English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Dera chief Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh sentenced to 20 years in jail

Published

on

Gurmeet Ram Rahim

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]CBI to appeal in higher court seeking life term for the self-styled Godman for raping two of his Dera followers in 2002 even as problems set to increase for the ‘Guru in Bling’ with court proceedings nearing conclusion in two murder cases in which he is the key accused

Three days after his conviction in twin rape cases dating back to 2002 led his followers to unleash havoc on the streets of Haryana, Punjab, Rajasthan and Delhi, Dera Sachha Sauda chief Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh was sentenced to 20 years in jail by special CBI court judge Jagdeep Singh.

Though for a better part of Monday, after a special CBI court set up in the Sunaria jail premises – where the Dera chief has been lodged since Friday – pronounced the quantum of punishment against him, it was believed that Gurmeet Ram Rahim will serve 10 years, it later transpired that CBI judge Singh had awarded him a total of 20 years in jail – 10 each for the two rape cases in which he was convicted.

“The judge announced 10 years of imprisonment and Rs 15 lakh fine each in two cases. Rs 14 lakh each to be paid to both victims,” SK Narwana, Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh’s lawyer, told news agency ANI. The lawyer explained that the “total sentence is 20(10-10) years, both sentences not consecutive but sentence of 376 and 506 would run concurrently”. Haryana chief minister Manohar Lal Khattar and CBI spokesperson Abhishek Dayal also confirmed that the Dera chief will serve a total of 20 years in jail.

It was earlier believed that the 10-year jail term awarded to the Guru in Bling, as the Dera chief is often called due to his love for gaudy costumes, was to be served concurrently for the two cases, but the special CBI judge seems to have ruled that he serve 10 years each for raping the 2 women.

The sentencing took place at a special sitting of the CBI court within the Sunaria jail premises in Haryana’s Rohtak district where the rapist Godman has been lodged since his conviction.

Amid demands by the public at large and also by the counsel of the CBI which investigated the rape case for sentencing the rapist Godman to serve a life sentence, the CBI court was bound by legal compulsions to award 10 years of rigorous imprisonment per case to the accused. The case against Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh had been registered in 2002 and legal provisions of the law against rape that applied during this period allow a maximum jail term of 10 years on conviction, the minimum being seven.

The special CBI court had to decline the CBI’s plea of a life term for the Dera chief as such a sentence for a rape convict was provided under the law only after 2013 in the aftermath of the public outrage over the December 2012 Nirbhaya (Delhi) gang rape case. The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013, which allowed amendments to relevant sections of the Indian Penal Code, Indian Evidence Act, and Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 on laws related to sexual offences had changed the limit on quantum of sentence that can be awarded to rape convicts from the earlier 7 to 10 years to a minimum of 10 years and maximum imprisonment for life.

However, with clarity now emerging on the actual stint that the rapist Godman is expected to serve in jail – unless the conviction is set aside by a higher court or the quantum of punishment reduced – those demanding life imprisonment for Gurmeet Ram Rahim may finally feel that a better sort of justice has been meted out.

CBI judge Jagmeet Singh had been flown in to Rohtak from Chandigarh in a helicopter due to the obvious risk to his life given the violent protests by Dera followers that claimed over 35 lives in Panchkula and Sirsa districts of Haryana in Friday’s mob mayhem. While all roads leading to the Sunaria jail were guarded heavily by the police and paramilitary forces, Rohtak town itself had been turned into a fortress to prevent a repeat of Friday’s violence which had forced the Punjab and Haryana high court to give a tight wrap on the knuckles to the state’s Manohar Lal Khattar government and even reprimand the Prime Minister Narendra Modi-led central government for evident failures in checking Dera followers from going on a rampage. The Army has been kept on standby while all routes to the jail were sealed.

As proceedings to announce the quantum of sentence against the Dera chief began at the special courtroom set up inside the Sunaria jail, Ram Rahim’s lawyers pleaded for a lenient sentence citing the “philanthropy work done by the Dera chief” and claiming that he “suffered various medical complications”. The 50-year-old Godman, who has been known for his ostentatious lifestyle and gaudy costumes but will now be forced to wear the uniform of a prison inmate as Prisoner Number 1997 of the Sunaria jail, was also present for the proceedings.

