English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

Trump to order Embassy shift to Jerusalem despite world community warning

Published

on

Trump to order Embassy shift to Jerusalem despite world community warning

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Most of friends and foes oppose the move

US President Donald Trump is creating history on Wednesday when he formally recognises Jerusalem as Israel’s capital and direct Department of State to begin process to move its embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. Announcement is expected at 1800 hrs GMT (23.30 IST).

Trump’s move comes at a time when world community, all regional countries, friends and foes have warned White House that it will undermine regional stability and affect the already tattered peace process.

Reports, quoting a senior administration official, from Washington, say that President will sign a waiver delaying the embassy move for another six months to comply with the law. The process is expected to take years before the embassy will really be shifted to the new address. Earlier he has signed similar waiver for once.

The US officials call the move “recognition of reality” as Jerusalem has been the seat of Israeli government. They have justified the move saying that the decision would have no impact on the boundaries of the future Israeli and Palestinian states as negotiated under a final status agreement.

According to CNN, the senior official who briefed the media persons on Tuesday, has rejected suggestions that the move would hurt the peace process. But he could not either offer any argument that it would help the peace process. He chose to counter the questioner saying that keeping US embassy in Tel Aviv, despite legislation calling for a move to Jerusalem, had not advanced peace process in more than two decades either.

“It seems clear now that the physical location of the American embassy is not material to a peace deal. It’s not an impediment to peace and it’s not a facilitator to peace,” the administration official said. “After having tried this for 22 years, an acknowledgment of reality seems like an important thing,” he added.

The decision to move US embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem by Trump administration is not only opposed by its traditional opponents in the region but their closest allies.

Spokesman for Antonio Guterres, the UN Secretary-General told reporters in New York that he has “consistently warned against any unilateral action that would have the potential to undermine the two-state solution”.

The European allies, who are closer to the Israel-Palestine theatre have expressed equal concern about the US move.

EU top diplomat Federica Mogherini, who recently took clear stand against Trump’s decision to withdraw from Iranian nuclear deal, said “any action that would undermine” peace efforts to create two separate states for the Israelis and the Palestinians “must absolutely be avoided.”

German foreign minister Sigmar Gabriel also warned that recognition of Jerusalem by US “as the capital of Israel does not calm a conflict, rather it fuels it even more,” and such a move “would be a very dangerous development.”

Meanwhile President Donald Trump called Palestinian President Mehmoud Abbas and other Arab leaders to inform about his intended announcement. The US president was warned by the regional leaders about the “dangerous consequences” it would have on the regional stability.

According to Nabil Abu Rudeina, the spokesman for head of the Palestinian Authority, “President Abbas warned of the dangerous consequences such a decision would have to the peace process and to the peace, security and stability of the region and of the world”.

Jordanian President’s palace statement says that King Abdullah II has told Trump that the move would have “dangerous repercussions on the stability and security of the region”. It further said, “Jerusalem is the key to achieving peace and stability in the region and the world”.

He also warned about the risks of any decision that amounts to be against final settlement of the Arab-Israeli conflict based on the creation of independent Palestinian state with its capital in East Jerusalem.

A statement issued by Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi has also cautioned US administration against “taking measures that would undermine the chances of peace in the Middle East”. He affirmed Egyptian position on preserving the legal status of Jerusalem with the framework of international references and relevant UN resolutions.

Saudi Arabia’s King Salman, who hosted Trump for his maiden overseas visit facilitating his meeting with more than 50 heads of states earlier this year, has told US, that “any American announcement regarding the situation of Jerusalem prior to reaching a permanent settlement will harm peace talks and increase tensions in the area”.

King Salman has reportedly further said, “Such a dangerous step is likely to inflame the passions of Muslims around the world due to the great status of Jerusalem and the al-Aqsa mosque”.

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, reacted to proposed US move by threatening to severe diplomatic ties with Israel. He said, “Jerusalem is a red line for Muslims. We implore the US once again: You cannot take this step.”

Palestinian Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh said that the decision by the Trump administration will “[ignite] the spark of rage against the occupation”, and that relocating the US Embassy to Jerusalem “breaks red lines”.

Haniyeh called Palestinian Authority President Mehmoud Abbas and both leaders agreed to hold a mass protest on Wednesday in the occupied territories against the US move. It is the rare occasion when Mehmoud Abbas, who is considered to be a US ally by most observers has joined hands with Hamas for the anti-US protest.

Arab League chief Ahmed Aboul-Gheit has also warned the US not to take any measures that would affect Jerusalem’s current legal status. While speaking at a meeting in Cairo he said US decision is a “dangerous measure that would have repercussions” across the entire region.

Currently there is no foreign embassy in Jerusalem. World community does not recognise Israel’s jurisdiction over land and ownership of the city.

Meanwhile, Tehran based Press TV commented on the Saudi Arabia’s reaction to US move saying, “In an attempt to portray itself as a defender of the Palestinian cause, Saudi Arabia has joined a chorus of condemnation of a contentious plan by US President Donald Trump to relocate Washington’s embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem al-Quds.”

It reminded recent disclosure by Lebanese al-Akhbar newspaper about a secret letter from Saudi foreign minister Adel al-Jubeir to Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman putting forward “a plan to normalize ties with Israel despite “risks” of a public backlash.

There are no diplomatic ties between Saudi Arabia and Israel. Some reports were published in Middle East that Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman has secretly visited Israel in recent months.

It has been difficult for Saudi rulers to balance between their projected image of being “the custodian of two grand mosques” and having ties with Israel. However, recently Israeli officials have declared about their relations with several Arab countries including Saudi Arabia. Egypt, Jordan and Turkey maintain diplomatic ties with Israel.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Latest world news

Netanyahu dismisses death rumours in video with US envoy, says I’m alive

Israel PM Benjamin Netanyahu has denied viral claims about his death, appearing in a video with US envoy Mike Huckabee and mocking online conspiracy theories.

