English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

In a row with Musk, Trump says relationship with him over, warns of serious consequences over supporting Democrats

Published

on

U.S President Donald Trump intensified his public dispute with billionaire Elon Musk on Saturday, declaring he has no intention of reconciling with the Tesla and SpaceX chief executive and hinting at “serious consequences” should Musk support Democratic candidates in the 2026 midterm elections.

In a telephone interview with NBC’s Kristen Welker, Trump dismissed the possibility of mending ties with Musk, a former campaign supporter. When asked if their relationship was finished, Trump replied, “I’d say so, yes. I’m focused on other priorities. I won a massive election victory, gave him plenty of support in my first term, and even saved his business. I’m not planning to talk to him.”

Trump issued a stern warning amid speculation that Musk might back Democrats in future elections. “If he does that, he’ll face the consequences,” Trump said, declining to elaborate. Musk’s companies, including SpaceX, hold significant federal contracts, making them potentially susceptible to government action. Trump has previously threatened to terminate these contracts, describing it as a cost-saving measure.

The rift, which marks a shift from alliance to animosity, erupted this week when Musk publicly opposed Trump’s proposed legislation, dubbed the “big beautiful bill,” pending in Congress. Musk labelled the bill a “disgusting abomination” that would balloon the federal deficit. Trump retaliated with criticism from the Oval Office, sparking a series of vitriolic exchanges on social media that left White House aides and Republican congressional leaders grappling with the fallout.

Musk escalated tensions by suggesting Trump’s impeachment and alleging, without proof, that the administration was withholding information about Trump’s ties to notorious paedophile Jeffrey Epstein. By Saturday morning, Musk appeared to have removed his Epstein-related posts from X, his social media platform.

Vice-President J.D. Vance sought to minimise the conflict in an interview with comedian Theo Von, taped on Thursday at a Nashville restaurant owned by Trump ally Kid Rock. Vance described Musk’s attacks as a “huge mistake” driven by emotion. “Elon’s an incredible entrepreneur, but he’s gone too far this time,” Vance said. “I hope he returns to the fold, but it may be too late after going so nuclear.”

Vance praised Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency, which aimed to reduce federal spending and led to thousands of job cuts, calling it “really good.” Addressing Musk’s Epstein claims, Vance refuted them, stating, “Donald Trump had no wrongdoing with Jeffrey Epstein. These accusations are unhelpful.” He also dismissed Musk’s impeachment call as “utterly mad,” insisting, “The President is doing well.”

Vance defended the controversial bill, clarifying that its primary aim was to extend the 2017 tax cuts from Trump’s first term, despite the Congressional Budget Office projecting it would increase deficits by $2.4 trillion over a decade and leave 10.9 million people uninsured. “It’s a solid bill, though not flawless,” Vance said.

The interview, conducted with Von—who recently made controversial remarks about drug use and US Navy personnel while opening for Trump at a Qatar military base—captured Vance’s response to Musk’s posts, including one urging Trump’s replacement with Vance, which the Vice-President called “completely unhelpful.”

Latest world news

Israel-Lebanon ceasefire to begin within hours as Trump announces 10-day truce

Israel and Lebanon may begin a 10-day ceasefire within hours after a proposal announced by Donald Trump amid ongoing tensions.

Published

on

Donald Trump

A temporary halt in hostilities between Israel and Lebanon is expected to begin within hours after US President Donald Trump announced a proposed 10-day ceasefire between the two sides, amid ongoing tensions in the region.

According to his statement, the ceasefire is likely to take effect around 5 p.m. Eastern Time, although independent confirmation from both sides is still awaited.

The development follows discussions involving Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Lebanese President Joseph Aoun, with mediation efforts led by the United States.

Officials indicated that the proposed truce is aimed at creating a limited window to reduce violence and potentially pave the way for broader diplomatic engagement. The situation along the Israel-Lebanon border has remained tense in recent weeks, with escalation linked to the activities of Hezbollah.

