English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

War of words: “Mentally deranged” Trump says “madman” Kim will be tested like never before

Published

on

donald trump

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]US president hits out at North Korean leader after the latter’s televised threats aimed at him in response to his maiden address at the UN General Assembly

In a clear indication that the war of words between him and Kim Jong Un is only set to intensify in the days to come, US president Donald Trump called the North Korean leader a “madman” and warned that he “will be tested like never before”.[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][vc_column_text]Trump’s latest swipe at Kim comes in response to the dictator’s first ever televised address to the world on Friday morning (as per North Korean local time) which was seen as his way of hitting back at the US president who, a day earlier, while delivering his maiden speech at the United Nations General Assembly had called the leader of North Korea a “Rocket Man” while threatening to “totally destroy” his country if necessary.

Retaliating against Trump’s tirade at the UNGA, Kim had said: “I will make the man holding the prerogative of the supreme command in the US pay dearly for his speech calling for totally destroying the DPRK (Democratic People’s Republic of Korea).”

Making a bellicose, personal attack at the US president, Kim said: “Whatever Trump might have expected, he will face results beyond his expectation…I will surely and definitely tame the mentally deranged US dotard with fire.”

“The speech made by the US president … on the UN arena in the prevailing serious circumstance, in which the situation on the Korean peninsula has been rendered tense as never before and is inching closer to a touch-and-go state, is arousing worldwide concern… far from making remarks of any persuasive power that can be viewed to be helpful to defusing tension, he made unprecedented rude nonsense one has never heard from any of his predecessors (sic),” Kim said in his televised address before going on to assert: “A frightened dog barks louder.”

The verbal attack by Kim was promptly followed by North Korean Minister of Foreign Affairs Ri Yong Ho issuing a threat suggesting that his country may consider testing a hydrogen bomb in the Pacific Ocean.

“It could be the most powerful detonation of an H-bomb in the Pacific…We have no idea about what actions could be taken as it will be ordered by leader Kim Jong Un.” Ho had said.

During his speech at the UNGA, Trump too had spared no effort at hitting out against Kim Jong Un and his regime in North Korea. He had said that the North Korean dictator is “on a suicide mission” and asserted that if his country continued its provocations, the US would “have no choice but to totally destroy” North Korea.

“Now North Korea’s reckless pursuit of nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles threatens the entire world with unthinkable loss of human life… It is an outrage that some nations would not only trade with such a regime, but would arm, supply, and financially support a country that imperils the world with nuclear conflict,” Trump had said.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Latest world news

Trump set for swearing-in as 47th President amid cold snap in Washington

Published

on

Former US President Donald Trump

Washington is bracing for the inauguration of Donald Trump as the 47th President of the United States, scheduled for January 20, 2025, in the Rotunda of the US Capitol. This venue change, prompted by an unusually cold forecast, marks a departure from the traditional platform setup on the Capitol’s West Lawn.

Trump, who has overcome two impeachment trials, a felony conviction, assassination attempts, and an indictment for attempting to overturn the 2020 election results, is making a historic return to the presidency after defeating Kamala Harris in the 2024 election. Alongside him, JD Vance, the Vice President-elect, will be sworn in, setting the stage for a new chapter in American politics.

The inauguration ceremony promises to be a highly orchestrated event, reflecting both tradition and Trump’s unique approach to governance. The President-elect is expected to outline his administration’s priorities in his inaugural address, focusing on stringent immigration control, aggressive executive powers, and policies aimed at redefining America’s role globally.

Trump’s commitment to act swiftly on key issues was evident during his pre-inaugural celebrations, including a campaign-style rally and a wreath-laying ceremony at Arlington National Cemetery. His supporters are anticipating a series of executive actions on his first day in office, particularly concerning immigration and national security.

Despite the change in venue and the chilly weather, the inauguration is set to feature all the ceremonial pomp. However, the planned parade down Pennsylvania Avenue has been modified, with festivities moving to the Capital One Arena in downtown Washington, D.C.

This inauguration is not just a ceremonial transfer of power but a significant pivot point for U.S. policy and international relations. As Trump prepares to deliver his inaugural address, the nation and the world await the impact of his promised reforms and leadership style.

For global audiences and those in the U.S., the event will be covered extensively by major news networks and streamed online, ensuring that no one misses out on this significant political moment.

Continue Reading

India News

Gaza ceasefire begins after Hamas shares 1st list of hostages to be freed

The Israeli government, under Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, insisted on receiving the complete list of 33 hostages before committing to the ceasefire, emphasizing its unwavering resolve to secure the release of all its citizens.

Published

on

A fragile ceasefire has descended upon the war-torn Gaza Strip, marking a tentative pause in the protracted conflict between Israel and Hamas. The truce, brokered by Qatar and effective as of 9:15 GMT (11:15 local time) on January 19, represents a significant, albeit temporary, de-escalation in a conflict that has claimed the lives of thousands and left a trail of devastation in its wake. The agreement’s precarious nature is underscored by the fact that its implementation directly depends on the release of Israeli hostages held by Hamas.

