English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Entertainment

AR Rahman, Ponniyin Selvan 2 makers face Rs 2 crore deposit order over copyright infringement

Delhi High Court has directed AR Rahman and Ponniyin Selvan 2 makers to deposit Rs 2 crore after finding their song ‘Veera Raja Veera’ identical to the classical composition ‘Shiv Stuti’.

Published

on

AR Rahman

The Delhi High Court has directed renowned composer AR Rahman and the makers of the film Ponniyin Selvan 2 to deposit Rs 2 crore in connection with a copyright infringement case concerning the musical piece ‘Shiv Stuti’ originally composed by the Junior Dagar Brothers.

In an interim order issued by Justice Prathiba M Singh on April 25, the court observed that the song ‘Veera Raja Veera’ from the film was “not just inspired but is, in fact, identical” to the ‘Shiv Stuti’ in terms of notes, emotional tone, and overall aural experience. The court emphasized that from a listener’s perspective, the two compositions are fundamentally the same.

Rights violation confirmed by court

Justice Singh highlighted that the rights of the original composers — Late Ustad N. Faiyazuddin Dagar and Late Ustad Zahiruddin Dagar — were violated. The court further directed that a slide crediting the Junior Dagar Brothers must be inserted across all OTT and online platforms where the film is available. Additionally, the court awarded Rs 2 lakh as costs to a family member of the late artists.

Ustad Faiyaz Wasifuddin Dagar, son of Faiyazuddin Dagar and nephew of Zahiruddin Dagar, had filed the lawsuit, asserting that he held the copyright to all original works of the Junior Dagar Brothers, including ‘Shiv Stuti’. The lawsuit alleged unauthorized use by the makers of Ponniyin Selvan 2.

Court highlights clear copyright infringement

The court ruled that despite the addition of modern elements and changes in lyrics, the essence of ‘Veera Raja Veera’ remains identical to ‘Shiv Stuti’. Thus, it amounts to copyright infringement. The court ordered that the Rs 2 crore deposited be held in a fixed deposit pending the final outcome of the case.

The court also pointed out that AR Rahman initially failed to acknowledge the original composers. It noted that Rahman only credited the work after being contacted by the plaintiff, suggesting a reluctant recognition.

Defendants’ arguments rejected

Rahman’s legal team had argued that ‘Shiv Stuti’ was based on the traditional dhrupad genre, a style in the public domain, and thus not eligible for copyright protection. However, the court found sufficient grounds to believe that the specific composition held copyright value.

The court maintained that without interim protection, irreparable harm would be caused to the original creators’ moral and creative rights. It also acknowledged the deep musical connection between the Junior Dagar Brothers and the defendants, noting that the singers of the disputed song were disciples of the plaintiff.

Entertainment

120 Bahadur box office day 1: Farhan Akhtar’s film starts slow with Rs 2.35 crore opening

Farhan Akhtar’s new release 120 Bahadur opened to Rs2.35 crore, while De De Pyaar De 2 continued its strong hold on day eight.

Published

on

Farhan akhtar

Farhan Akhtar’s latest release 120 Bahadur hit theatres on November 21 but registered a dull opening on its first day, earning Rs 2.35 crore. In comparison, De De Pyaar De 2, which is now in its second week, continues to show stronger hold at the box office.

Slow start for 120 Bahadur on day one

The action-drama opened to modest numbers on Friday, collecting Rs2.35 crore on its first day. Despite pre-release buzz around Farhan Akhtar’s performance, the film has begun its run on the lower side.

De De Pyaar De 2 maintains its advantage

Meanwhile, De De Pyaar De 2 continues its steady run. On its eighth day, the film maintained an edge over 120 Bahadur in overall earnings, according to media. The strong hold of the Ajay Devgn-led sequel appears to have impacted the new release’s opening day business.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Family Man 3 ending triggers online backlash despite strong reviews

The Family Man 3 has impressed viewers with its performances and storytelling, but its abrupt ending has sparked online criticism, leaving fans demanding closure.

Published

on

Family man

Fans of The Family Man 3 are celebrating the gripping new season, but a large section of viewers has taken to social media to criticise what they describe as an “abrupt” and “unsatisfying” ending. The latest season, which released on Amazon Prime Video on Friday, has drawn praise for its emotional depth and high-stakes storytelling, yet its final moments have left many feeling short-changed.

