English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

India says it never depended on permission to import Russian oil

India says it continues to import Russian oil based on competitive pricing and national interest, while energy supplies remain stable despite global tensions.

Published

on

India on Saturday reiterated that it has never relied on permission from any country to purchase Russian oil, even as the United States recently issued a temporary waiver allowing certain shipments to continue.

The Centre said India’s energy strategy remains focused on securing crude oil at the most competitive prices while maintaining stable supplies despite rising tensions in global shipping routes.

India continues Russian oil imports

According to the government, India continues to import Russian crude and has done so consistently throughout the Russia-Ukraine conflict.

Officials said Russia remains India’s largest crude oil supplier, with imports rising significantly after 2022 due to discounted prices and the demand from domestic refineries.

“India has never depended on permission from any country to buy Russian oil,” the Centre said in a statement, adding that purchases are based on affordability and national interest.

Energy supplies remain secure

The government said India’s energy supply remains stable despite disruptions along the Strait of Hormuz route amid tensions linked to the Iran-US-Israel conflict.

To strengthen energy security, India has expanded its crude oil sourcing network from 27 countries to 40 countries, creating multiple supply options.

The Centre also said the country currently holds more than 250 million barrels of crude oil and petroleum products across its reserves and supply chain. This stockpile provides a buffer equivalent to around seven to eight weeks of consumption.

India’s refining capacity stands at 258 million metric tonnes per annum, which the government said exceeds current domestic demand.

US waiver and global oil market volatility

The United States on Thursday temporarily eased sanctions on Russia to allow oil already loaded on vessels at sea to be sold to India.

Officials in New Delhi said describing the waiver as enabling such purchases overlooks the fact that the trade has continued for years.

“India is a net exporter of refined products to the world — a position that reinforces, not undermines, its energy security,” the Centre said.

Meanwhile, tensions in the Middle East have affected global oil markets. Military actions involving the United States and Israel against Iran, along with retaliatory strikes by Tehran across the Gulf region, have disrupted shipping routes and energy flows.

Global oil prices surged 8.5 per cent on Friday and had climbed nearly 30 per cent over the previous week, following remarks by US President Donald Trump that the conflict would end only with Iran’s “unconditional surrender”.

Earlier in February, Washington removed a 25 per cent tariff on Indian exports under an interim trade agreement. The US administration said the decision followed a commitment by India to halt Russian oil purchases. However, no such commitment appears in the joint statement issued at the time, and the Indian government has not confirmed or denied the claim.

Latest world news

US judge strikes down Donald Trump’s $100,000 H-1B visa fee, calls it unlawful

A federal judge in Boston has invalidated Donald Trump’s $100,000 fee on new H-1B visas, ruling that the measure was an unlawful tax imposed without authorization from Congress.

Published

on

A US federal judge has struck down President Donald Trump’s controversial $100,000 fee on new H-1B visas, ruling that the measure amounted to an unlawful tax that had not been authorised by Congress.

The decision was delivered by US District Judge Leo Sorokin in Boston in a case brought by 20 Democratic state attorneys general who challenged the fee announced by the Trump administration in September. The lawsuit argued that the sharp increase in visa costs would make it harder for employers to recruit highly skilled foreign professionals.

Court says fee exceeded presidential authority

In his ruling, Judge Sorokin rejected the administration’s argument that the fee was a lawful penalty under immigration law. Instead, he concluded that the charge functioned as a tax, which can only be imposed with congressional approval.

The court found that the president did not have the authority to introduce such a levy through executive action. The ruling invalidates the fee and prevents its enforcement.

H-1B programme widely used by employers

The H-1B visa programme is a key pathway used by US employers to hire foreign professionals in specialised fields. The programme issues 65,000 visas annually, along with an additional 20,000 visas for individuals holding advanced degrees. Approved visas are generally valid for three to six years.

Before the fee increase, employers typically paid between $2,000 and $5,000 in visa-related charges, depending on various factors. Trump’s policy raised the cost dramatically, drawing criticism from technology companies and other employers that rely on skilled international talent.

Fee saw limited uptake

Court filings showed that the higher fee significantly reduced demand for new H-1B applications. According to government submissions, US Citizenship and Immigration Services had received only 85 payments of the $100,000 fee by mid-February.

The Trump administration is expected to appeal the ruling, keeping the legal battle over the policy ongoing.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Iran fires missiles at Israel for first time since April ceasefire, regional tensions flare

Iran launched a missile attack on Israel for the first time since the April ceasefire, raising fears of renewed conflict and prompting airspace restrictions in parts of the Middle East.

Published

on

Iran launched missiles toward Israel in a significant escalation of tensions, marking its first direct missile attack on Israeli territory since a fragile ceasefire was reached in April. The development has raised concerns about the possibility of renewed conflict in the Middle East.

According to Israeli military officials, air defence systems were activated after missile launches were detected from Iran. Warning sirens sounded in several areas as authorities moved to intercept the incoming projectiles. Reports indicated that most, if not all, of the missiles were intercepted before causing major damage.

Attack follows tensions over Beirut strike

The missile launch came after heightened tensions linked to Israeli military operations in Beirut. Iranian officials accused Israel of crossing red lines through its actions in Lebanon and signalled that retaliation was inevitable.

Iran’s military and political leadership warned that further Israeli actions could trigger broader responses across the region. The attack is being viewed as one of the most serious challenges to the ceasefire arrangement that has largely held since April.

Regional airspace restrictions imposed

In response to the growing security concerns, Iraq and Syria moved to restrict or close portions of their airspace. Iran also implemented airspace-related measures as regional governments sought to prevent risks to civilian aviation amid fears of further military escalation.

The latest developments have disrupted travel routes and heightened alert levels across several Middle Eastern countries.

Israel warns of response

Israeli officials condemned the missile attack and signalled that a response could follow. Military leaders stated that Israel would act when authorised, while security forces remained on high alert amid concerns that additional attacks could occur.

Meanwhile, international diplomatic efforts are continuing to prevent a broader regional conflict. Several countries have urged restraint as fears grow that the latest exchange could undermine ongoing negotiations and destabilise an already volatile region.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Vladimir Putin backs India’s independent foreign policy, warns against sanctions pressure

Russian President Vladimir Putin said sanctions threats against India would boomerang, praising PM Narendra Modi’s leadership and India’s commitment to pursuing its national interests.

Published

on

Vladimir Putin

Russian President Vladimir Putin has said that any sanctions threats directed at India would ultimately backfire, asserting that New Delhi has consistently acted in accordance with its national interests and is unlikely to change course under Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s leadership.

Speaking about India-Russia relations and New Delhi’s foreign policy approach, Putin praised India’s independent decision-making and emphasized that attempts to pressure the country over its ties with Moscow would not achieve the desired outcome. He suggested that any such measures would have negative consequences for those imposing them.

The Russian leader described India as a reliable partner and highlighted the strength of bilateral ties between the two countries. He also indicated that Russia does not view India’s growing engagement with other nations, including the United States, as a threat to its relationship with New Delhi.

Putin further praised India’s economic progress and reiterated confidence in the country’s ability to pursue policies based on its own priorities. His remarks come amid continuing global discussions over sanctions, geopolitical alignments and international partnerships.

The comments underscore Moscow’s efforts to reinforce its strategic partnership with India while highlighting Russia’s support for New Delhi’s independent foreign policy stance.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com