English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

G RAM G bill replacing MGNREGA passes Parliament amid opposition walkout and protests

The G RAM G Bill replacing MGNREGA has been passed by Parliament after overnight debate in the Rajya Sabha, triggering protests and walkouts by opposition parties.

Published

on

Parliament

Parliament has cleared the Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Employment and Livelihood Mission (Rural) Bill, commonly referred to as the G RAM G Bill, paving the way for the replacement of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA). The legislation was passed within two days amid sharp political confrontation, walkouts and overnight protests by opposition parties.

The bill was approved by the Lok Sabha despite repeated disruptions and protests. In the Rajya Sabha, the debate stretched beyond midnight, with voting held around 12.15 am. The bill was eventually passed by a voice vote after opposition members staged a walkout, leaving the ruling alliance members present in the House.

Opposition objects to name change and provisions

The Congress and other opposition parties mounted a strong challenge to the bill, objecting both to the change in the scheme’s name and its revised framework. A key point of contention was the removal of Mahatma Gandhi’s name from the legislation, which opposition leaders said reflected an ideological shift rather than a policy necessity.

Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge launched a sharp attack during the Rajya Sabha debate, urging the government to withdraw the bill and warning that it would harm the rural poor. He accused the government of speaking in the name of welfare while undermining the interests of vulnerable communities, making an emotional appeal to reconsider the legislation.

Several opposition members initially demanded that the bill be referred to a standing committee for detailed scrutiny. When that demand was not accepted, they called for the bill’s withdrawal and later staged a walkout. Members of the Trinamool Congress and other parties subsequently sat on a dharna within Parliament premises.

Heated exchanges in the Upper House

The debate witnessed intense exchanges between the treasury benches and the opposition. Trinamool Congress MP Derek O’Brien linked the passage of the bill with developments in West Bengal, alleging that the Centre’s actions had consequences for the implementation of rural employment schemes in the state. He also referred to the state government’s decision to rename its employment initiative following the Lok Sabha vote.

As Rural Development Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan rose to reply, opposition members raised slogans demanding the withdrawal of what they termed a “black bill”. When the protests continued, opposition MPs walked out, allowing the bill to be passed without their presence.

Responding sharply, Chouhan criticised the walkout and accused the opposition of refusing to engage in debate. He defended the government’s move, arguing that the earlier scheme had suffered from corruption and inefficiencies, and said the new law was drafted after consultations with stakeholders.

Government defends overhaul of rural employment scheme

The government has maintained that updating the two-decade-old MGNREGA framework was necessary to address structural shortcomings and align it with current rural needs. According to the provisions outlined, the new law increases the guaranteed days of work from 100 to 125 while retaining key elements of the earlier scheme.

However, critics have pointed out that employment under the new framework will be based on pre-approved plans rather than demand-driven applications at the gram panchayat level. The work categories have also been streamlined into four segments—water security, core rural infrastructure, livelihood-related assets, and climate resilience—raising concerns that local flexibility may be reduced.

Opposition leaders have argued that these changes dilute the original spirit of MGNREGA, which was designed as a rights-based, demand-driven employment guarantee programme.

Protests continue after passage

Following the bill’s passage, opposition parties reiterated their charge that the legislation weakens the guarantee, livelihood assurance and social security that formed the core of the original programme introduced in 2005. Despite these objections, the government’s numerical strength ensured the bill’s smooth passage through both Houses.

With parliamentary approval now secured, the G RAM G Bill is set to replace MGNREGA, marking a significant shift in India’s rural employment policy framework amid continuing political debate.

India News

KCR summoned by SIT in Telangana phone-tapping probe, BRS cries vendetta

Former Telangana CM K Chandrashekar Rao has been summoned by the SIT for questioning in the phone-tapping case linked to the previous BRS government, triggering a political war of words.

Published

on

K Chandrasekhar Rao

Former Telangana chief minister and BRS president K Chandrashekar Rao (KCR) has been summoned for questioning for the first time in connection with the alleged phone-tapping case linked to his tenure in office.

The Special Investigation Team (SIT), which is probing the case, served a notice at KCR’s residence in Hyderabad on Thursday, asking him to appear before investigators on Friday at 3 pm. Considering his age, the SIT has allowed KCR to choose a convenient location within Hyderabad for questioning under Section 160 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Allegations linked to previous BRS government

The case relates to allegations that during the earlier BRS government, officials of the Special Intelligence Bureau (SIB) illegally intercepted phone conversations of politicians, journalists, businessmen and others without obtaining mandatory authorisation.

Following the change of government in Telangana in 2023, an FIR was registered in 2024 after the Congress-led administration under Chief Minister Revanth Reddy assumed office. A Special Investigation Team was subsequently constituted to probe the matter.

Senior police officers named in FIR

The FIR names several former senior police officials and others as accused, including former SIB chief T Prabhakar Rao, DSP D Praneeth Rao, Additional SPs N Bhujanga Rao and M Thirupathanna, former DCP Radha Kishan Rao, and television channel owner Shravan Kumar Rao.

While some of the accused are currently out on bail, others have secured interim protection from arrest as the investigation continues.

BRS leaders questioned earlier

Before summoning KCR, the SIT had questioned multiple senior leaders of the BRS. His nephew and senior leader T Harish Rao appeared before investigators on January 19, followed by BRS Working President and his son KT Rama Rao (KTR), who was questioned for nearly seven hours on January 23. Another nephew, Joginapally Santosh Rao, was questioned on January 28.

