English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Jaitley rushes in to defend demonetisation after RBI says 99 per cent banned notes back with banks

Published

on

Arun Jaitley

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Finance minister admits that not all money deposited with banks post noteban was legal, claims objective of demonetisation was to gradually reduce cash flow and move towards a digitised economy

With the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) declaring that 99 per cent of the banned Rs 500 and Rs 1000 notes were deposited into various banks across the country after demonetisation, Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s claim that his sudden and radical move had crushed the shadow economy and eradicated black money is once again under scrutiny.

On Thursday, Union finance minister Arun Jaitley attempted to launch the Modi government’s refurbished defense of demonetisation that, from the time the Prime Minister announced it on November 8, has been attributed various motives by the Centre.

Insisting that the impact of noteban was “extremely positive”, the finance minister said on Thursday, “Confiscation of money was not the objective of demonetisation… It is needed to be seen in the context of a wider tax base, a more digitalised economy, lesser use of cash and an integration of the informal economy with the formal”.

“The object of demonetisation was not confiscation of money. The object was that India is predominantly a high cash economy therefore that scenario requires to be significantly altered… So rely more on banking transaction and digitisation. The RBI report says the volume of cash currency has come down by 17 per cent,” Jaitley said.

But then the finance minister also added that “My next step would be to end black money in polls”, clearly indicating that the shadow economy was still in operation. Though Jaitley claimed that “terrorist and Naxalite financing stopped almost entirely due to demonetisation”, he or the Modi government have failed to provide any evidence substantiating this claim so far.

Demonetization

Modi’s originally stated goals of demonetisation were mainly three – clampdown on the black money in the system, ending cash-based corruption and strapping terrorists off funding. Of these, there is no visible evidence to show that the latter two have been achieved – terror strikes, especially in the strife-torn Jammu and Kashmir have only seen a steady increase over the past year while systemic corruption has clearly remained untouched.

That leaves the goal of eradicating black money from the system. If provisional figures released by the RBI – 10 months after the demonetisation exercise – are to be believed then “the estimated value of SBNs (specified bank notes of Rs 500 and Rs 1000) received as on 30 June 2017 is Rs 15.28 trillion (or Rs 15.28 lakh crore).”

Now a back of the envelope calculation would show that if the RBI’s estimate of invalidated Rs 500 and Rs 1,000 notes at the time of demonetisation being pegged at Rs 15.44 lakh crore or around 86 percent of the currency in circulation was correct then, as much as 99 percent of the demonetised currency has found its way back to India’s banking system. Only a little over Rs 16,000 crore of the demonetised Rs 15.44 lakh crore was not returned and could be termed as black money – though a large part of this money too could be what people failed to deposit in the banks due to various reasons, including the time-bar on returning the demonetised notes to banks and the overburdened banking system that saw serpentine queues of haggard citizens lining up at cash deposit counters everyday and often returning home without managing to reach the cashier.

Demonetization

It is also pertinent to mention here that the Rs 15.28 lakh crore in demonetised notes that the RBI claims was back in the banking system is still a provisional figure. The RBI is still in the process of counting old notes received at cooperative banks and old notes submitted by citizens in institutions of Nepal. By the time these numbers are formalised, the final figure of demonetised notes that were deposited back with banks might even reach 100 per cent.

Jaitley underscored on Thursday that one of the objectives of demonetisation was also to check circulation of counterfeit currency. Now, the RBI report shows that the number of counterfeit notes detected during the exercise is only minuscule, just about 7.6 lakh pieces, as compared with 6.3 lakh pieces in the year ahead.

Defending the indefensible is often the test of a good lawyer and Jaitley is, in his professional life a senior and accomplished advocate. No wonder then that the finance minister used this skill in defense of noteban.

“It’s nobody’s case that black money has been completely eliminated after demonetisation… The fallout of demonetisation is on predicted lines… the fact that money got deposited in banks doesn’t make it legitimate money,” Jaitley claimed.

The clear admission of the finance minister about illicit money making its way back into the banking system shows that not only was demonetisation as a tool for eradicating black money an utter failure but also that those who possessed the illicit wealth were able to turn it into ‘white money’.

The RBI report also turns at least two claims made by the Modi government – one by Jaitley himself and the other by Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi – into clear instances of misleading the country.

Senior journalist MK Venu points out: “The finance minister had claimed in November that going by past experience about 15-20 per cent of the demonetised currency, roughly Rs 3 lakh crore, was likely to get extinguished and would not return to the system. It would be tantamount to confiscation and become RBI property, to be eventually handed over to government for the welfare of the poor. The then attorney general Mukul Rohatgi stated this before the Supreme Court. So how can Jaitley now say the confiscation of black money was never the objective? The cash that does not return to the system stands automatically confiscated. It is like money taxed at 100%.”

Forget Rs 3 lakh crore that Jaitley claimed would be ‘extinguished’ due to demonetisation, the banned notes that didn’t finds their way back to the banks – provisionally – account for just Rs 16000 crore.

