English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Indu Malhotra to be first woman to be promoted from Bar to SC judgeship

Published

on

Indu Malhotra to be first woman to be promoted from Bar to SC judgeship

Supreme Court Collegium also recommends elevation of Uttarakhand Chief Justice KM Joseph as judge of the apex court

In a first, the Supreme Court Collegium has decided to elevate a woman lawyer – Indu Malhotra – straight from the Bar Council to be made a judge of the apex court.

Indu Malhotra to be first woman to be promoted from Bar to SC judgeshipThe Collegium, comprising senior-most judges of the Supreme Court – Chief Justice Dipak Misra, Justices Chelameswar, Ranjan Gogoi, Madan B Lokur and Kurian Joseph – has, according to media reports, recommended unanimously the appointment of Malhotra and Uttarakhand Chief Justice KM Joseph as judges of the apex court.

It is pertinent to note that in the first 39 years of its existence, the Supreme Court’s judiciary had no woman member. The glass ceiling was broken in 1989 with the appointment of Justice Fathima Beevi as a judge of the Supreme Court. Justice Beevi was not just the first woman judge of the Supreme Court but also the first Muslim woman to have made it to India’s higher judiciary. The other women judges of the Supreme Court have been Justice Sujatha Manohar,  Justice Ruma Pal, Justice Gyan Sudha Misra and Justice Ranjana Desai.

With Malhotra’s appointment, the Supreme Court will now have two sitting women judges, the other being Justice R Banumati. Malhotra would be one of only seven women judges that the apex court has had so far since independence.

However, this won’t be the first time that the apex court will have two sitting women judges. Speaking to India Legal, Justice (retired) Gyan Sudha Misra said: “Little after Justice Ruma Pal retired I was elevated to the Supreme Court and was the only lady judge for a while before Justice Ranjana Desai was elevated to the SC. Justice Desai and I served as judges of the Supreme Court together for a while.”

However, when asked for her views on the direct elevation of a lawyer to the SC judgeship, Justice (retd) Misra said: “It is the Collegium’s decision and I would not like to comment on it”.

Malhotra had, in 2007, become the second woman to be designated as a Senior Advocate by the Supreme Court. A expert on arbitration, Malhotra has authored the third edition of The Law and Practice of Arbitration and Conciliation, 2014 and has appeared in various domestic and international commercial arbitrations. She has also served as a member of the Centre-appointed High Level Committee (HLC) in the Ministry of Law and Justice to review ‘Institutionalization of Arbitration Mechanism in India’.

Daughter of the late Om Prakash Malhotra, a legal luminary himself with pioneering work in the legal disciplines of industrial disputes and arbitration, Indu Malhotra had enrolled as a lawyer in the Bar Council of Delhi in 1983. Then, in 1988 she qualified as an Advocate-on-Record (AoR) in the Supreme Court and also served as Standing Counsel for the State of Haryana and represented statutory bodies like the Securities Exchange Board of India (Sebi), Delhi Development Authority (DDA), Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Indian Council for Agricultural Research (ICAR), before the Supreme Court.

The Collegium’s other pick for the Supreme Court judiciary – Uttarakhand Chief Justice KM Joseph – is also an interesting one. It was Justice Joseph who had, in 2016, struck down the imposition of President’s Rule in Uttarakhand by the Narendra Modi-led government and allowed Congress’ Harish Rawat to prove his strength in the state assembly. The decision had paved the way for Harish Rawat to return as Uttarakhand chief minister following the controversial defections to the BJP that had been orchestrated by his predecessor and then party colleague Vijay Bahuguna. A month after he delivered this verdict, the Supreme Court Collegium had recommended Justice Joseph’s transfer to the joint high court for Andhra Pradesh and Telangana in Hyderabad. However, the Modi government refused to clear the transfer, instead choosing to keep the Chief Justice’s post vacant. The high court at Hyderabad still does not have a full-time Chief Justice.

The Collegium has also regularised Chief Justices of five High Courts which currently had acting chief justices. Justice J Bhattacharaya, who is presently chief justice of Calcutta High Court, will be the new chief justice of Delhi High Court, taking over from Justice Gita Mittal who has been serving as the acting chief justice of the court for several months now.

Chief Justice of the Chattishgarh High Court, Justice TB Radhakrishnan, has been transferred to the Andhra Pradesh High Court which Justice Abhilasha Kumari of the Gujarat High Court has been transferred to Manipur as chief justice. The Collegium has also appointed Justice A Dominic as chief justice of the Kerala High Court while Justice Ajay Rastogi has been transferred to the Tripura High Court. Justice Surya Kant of the Punjab and Haryana High court will be the new chief justice of Himachal Pradesh.

India News

Centre asks Blinkit, Zepto and Swiggy to stop 10-minute delivery claims

The Centre has urged Blinkit, Zepto and Swiggy to remove 10-minute delivery claims, citing safety concerns for delivery partners, government sources said.

