English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

MJ Akbar’s defamation suit: Court takes cognisance, to hear on Oct 31

Published

on

MJ Akbar’s defamation suit: Court takes cognisance, to hear on Oct 31

The Patiala House Court in New Delhi today (Thursday, October 18), took cognisance of the criminal defamation complaint filed by BJP MP and former minister MJ Akbar against Priya Ramani, the first woman journalist to publicly accuse him of sexual misconduct, fixing October 31 for examining the complaint and recording witnesses’ statements.

The court said that it has taken cognisance of the offence under Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code.

Akbar, a former journalist of stature, resigned as the union minister of state for external affairs on Wednesday (October 17) amid a barrage of allegations levelled by women scribes about his alleged sexual, moral and ethical misconduct after Ramani related her experience when she worked at The Asian Age newspaper over 20 years ago when Akbar was the editor.

Following Ramani’s claims against Akbar, over 15 women journalists have so far raised similar allegations against him. Akbar is now a BJP MP in Rajya Sabha.

Akbar has dismissed all these allegations as being baseless and politically motivated. Earlier this week, he had hired senior advocate Raian Karanjawala and his firm to represent him in the criminal defamation suit against Ramani.

Calling his resignation a ‘vindication,’ Ramani had said she was ready for the legal battle. Twenty women journalists have urged the court to also consider their testimonies, and to be called as witnesses.

On Thursday, as the case came up for hearing in the court of ACMM Samar Vishal, senior advocate Geeta Luthra appeared on behalf of Akbar and argued that the baseless comments made by Ramani in an article and then on Twitter had tarnished the reputation of her client.

Luthra alleged that the tweets, retweeted by many, have caused irreparable damage to the reputation of the former minister. Akbar has resigned due to these allegations and they show the damage caused to his reputation, his lawyer argued.

To establish Akbar’s credentials before the court, Luthra talked about his 40 year stint as a highly regarded journalist and editor, a former Lok Sabha member and a union minister till just a day ago.

She asserted that Ramani’s allegations, which in turn provoked similar charges being levelled by a slew of other women scribes, had done irreparable damage to Akbar’s image and had not just diminished his reputation but made it vanish altogether.

ACMM Samar Vishal heard the submissions made by Luthra and said that he was taking cognizance of the defamation suit under section 500 of the Indian Penal Code. The court then fixed October 31, 12 noon, as the next date and time of hearing in the case when it will conduct an examination of the plea filed by Akbar.

While Akbar wasn’t present in court today, he will have to appear in person to record pre-summoning evidence.

The witnesses to be examined on the next date of hearing are Joyeeta Basu, Veenu Sandal, Syed Habibur Rehman, Tapan Chaki, Sunil Gujral, Manjal Ali etc.

Akbar had filed the case against Ramani on Monday, seeking her prosecution under Sections 499 and 500 of the IPC for defamation.

Meanwhile, the Editors Guild of India and a large number of eminent citizens like senior advocate Indira Jaising and common people – men and women alike – who have voiced their support for the #MeToo campaign have urged Akbar to withdraw the defamation suit against Ramani.

The Editors Guild of India came out in support of the 20 women journalists who have named journalist-turned-politician MJ Akbar in the growing #MeToo movement, accusing him of sexual harassment. The top body of editors representing the media industry expressed its concern over Akbar’s defamation case against one of the journalists, Priya Ramani, and said he should withdraw the case.

“We hope that Mr Akbar will also display the grace to withdraw the criminal defamation case he has filed against one of these complainants. While Mr Akbar is entitled to all legal instruments available to a citizen to seek vindication, it would be paradoxical for a veteran editor to employ the instrument of criminal defamation,” the Editors Guild said in a statement.

The Editors Guild assured its full support to the other women journalists in case he decides to sue them. “If any of them were to need legal advice or assistance, the Guild will do the best it can to help and also appeal to eminent lawyers to represent them pro bono,” Editors Guild said.MJ Akbar’s defamation suit: Court takes cognisance, to hear on Oct 31

India News

Yogi Adityanath’s love jihad and land jihad remarks draw sharp Akhilesh Yadav response

Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath’s comments on ‘love jihad’ and ‘land jihad’ have triggered a sharp political response from Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav.

Published

on

Yogi Adityanath on holiday

Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav engaged in a fresh war of words after the chief minister spoke about what he described as “love jihad” and “land jihad” during a public event in Lucknow.

Addressing the closing ceremony of the Ramkatha Mahotsav, Yogi Adityanath urged people to remain vigilant against attempts that he alleged were aimed at altering the country’s religious and demographic landscape. He said India could not become a refuge for those lacking loyalty to the nation and stressed the need for society to remain united against divisive forces.

The chief minister also referred to concerns about unlawful religious conversions and highlighted the Uttar Pradesh government’s anti-conversion legislation enacted in 2020. He called for greater public awareness and vigilance, arguing that society must collectively confront activities he described as threats to social harmony.