Published

on

PM Benjamin Netanyahu

Israeli Prime Minister appears alongside US envoy, addresses conspiracy theories and ongoing conflict remarks

Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has publicly dismissed viral rumours about his death, appearing in a fresh video alongside US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee.

The video surfaced after days of speculation online, where misleading posts questioned his absence and circulated claims about altered footage showing him with “six fingers.”

In the clip, Huckabee jokes that US President Donald Trump had asked him to personally check on Netanyahu. Responding with humour, Netanyahu says, “Yes, Mike. Yes, I’m alive.”

Rumours and online claims gain traction

Speculation had intensified across social media as tensions escalated between Israel and Iran.

Some posts claimed Netanyahu had not been seen publicly, while others pointed to a previous video where his hand appeared unusual, fuelling conspiracy theories about manipulated or AI-generated footage.

Remarks on iran conflict

During the interaction, Netanyahu also made comments referencing Israeli strikes, mentioning Iranian figures including Ali Larijani and Basij commander Gholamreza Soleimani.

Using a metaphorical tone, he spoke about “erasing names” from a list, while praising US support and reiterating Israel’s stance against Iran’s nuclear ambitions.

Huckabee responded in a lighter tone, joking that his own name was not on the list, to which Netanyahu replied that he was among the “good guys.”

Earlier video mocked conspiracy

Before releasing this clip, Netanyahu had already addressed the rumours in another video posted online. Sitting at a café, he joked about being “dead for coffee,” using a phrase implying strong liking.

He also directly responded to the “six fingers” claim by showing both hands to the camera and inviting viewers to count his fingers.

The videos appear aimed at countering misinformation circulating online as geopolitical tensions continue in the region.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

US strikes Iranian missile sites near Hormuz with 5,000-pound bunker buster bombs

US forces hit Iranian missile positions near the Strait of Hormuz using deep penetrator bombs to counter threats to global shipping.

Published

on

In a major escalation aimed at restoring maritime movement, the United States has carried out airstrikes on Iranian missile positions near the Strait of Hormuz using powerful deep-penetration bombs.

The US military confirmed that multiple 5,000-pound bunker buster munitions were used to target hardened missile infrastructure along Iran’s coastline. According to an official statement, the sites housed anti-ship cruise missiles that posed a significant threat to international shipping in the strategic waterway.

The strikes mark the first major US military action to reopen the Strait of Hormuz after Iran reportedly shut it down in response to the ongoing conflict involving the United States and Israel.

Strait disruption triggers global concern

The Strait of Hormuz is a critical global النفط transit route, with nearly one-fifth of the world’s oil supply passing through it. Its closure has severely disrupted shipping activity and triggered a sharp rise in global energy prices.

The US action appears to be aimed at neutralising immediate threats to vessels and restoring safe passage through the region.

Allies reluctant to back US move

The development comes amid reports that several US allies, including NATO members, have declined calls from President Donald Trump to support efforts to secure the strait.

Expressing frustration, Trump criticised allies for not contributing even limited resources such as minesweepers, despite longstanding US support to NATO. He maintained that preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons remains a priority for global security.

However, Iran has consistently denied pursuing nuclear weapons, stating that its nuclear programme is intended solely for peaceful purposes, including energy production.

Use of bunker buster bombs

The bombs used in the operation are designed to destroy fortified or deeply buried targets. These 5,000-pound munitions, often referred to as bunker busters, are capable of penetrating hardened structures before detonation.

While powerful, they are smaller compared to the 30,000-pound bombs reportedly used by the US in previous strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Top US counterterrorism official resigns over Iran war, cites conscience

Joseph Kent steps down as US counterterrorism chief, questioning the justification for the Iran war and citing moral concerns.

Published

on

Trump official resigns

A senior US national security official has stepped down in protest against the ongoing war with Iran, citing moral concerns and disagreement with the administration’s decision.

Joseph Kent, who headed the National Counterterrorism Center, resigned from his post, stating he could not support the conflict “in good conscience.” In his resignation letter, Kent argued that Iran did not pose an “imminent threat” to the United States.

He also alleged that external pressure, particularly from Israel and influential pro-war voices, played a role in shaping the decision to enter the conflict under President Donald Trump.

“I cannot in good conscience support the ongoing war in Iran,” Kent wrote, adding that the US had been drawn into the conflict despite a lack of direct threat.

Kent further claimed that a “misinformation campaign” by senior Israeli officials and sections of the American media contributed to building support for military action. According to him, this created an “echo chamber” that influenced the president’s perception of Iran as an immediate danger.

In his letter, Kent said that until mid-2025, Trump had acknowledged that prolonged wars in the Middle East had drained US resources and cost lives. However, he suggested that this position shifted under sustained pressure and messaging.

He urged the president to reconsider the course of action, warning that the conflict could push the country toward instability. “You can reverse course and chart a new path for our nation, or allow us to slip further toward decline and chaos,” he wrote.

Kent’s resignation marks the first high-level departure from the administration directly linked to the Iran war.

As head of the National Counterterrorism Center, Kent was responsible for analysing and monitoring terrorist threats. His tenure, however, had been controversial. He was confirmed to the role last year by a narrow Senate vote, facing strong opposition from Democrats over his past associations.

Critics had raised concerns about his links to far-right figures and his stance on conspiracy theories. During his earlier political campaign, Kent had professional associations with individuals connected to extremist groups, which became a point of contention during his confirmation hearings.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com