English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

Zimbabwe: Mugabe bows down to pressure, leaves office after 37-years

Published

on

Zimbabwe: Mugabe bows down to pressure, leaves office after 37-years

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Former VP Emmerson Mnangagwa may succeed

Finally Zimbabwe’s President Robert Mugabe has ended political controversy by resigning from his office, after ruling nearly four decades, on Tuesday evening while impeachment proceedings were underway in the parliament.
His letter of resignation reached speaker of the parliament Jacob Mudenda while he was heading the debate on impeachment. Mugabe wrote, “I Robert Gabriel Mugabe in terms of section 96 of the constitution of Zimbabwe hereby formally tender my resignation … with immediate effect.”
Mugabe wrote a message on tweet indicating he feels free from all responsibilities and is looking for home made food;[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][vc_column_text]Mugabe defied demands for resignation for almost a week after military took over the country’s control which was followed by his expulsion from his own party ZANU-PF.

However, he escaped a more embarrassing departure by sending his papers while parliament had started proceedings to impeach him. The proceedings were immediately suspended.

All parliamentarians, irrespective of their party affiliation were jubilant. They thanked Mugabe for his right move. Cheers were witnessed all over the session.

Zimbabwe: Mugabe bows down to pressure, leaves office after 37-years

People also came out on Harare streets in jubilation as large crowds cheered, danced and sang celebrating Mugabe’s departure for hours.

According to reports people were coming out onto the streets calling this day as Independence Day. Some people did not believe as to what has happened. They expressed their excitement and hoped for a better future. People were seen removing Mugabe’s pictures from their business establishments and offices.

On November 15, Zimbabwe, was suddenly plunged into political uncertainty while Major General SB Moyo, Chief of Staff Logistics took control of the country for targeting assault on “criminals” around Presdent Mugabe. He assured that leader and his family was safe and sound.

Next day nobody came out to support Mugabe against the military takeover. Harare remained calm while offices and schools remained open. Business remained usual in the market.

On November 18, more than ten thousand people participated in huge rally demanding Mugabe’s resignation. This was a rare show of public defiance in country’s history.

Zimbabwe: Mugabe bows down to pressure, leaves office after 37-years

On November 19, Mugabe addressed the nation but did not announce his resignation. It was quite disappointing for the military and the people who participated in massive demonstrations. Despite expulsion by his own ZANU-PF party, Mugabe announced that he will lead the upcoming party’s congress to be held in December.

However, the very next day on November 20, a source close to Mugabe had claimed that the leader was ready to resign. The report indicated that army generals have accepted Mugabe’s demands including full immunity for himself and his wife and permission to keep his private properties in the country.

Mugabe, 93, led Zimbabwe’s movement for independence in 1970s and came to power in 1980. During his 37-year rule he was criticised for repression of the dissidents, alleged election rigging and causing economic collapse of the country.

Though Mugabe’s resignation has not specified his successor’s name but it seems almost certain that the ousted Vice President Emmerson Mnangagwa, will lead the country. ZANU-PF had, in its recent meeting anointed him as the next president. He is expected to be sworn in within next two days.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Latest world news

General Asim Munir reaffirms Pakistan’s hardline stance on Kashmir and Balochistan

In a speech abroad, General Asim Munir reignites Indo-Pak tensions by reiterating Pakistan’s claims on Kashmir and dismissing concerns about terrorism and separatist movements.

Published

on

In a provocative address to overseas Pakistanis, Pakistan Army Chief General Asim Munir has reiterated Islamabad’s uncompromising position on Kashmir, asserting that it remains Pakistan’s “jugular vein” and would never be forgotten. His remarks, delivered while addressing a gathering of Pakistanis abroad, are likely to provoke a strong diplomatic reaction from India.

General Munir described those residing overseas as Pakistan’s “ambassadors” and urged them to uphold what he called a “superior ideology and culture.” He framed his statements within the context of the two-nation theory, which served as the ideological foundation for the creation of Pakistan in 1947. Emphasising civilizational differences, he said, “Our forefathers thought that we are different from the Hindus in every aspect of life… our religions, our customs, traditions, thoughts and ambitions are different.”

The two-nation theory, championed by Muhammad Ali Jinnah, has long been a source of ideological division between India and Pakistan. It directly opposes the vision of a united India based on secular values and shared heritage.

Assertion on Kashmir and national identity

Referring to the ongoing dispute over Kashmir, General Munir said, “It was our jugular vein, it will be our jugular vein, we will not forget it.” He further added, “We will not leave our Kashmiri brothers in their heroic struggle,” framing the Kashmir issue as central to Pakistan’s national narrative and identity.

In a broader nationalist tone, General Munir urged Pakistanis to keep narrating the country’s creation story to future generations to maintain a strong bond with the nation.

