English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

BJP’s ‘margdarshak mandal’ member Yashwant Sinha rips apart Modi, Jaitley on economy

Published

on

Yashwant Sinha

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]In an editorial for The Indian Express, the former finance minister indicts Jaitley for making a “mess” of the Indian economy, says he’s working “over-time” to ensure that all Indians see poverty at close quarters

In a no-holds barred critique of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Union finance minister Arun Jaitley’s handling of the Indian economy, former finance minister and member of the BJP’s ‘margdarshak mandal’ Yashwant Sinha has echoed sentiments that until now were being voiced largely by members of the Opposition and some economic experts.

Sinha’s editorial in the Indian Express titled ‘I need to speak up now’ could not have come at a more opportune or worse time for the Modi government – depending on whose side the beholder stands.

While the Modi government has been working over-time to ward off allegations of pushing the Indian economy towards an impending doom with its demonetisation and hasty rollout of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime, Sinha has lambasted Jaitley for “working over-time to make sure that all Indians” see poverty from “close quarters”.

The most hard-hitting attacks by the BJP veteran, who served as India’s finance minister during the Atal Bihari Vajpayee regime, have predictably been reserved for Jaitley. Sinha starts off by saying: “I shall be failing in my national duty if I did not speak up even now against the mess the finance minister has made of the economy.”

Interestingly, Sinha’s son Jayant, served briefly as minister of state for finance under Jaitley during the initial days of the Modi government. He was then moved out to the civil aviation portfolio – a shift that seemed to have more to do with his father’s strong views against the Modi government on critical issues than his performance as the junior finance minister – a role, many say, he was perfectly suited to.

Noting that he is convinced that his views are shared by “a large number of people in the BJP and elsewhere”, Sinha says that these people “are not speaking up out of fear”. At a time when almost anyone – including leaders from within the BJP (read: the likes of Sultanpur MP Varun Gandhi) and even ministers in the Modi government (ask Ravi Shankar Prasad) – who doesn’t condone the government or its ‘bhakts’ is subjected to unprecedented abuse on social media platforms like Twitter and stares at the wrath of the Pradhan Sevak, Sinha couldn’t have made a more accurate assumption of the situation.

Troika

Sinha says of the incumbent finance minister: “Arun Jaitley is considered to be the best and the brightest in this government… His losing his Lok Sabha election from Amritsar was not allowed to come in the way of this appointment (as finance minister)… His indispensability was established further when the prime minister rewarded him not only by giving him the finance ministry including the department of disinvestment, but also the ministries of defence and corporate affairs. Four ministries in one go out of which he still retains three.”

The former finance minister then goes on to rip Jaitley’s handling of the finance portfolio to shreds. “I have handled the ministry of finance and know how much hard work there is in that ministry alone. Finance ministry, in the best of times, calls for the undivided attention of its boss if the job has to be properly done. In challenging times it becomes more than a 24/7 job. Naturally, even a superman like Jaitley could not do justice to the task,” Sinha writes.

Claiming that Jaitley – “a lucky finance minister, luckier than any in the post-liberalisation era” wasted the ‘oil bonanza’ that the Modi government benefitted from in wake of the “depressed global crude oil prices (which) placed at his disposal lakhs of crores of rupees” Sinha says, the de-facto number 2 in the Modi cabinet not only allowed legacy problems like stalled projects and bank NPAs (non performing assets) to persist, but made them worse.

Sinha also endorsed the Opposition’s, in particular the Congress party’s, claims that the country’s GDP and growth indices were actually lower than what were being projected by the Modi government but that the current figures being thrown around by the likes of Jaitley, his ministerial colleagues and BJP spokespersons were actually arrived at by cleverly tweaking the manner in which they are calculated.

“The methodology for calculation of the GDP was changed by the present government in 2015 as a result of which the growth rate recorded earlier increased statistically by over 200 basis points on an annual basis. So, according to the old method of calculation, the growth rate of 5.7 per cent is actually 3.7 per cent or less,” Sinha writes.

It may be recalled that even this 5.7 per cent GDP growth rate is actually a three-year low and Jaitley himself had called the slump a “matter of concern.” Yet, the BJP leadership, Jaitley, of course included, had recently during the party’s national executive meet claimed that the Indian economy was actually flourishing under the Modi regime and that India had seen “unprecedented growth and development” since May 2014 – when the NDA stormed to power.

