English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Judges upset with Modi govt altering Justice KM Joseph’s seniority, CJI says will take it up

Published

on

Judges upset with Modi govt altering Justice KM Joseph’s seniority, CJI says will take it up

A group of judges met Chief Justice of India (CJI) Dipak Misra today (Monday, Aug 6), to take up call the government’s attempt to alter the seniority of Justice KM Joseph by putting his name at the bottom of the list of judges cleared for elevation to the top court.

The CJI assured the judges that he would take up the matter with the government. The swearing-in is scheduled for tomorrow, August 7.

The government had been reluctant to clear Justice Joseph’a name and his appointment as SC judge was cleared after much back-and-forth in the past eight months. Even while finally clearing his name when the SC Collegium sent it back a second time, the government did what it could against the interests of the Judge and put his name at the bottom of the list of judges approved, after the names of Justices Indira Banerjee and Vineet Saran.

With his name at the bottom of the list in notification for swearing in on Tuesday (August 7), he will be sworn in last. This will not allow him to even head an independent bench in a long while. It is known, though, that Justice Joseph, considering his seniority, date of retirement, and other issues, will never be the Chief Justice of India.

According to tradition – and tradition rules at the Supreme Court – judges lose seniority even if they are sworn in on the same day but hours apart. This had happened during the swearing in of two judges of the Supreme Court, Justices Ruma Pal and YK Sabharwal.

In 2000 both judges were named to the top court and Justice Pal was being sworn in for a six-year stint at the top court, which was time enough for her to be elevated to the post of Chief Justice of India.

However, the communication reached her late and her trip to Delhi was delayed. She was sworn in a few hours after Justice Sabharwal. That delayed communication robbed Justice Pal of the opportunity to be the Chief Justice, despite her being the senior judge of the two.

The issue of Justice KM Joseph’s seniority being affected in this manner was taken up some SC judges, including three from the Supreme Court collegium or panel that recommends appointments, with Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra today.

They were told by the Chief Justice that he would take up their protest with the Centre. The swearing-in takes place tomorrow.

Government sources, however, justified the order that places Justice Joseph last among the three judges to be sworn in on Tuesday, reported NDTV.

Denying the charge, government sources said Justice Joseph was appointed high court judge in October 2004, more than two years after Justice Indira Banerjee and Justice Vineet Sharan (both in February 2002). They argued that in the all-India seniority list of judges, Justice Banerjee is at number 2, Justice Sharan at 3 and Justice Joseph places 39.

Justice Joseph did become Chief Justice before the other two judges, but seniority is decided on the date of appointment as high court judge, not Chief Justice, the government sources contended, according to NDTV.

Countering that argument, sources in judiciary told NDTV “seniority is not the only criteria for elevation to the Supreme Court”, and that’s why the collegium rejected the government’s contention on seniority and stood firm by its recommendation of Justice Joseph.

The Supreme Court collegium named Justice Joseph for elevation in January, but the government sent back his file questioning the choice and pointing to inadequate representation in the top court from other states, especially Kerala. As the collegium reasserted its choice of Justice Joseph, the government was forced to accept it.

The government denies opposition allegations that its objections were linked to Justice Joseph’s order in 2016 scrapping President’s Rule in Uttarakhand, which helped restore the Congress’s government.

India News

Amit Shah counters delimitation concerns, says southern states to gain Lok Sabha seats

Amit Shah assures Parliament that southern states will gain Lok Sabha seats after delimitation, countering opposition criticism during the women’s reservation debate.

Published

on

Amit Shah

Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Thursday addressed concerns over the proposed delimitation exercise, asserting in the Lok Sabha that southern states will not lose representation but instead see an increase in their number of seats.

His remarks came during a heated debate linked to the implementation of women’s reservation, where opposition parties have raised fears that population-based delimitation could reduce the political weight of southern states.

Shah rejected these claims, calling them misleading, and said the proposed framework ensures fairness while expanding the overall strength of the Lok Sabha.

Seat count to rise with expansion of Lok Sabha

The government has indicated that the total number of Lok Sabha seats could increase significantly as part of the delimitation process. In this expanded House, the combined representation of southern states is expected to rise from 129 seats at present to around 195 seats.

Shah emphasised that no state will lose seats in absolute terms, and the exercise is designed to reflect population changes while maintaining balance across regions.