As CBI judge Singh pronounced the quantum of sentence, sources say, the Dera chief broke down and sat on the floor of the make-shift courtroom, refusing to leave the premises. Shortly after, he complained of chest pain while still sobbing. Prison and police authorities were forced to drag the Dera chief out of the court premises and he was then taken for medical examination.

Honeypreet

It is learnt that the court has also reprimanded the Sunaria jail authorities and police for giving special treatment to the Dera chief and said this must stop immediately after he is transferred to his jail cell. The court has made it clear that the Dera chief must be made to serve his sentence like an ordinary prisoner. Sources said that CBI judge Singh also ticked off the prison and police officials for allowing an almost the Dera chief’s aide Honeypreet ‘unrestricted access’ to him. Honeypreet was with Gurmeet Ram Rahim in the chopper that was used to ferry him from Panchkula to Rohtak after he was convicted last week and she had accompanied him to the Sunaria jail too. Although she didn’t stay at the Sunaria prison with the Dera chief through the weekend, sources said she visited him for long hours and was present in the prison on Monday too when the Dera chief was taken for sentencing .

Rabid followers of the rapist Godman have asserted that they will appeal in the higher courts against his conviction in the rape case and claimed that the court and probe agency had been “unfair” to him by giving him a 10-year jail term.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1503923411562{margin-bottom: 20px !important;border-top-width: 20px !important;border-bottom-width: 20px !important;padding-top: 20px !important;background-color: #a2b1bf !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text]Sentence is just the beginning of Dera chief’s troubles:

His conviction in the 15-year-old rape case isn’t the end of troubles for the Dera chief. Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh is also accused in at least two murder cases – that of journalist Ramchandra Chatrapati, who ran a local newspaper in Sirsa called ‘Poora Sach’. Chatrapati was killed in October 2002 after he had published a series of reports on rape of a woman follower by the Dera chief. The second murder case pertains to that of one Ranjit Singh and dates back to 2002.

Anshul Chhatrapati

The slain journalist’s son, Anshul, who has carried on his father’s fight against the Dera chief and also the legal battle for getting justice for Ramchandra Chhatrapati’s murder, welcomes the court’s decision, on Monday, while hoping that other cases against Gurmeet Ram Rahim will also reach their logical conclusion soon.

The trial in both these cases is in an advanced stage at the CBI has maintained that both these cases are built on strong evidence against the dubious Godman and would earn him convictions.

Then there is a case of disappearance of a Dera manager, Fakir Chand. Another case against the Dera chief is of forcing some ‘sewadars’ in his Dera at Sirsa to undergo castration. Now that Gurmeet Ram Rahim is in jail, there is a possibility that more eyewitnesses may come forward to testify against him in these ongoing cases.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]A 15-year-old case that finally reached its conclusion:

The special CBI court of judge Jagdeep Singh in Panchkula last Friday held Ram Rahim guilty of rape in a case that was registered on the basis of an anonymous written complaint in April 2002 alleging that he had sexually exploited two female followers. The case was registered by the CBI in December 2002 on the directions of the Punjab and Haryana High Court.

The CBI had filed the chargesheet against the Dera chief in an Ambala court in July 2007, five years after the rape case was registered. The chargesheet mentions sexual exploitation of two ‘Sadhvis’ (women followers) between 1999 and 2001.

The special CBI court framed charges against Ram Rahim under sections 376 (rape) and 506 (criminal intimidation) of the IPC in September 2008. Over the next two years, the two complainants recorded their statements before the court.

The special CBI court shifted from Ambala to Panchkula and the case against Ram Rahim Singh was also transferred to this court.

In July 2017, the court ordered daily hearings in the case following which arguments of prosecution and defence concluded on August 17, 2017 with the Dera chief being held guilty of rape on August 25.

