English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Chhattisgarh elections: Raman Singh’s 3 mistakes that cost him in 2018 still cast a shadow

Himself without the taint of corruption, Singh didn’t act when his ministers ran riot.

Published

on

By Neeraj Mishra

It’s polling day tomorrow in Chhattisgarh and it will take former chief minister Dr Raman Singh to the same day five years ago when he lost his empire to the Congress. Politics is all about opportunities lost and opportunities snatched. Dr Raman Singh’s 15-year reign came to an end to what most people attribute as the anti-incumbency factor and Congress’ clever promise of paddy procurement at Rs 2,500 per quintal that swung the farm vote.

While that may be true, what Singh will probably rue most are the three crucial mistakes he made in power in the third term. There was no serious allegation of corruption against him personally and he remains popular till this day but his government had become corrupt and inefficient and you cannot sit over it and expect people to swallow the inadequacies of his administration. While corruption in itself was not a major issue in the 2018 campaign, people had had enough of Singh’s team.

So the first mistake was to succumb to the pressure of the business lobby. Brijmohan Agarwal, Amar Agarwal, Gaurishankar Agarwal and Rajesh Mudat were the most powerful ministers in his cabinet. They more or less did as they pleased and each one was involved in some scam or the other. Some proven, some mere allegations. From land to real estate, excise to mining, they controlled every bit of the monetary landscape. Ultimately, Singh was forced to use some trusted bureaucrats to counter their power. This brought on another calamity.

Some bureaucrats gained disproportionate power as happens almost everywhere. They remain behind the scenes so the ultimate loss was the BJP’s and Raman Singh’s. All the businessmen-turned-politicians lost in an upheaval, except Brijmohan, caused by dissatisfaction in the electorate with exploitation.

The Congress, and particularly Bhupesh Baghel, caught onto this theme smartly and over the next five years, Baghel built an aura of being “Chhattisgaria” and everyone else branded as outsider or pardesia. Today, the elections are being fought on farmer enticement and Chhattisgaria pride. Some of the losing businessmen politicians of the BJP have returned and may again cause some damage. Singh perhaps knows but not everything is now under his control.

Which brings us to the second big mistake Raman Singh made. He let go of a solid corruption case against a senior Congressman. This leader was involved in a scam in his department as minister in the Jogi government. Singh let the case be withdrawn by the state. Today, he must be kicking himself for it, since it ultimately led to his own downfall and the Congress’ return.

The third mistake Raman Singh made was to bring his son into active politics by making him contest the 2014 Lok Sabha elections. His son, Abhishek, is a warm, smart person but should have remained in the background, biding his time. This was also done against the advice of the then BJP PM candidate Narendra Modi, who frowned upon dynastic politics. Abhishek was denied a ticket in 2019 after his name came up in the Panama papers. Though nothing has been proved and the allegations have remained unsubstantiated, it brought down Raman Singh’s own standing within the party.

Tomorrow, Raman Singh and his party face the most crucial election of his life because after this he will not get another shot at anything in Chhattisgarh politics. If he loses, he will fade into the political horizon and if he wins, he will still have the opportunity to contest against political upstarts in his own party for the top job. The stage is set, the stakes are high and Raman Singh has his fingers crossed firmly.

India News

PM Modi assures no discrimination in women’s quota, delimitation debate intensifies in Parliament

PM Narendra Modi has assured that women’s reservation will be implemented without discrimination, amid a heated debate over delimitation in Parliament.

Published

on

PM modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has assured that there will be no discrimination in the implementation of women’s reservation, as Parliament witnessed a sharp debate over the proposed linkage between the quota and delimitation exercise.

During the ongoing special session, the government reiterated its commitment to ensuring fair representation while addressing concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the timing and structure of the legislation.

The proposed framework aims to reserve 33 percent of seats for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. However, its implementation is tied to a fresh delimitation exercise, which is expected after the next census.

Opposition questions timing and intent

Opposition leaders have raised concerns that linking the women’s quota to delimitation could delay its implementation. They argue that the process of redrawing constituencies may push the actual rollout further into the future.

