English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Dera chief Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh sentenced to 20 years in jail

Published

on

Gurmeet Ram Rahim

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]CBI to appeal in higher court seeking life term for the self-styled Godman for raping two of his Dera followers in 2002 even as problems set to increase for the ‘Guru in Bling’ with court proceedings nearing conclusion in two murder cases in which he is the key accused

Three days after his conviction in twin rape cases dating back to 2002 led his followers to unleash havoc on the streets of Haryana, Punjab, Rajasthan and Delhi, Dera Sachha Sauda chief Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh was sentenced to 20 years in jail by special CBI court judge Jagdeep Singh.

Though for a better part of Monday, after a special CBI court set up in the Sunaria jail premises – where the Dera chief has been lodged since Friday – pronounced the quantum of punishment against him, it was believed that Gurmeet Ram Rahim will serve 10 years, it later transpired that CBI judge Singh had awarded him a total of 20 years in jail – 10 each for the two rape cases in which he was convicted.

“The judge announced 10 years of imprisonment and Rs 15 lakh fine each in two cases. Rs 14 lakh each to be paid to both victims,” SK Narwana, Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh’s lawyer, told news agency ANI. The lawyer explained that the “total sentence is 20(10-10) years, both sentences not consecutive but sentence of 376 and 506 would run concurrently”. Haryana chief minister Manohar Lal Khattar and CBI spokesperson Abhishek Dayal also confirmed that the Dera chief will serve a total of 20 years in jail.

It was earlier believed that the 10-year jail term awarded to the Guru in Bling, as the Dera chief is often called due to his love for gaudy costumes, was to be served concurrently for the two cases, but the special CBI judge seems to have ruled that he serve 10 years each for raping the 2 women.

The sentencing took place at a special sitting of the CBI court within the Sunaria jail premises in Haryana’s Rohtak district where the rapist Godman has been lodged since his conviction.

Amid demands by the public at large and also by the counsel of the CBI which investigated the rape case for sentencing the rapist Godman to serve a life sentence, the CBI court was bound by legal compulsions to award 10 years of rigorous imprisonment per case to the accused. The case against Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh had been registered in 2002 and legal provisions of the law against rape that applied during this period allow a maximum jail term of 10 years on conviction, the minimum being seven.

The special CBI court had to decline the CBI’s plea of a life term for the Dera chief as such a sentence for a rape convict was provided under the law only after 2013 in the aftermath of the public outrage over the December 2012 Nirbhaya (Delhi) gang rape case. The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013, which allowed amendments to relevant sections of the Indian Penal Code, Indian Evidence Act, and Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 on laws related to sexual offences had changed the limit on quantum of sentence that can be awarded to rape convicts from the earlier 7 to 10 years to a minimum of 10 years and maximum imprisonment for life.

However, with clarity now emerging on the actual stint that the rapist Godman is expected to serve in jail – unless the conviction is set aside by a higher court or the quantum of punishment reduced – those demanding life imprisonment for Gurmeet Ram Rahim may finally feel that a better sort of justice has been meted out.

CBI judge Jagmeet Singh had been flown in to Rohtak from Chandigarh in a helicopter due to the obvious risk to his life given the violent protests by Dera followers that claimed over 35 lives in Panchkula and Sirsa districts of Haryana in Friday’s mob mayhem. While all roads leading to the Sunaria jail were guarded heavily by the police and paramilitary forces, Rohtak town itself had been turned into a fortress to prevent a repeat of Friday’s violence which had forced the Punjab and Haryana high court to give a tight wrap on the knuckles to the state’s Manohar Lal Khattar government and even reprimand the Prime Minister Narendra Modi-led central government for evident failures in checking Dera followers from going on a rampage. The Army has been kept on standby while all routes to the jail were sealed.

As proceedings to announce the quantum of sentence against the Dera chief began at the special courtroom set up inside the Sunaria jail, Ram Rahim’s lawyers pleaded for a lenient sentence citing the “philanthropy work done by the Dera chief” and claiming that he “suffered various medical complications”. The 50-year-old Godman, who has been known for his ostentatious lifestyle and gaudy costumes but will now be forced to wear the uniform of a prison inmate as Prisoner Number 1997 of the Sunaria jail, was also present for the proceedings.

As CBI judge Singh pronounced the quantum of sentence, sources say, the Dera chief broke down and sat on the floor of the make-shift courtroom, refusing to leave the premises. Shortly after, he complained of chest pain while still sobbing. Prison and police authorities were forced to drag the Dera chief out of the court premises and he was then taken for medical examination.