Akhilesh Yadav counters chief minister’s remarks

Responding to the statements, Akhilesh Yadav took a swipe at the chief minister, saying he “doesn’t understand love”. The Samajwadi Party leader remarked that the Uttar Pradesh chief minister appeared to have more concern for land than love.

Referring to the “land jihad” comments, Yadav questioned property ownership records in Gorakhpur and suggested they should be examined before making such allegations. He also said that Sanatan Dharma promotes love, brotherhood and truth, and accused the state government of deviating from those values.

Debate over ‘love jihad’ and ‘land jihad’

The terms “love jihad” and “land jihad” have frequently featured in political debates, particularly among right-wing groups that allege organised efforts involving religious conversion through marriage or illegal land acquisition. Critics, however, dispute these claims and argue that such terminology targets specific communities.

According to the Union Home Ministry’s earlier statements in Parliament, “love jihad” is not formally defined under Indian law. Several states, including Uttar Pradesh, have instead enacted laws dealing with religious conversions carried out through force, fraud, coercion or inducement.

The latest exchange between the two leaders adds to the continuing political rivalry between the BJP and the Samajwadi Party ahead of the next major electoral contests in Uttar Pradesh.

Continue Reading

India News

Delhi sees winds up to 111 kmph as heat persists, IMD forecasts thunderstorms

Delhi recorded wind speeds of up to 111 kmph on Tuesday evening, but heat conditions persisted with temperatures remaining above normal. IMD has forecast thunderstorms and lightning in isolated areas.

Published

on

Delhi weather update

Delhi witnessed powerful winds reaching speeds of up to 111 kmph on Tuesday evening, bringing dramatic weather conditions across several parts of the national capital. Despite the strong gusts, temperatures remained significantly above normal levels, with residents continuing to experience intense heat.

According to weather officials, the strongest wind speed was recorded at Palam, where gusts touched 111 kmph. The sudden change in weather led to dusty conditions and reduced visibility in some areas, while several parts of the city experienced strong winds during the evening hours.

The India Meteorological Department (IMD) said Delhi is likely to witness a partly cloudy sky, with the possibility of thunderstorms and lightning at isolated places over the coming days.

Temperatures remain well above normal

Even as strong winds swept through the city, temperatures remained elevated across Delhi. The Ridge weather station recorded the highest maximum temperature at 44.7 degrees Celsius, highlighting the continued impact of intense summer conditions.

The Safdarjung observatory, considered the city’s primary weather station, recorded a maximum temperature of 43.5 degrees Celsius and a minimum temperature of 29.2 degrees Celsius. These readings remained above seasonal averages, indicating that the heat has not significantly eased despite the change in weather.

IMD issues weather outlook

The IMD has forecast partly cloudy conditions for Delhi and surrounding areas, along with the possibility of thunderstorms and lightning at isolated locations. Weather officials have advised residents to remain cautious during periods of strong winds and thunderstorm activity.

The department is closely monitoring weather developments as fluctuating conditions continue to affect parts of north India, including Delhi-NCR.

As the capital navigates a mix of scorching temperatures and intermittent weather disturbances, residents are expected to face challenging conditions over the next few days.

Continue Reading

India News

CID searches Mamata Banerjee’s residence-cum-office in signature forgery investigation

The West Bengal CID carried out a search at Mamata Banerjee’s Kalighat residence-cum-office in Kolkata as part of an ongoing probe into allegations that signatures of Trinamool Congress MLAs were forged on a document submitted to the Assembly Speaker.

Published

on

Mamata Banerjee

The West Bengal Crime Investigation Department (CID) on Tuesday carried out a search at the Kalighat residence-cum-office of Trinamool Congress chief Mamata Banerjee as part of its investigation into an alleged signature forgery case that has triggered a major political controversy in the state.

The probe relates to allegations that signatures of several Trinamool Congress MLAs were forged on a communication submitted to the Assembly Speaker regarding the selection of senior party leader Sobhandeb Chattopadhyay as the Leader of Opposition.

According to the complaint, two party MLAs, Ritabrata Banerjee and Sandipan Saha, informed the Speaker that no resolution had been adopted at a May 6 meeting as claimed in the official communication. They further alleged that signatures were added later and questioned the authenticity of several entries on the document.

The CID team, accompanied by police personnel, arrived at the premises located at 30B Harish Chatterjee Street in Kolkata. The location serves as both Mamata Banerjee’s residence and an important party office. Investigators reportedly conducted the search after seeking information connected to the collection of signatures under scrutiny.

The development comes amid an intensifying investigation that has already seen multiple notices issued to Trinamool Congress national general secretary Abhishek Banerjee. Searches were also conducted at locations linked to him as investigators sought to verify details regarding the process through which the signatures were collected.

The signature forgery controversy has added to the political challenges facing the Trinamool Congress, with the issue exposing internal divisions within the party following its recent electoral setback in West Bengal.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com