In his summary of the country’s economic condition, Sinha points to a picture that can at best be dubbed as abysmal. “Private investment has shrunk as never before in two decades, industrial production has all but collapsed, agriculture is in distress, construction industry, a big employer of the work force, is in the doldrums, the rest of the service sector is also in the slow lane, exports have dwindled, sector after sector of the economy is in distress, demonetisation has proved to be an unmitigated economic disaster, a badly conceived and poorly implemented GST has played havoc with businesses and sunk many of them and countless millions have lost their jobs with hardly any new opportunities coming the way of the new entrants to the labour market,” Sinha writes.

The BJP margdarshak also took a sharp swipe at BJP national president Amit Shah for recently declaring that the slump in the GDP was due to “technical reasons” and not because of Modi’s demonetisation or the GST rollout.

“Even the SBI, the largest public sector bank of the country, has stated with unusual frankness that the slowdown is not transient or “technical”, it is here to stay. It has openly contradicted what the BJP president said just a few days ago that the slowdown in the last quarter was on account of “technical” reasons and will be corrected soon. According to the SBI chairman, the telecom sector is the latest entrant to the long list of stressed sectors,” Sinha writes.

Sinha also raised doubts on whether Modi’s recent decision to revive and reconstitute the UPA-era Prime Minister’s Economic Advisory Council, with NITI Aayog member Bibek Debroy as its head, would prove worthy of the ominous task of bringing the economy out if the doldrums.

“The prime minister is worried”, Sinha notes, adding that a “meeting convened by the prime minister with the finance minister and his officials appears to have been postponed indefinitely”. He goes on to then mock at the EAC saying: “Like the five Pandavas they (the five EAC members) are expected to win the new Mahabharat war for us.”

In the backdrop of the large scale raids that agencies like the CBI, Enforcement Directorate and the Income Tax department have been forced to undertake across India after demonetisation and the GST rollout to nab alleged black money hoarders and tax evaders, Sinha says: “Instilling fear in the minds of the people is the name of the new game.”

“We protested against raid raj when we were in opposition. Today it has become the order of the day. Post demonetisation, the income tax department has been charged with the responsibility of investigating lakhs of cases involving the fate of millions of people. The Enforcement Directorate and the CBI also have their plates full,” the BJP veteran says.

Adding his weight behind the Opposition’s argument that the Modi government is all about making tall claims and delivering little, if not nothing, Sinha says of the government’s proposed moves to revive the economy: “A hard landing appears inevitable. Bluff and bluster is fine for the hustings, it evaporates in the face of reality.”

The former finance minister clearly kept his ‘best for the last’, ending his piece with a sarcastic swipe at both Modi and Jaitley. “The prime minister claims that he has seen poverty from close quarters. His finance minister is working over-time to make sure that all Indians also see it from equally close quarters,” Sinha writes.

Evidently, the Opposition, especially the Congress party, is overjoyed at the BJP insider’s vociferous criticism of the Modi government.

Former finance minister and Congress leader P Chidambaram took to Twitter to endorse Sinha’s critique.[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][vc_column_text]Congress vice president too took an effective dig at the BJP, using Sinha’s editorial as ammunition.[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][vc_column_text]The BJP and the Modi government are yet to reply to Sinha’s attack but given their past record one can expect a full panel of senior ministers and party spokespersons surfacing in television news studios and for briefings to hit back with “bluff and bluster”.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

Massive fire destroys around 80 shanties in west Delhi, hundreds left homeless

A massive blaze swept through a slum cluster in west Delhi’s Matiala village, destroying around 80 shanties and leaving hundreds of migrant families homeless overnight.

Published

on

massive fire

A massive overnight fire destroyed around 80 shanties in west Delhi, leaving hundreds of migrant families homeless after flames swept through a large slum settlement near Uttam Nagar.

The incident took place late on the night of March 11 at the Machhli Mandi shanty cluster in Matiala village. The blaze spread rapidly across nearly four acres, reducing homes made of bamboo, tarpaulin and plastic sheets to ashes within hours.

According to Delhi Police, the affected families were largely migrant workers from Bihar who earn their livelihood as daily-wage labourers and ragpickers. Though no deaths were reported, residents lost most of their belongings including clothes, utensils, food supplies and documents.

Firefighters battle flames through the night

The Delhi Fire Service deployed 23 fire tenders to control the blaze. Firefighters continued operations throughout the night and managed to bring the flames under control at around 3 am on Thursday. Cooling operations continued afterward to prevent the fire from reigniting.