Victim’s lawyer to approach HC for enhancement of punishment

Utsav Singh Bains, lawyer for the victims, said he would seek a longer sentence and asked India’s federal investigations bureau to investigate dozens more alleged cases of abuse.

“We will file two appeals shortly. One for enhancement of the punishment and another for further investigation into the case,” Bains told AFP by phone.

“We believe there are at least 48 more victims who were sexually abused and who may have been killed or are too scared to come out and testify against Ram Rahim,” Bains said.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

Delhi Police offers 11-person limit for CJP’s Connaught Place protest

Delhi Police has offered to facilitate a group of 11 people at Central Park in Connaught Place for the Cockroach Janata Party’s October 16 protest, while warning that violations of prohibitory orders could invite legal action.

Published

on

CJP protest to continue

Delhi Police has proposed allowing a group of 11 people to carry the national flag and sing the national anthem at Central Park in Connaught Place on October 16, ahead of a protest called by the Cockroach Janata Party (CJP) over alleged electoral fraud.

The police said it could facilitate the group at a suitable place in the park, while appealing to the public not to join the proposed gathering in large numbers. The offer comes amid prohibitory orders in Connaught Place and adjoining areas under Section 163 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS).

CJP founder Abhijeet Dipke has called on people to assemble at Central Park at 5 pm on Friday with the national flag. The proposed demonstration, named “Lehra Do Tiranga”, follows the detention of CJP members Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka during an earlier protest.

Why Delhi Police proposed limiting the gathering

In its statement, Delhi Police cited the prevailing security and law-and-order situation in the area. It also referred to information from the New Delhi Municipal Council (NDMC) that Central Park would remain closed on October 16 and 17 for administrative reasons.

Deputy Commissioner of Police Neha Yadav said the NDMC had informed the police about the closure and had asked that no gathering be allowed near the park.

The police also cited representations from trader and market associations in Connaught Place and surrounding areas. According to the police, the associations had raised concerns about unlawful assemblies and their impact on businesses, particularly during the festive season.

Police warned that violations of Section 163 BNSS would invite appropriate legal action. It also stressed that the national flag must be displayed and carried, and the national anthem sung, in the prescribed manner with due respect and dignity.

Delhi High Court declines to stop CJP protest

The proposed gathering reached the Delhi High Court after a vendor sought intervention over concerns about disruption to businesses and public movement in Connaught Place.

On Thursday, the court declined to restrain the CJP from holding the protest. It recorded the police’s assurance that all possible measures under the law would be taken to regulate the gathering and maintain peace.

The petition was filed by a vendor at Palika Bazar in Connaught Place, who raised concerns about the potential impact of the demonstration on traders and others working in the area.

Additional Solicitor General Chetan Sharma, appearing for the authorities, told the court that steps had already been taken to regulate the proposed protest.

CJP’s protest call follows detention of party members

Dipke’s October 16 protest call follows earlier demonstrations over alleged electoral fraud. CJP members Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka are in jail on trespass charges after raising the national flag at Jantar Mantar earlier this week, according to the report.

The party has been protesting over alleged electoral fraud and has raised questions about the Election Commission.

Dipke has urged people to gather at Central Park with the national flag, arguing that raising the Tricolour should not be treated as a crime.

The police’s proposal to facilitate a group of 11 people came as the authorities sought to prevent a larger gathering at the site. The CJP’s response to the police’s offer was still awaited in the report published on October 15.

Continue Reading

India News

Actor Imran Khan asked to leave India after CJP protest

Actor Imran Khan has been asked to leave India by October 28, days after participating in a protest called by the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) in Mumbai.

Published

on

Actor Imran Khan, nephew of Bollywood star Aamir Khan, has been asked to leave India by the Mumbai Police, days after participating in a protest organised by the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) in Mumbai.

According to the notice, the actor has been given until October 28 to leave the country. The development follows his participation in the demonstration, which brought the actor into the spotlight over his involvement in a political protest.

Imran Khan is believed to hold US citizenship and an Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) card rather than full Indian citizenship, according to the report.