Honeypreet

It is learnt that the court has also reprimanded the Sunaria jail authorities and police for giving special treatment to the Dera chief and said this must stop immediately after he is transferred to his jail cell. The court has made it clear that the Dera chief must be made to serve his sentence like an ordinary prisoner. Sources said that CBI judge Singh also ticked off the prison and police officials for allowing an almost the Dera chief’s aide Honeypreet ‘unrestricted access’ to him. Honeypreet was with Gurmeet Ram Rahim in the chopper that was used to ferry him from Panchkula to Rohtak after he was convicted last week and she had accompanied him to the Sunaria jail too. Although she didn’t stay at the Sunaria prison with the Dera chief through the weekend, sources said she visited him for long hours and was present in the prison on Monday too when the Dera chief was taken for sentencing .

Rabid followers of the rapist Godman have asserted that they will appeal in the higher courts against his conviction in the rape case and claimed that the court and probe agency had been “unfair” to him by giving him a 10-year jail term.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1503923411562{margin-bottom: 20px !important;border-top-width: 20px !important;border-bottom-width: 20px !important;padding-top: 20px !important;background-color: #a2b1bf !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text]Sentence is just the beginning of Dera chief’s troubles:

His conviction in the 15-year-old rape case isn’t the end of troubles for the Dera chief. Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh is also accused in at least two murder cases – that of journalist Ramchandra Chatrapati, who ran a local newspaper in Sirsa called ‘Poora Sach’. Chatrapati was killed in October 2002 after he had published a series of reports on rape of a woman follower by the Dera chief. The second murder case pertains to that of one Ranjit Singh and dates back to 2002.

Anshul Chhatrapati

The slain journalist’s son, Anshul, who has carried on his father’s fight against the Dera chief and also the legal battle for getting justice for Ramchandra Chhatrapati’s murder, welcomes the court’s decision, on Monday, while hoping that other cases against Gurmeet Ram Rahim will also reach their logical conclusion soon.

The trial in both these cases is in an advanced stage at the CBI has maintained that both these cases are built on strong evidence against the dubious Godman and would earn him convictions.

Then there is a case of disappearance of a Dera manager, Fakir Chand. Another case against the Dera chief is of forcing some ‘sewadars’ in his Dera at Sirsa to undergo castration. Now that Gurmeet Ram Rahim is in jail, there is a possibility that more eyewitnesses may come forward to testify against him in these ongoing cases.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]A 15-year-old case that finally reached its conclusion:

The special CBI court of judge Jagdeep Singh in Panchkula last Friday held Ram Rahim guilty of rape in a case that was registered on the basis of an anonymous written complaint in April 2002 alleging that he had sexually exploited two female followers. The case was registered by the CBI in December 2002 on the directions of the Punjab and Haryana High Court.

The CBI had filed the chargesheet against the Dera chief in an Ambala court in July 2007, five years after the rape case was registered. The chargesheet mentions sexual exploitation of two ‘Sadhvis’ (women followers) between 1999 and 2001.

The special CBI court framed charges against Ram Rahim under sections 376 (rape) and 506 (criminal intimidation) of the IPC in September 2008. Over the next two years, the two complainants recorded their statements before the court.

The special CBI court shifted from Ambala to Panchkula and the case against Ram Rahim Singh was also transferred to this court.

In July 2017, the court ordered daily hearings in the case following which arguments of prosecution and defence concluded on August 17, 2017 with the Dera chief being held guilty of rape on August 25.

Victim’s lawyer to approach HC for enhancement of punishment

Utsav Singh Bains, lawyer for the victims, said he would seek a longer sentence and asked India’s federal investigations bureau to investigate dozens more alleged cases of abuse.

“We will file two appeals shortly. One for enhancement of the punishment and another for further investigation into the case,” Bains told AFP by phone.

“We believe there are at least 48 more victims who were sexually abused and who may have been killed or are too scared to come out and testify against Ram Rahim,” Bains said.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

Amit Shah counters delimitation concerns, says southern states to gain Lok Sabha seats

Amit Shah assures Parliament that southern states will gain Lok Sabha seats after delimitation, countering opposition criticism during the women’s reservation debate.

Published

on

Amit Shah

Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Thursday addressed concerns over the proposed delimitation exercise, asserting in the Lok Sabha that southern states will not lose representation but instead see an increase in their number of seats.

His remarks came during a heated debate linked to the implementation of women’s reservation, where opposition parties have raised fears that population-based delimitation could reduce the political weight of southern states.

Shah rejected these claims, calling them misleading, and said the proposed framework ensures fairness while expanding the overall strength of the Lok Sabha.

Seat count to rise with expansion of Lok Sabha

The government has indicated that the total number of Lok Sabha seats could increase significantly as part of the delimitation process. In this expanded House, the combined representation of southern states is expected to rise from 129 seats at present to around 195 seats.