As former finance minister P Chidambaram points out: “the RBI ‘gained’ Rs 16000 crore but ‘lost’ Rs 21000 crore in printing new notes (of Rs 500 and Rs 2000 that were introduced post noteban). The economist deserves a Nobel Prize!”

Chidambaram took a series of digs at the Centre and its demonetisation drive through his tweets.[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_html]JTNDYmxvY2txdW90ZSUyMGNsYXNzJTNEJTIydHdpdHRlci10d2VldCUyMiUyMGRhdGEtbGFuZyUzRCUyMmVuJTIyJTNFJTNDcCUyMGxhbmclM0QlMjJlbiUyMiUyMGRpciUzRCUyMmx0ciUyMiUzRVJzJTIwMTYwMDAlMjBjciUyMG91dCUyMG9mJTIwZGVtb25ldGlzZWQlMjBub3RlcyUyMG9mJTIwUnMlMjAxNTQ0JTJDMDAwJTIwY3IlMjBkaWQlMjBub3QlMjBjb21lJTIwYmFjayUyMHRvJTIwUkJJLiUyMFRoYXQlMjBpcyUyMDElMjUuJTIwU2hhbWUlMjBvbiUyMFJCSSUyMHdoaWNoJTIwJTI2JTIzMzklM0JyZWNvbW1lbmRlZCUyNiUyMzM5JTNCJTIwZGVtb25ldGlzYXRpb24lM0MlMkZwJTNFJTI2bWRhc2glM0IlMjBQLiUyMENoaWRhbWJhcmFtJTIwJTI4JTQwUENoaWRhbWJhcmFtX0lOJTI5JTIwJTNDYSUyMGhyZWYlM0QlMjJodHRwcyUzQSUyRiUyRnR3aXR0ZXIuY29tJTJGUENoaWRhbWJhcmFtX0lOJTJGc3RhdHVzJTJGOTAyODcxNTY1NDM5NzA1MDg4JTIyJTNFQXVndXN0JTIwMzAlMkMlMjAyMDE3JTNDJTJGYSUzRSUzQyUyRmJsb2NrcXVvdGUlM0UlMEElM0NzY3JpcHQlMjBhc3luYyUyMHNyYyUzRCUyMiUyRiUyRnBsYXRmb3JtLnR3aXR0ZXIuY29tJTJGd2lkZ2V0cy5qcyUyMiUyMGNoYXJzZXQlM0QlMjJ1dGYtOCUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRnNjcmlwdCUzRQ==[/vc_raw_html][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][vc_column_text]The Twitteratti too gave a big thumbs down to demonetisation as well as Jaitley’s claims over the RBI report. All through Thursday hastags like #DeMonetisationFailed, #DeMonetisationDisaster and #DeMonetisationScam were trending on the micro-blogging website.[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][vc_column_text]Congress vice president Rahul Gandhi too joined the Twitteratti to hit out at the Centre over demonetisation.[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

Supreme Court questions EC over missing records in Sringeri election dispute

The Supreme Court questioned the Election Commission over missing video footage of the 2023 counting in Karnataka’s Sringeri constituency. The case involves a revised result following a recount of postal ballots.

Published

on

The Supreme Court on Wednesday questioned the Election Commission of India (ECI) over its inability to locate video recordings of the original vote counting in Karnataka’s Sringeri Assembly constituency in 2023. The court said it would not accept what it described as “lame excuses” and directed the poll body to produce whatever records are available at the next hearing.

A bench of Justices Sanjay Kumar and Sanjeev Sachdeva expressed displeasure after the Election Commission’s counsel informed it that the footage of the original counting could not be traced.

The bench also warned that it could draw an adverse inference if the required documents were not produced.

Questioning how the poll body could lose records relating to an election it had conducted, the judges stressed that maintaining election documentation was central to its responsibilities.

“How can the Election Commission of India say that it has lost the records? Your whole purpose is to hold an election, and you need to have a document. Where is the question of you saying we are trying to trace it?” the bench asked.

“We will not accept these kinds of lame excuses,” it added.

What is the Sringeri election dispute?

The case stems from the 2023 Karnataka Assembly election in Sringeri, where Congress leader TD Rajegowda was initially declared the winner.

The result was challenged by BJP candidate Jeevaraj before the Karnataka High Court. The High Court later ordered a recount of postal ballots, including the reverification of 279 rejected postal votes.

Following the recount, the Returning Officer declared a revised result in which Jeevaraj was declared the winner. Rajegowda then approached the Supreme Court to challenge the revised outcome.

In May, the Supreme Court granted interim relief to Rajegowda, directing that he continue as the Member of the Legislative Assembly while his plea remained pending.

Rajegowda seeks counting records and observer’s report

Rajegowda has sought access to the election observer’s report and video recordings of both the original counting conducted in 2023 and the recount held this year.

The missing original counting footage became a point of concern during Wednesday’s hearing, with the bench questioning the Election Commission’s inability to trace the recording.