What led to the notice against Imran Khan?

The notice came days after Imran Khan joined a protest called by the CJP in Mumbai. The group, described as a satirical political organisation, had called for the demonstration.

The actor’s participation was followed by action from the authorities, with the Mumbai Police directing him to leave India by the specified deadline.

The notice does not, by itself, mean that the actor has already left the country or has been deported. October 28 is the deadline mentioned for his departure.

Imran Khan and his citizenship status

Imran Khan is known for his work in Hindi films, including Jaane Tu… Ya Jaane Na and Delhi Belly. He is also the nephew of actor Aamir Khan.

The report states that Imran Khan is believed to be a US citizen and hold an OCI card. OCI status does not confer Indian citizenship, although it provides eligible foreign citizens of Indian origin with specified privileges under Indian law.

The notice directing the actor to leave India follows his participation in the Mumbai protest. The reported development has brought attention to the intersection of immigration rules and the participation of foreign nationals in political demonstrations.

Continue Reading

India News

Election Commission orders voter roll revision in 17 states, UTs

The Election Commission has ordered a Special Summary Revision of electoral rolls in 17 states and Union Territories. Draft rolls are scheduled for November 12, with final rolls due on January 4, 2027.

Published

on

The Election Commission of India (ECI) has ordered a Special Summary Revision (SSR) of electoral rolls in 17 states and Union Territories, with the exercise aimed at facilitating voter registration and including eligible electors who may have been left out during the Special Intensive Revision (SIR).

The order was issued on Thursday, October 15, amid continuing political controversy over the SIR process and concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the exclusion of names from electoral rolls.

Under the announced schedule, January 1, 2027, will be the qualifying date for the revision. The draft electoral rolls are scheduled to be published on November 12, while the final rolls are due on January 4, 2027. Uttar Pradesh and Punjab, two states included in the exercise, are scheduled to go to the polls by February 2027.

Which states and Union Territories are covered?

The Special Summary Revision will cover the following 17 states and Union Territories:

  • Andaman and Nicobar Islands
  • Assam
  • Bihar
  • Chhattisgarh
  • Goa
  • Gujarat
  • Kerala
  • Lakshadweep
  • Madhya Pradesh
  • Manipur
  • Puducherry
  • Punjab
  • Rajasthan
  • Tamil Nadu
  • Uttar Pradesh
  • Uttarakhand
  • West Bengal

The Election Commission’s order follows earlier instructions issued to state election officials on September 29 to undertake a special drive to enrol eligible voters who had been left out, along with young and first-time electors.

Why has the Election Commission ordered the revision?

The announcement comes amid protests and political disagreements over the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls. Opposition parties have raised concerns about names being excluded during the exercise.

Another point of contention has been an additional declaration required from applicants submitting Form 6 for voter enrolment while the SIR was underway. The declaration required applicants to map their parents to the last SIR, which was conducted around 20 years ago.

The Election Commission had clarified on October 7 that the additional declaration applied only in states and Union Territories where the SIR was being conducted. It said the regular forms prescribed under the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960, would apply outside the SIR period.

The latest SSR order refers to applications for inclusion through Form 6 but does not mention the additional declaration.

What happens in states not covered by the current schedule?

The Election Commission has said that the schedule for the Special Summary Revision will be announced later in states and Union Territories where the SIR is ongoing or has recently been completed.

These include Andhra Pradesh, Arunachal Pradesh, Chandigarh, Dadra and Nagar Haveli, Daman and Diu, Haryana, Jharkhand, Karnataka, Maharashtra, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland, the National Capital Territory of Delhi, Odisha, Sikkim, Tripura and Telangana.

For Himachal Pradesh, Jammu and Kashmir, and Ladakh, where the SIR has not yet started, the schedule for electoral roll revision will be announced in due course, taking local weather conditions into account.

The Election Commission’s latest order sets out a separate timeline for the 17 states and Union Territories covered by the current SSR exercise, while leaving the schedules for the other regions to be announced later.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com