Viewers disappointed with the “sudden” conclusion

Soon after the release, frustrated fans began sharing their reactions online. One viewer wrote that the season “ends so abruptly it feels like the makers simply packed up and went home,” calling the lack of closure “exhausting”. Another comment read, “#TheFamilyMan3… ahh ending entra. Fully disappointed.”

Some tried to strike a balanced tone, acknowledging the well-crafted emotional arc and a comic cameo stretch that offered relief. However, the overall complaint remained the same — that the season cuts off just when the tension reaches its peak. “Why make us watch the entire season if the makers plan to keep the best part hanging for the next one?” a user questioned.

Still, many fans have labelled the show “engaging” and applauded the team for delivering another compelling chapter.

Season 3: Srikant caught between personal turmoil and a national crisis

The new season places Srikant Tiwari (Manoj Bajpayee) in one of the most complicated phases of his life. His relationship with Suchitra (Priyamani) appears strained, marked by distance and unspoken tension. Even as his home life falters, a series of coordinated blasts in the Northeast within 48 hours threatens a major peace initiative led by Prime Minister Basu (Seema Biswas).

Srikant and his senior officer Gautam Kulkarni (Dalip Tahil) travel to Nagaland to salvage Project Sahakar, relying on regional leader David Khuzou (Sunil Thapa) to bring warring sides to agreement. But the fragile situation collapses after a deadly ambush by drug kingpin Rukma (Jaideep Ahlawat), leaving David and Kulkarni dead. Srikant survives but soon becomes a suspect as investigators scrutinise how he was the only one aware of the convoy’s route.

Meanwhile in Mumbai, Suchitra faces her own crisis after the government bans 69 Chinese apps, including her platform ShrinkMe, sparking online targeting that impacts her family.

With an arrest warrant issued against him, Srikant chooses to escape with his family, setting off a tense chase as he tries to prove his innocence. Each twist raises new questions — who planned the ambush, and why is Srikant being framed?

Final reactions

While audiences largely appreciated the writing, performances and momentum, the widespread sentiment remains that the season’s final act lacked the closure fans expected. Many now hope the next instalment arrives sooner and concludes the arc that Season 3 left unresolved.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Satish Shah, beloved Sarabhai vs Sarabhai actor, passes away at 74 in Mumbai due to kidney failure

Veteran actor Satish Shah, celebrated for his iconic comic roles in Sarabhai vs Sarabhai and Jaane Bhi Do Yaaro, passed away in Mumbai at the age of 74 due to kidney failure.

Published

on

Satish Shah

Veteran Bollywood actor Satish Shah, best known for his memorable comic roles in films and television, passed away on Saturday in Mumbai. He was 74.

Filmmaker Confirms The News

Confirming the tragic news, filmmaker Ashoke Pandit expressed grief over the actor’s demise, saying that Shah died around 2:30 pm following kidney failure. His condition reportedly worsened at home before being rushed to the hospital, where he could not be revived. His cremation is expected to take place later today.

“It’s a very big loss for the industry. I have worked with him on many projects,” said the filmmaker, recalling that he learned about Shah’s death shortly after attending adman Piyush Pandey’s last rites.

A Legacy Of Laughter

Born on June 25, 1951, in Bombay (now Mumbai), Satish Shah hailed from a Kutchi Gujarati family. His career began in 1978 with Arvind Desai Ki Ajeeb Dastaan, but it was his portrayal of Municipal Commissioner D’Mello in the 1983 satire Jaane Bhi Do Yaaro that brought him widespread recognition.

Over a remarkable film career spanning decades, Shah appeared in more than 250 movies, including Hum Saath Saath Hain (1999), Kal Ho Naa Ho (2003), Mujhse Shaadi Karogi (2004), and Om Shanti Om (2007).

Television Stardom

Shah also left a lasting impact on Indian television. His 1984 sitcom Yeh Jo Hai Zindagi became iconic, where he played a new character in each of its 55 episodes. His role as Indravadhan Sarabhai in Sarabhai vs Sarabhai (2004), opposite Ratna Pathak Shah, remains one of the most loved comic portrayals in Indian TV history.

He also starred in Filmy Chakkar (1995) and later judged comedy-based reality shows such as Comedy Circus, continuing his association with humour and entertainment.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com