Diplomatic efforts have intensified in recent days, with discussions facilitated by the United States, including the involvement of US Secretary of State Marco Rubio. However, details of the agreement and the extent of coordination between the parties remain unclear.

The situation remains fluid, and the success of the ceasefire will depend on adherence by all sides involved. The conflict has already led to significant humanitarian and geopolitical consequences, including displacement and disruption in affected areas.

While the proposed ceasefire is being seen as an important step toward de-escalation, broader negotiations involving regional stakeholders are expected to be necessary for any lasting resolution.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

US ends oil sanctions waiver for Iran and Russia, impact likely on India’s energy imports

The US decision to end the Iran and Russia oil waiver may impact India’s oil imports, fuel prices and global energy markets.

Published

on

US oil tanker

The United States has decided not to extend a temporary sanctions waiver that allowed limited trade in Iranian and Russian oil, marking a shift towards stricter enforcement of economic restrictions.

The waiver, introduced in March 2026, had permitted the sale of oil already loaded on ships to stabilise global supply during heightened geopolitical tensions. However, it is now set to expire around mid-April without renewal.

US officials have indicated that the move is part of a broader strategy to increase pressure on both Iran and Russia amid ongoing conflicts and geopolitical tensions.

What the waiver did and why it mattered

The short-term waiver allowed millions of barrels of oil—estimated at around 140 million barrels—to enter global markets, helping ease supply shortages and prevent sharp price spikes.

It also enabled countries like India to purchase discounted crude oil from Russia and resume limited imports from Iran after years of restrictions.

Impact on India

India, one of the world’s largest oil importers, is expected to feel the impact of the decision in several ways:

  • Reduced access to discounted oil
    India had been buying cheaper Russian crude and recently resumed Iranian imports under the waiver. Its end may limit these options.
  • Potential rise in fuel costs
    With fewer discounted supplies available, India may need to rely more on costlier sources, which could increase domestic fuel prices.
  • Supply diversification pressure
    India may need to explore alternative suppliers in the Middle East, Africa, or the US to maintain energy security.
  • Geopolitical balancing challenge
    The move adds pressure on India to align with US sanctions while managing its own economic interests.

Global energy market concerns

The end of the waiver comes at a time when global oil markets are already under stress due to conflict in West Asia and disruptions in key routes like the Strait of Hormuz.

Analysts warn that tightening sanctions could:

  • Reduce global oil supply
  • Increase price volatility
  • Intensify competition among major buyers like India and China

Bigger picture

The US decision reflects a broader shift from temporary relief measures to stricter enforcement of sanctions, even if it risks tightening global energy markets.

For India, the development highlights a recurring challenge—balancing affordable energy access with geopolitical realities.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Sanctioned tanker fails to breach US blockade, turns back near Strait of Hormuz

A US-sanctioned tanker failed to cross the Hormuz blockade and turned back, underscoring rising tensions and disruption in global shipping routes.

Published

on

A US-sanctioned oil tanker failed to break through a newly imposed American naval blockade and was forced to turn back near the Strait of Hormuz, highlighting growing tensions in the region.

The vessel, identified as the Rich Starry, reversed its course after attempting to exit the Gulf, according to shipping data. The development comes just days after the United States enforced restrictions on ships linked to Iranian ports.

The blockade was announced by Donald Trump following the collapse of recent diplomatic talks with Iran. The move aims to restrict maritime traffic associated with Iranian trade.

Officials said that during the first 24 hours of enforcement, no vessel successfully crossed the blockade. Several ships, including the sanctioned tanker, complied with instructions from US forces and turned back toward regional waters.

The tanker is reported to be linked to a Chinese company previously sanctioned for dealing with Iran. It was carrying a cargo of methanol loaded from the United Arab Emirates at the time of the incident.

The situation underscores the rising risks in one of the world’s most critical oil transit routes. The Strait of Hormuz typically handles a significant share of global energy shipments, but traffic has sharply declined due to ongoing geopolitical tensions.

The blockade, which applies specifically to vessels travelling to or from Iranian ports, has added further uncertainty for shipping companies, insurers and global energy markets.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com