English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Jaitley rushes in to defend demonetisation after RBI says 99 per cent banned notes back with banks

Published

on

Arun Jaitley

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Finance minister admits that not all money deposited with banks post noteban was legal, claims objective of demonetisation was to gradually reduce cash flow and move towards a digitised economy

With the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) declaring that 99 per cent of the banned Rs 500 and Rs 1000 notes were deposited into various banks across the country after demonetisation, Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s claim that his sudden and radical move had crushed the shadow economy and eradicated black money is once again under scrutiny.

On Thursday, Union finance minister Arun Jaitley attempted to launch the Modi government’s refurbished defense of demonetisation that, from the time the Prime Minister announced it on November 8, has been attributed various motives by the Centre.

Insisting that the impact of noteban was “extremely positive”, the finance minister said on Thursday, “Confiscation of money was not the objective of demonetisation… It is needed to be seen in the context of a wider tax base, a more digitalised economy, lesser use of cash and an integration of the informal economy with the formal”.

“The object of demonetisation was not confiscation of money. The object was that India is predominantly a high cash economy therefore that scenario requires to be significantly altered… So rely more on banking transaction and digitisation. The RBI report says the volume of cash currency has come down by 17 per cent,” Jaitley said.

But then the finance minister also added that “My next step would be to end black money in polls”, clearly indicating that the shadow economy was still in operation. Though Jaitley claimed that “terrorist and Naxalite financing stopped almost entirely due to demonetisation”, he or the Modi government have failed to provide any evidence substantiating this claim so far.

Demonetization

Modi’s originally stated goals of demonetisation were mainly three – clampdown on the black money in the system, ending cash-based corruption and strapping terrorists off funding. Of these, there is no visible evidence to show that the latter two have been achieved – terror strikes, especially in the strife-torn Jammu and Kashmir have only seen a steady increase over the past year while systemic corruption has clearly remained untouched.

That leaves the goal of eradicating black money from the system. If provisional figures released by the RBI – 10 months after the demonetisation exercise – are to be believed then “the estimated value of SBNs (specified bank notes of Rs 500 and Rs 1000) received as on 30 June 2017 is Rs 15.28 trillion (or Rs 15.28 lakh crore).”

Now a back of the envelope calculation would show that if the RBI’s estimate of invalidated Rs 500 and Rs 1,000 notes at the time of demonetisation being pegged at Rs 15.44 lakh crore or around 86 percent of the currency in circulation was correct then, as much as 99 percent of the demonetised currency has found its way back to India’s banking system. Only a little over Rs 16,000 crore of the demonetised Rs 15.44 lakh crore was not returned and could be termed as black money – though a large part of this money too could be what people failed to deposit in the banks due to various reasons, including the time-bar on returning the demonetised notes to banks and the overburdened banking system that saw serpentine queues of haggard citizens lining up at cash deposit counters everyday and often returning home without managing to reach the cashier.

Demonetization

It is also pertinent to mention here that the Rs 15.28 lakh crore in demonetised notes that the RBI claims was back in the banking system is still a provisional figure. The RBI is still in the process of counting old notes received at cooperative banks and old notes submitted by citizens in institutions of Nepal. By the time these numbers are formalised, the final figure of demonetised notes that were deposited back with banks might even reach 100 per cent.

Jaitley underscored on Thursday that one of the objectives of demonetisation was also to check circulation of counterfeit currency. Now, the RBI report shows that the number of counterfeit notes detected during the exercise is only minuscule, just about 7.6 lakh pieces, as compared with 6.3 lakh pieces in the year ahead.

Defending the indefensible is often the test of a good lawyer and Jaitley is, in his professional life a senior and accomplished advocate. No wonder then that the finance minister used this skill in defense of noteban.

“It’s nobody’s case that black money has been completely eliminated after demonetisation… The fallout of demonetisation is on predicted lines… the fact that money got deposited in banks doesn’t make it legitimate money,” Jaitley claimed.

The clear admission of the finance minister about illicit money making its way back into the banking system shows that not only was demonetisation as a tool for eradicating black money an utter failure but also that those who possessed the illicit wealth were able to turn it into ‘white money’.

The RBI report also turns at least two claims made by the Modi government – one by Jaitley himself and the other by Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi – into clear instances of misleading the country.

Senior journalist MK Venu points out: “The finance minister had claimed in November that going by past experience about 15-20 per cent of the demonetised currency, roughly Rs 3 lakh crore, was likely to get extinguished and would not return to the system. It would be tantamount to confiscation and become RBI property, to be eventually handed over to government for the welfare of the poor. The then attorney general Mukul Rohatgi stated this before the Supreme Court. So how can Jaitley now say the confiscation of black money was never the objective? The cash that does not return to the system stands automatically confiscated. It is like money taxed at 100%.”

Forget Rs 3 lakh crore that Jaitley claimed would be ‘extinguished’ due to demonetisation, the banned notes that didn’t finds their way back to the banks – provisionally – account for just Rs 16000 crore.