Thick grey ash and burnt debris covered large parts of the area after the fire. Charred bamboo frames, melted plastic sheets and twisted tin roofs were scattered across the ground.

Some residents claimed they saw unidentified people arrive on motorcycles and set several huts on fire before fleeing. Authorities have not confirmed this allegation.

Authorities cite disputed land and possible waste burning

District Magistrate Mekala Chaitanya visited the site and said the land has been under dispute for a long time.

He stated that the occupants had been issued an evacuation notice on March 7, with the night of the fire marking the final deadline to vacate the area.

An investigation is underway to determine the exact cause of the fire. The district administration suggested that the blaze may have started due to ragpickers burning waste at night, a practice commonly reported in the area.

Officials also noted that a similar fire incident had occurred earlier this month at the same location after illegal garbage dumping, which required eight fire tenders to extinguish.

Police say evacuation prevented casualties

Deputy Commissioner of Police (Dwarka) Kushal Pal Singh said police teams helped evacuate residents before the fire intensified.

He said the temporary structures were made from highly flammable materials, which allowed the fire to spread quickly. However, swift action by police and firefighters ensured that no lives were lost.

Families struggle after losing everything

Residents said they are now struggling to survive without basic necessities.

Rani Devi, a mother of three, said her family had no food, milk or drinking water after the fire destroyed their home and belongings. She added that many families were now sleeping amid the burnt debris.

A student, Rahul Kumar, whose board examinations are scheduled to begin soon, said his textbooks, notebooks and school uniform were all destroyed in the blaze.

Another resident, 42-year-old Rajesh Paswan, who migrated from Bihar over a decade ago and works as a ragpicker, said the fire wiped out everything his family owned overnight.

Demand for compensation and rehabilitation

AAP leader Ramesh Matitala met affected families and called for immediate compensation and rehabilitation.

He said the families should be provided financial assistance and relocated to a safer place, adding that authorities must ensure accountability if negligence or foul play is found in the investigation.

Continue Reading

India News

Mamata Banerjee questions PM Modi’s respect for President Murmu using 2024 photograph

Mamata Banerjee criticised Prime Minister Narendra Modi using a 2024 photograph during a rally as political tensions grow over President Droupadi Murmu’s visit to West Bengal.

Published

on

mamta banerjee

West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has intensified her attack on Prime Minister Narendra Modi amid a growing dispute over President Droupadi Murmu’s recent visit to the state.

Speaking at a public rally, Banerjee referred to a photograph from March 2024 that shows the President standing while the Prime Minister is seated during a meeting with veteran leader Lal Krishna Advani. The Trinamool Congress leader questioned the government’s claims about respecting the office of the President.

According to a video shared by the Trinamool Congress, two party leaders displayed the photograph while Banerjee addressed the gathering. She argued that while leaders often speak about honouring the President’s office, such visual moments raise questions about whether that respect is truly reflected in conduct.

The photograph referenced by Banerjee was taken on March 31, 2024, when President Murmu and Prime Minister Modi visited Advani to present him with the Bharat Ratna.

Banerjee said the image showed the President standing while the Prime Minister remained seated. She asked whether the government truly respected the country’s first tribal woman President, adding that the picture demonstrated “who respects and who does not”.

President’s visit to Bengal triggers controversy

The political exchange began after President Murmu visited West Bengal on Saturday to attend the ninth International Santal Conference in Darjeeling.

While addressing the event, the President publicly noted that neither the chief minister nor other state ministers were present to receive her. She said that usually the chief minister welcomes the President during such visits but that did not happen in this case.

Murmu added that Banerjee is like a “younger sister” to her and said she did not know whether the chief minister was upset.

The President also raised concerns about the change in the event venue and suggested that the new location made it difficult for people to attend. She said she did not know why the state administration had not permitted the programme at the earlier venue.

Prime minister criticises Bengal government

Reacting to the developments, Prime Minister Modi described the situation as “shameful and unprecedented”. In a post on social media, he said the incident had saddened people who believe in democracy and in empowering tribal communities.

He added that the pain expressed by President Murmu had caused widespread concern and accused the West Bengal government of disrespecting the office of the President. The Prime Minister also said the dignity of the President’s position should remain above political disputes.

Speaking at a public event later, Modi said the developments were particularly unfortunate as they occurred on International Women’s Day. He alleged that the Trinamool Congress government had boycotted both the tribal event and the President.