The initial phase of the ceasefire, designed to last for 42 days, is contingent upon Hamas fulfilling its commitment to release a first tranche of 33 Israeli hostages from the approximately 98 still held captive.

To initiate this crucial first step, Hamas publicly released the names of three female hostages: Romi Gonen, Emily Damari, and Doron Steinbrecher. This symbolic gesture served as a crucial catalyst, paving the way for the cessation of hostilities. However, the delay in the ceasefire’s implementation, initially scheduled for 8:30 AM local time, highlighted the deep-seated mistrust and the complexities inherent in negotiating a lasting peace.

The Israeli government, under Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, insisted on receiving the complete list of 33 hostages before committing to the ceasefire, emphasizing its unwavering resolve to secure the release of all its citizens.

The exchange of hostages is not a one-sided affair. In return for the release of the Israeli captives, Israel has pledged to release approximately 2,000 Palestinian prisoners currently incarcerated in Israeli prisons. This reciprocal element underscores the delicate balance involved in brokering a ceasefire and the intricate negotiations required to achieve a mutually acceptable agreement.

The release of these Palestinian prisoners represents a substantial concession on Israel’s part, reflecting the high stakes and the complex political calculations involved in ending the prolonged hostilities.

The ceasefire’s fragility is underscored by the ongoing uncertainty surrounding its longevity and the prospects for a more sustainable peace. The 42-day timeframe represents only the first phase, with discussions planned for a second phase to commence in two weeks.

This limited timeframe highlights the tentative nature of the agreement and leaves open the possibility of renewed conflict should the negotiations for a second phase falter. The limited scope of the truce emphasizes the deep-seated challenges and the long road ahead toward achieving a durable peace in the region.

Even with the ceasefire in effect, the shadow of violence continues to loom large. Despite the official commencement of the truce, reports indicate that Israeli airstrikes persisted until the complete list of hostages was provided, illustrating the tension and the unresolved issues that continue to threaten the fragile agreement. This underscores the deep-seated mistrust between the two sides and the difficulty in transitioning from a state of active conflict to a period of sustained peace.

The conflict, which began with the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack that resulted in the deaths of approximately 1,200 Israelis and the capture of hundreds, has unleashed a cascade of violence that has left an indelible mark on the region. The subsequent Israeli offensive has resulted in the deaths of more than 46,000 Palestinians, according to local health officials.

These staggering casualty figures serve as a stark reminder of the devastating human cost of this protracted conflict and the urgent need for a lasting solution. The path to peace remains arduous and fraught with obstacles, but the current ceasefire offers a glimmer of hope, albeit a fragile one, amidst the ruins of war.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

TikTok’s new rival: The RedNote App and its hilarious memes

RedNote’s recent surge in popularity, reaching the number one spot on the Apple App Store’s free downloads chart, underscores this mass migration.

Published

on

With the Supreme Court’s impending decision on a potential TikTok ban in the United States looming, millions of users are scrambling for alternatives. The January 19th deadline for ByteDance, TikTok’s owner, to either divest its U.S. assets or face a ban has fueled widespread anxiety.

According to reports a ban is highly likely, with users anticipating a cessation-of-service message within the app on that date. While some users are exploring VPNs to circumvent the ban, the effectiveness of this workaround remains uncertain, particularly for those using U.S. SIM cards.

The exodus has led many American TikTok users to Xiaohongshu, also known as RedNote, a Chinese-owned social media platform. This ironic shift, noted by several sources, highlights the users’ search for a similar platform. RedNote, increasingly dubbed “China’s TikTok,” offers many comparable features, including short-form videos, photo posts, and integrated shopping. Recent app updates have seemingly streamlined the user experience to more closely resemble TikTok.

Reports suggested that the move to RedNote is partially driven by protests against the U.S. government’s action. The potential ban stems from national security concerns surrounding ByteDance’s ownership, making the migration to another Chinese-owned app a pointed act of defiance. RedNote’s recent surge in popularity, reaching the number one spot on the Apple App Store’s free downloads chart, underscores this mass migration.

However, this shift isn’t without its concerns. The anxieties expressed by cybersecurity experts and U.S. officials regarding the safety and security implications of switching to RedNote. The same national security concerns that prompted the potential TikTok ban could potentially extend to RedNote.

Furthermore, RedNote’s content moderation policies are reportedly more stringent than TikTok’s. Despite these concerns, a sense of camaraderie is developing among American “TikTok refugees” and existing RedNote users, with some even beginning to learn Mandarin to better navigate the platform. The situation remains fluid, leaving TikTok users in a state of uncertainty as they navigate this rapidly evolving landscape.

Meanwhile, the memes broke out on the internet. One user said, “Me selecting “ALLOW” when Rednote asks if I will allow them to track my data.”

Another said: “The cultural fusion about to be’ fire, and it seems like it!.” “Xiaohongshu opened a window for Americans to learn more about China by directly interacting with Chinese people. These exchanges also seem to be sparking an even deeper appreciation among locals for their own systems. An all-around massive PR fail for US gov’t propagandists,” one said.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com