Published

on

10 minutes delivery

The Centre has asked quick commerce platforms such as Blinkit, Zepto and Swiggy to remove claims related to 10-minute deliveries, citing concerns over the safety of delivery partners, according to government sources.

The issue was discussed during a meeting between Union Labour Minister Mansukh Mandaviya and representatives of major food and grocery delivery aggregators. Executives from platforms including Zomato, Swiggy, Blinkit and Zepto were present at the meeting, sources said.

Safety of delivery partners discussed in meeting

Government sources indicated that the minister raised concerns about strict delivery timelines and their potential impact on the safety and well-being of delivery partners. Platforms were advised to prioritise safe working conditions instead of promoting ultra-fast delivery promises.

The discussion focused on delivery expectations, rider pressure and the broader responsibility of aggregators towards their workforce, sources added.

Blinkit revises tagline after government intervention

Following the meeting, Blinkit has revised its marketing tagline. The platform earlier promoted “10,000 plus products delivered in 10 minutes” but has now changed it to “30,000 plus products delivered at your doorstep,” according to sources.

The revision reflects a shift away from highlighting delivery speed as a key promise, in line with the concerns raised during the discussions.

The government is expected to continue engaging with aggregators on labour welfare and safety-related issues, sources said.

Continue Reading

India News

AI errors in voter list digitisation causing hardship during SIR, Mamata writes to EC chief

Mamata Banerjee has written to the chief election commissioner alleging that AI-driven digitisation errors in electoral rolls are causing hardship, harassment and distress to genuine voters during the SIR process in West Bengal.

Published

on

mamta banerjee

West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has once again written to Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, alleging that errors arising from AI-driven digitisation of the 2002 electoral rolls are causing widespread hardship to genuine voters during the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise in the state.

In her fifth letter since the SIR process began, Banerjee claimed that the use of artificial intelligence tools to digitise older voter lists led to serious inaccuracies in electors’ personal details. According to her, these errors have resulted in large-scale data mismatches, with many genuine voters being wrongly flagged as having “logical discrepancies”.

The chief minister accused the Election Commission of disregarding statutory processes that had been followed over the past two decades. She said voters were now being forced to re-establish their identity despite corrections having been made earlier through quasi-judicial hearings.

Calling the approach arbitrary and illogical, Banerjee alleged that it went against the constitutional spirit by effectively disowning the commission’s own past actions and mechanisms. She further claimed that voters submitting documents during the SIR exercise were not being given proper acknowledgements, terming the procedure “fundamentally flawed”.

Raising concerns over the nature of hearings, Banerjee said the SIR process had become largely mechanical and overly dependent on technical data, lacking sensitivity, human judgment and compassion. She argued that such an approach undermines democratic values and the constitutional framework.

Highlighting the human impact of the exercise, the chief minister claimed that the revision process had already seen 77 deaths, four suicide attempts and 17 cases of hospitalisation. She attributed these incidents to fear, intimidation and excessive workload caused by what she described as an unplanned exercise by the Election Commission.

Banerjee also criticised the treatment of several eminent citizens, alleging that they were subjected to harassment during the process. She further expressed concern over the handling of cases involving women voters, particularly those who had changed their surnames after marriage or shifted to their matrimonial homes.

According to her, women electors were being questioned and summoned to prove their identity, reflecting a lack of social sensitivity and amounting to an insult to women and genuine voters. She questioned whether a constitutional authority should treat half of the electorate in such a manner.

Urging immediate corrective steps, Banerjee called on the Election Commission to address the issues arising from the SIR exercise to end what she described as harassment and agony for both citizens and officials, and to safeguard democratic rights.

Continue Reading

India News

Communist Party of China delegation visits BJP headquarters in Delhi

A delegation from the Communist Party of China, led by Vice Minister Sun Haiyan, visited the BJP headquarters in Delhi and held discussions on inter-party communication.

Published

on

China delegation visits BJP office

A delegation from the Communist Party of China (CPC), led by Sun Haiyan, Vice Minister of the International Department of the CPC Central Committee (IDCPC), visited the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) headquarters in Delhi on Monday.

During the visit, the Chinese delegation held discussions with a BJP team headed by party general secretary Arun Singh. The talks focused on ways to advance inter-party communication and engagement between the BJP and the CPC.

Sharing details of the meeting, BJP foreign affairs department in-charge Vijay Chauthaiwale said the interaction involved an in-depth exchange on strengthening party-to-party dialogue. He confirmed the visit in a post on social media, stating that the CPC delegation was received at the BJP head office as part of ongoing inter-party interactions.

The Chinese Ambassador to India, Xu Feihong, was also present during the meeting, accompanying the CPC delegation.

According to Chauthaiwale, the visit was led by Sun Haiyan in her capacity as Vice Minister of the IDCPC, underscoring the importance attached to party-level exchanges between the two sides.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com