State-wise projections shared in Parliament

During his address, Shah also provided indicative figures for individual southern states, suggesting notable increases in representation. According to the projections:

  • Tamil Nadu could see its seats rise substantially
  • Kerala, Telangana, and Andhra Pradesh are also expected to gain additional seats
  • Karnataka’s representation may increase as well

These figures were presented to counter the argument that delimitation would disproportionately favour northern states.

Political debate intensifies over linkage with women’s quota

The delimitation exercise has been closely linked to the rollout of women’s reservation, which proposes one-third seats for women in Parliament and state assemblies.

Opposition leaders have questioned this linkage, arguing that tying reservation to delimitation could delay its implementation and raise federal concerns. Some leaders have also warned that the move could impact national unity if apprehensions among states are not addressed.

The government, however, maintains that the reforms are necessary to ensure equitable representation and to align the electoral system with demographic realities.

Centre dismisses ‘false narrative’ on southern states

Shah reiterated that concerns about southern states losing influence are unfounded. He said the delimitation process will increase representation across regions and described the criticism as a “false narrative” aimed at creating confusion.

The issue is expected to remain a key flashpoint as Parliament continues discussions on the women’s reservation framework and related legislative changes.

Continue Reading

India News

PM Modi assures no discrimination in women’s quota, delimitation debate intensifies in Parliament

PM Narendra Modi has assured that women’s reservation will be implemented without discrimination, amid a heated debate over delimitation in Parliament.

Published

on

PM modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has assured that there will be no discrimination in the implementation of women’s reservation, as Parliament witnessed a sharp debate over the proposed linkage between the quota and delimitation exercise.

During the ongoing special session, the government reiterated its commitment to ensuring fair representation while addressing concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the timing and structure of the legislation.

The proposed framework aims to reserve 33 percent of seats for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. However, its implementation is tied to a fresh delimitation exercise, which is expected after the next census.

Opposition questions timing and intent

Opposition leaders have raised concerns that linking the women’s quota to delimitation could delay its implementation. They argue that the process of redrawing constituencies may push the actual rollout further into the future.

The issue has triggered a broader political confrontation, with multiple parties questioning whether the move could alter representation across states.

Some critics have also alleged that the delimitation exercise could disproportionately benefit certain regions based on population, a charge the government has rejected.

Government reiterates commitment to fair implementation

Responding to these concerns, the Centre has maintained that the reforms are necessary to ensure accurate and updated representation based on population data.

Leaders from the ruling side have repeatedly emphasized that the process will be carried out transparently and without bias. The assurance that there will be “no discrimination” is aimed at addressing fears among states and opposition parties.

The debate marks a key moment in Parliament, with both sides engaging in intense exchanges over one of the most significant electoral reforms in recent years.

Continue Reading

India News

Give all tickets to Muslim women, Amit Shah says, attacking Akhilesh Yadav on sub-quota demand

A sharp exchange between Amit Shah and Akhilesh Yadav in Parliament over sub-quota for Muslim women highlights key divisions on women’s reservation implementation.

Published

on

A heated exchange broke out in Parliament during discussions on the women’s reservation framework, with Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav locking horns over the demand for a sub-quota for Muslim women.

The debate unfolded as the government pushed forward key legislative measures to implement 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies.

Akhilesh Yadav argued that the proposed reservation must ensure representation for women from marginalised communities, including Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and Muslim women. He said that without such provisions, large sections could remain excluded from political participation.

He also questioned the timing of the bill, alleging that the Centre was avoiding a caste census. According to him, a census would lead to renewed demands for caste-based reservations, which the government is reluctant to address.

Government rejects religion-based quota

Responding to the demand, Amit Shah made it clear that reservation based on religion is not permitted under the Constitution.

He stated that any proposal to provide quota to Muslims on religious grounds would be unconstitutional, firmly rejecting the idea of a separate sub-quota for Muslim women within the broader reservation framework.

The government has maintained that the existing framework already includes provisions for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) women within the overall reservation structure.

Wider political divide over implementation

The issue of sub-categorisation within the women’s quota has emerged as a major flashpoint, even as most opposition parties broadly support the idea of women’s reservation.

Samajwadi Party leaders reiterated that their support for the bill depends on inclusion of OBC and minority women, while the government continues to defend its constitutional position.

The debate is part of a broader discussion during the special Parliament session, where multiple bills linked to delimitation and implementation of the women’s quota are being taken up.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com