As former finance minister P Chidambaram points out: “the RBI ‘gained’ Rs 16000 crore but ‘lost’ Rs 21000 crore in printing new notes (of Rs 500 and Rs 2000 that were introduced post noteban). The economist deserves a Nobel Prize!”

Chidambaram took a series of digs at the Centre and its demonetisation drive through his tweets.[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][vc_column_text]The Twitteratti too gave a big thumbs down to demonetisation as well as Jaitley’s claims over the RBI report. All through Thursday hastags like #DeMonetisationFailed, #DeMonetisationDisaster and #DeMonetisationScam were trending on the micro-blogging website.[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][vc_column_text]Congress vice president Rahul Gandhi too joined the Twitteratti to hit out at the Centre over demonetisation.[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

Women’s quota bill fails in Lok Sabha as it falls short of two-thirds majority

Women’s reservation proposal failed in Lok Sabha after securing 298 votes, below the required two-thirds majority

Published

on

Parliament

Government secures 298 votes in favour, 230 against; proposal does not pass constitutional threshold

The proposed amendment related to women’s reservation failed to pass in the Lok Sabha on Friday after the government could not secure the required two-thirds majority.

The bill received 298 votes in favour and 230 against, falling short of the constitutional threshold needed for passage. As a constitutional amendment, it required the support of at least two-thirds of members present and voting.

Despite securing a simple majority, the government was unable to gather sufficient support to meet this requirement.

Debate continues over two days

The discussion on the bill extended late into Thursday and continued on Friday, with members from both sides participating in the debate on women’s representation in legislative bodies.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi urged members to support the proposal, calling for wider consensus on the issue.

Implications of the outcome

The failure of the bill underscores the challenges in securing broad political agreement on constitutional amendments, especially those related to representation and electoral reforms.

The proposal was aimed at advancing women’s representation in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies, an issue that has remained under discussion for several years.

Continue Reading

India News

Rahul Gandhi faces FIR order as Allahabad High Court acts on dual citizenship plea

High Court allows plea in Rahul Gandhi citizenship case, paving the way for further legal process.

Published

on

Rahul Gandhi

The Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court has allowed a petition seeking legal action in connection with allegations related to Congress leader Rahul Gandhi’s citizenship status, marking a fresh development in the case.

The petition was filed by a political worker, who had approached the court seeking directions for registration of a case over claims that Gandhi may have held foreign citizenship. The High Court, while hearing the matter, passed directions for further proceedings in accordance with law.

The development comes after a special MP/MLA court in Lucknow had earlier declined to order registration of an FIR, reportedly observing that it lacked jurisdiction in matters concerning citizenship.

Background

The case is linked to allegations that Rahul Gandhi may have held British citizenship. Under Indian law, dual citizenship is not permitted. However, these claims remain part of the petitioner’s submissions and have not been established by any court.

During earlier hearings, the High Court had sought records and considered material presented by the parties involved.

What happens next

With the High Court allowing the plea, the matter is expected to proceed as per due legal process. This may involve examination by the appropriate authority and further judicial review at subsequent stages.

The case carries both legal and political significance given Rahul Gandhi’s role as Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha.

Continue Reading

India News

Pawan Khera faces fresh setback as Supreme Court refuses relief in passport row case

Congress leader Pawan Khera faces fresh setback as Supreme Court refuses interim relief and directs him to seek bail from Guwahati High Court.

Published

on

Pawan Khera

Congress leader Pawan Khera suffered another legal setback on Friday after the Supreme Court of India declined to extend protection in a case linked to his remarks about Himanta Biswa Sarma’s wife.

A bench of the apex court refused to interfere with an earlier order that had stayed the transit anticipatory bail granted to Khera by the Telangana High Court. This decision leaves the Congress leader open to possible arrest by Assam Police in connection with the case.

During the hearing, Khera’s counsel sought interim protection, but the court declined the request and advised him to approach the appropriate court in Assam for relief. The bench clarified that the Guwahati High Court should decide any bail plea independently and on its merits.

“Am I a terrorist?” remark during hearing

While seeking protection, Khera’s legal team expressed concern over the urgency of the situation. In court, his counsel remarked, “Am I a terrorist?” highlighting the plea for temporary relief until a fresh bail application could be filed.

The Supreme Court also raised concerns over the submission of incorrect documents during the proceedings, adding another layer to the legal complications faced by the Congress leader.

Case linked to remarks on CM’s wife

The case stems from a press conference held earlier this month, where Khera made allegations regarding the citizenship status and financial assets of the Assam Chief Minister’s wife, Riniki Bhuyan Sharma.

He had claimed that she possessed multiple passports and owned undisclosed overseas properties. These allegations were strongly denied by the Chief Minister’s family, who termed them fabricated and misleading.

Legal battle intensifies

Earlier, the Telangana High Court had granted Khera temporary transit anticipatory bail, allowing him time to seek relief from a competent court in Assam. However, the Supreme Court stayed that order following a challenge by Assam authorities, escalating the legal battle.

With the latest ruling, Khera is now expected to move the Guwahati High Court for anticipatory bail as the case continues to unfold.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com