Political reactions sharpen

The BRS has accused the Congress government of using the probe as a tool for political vendetta. KTR alleged that the investigation was aimed at diverting public attention from the ruling party’s failure to fulfil election promises. He said KCR, who played a key role in the formation and development of Telangana, was being targeted through what he described as “revenge politics”.

The Congress, however, rejected the allegations and defended the SIT’s action. Party leaders said the investigation was being conducted strictly in accordance with the law and insisted that questioning all concerned individuals was essential to ensure accountability.

Continue Reading

India News

Bihar announces up to Rs 2 lakh top-up for women under self-employment scheme

Bihar will provide up to Rs 2 lakh additional financial assistance to selected women beneficiaries under the Mukhya Mantri Mahila Rojgar Yojana after assessing six months of performance.

Published

on

nitish-kumar

Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar on Wednesday announced an additional financial top-up of up to Rs 2 lakh for selected beneficiaries under the state government’s Mukhya Mantri Mahila Rojgar Yojana, a scheme aimed at promoting self-employment among women.

Under the scheme, one eligible woman from each family currently receives an initial financial aid of Rs 10,000 to begin self-employment activities. The newly announced top-up will be provided only after reviewing the beneficiary’s progress six months after the start of her enterprise.

In a post shared on X in Hindi, the chief minister said the government has initiated the process to extend further financial assistance to women whose initial funds have been utilised properly for employment-related purposes. He added that the additional amount will be released in phases, depending on the performance of the self-employment initiative.

Kumar also noted that if a woman’s enterprise is running successfully, the government may consider releasing the assistance as a lump sum, based on requirements.

Link with government programmes mandatory

To qualify for the additional financial support, the self-employment initiative must be connected with government-backed programmes such as Sudha sales centres or the Didi Ki Rasoi Yojana, the chief minister said.

According to the government, around 1.56 crore women have already received the initial Rs 10,000 assistance directly into their bank accounts through the direct benefit transfer (DBT) mechanism.

The chief minister also recalled that the introduction of prohibition in Bihar had been widely viewed as a move that benefited women across the state.

Political context

The Rs 10,000 assistance was announced ahead of the Bihar Assembly elections held in November 2025. The ruling parties faced criticism from opposition leaders, who alleged that the timing of the payout was intended to influence voters.

Political strategist-turned-leader Prashant Kishor had claimed that the financial assistance distributed shortly before polling was sufficient to sway votes. However, the ruling alliance went on to register a strong performance in the elections, with the JD(U) winning 85 seats, significantly improving its tally compared to the 2015 Assembly polls.

Continue Reading

India News

NCP leaders’ meet with Sunetra Pawar triggers succession debate after Ajit Pawar’s death

A meeting between senior NCP leaders and Sunetra Pawar shortly after Ajit Pawar’s funeral has reignited debate over leadership succession and the future of the party.

Published

on

A meeting between senior Nationalist Congress Party leaders and Sunetra Pawar, the wife of late Maharashtra Deputy Chief Minister Ajit Pawar, has sparked intense speculation about the party’s future leadership, just hours after his funeral in Baramati.

Senior NCP leaders Praful Patel, Chhagan Bhujbal and Dhananjay Munde met Sunetra Pawar on Thursday. While sources claimed the leaders urged her to consider taking up the deputy chief minister’s post, Bhujbal publicly dismissed such claims, stating that it was merely a courtesy visit and that no political discussion took place following Ajit Pawar’s death in the plane crash on Wednesday.

Adding to the political buzz, senior NCP leader and Maharashtra FDA Minister Narhari Zirwal said that people across the state want Sunetra Pawar to be part of the cabinet.

Sunetra Pawar is currently a member of the Rajya Sabha. With a bye-election due in the Baramati Assembly constituency — a seat Ajit Pawar represented continuously since 1991 — speculation has grown that a member of the Pawar family will be fielded. Political circles are discussing the possible candidature of Ajit Pawar’s sons, Parth Pawar or Jay Pawar.

However, for Sunetra Pawar to assume the post of deputy chief minister, she would need to secure a seat either in the legislative assembly or the legislative council.

Leadership vacuum concerns within NCP

Political analysts believe Ajit Pawar’s death has left a significant leadership vacuum within the NCP. Groomed over decades by Sharad Pawar, Ajit Pawar commanded authority and organisational control that few within the party can replicate.

According to analysts, leaders such as Sunil Tatkare and Praful Patel could attempt to position themselves at the helm of the party unless a reunification with the Sharad Pawar-led faction takes place — a development that could dramatically alter the political landscape.

The urgency within the NCP is also being linked to its recent electoral setbacks, particularly in the municipal corporation elections, where the party failed to gain control of key civic bodies such as Pune and Pimpri-Chinchwad. Any prolonged uncertainty, analysts warn, could further weaken the party’s position.

Sharad Pawar faction hints at merger talks

Meanwhile, the Sharad Pawar-led faction of the NCP indicated that Ajit Pawar had spoken about resolving differences between the two groups.

The faction’s Maharashtra president said Ajit Pawar had suggested discussions on a possible merger after the completion of local body elections, including Zilla Parishad and Panchayat Samiti polls scheduled for February 5.

He added that Ajit Pawar wanted both factions to come together and maintain family unity, describing him as an emotional leader who felt it was time to end internal divisions. Whether these efforts move forward now, he said, remains to be seen.

On the question of joining the BJP-led Mahayuti alliance, the leader said it was too early to comment, noting that discussions on reconciliation would have to take precedence before any decision on alliances.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com