The issue has triggered a broader political confrontation, with multiple parties questioning whether the move could alter representation across states.

Some critics have also alleged that the delimitation exercise could disproportionately benefit certain regions based on population, a charge the government has rejected.

Government reiterates commitment to fair implementation

Responding to these concerns, the Centre has maintained that the reforms are necessary to ensure accurate and updated representation based on population data.

Leaders from the ruling side have repeatedly emphasized that the process will be carried out transparently and without bias. The assurance that there will be “no discrimination” is aimed at addressing fears among states and opposition parties.

The debate marks a key moment in Parliament, with both sides engaging in intense exchanges over one of the most significant electoral reforms in recent years.

Continue Reading

India News

Give all tickets to Muslim women, Amit Shah says, attacking Akhilesh Yadav on sub-quota demand

A sharp exchange between Amit Shah and Akhilesh Yadav in Parliament over sub-quota for Muslim women highlights key divisions on women’s reservation implementation.

Published

on

A heated exchange broke out in Parliament during discussions on the women’s reservation framework, with Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav locking horns over the demand for a sub-quota for Muslim women.

The debate unfolded as the government pushed forward key legislative measures to implement 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies.

Akhilesh Yadav argued that the proposed reservation must ensure representation for women from marginalised communities, including Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and Muslim women. He said that without such provisions, large sections could remain excluded from political participation.

He also questioned the timing of the bill, alleging that the Centre was avoiding a caste census. According to him, a census would lead to renewed demands for caste-based reservations, which the government is reluctant to address.

Government rejects religion-based quota

Responding to the demand, Amit Shah made it clear that reservation based on religion is not permitted under the Constitution.

He stated that any proposal to provide quota to Muslims on religious grounds would be unconstitutional, firmly rejecting the idea of a separate sub-quota for Muslim women within the broader reservation framework.

The government has maintained that the existing framework already includes provisions for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) women within the overall reservation structure.

Wider political divide over implementation

The issue of sub-categorisation within the women’s quota has emerged as a major flashpoint, even as most opposition parties broadly support the idea of women’s reservation.

Samajwadi Party leaders reiterated that their support for the bill depends on inclusion of OBC and minority women, while the government continues to defend its constitutional position.

The debate is part of a broader discussion during the special Parliament session, where multiple bills linked to delimitation and implementation of the women’s quota are being taken up.

Continue Reading

India News

No state will lose a seat, Centre assures as delimitation debate takes centre stage in Parliament

Parliament’s special session begins with key focus on implementing women’s reservation and delimitation, setting the stage for major electoral changes.

Published

on

Parliament

A special session of Parliament commenced on Thursday, with the Centre set to take up crucial legislation related to women’s reservation and delimitation of constituencies. The session, scheduled over three days, is expected to witness intense debate as the government pushes forward its legislative agenda.

At the centre of discussions is the proposal to operationalise the women’s reservation law, which seeks to allocate 33 percent of seats in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies to women. The law, passed earlier, requires enabling provisions before it can be implemented.

The rollout of the reservation is closely tied to the delimitation exercise — a process that redraws parliamentary constituencies based on updated population data. The implementation is expected only after the next census and delimitation process are completed.

The government is aiming to put in place the framework so that the reservation can be enforced in future elections, likely around 2029.

Delimitation and numbers at play

Delimitation is a key aspect of the proposed changes, as it will determine how seats are redistributed and which constituencies are reserved. The exercise is expected to reflect population shifts and may also involve an increase in the total number of Lok Sabha seats.

This linkage has made the issue politically sensitive, with several opposition parties backing women’s reservation in principle but raising concerns over how and when delimitation will be carried out.

Political reactions and expected debate

The session is likely to see sharp exchanges between the government and opposition. While there is broad agreement on increasing women’s representation, disagreements remain over the timing, process, and potential political implications of the delimitation exercise.

Some leaders have argued that delimitation could significantly alter the balance of representation among states, making it a contentious issue beyond the women’s quota itself.

The government, however, has framed the move as a step toward strengthening women’s participation in governance and ensuring more inclusive policymaking.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com