Shah emphasised that no state will lose seats in absolute terms, and the exercise is designed to reflect population changes while maintaining balance across regions.

State-wise projections shared in Parliament

During his address, Shah also provided indicative figures for individual southern states, suggesting notable increases in representation. According to the projections:

  • Tamil Nadu could see its seats rise substantially
  • Kerala, Telangana, and Andhra Pradesh are also expected to gain additional seats
  • Karnataka’s representation may increase as well

These figures were presented to counter the argument that delimitation would disproportionately favour northern states.

Political debate intensifies over linkage with women’s quota

The delimitation exercise has been closely linked to the rollout of women’s reservation, which proposes one-third seats for women in Parliament and state assemblies.

Opposition leaders have questioned this linkage, arguing that tying reservation to delimitation could delay its implementation and raise federal concerns. Some leaders have also warned that the move could impact national unity if apprehensions among states are not addressed.

The government, however, maintains that the reforms are necessary to ensure equitable representation and to align the electoral system with demographic realities.

Centre dismisses ‘false narrative’ on southern states

Shah reiterated that concerns about southern states losing influence are unfounded. He said the delimitation process will increase representation across regions and described the criticism as a “false narrative” aimed at creating confusion.

The issue is expected to remain a key flashpoint as Parliament continues discussions on the women’s reservation framework and related legislative changes.

Continue Reading

India News

PM Modi assures no discrimination in women’s quota, delimitation debate intensifies in Parliament

PM Narendra Modi has assured that women’s reservation will be implemented without discrimination, amid a heated debate over delimitation in Parliament.

Published

on

PM modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has assured that there will be no discrimination in the implementation of women’s reservation, as Parliament witnessed a sharp debate over the proposed linkage between the quota and delimitation exercise.

During the ongoing special session, the government reiterated its commitment to ensuring fair representation while addressing concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the timing and structure of the legislation.

The proposed framework aims to reserve 33 percent of seats for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. However, its implementation is tied to a fresh delimitation exercise, which is expected after the next census.

Opposition questions timing and intent

Opposition leaders have raised concerns that linking the women’s quota to delimitation could delay its implementation. They argue that the process of redrawing constituencies may push the actual rollout further into the future.

The issue has triggered a broader political confrontation, with multiple parties questioning whether the move could alter representation across states.

Some critics have also alleged that the delimitation exercise could disproportionately benefit certain regions based on population, a charge the government has rejected.

Government reiterates commitment to fair implementation

Responding to these concerns, the Centre has maintained that the reforms are necessary to ensure accurate and updated representation based on population data.

Leaders from the ruling side have repeatedly emphasized that the process will be carried out transparently and without bias. The assurance that there will be “no discrimination” is aimed at addressing fears among states and opposition parties.

The debate marks a key moment in Parliament, with both sides engaging in intense exchanges over one of the most significant electoral reforms in recent years.

Continue Reading

India News

Give all tickets to Muslim women, Amit Shah says, attacking Akhilesh Yadav on sub-quota demand

A sharp exchange between Amit Shah and Akhilesh Yadav in Parliament over sub-quota for Muslim women highlights key divisions on women’s reservation implementation.

Published

on

A heated exchange broke out in Parliament during discussions on the women’s reservation framework, with Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav locking horns over the demand for a sub-quota for Muslim women.

The debate unfolded as the government pushed forward key legislative measures to implement 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies.

Akhilesh Yadav argued that the proposed reservation must ensure representation for women from marginalised communities, including Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and Muslim women. He said that without such provisions, large sections could remain excluded from political participation.

He also questioned the timing of the bill, alleging that the Centre was avoiding a caste census. According to him, a census would lead to renewed demands for caste-based reservations, which the government is reluctant to address.

Government rejects religion-based quota

Responding to the demand, Amit Shah made it clear that reservation based on religion is not permitted under the Constitution.

He stated that any proposal to provide quota to Muslims on religious grounds would be unconstitutional, firmly rejecting the idea of a separate sub-quota for Muslim women within the broader reservation framework.

The government has maintained that the existing framework already includes provisions for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) women within the overall reservation structure.

Wider political divide over implementation

The issue of sub-categorisation within the women’s quota has emerged as a major flashpoint, even as most opposition parties broadly support the idea of women’s reservation.

Samajwadi Party leaders reiterated that their support for the bill depends on inclusion of OBC and minority women, while the government continues to defend its constitutional position.

The debate is part of a broader discussion during the special Parliament session, where multiple bills linked to delimitation and implementation of the women’s quota are being taken up.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com