Stance on terrorism and Balochistan separatism

Touching upon concerns related to terrorism and investment, the Pakistan Army chief dismissed doubts about the country’s stability, stating, “The 1.3 million-strong Indian Army, with all its wherewithal, if they cannot intimidate us, do you think these terrorists can subdue the armed forces of Pakistan?”

On the issue of Balochistan, where separatist movements have long challenged the central authority, Munir declared the province to be “Pakistan’s pride” and warned against any illusions of secession. “You won’t be able to take it in 10 generations,” he said, pledging that the military will decisively counter separatist groups.

Implications for India-Pakistan relations

The Indian Ministry of External Affairs is yet to issue an official response, but given the sharply worded statements, diplomatic engagement or condemnation is anticipated. General Munir’s comments underscore the enduring friction between the two nations and reinforce the Pakistan Army’s dominant role in shaping Islamabad’s foreign and domestic policies.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

China halts Boeing jet deliveries amid trade war with US

This halt in Boeing deliveries could have significant repercussions for both China’s aviation industry and the American aerospace sector.

Published

on

In a significant escalation of trade tensions between China and the United States, Beijing has directed its airlines to stop receiving aircraft from American aerospace manufacturer Boeing, according to a report released on Tuesday.

Additionally, Chinese authorities have ordered their carriers to cease purchasing aircraft-related equipment and components from U.S. companies.

This development, initially reported by Bloomberg News, comes amid rising tensions in the ongoing trade conflict between Washington and Beijing, which began following the introduction of “reciprocal tariffs” under former President Donald Trump.

Since Trump took office in January, the two largest economies in the world have engaged in a reciprocal trade war, with the U.S. imposing tariffs as high as 145 percent on certain Chinese imports.

In retaliation, Beijing has described Washington’s actions as illegal “bullying” and has implemented counter-tariffs of 125 percent on American goods, claiming that further tax increases would be futile.

The recent Chinese government order to suspend Boeing deliveries, affecting both state-owned and private airlines, is interpreted as part of China’s broader strategy to address the U.S. tariffs.

This halt in Boeing deliveries could have significant repercussions for both China’s aviation industry and the American aerospace sector.

On the same day, China emphasized its commitment to forging stronger trade relationships, with the foreign ministry stating its preference for cooperation over conflict. Lin Jian, a spokesperson for the foreign ministry, remarked during a briefing that China aims to “tear down walls” and foster connections instead of creating barriers.

Meanwhile, the World Trade Organization has cautioned that the intense trade dispute between the two nations could lead to an 80% reduction in goods shipments between them and could severely impact global economic growth.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Barack Obama backs Harvard University after Trump freezes $2.3 billion funding, says attempt to stifle academic freedom

The demands also called for banning face coverings—viewed as targeting pro-Palestinian protesters—and dismantling the university’s diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs, which the government criticized as fostering “simplistic racial stereotypes.”

Published

on

Former United States President Barack Obama on Tuesday lauded Harvard University for resisting the Trump administration’s decision to withhold $2.3 billion in federal funding after the institution rejected a series of White House demands. Calling Harvard’s stance a beacon for other colleges, Obama praised its commitment to academic freedom amid intensifying political pressure.

Harvard President Alan Garber firmly rebuffed the administration’s conditions, which included overhauling admissions to prioritize “merit-based” criteria, curbing student activism, auditing diversity initiatives, and derecognizing certain student groups. The demands also called for banning face coverings—viewed as targeting pro-Palestinian protesters—and dismantling the university’s diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs, which the government criticized as fostering “simplistic racial stereotypes.”

“Harvard’s rejection of this heavy-handed attempt to undermine academic freedom sets a powerful example for higher education,” Obama wrote on X, commending the university for fostering “intellectual rigor, open debate, and mutual respect.”

The clash escalated after the Department of Education’s antisemitism task force accused Harvard of neglecting civil rights laws and fostering an “entitlement mindset” while failing to protect Jewish students amid campus disruptions.

The White House argued that elite universities, flush with federal funds, have tolerated unrest tied to pro-Palestinian protests since Israel’s war in Gaza began, with some demonstrations accused of endorsing Hamas—a group the US labels a terrorist organization following its October 7 attack on Israel.

Garber, in a defiant open letter, declared, “No government, regardless of party, has the right to dictate what private universities teach, who they admit or hire, or what research they pursue.” Hours later, the Trump administration froze $2.3 billion in funding, marking a dramatic escalation in its campaign to reshape higher education.

Harvard’s stand makes it the first major US university to openly challenge such federal directives, which also urged cooperation with immigration authorities and the withdrawal of support for student groups linked to violence or harassment. The university’s endowment, valued at over $50 billion, may cushion the financial blow, but the standoff signals deeper tensions over campus autonomy.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com