Mamata Banerjee denies protocol violation

Banerjee rejected the allegations, saying no protocol lapse occurred during the visit.

According to the chief minister, the event had been organised by a private body, the International Santal Council, which invited the President to attend the conference in Siliguri. She said the district administration had warned the President’s Secretariat that the organisers lacked adequate arrangements to host such a programme.

Banerjee also stated that the advance team from the President’s Secretariat visited the site earlier in March and was informed about the shortcomings but the event continued as scheduled.

She added that officials including the mayor of Siliguri Municipal Corporation, the Darjeeling district magistrate and the Siliguri police commissioner received and saw off the President according to the approved protocol lineup.

The chief minister said she was not part of the official lineup or the event’s dais plan and accused the BJP of using the country’s highest constitutional office for political purposes.

Centre seeks report from state

The issue escalated further after Union Home Secretary Govind Mohan wrote to West Bengal Chief Secretary Nandini Chakravorty seeking a report on alleged lapses during the President’s visit.

According to sources, the letter asked why senior state officials such as the chief minister, the chief secretary and the director general of police were not present to receive the President. It also raised concerns about reports of poor arrangements at the venue, including the absence of water in a washroom designated for the President and garbage along the route.

Officials from the Darjeeling district administration and Siliguri police were also mentioned in the communication, with the Centre seeking details of any action taken.

The controversy has now turned into a sharp political confrontation between the Centre and the West Bengal government.

Continue Reading

India News

President Murmu questions tribal development in Bengal, Mamata Banerjee calls remarks political

President Droupadi Murmu raised concerns about tribal development in West Bengal and questioned the absence of state representatives during her north Bengal visit. Mamata Banerjee called the remarks political and said they were based on misinformation.

Published

on

mamta banerjee

President Droupadi Murmu on Saturday raised questions about the development of tribal communities in West Bengal and also expressed surprise over the absence of state government representatives during her visit to north Bengal.

Speaking at the International Santhal Conference, an event organised for the tribal community, the President wondered whether Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee was upset with her, as neither the chief minister nor any minister from the state cabinet was present to receive her.

Murmu also referred to the decision to shift the venue of the conference from Bidhannagar to Goshaipur. She questioned why the programme was not allowed at the earlier venue despite adequate space being available.

Addressing the gathering, the President said she did not know whether Banerjee was upset with her and remarked that she also considers herself a daughter of Bengal. She added that Banerjee was like a younger sister to her but the reason behind shifting the programme location remained unclear.

During her speech, Murmu also raised broader concerns about the condition of tribal communities in the region. She questioned whether development and facilities intended for Santhals and other tribal groups were actually reaching them.

According to the President, the Centre has worked over the past decade to strengthen tribal identity and accelerate development for tribal communities. However, she said it did not appear that the benefits were reaching people in the region.

Murmu also suggested that some individuals might have been prevented from attending the event and said it appeared that certain groups did not want the Santhal community to unite, progress, or gain access to education and strength.

The remarks triggered a political response, with Prime Minister Narendra Modi criticising the situation. Sharing a video of the President’s speech, he said the incident was shameful and expressed concern over what he described as an insult to the President and to Santhal culture.

The BJP also criticised the West Bengal government, alleging that the lack of preparation and protocol during the President’s visit reflected administrative failure and disrespect for constitutional offices.

Responding to the President’s remarks, Mamata Banerjee said the statements were political in nature. Speaking during a protest in Kolkata against the Special Intensive Revision of voter rolls, the chief minister urged the President to avoid making remarks that could affect the dignity of the office.

Banerjee said the President had spoken about only one community and not about others in the state. She also asked her party’s MPs to seek an appointment with Rashtrapati Bhavan to present details of the state government’s work for Scheduled Tribe and Scheduled Caste communities.

The Trinamool Congress also rejected the suggestion that there had been no development for tribal communities in the state. In a statement, the party said the President appeared to have been misinformed.

The party highlighted several welfare initiatives, including financial assistance under the Lakshmir Bhandar scheme. It said women from Scheduled Tribe communities now receive Rs 1,700 per month, amounting to Rs 20,400 annually.

The Trinamool Congress also referred to scholarships for tribal students, the establishment of schools and other development programmes aimed at improving conditions in tribal areas.

According to the party, these measures represent concrete initiatives designed to improve opportunities, dignity and development for Adivasi communities across West Bengal.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com