The court directed the Commission to submit whatever records it possesses at the next hearing. Its warning about a possible adverse inference underscores the importance the bench attached to the production of the requested documents.

The court has scheduled the next hearing for February 15, 2027.

Continue Reading

India News

Rahul Gandhi joins India Gate protest by Ankita Bhandari’s parents

Rahul Gandhi joined the protest by Ankita Bhandari’s parents at India Gate in New Delhi on October 14. The demonstration has brought renewed attention to the 2022 murder case and the family’s concerns following Dushyant Gautam’s appointment as Sikkim Governor.

Published

on

Congress leader Rahul Gandhi joined a protest by the parents of Ankita Bhandari at India Gate in New Delhi on Wednesday, October 14, bringing renewed attention to the 2022 murder case from Uttarakhand.

The family’s demonstration follows the appointment of Dushyant Gautam, a former BJP leader associated with the party’s Uttarakhand organisation, as Governor of Sikkim. The appointment has prompted objections from Ankita’s family and political leaders, who have raised concerns about the case and the demand for justice.

Congress MP Priyanka Gandhi Vadra also met the family, according to reports.

Why Ankita Bhandari’s family is protesting

Ankita Bhandari, 19, worked as a receptionist at a resort in Uttarakhand. She was murdered in September 2022, and the case triggered widespread public anger and demands for accountability.

The protest has returned to the spotlight amid questions raised by the family and activists over the alleged role of a VIP in the case. These allegations and demands should be distinguished from findings established through the criminal proceedings.

Dushyant Gautam’s appointment as Sikkim Governor has become a fresh point of contention because his name has been linked to allegations surrounding the alleged VIP connection. Such allegations should not be treated as proof of involvement in the crime.

Political reactions and demand for justice

Rahul Gandhi’s participation brought the Congress leadership into the family’s latest protest in the national capital. The demonstration reflects continuing demands for accountability and further clarity over the concerns raised by the family.

The case has remained a subject of public and political debate, including questions about the investigation and the alleged VIP connection. The family’s concerns and the political reactions have renewed attention on the demand for justice for Ankita Bhandari.

Continue Reading

India News

Meerut murder: Muskaan Rastogi and Sahil Shukla get death sentence

A Meerut court has sentenced Muskaan Rastogi and Sahil Shukla to death in the blue drum murder case involving the killing of merchant navy officer Saurabh Rajput in March 2025.

Published

on

A court in Meerut has sentenced Muskaan Rastogi and Sahil Shukla to death for the murder of Saurabh Rajput, Muskaan’s husband and a former Merchant Navy officer. The sentencing was pronounced on Wednesday, October 14, 2026, after the court convicted the two in the case widely known as the Meerut blue drum murder.

The case involved the killing of Rajput in March 2025 and the concealment of his dismembered remains inside a blue plastic drum sealed with cement and sand.

The two were convicted on September 30. The prosecution had sought the death penalty, arguing for the maximum punishment in the case.

Court verdict follows 126 hearings

The trial involved 126 hearings and statements from 22 prosecution witnesses. District Judge Arvind Kumar Mishra delivered the sentence after the court considered the evidence presented during the proceedings.

The investigation and prosecution relied on a combination of circumstantial, technical and physical evidence. This included forensic findings, witness testimony and material recovered during the investigation.

The case drew attention after police discovered Rajput’s remains inside the cement-filled drum at the couple’s residence in Meerut.

How Saurabh Rajput was killed

According to the prosecution’s account of the case, Rajput was killed in March 2025 after he returned to Meerut from London. Investigators alleged that Muskaan and Sahil had planned the murder.

The prosecution said Rajput was given food laced with sleeping medication before he was attacked. His body was subsequently dismembered, and the remains were placed inside a blue plastic drum.

The drum was filled with a mixture containing cement and sand and sealed. Investigators later recovered the remains from inside it.

Evidence presented during the investigation

Investigators built the case using several strands of evidence. Shopkeepers provided testimony about the purchase of materials, including a blue drum, cement, sand and cutting implements, before the murder.

Call detail records and mobile tower information were also cited to establish Sahil’s presence at the residence around the time of the crime. The prosecution further relied on post-mortem findings that confirmed Rajput had died from stab injuries.

The investigation also traced the movements of Muskaan and Sahil during their trip to Himachal Pradesh following the killing. Investigators said photographs and activity linked to Rajput’s phone were used to create the impression that he was still alive.

The case came to light in March 2025

The murder came to light after questions arose over Rajput’s whereabouts. According to the investigation, the couple’s attempt to move the heavy drum eventually raised suspicion.

Rajput’s family approached the police, leading to an investigation that uncovered the remains. Muskaan and Sahil were arrested in March 2025.

The sentencing on October 14 marks a major development in the case, which had proceeded from the discovery of Rajput’s remains to a trial involving dozens of witness statements and more than a hundred hearings.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com