the United Arab Emirates at the time of the incident.

The situation underscores the rising risks in one of the world’s most critical oil transit routes. The Strait of Hormuz typically handles a significant share of global energy shipments, but traffic has sharply declined due to ongoing geopolitical tensions.

The blockade, which applies specifically to vessels travelling to or from Iranian ports, has added further uncertainty for shipping companies, insurers and global energy markets.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com