English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

It Was Godse Who Killed Gandhi, No need to re-investigate: Amicus to SC

Published

on

It Was Godse Who Killed Gandhi, No need to re-investigate: Amicus to SC

Senior advocate Amarendra Sharan, appointed amicus curiae by the Supreme Court in a petition seeking re-investigation of the assassination of Mahatma Gandhi 70 years ago, has stated that such a probe was not required.

In his report to the apex court, Sharan has reportedly said that the theory pushed by the petitioner – Pankaj Phadnis, co-founder of Abhinav Bharat (an organisation inspired by the ideology of RSS and BJP icon Vinayak Damodar Savarkar) – of the presence of a second assassin on the day the Mahatma was murdered was without any basis.

Phadnis had termed the investigation into Gandhi’s assassination as the “biggest cover-up” in the history of India. “The blame on the Marathi people in general and Veer Savarkar in particular for being the cause of the Mahatma’s death has no basis in law and facts. On the other hand, there is a compelling need to uncover the larger conspiracy behind the murder by constituting a new Commission of Inquiry to look into the issue,” Phadnis’ PIL had mentioned.

Rejecting the contentions put forth by Phadnis in the PIL, the amicus curiae said that the Father of the Nation had been killed by Nathuram Godse.

In his report, Sharan – who had been appointed amicus curiae by a Supreme Court bench of Justices SA Bobde and L Nageswara Rao in October last year – has concluded: “the bullets which pierced Mahatma Gandhi’s body, the pistol from which it was fired, the assailant who fired the said bullets, the conspiracy which led to the assassination and the ideology which led to the said assassination have all been duly identified.” Sharan adds that no substantive material has come to light to throw any doubt on the investigation of the Mahatma’s murder.

For the purpose of his report, Sharan, assisted by advocates Sanchit Guru and Samarth Khanna, had examined nearly 4,000 pages of trial court records in the assassination case, besides the Jeevan Lal Kapur Inquiry Commission report.

The PIL filed by Phadnis had claimed that there was a “fourth bullet” that had pierced the Mahatma’s body the day he was assassinated (January 30, 1948) and that this bullet was fired by a second assassin and not Nathuram Godse, the man widely believed to be the murderer of the Father of the Nation. Godse, along with an associate, was hanged for the assassination.  The RSS, the parent organisation of the BJP, was subsequently banned by Sardar Patel, the then Deputy Prime Minister and Union home minister, in February 1948 for its role in fomenting an atmosphere of hate which played its role in precipitating events.

While rejecting the need for a re-investigation or a fact-finding commission to look at the Mahatma’s assassination afresh, Sharan has noted that he received a letter and an affidavit on December 2, 2017, of one Dr Nene who claimed to have treated the so-called second assassin of the Mahatma in the late 1950s.

According to a report by The Indian Express, the amicus curiae has pointed out in his report: “That material (submissions by Dr Nene) has no evidentiary value in the court of law after sixty years, especially as Dr Nene had the opportunity to appear before the Kapur Commission (constituted to investigate the assassination) in 1965 and then when a similar petition came up before the Bombay High Court in 2016.”

The amicus curiae’s report has also junked the alleged involvement of a foreign intelligence agency in the assassination, and stated that the petitioner’s claim was not substantiated by any evidence.

Phadnis had earlier filed a similar petition before the Bombay High Court in June 2016. However, the court had then rejected Phadnis’ demand for a fresh Commission of Inquiry in the assassination case.

With Sharan having submitted his report, the PIL is now scheduled to come up for hearing before the Supreme Court Bench on Friday (January 12). It may be recalled that several distinguished citizens of the country, including the Mahatama’s grandson Gopalkrishna Gandhi and great-grandson Tushar Gandhi have voiced their opposition to Phadnis’ demand for a fresh probe in the assassination case, raising concerns over the possible political motive behind such a move.

India News

Amit Shah sets 2029 deadline to make India drug-free

Union Home Minister Amit Shah has set December 31, 2029 as the deadline for India’s fight against drugs, urging states to focus on dismantling trafficking networks rather than only recording seizures.

Published

on

Union Home Minister Amit Shah has set December 31, 2029 as the deadline for India’s campaign against drugs, calling on states and Union Territories to move beyond recording seizures and focus on dismantling the networks behind narcotics trafficking.

Speaking at the third National Conference of Anti-Narcotics Task Force Heads in New Delhi on Tuesday, Mr Shah said India would not allow drugs to enter or leave the country.

“Neither will we allow a single gram of drugs to enter India, nor will we allow a single gram of drugs to go out,” he said.

The conference brought together police chiefs from 36 states and Union Territories as the government outlined its roadmap for tackling the country’s drug problem.

Amit Shah asks states to focus on drug networks

Mr Shah said drug seizures alone should not be treated as the measure of success. He called for a shift from meetings to missions, reports to results and seizures to dismantling the networks responsible for drug trafficking.

Districts have been identified as the frontline units in the strategy. They are to be assessed based on whether they are involved in drug production or entry, serve as transit corridors or primarily face drug consumption.

The response would then be tailored according to the nature of the threat in each district.

The Home Minister also stressed the need to follow the money generated by narcotics trafficking, including through investigations into bank accounts and shell transactions that help sustain drug networks.

Synthetic drugs, darknet and crypto payments in focus

The government is also preparing for emerging methods used by drug traffickers, with synthetic drugs, darknet marketplaces, cryptocurrency payments and dead-drop deliveries identified as areas requiring greater attention.

Mr Shah urged states to develop specialised teams capable of investigating these newer forms of narcotics trafficking.

The government also wants foreign nationals involved in drug supply chains to face deportation and blacklisting, while those operating supply networks into India from abroad are to be pursued for extradition.

2026-2029 drug control roadmap

The government’s Vision Document 2026-2029 is based on four pillars: enforcement and intelligence, control of precursor chemicals and synthetic drugs, demand and harm reduction, and capacity building.

According to the report, the document contains more than 100 individual targets.

The Nashamukt Mitra programme is another part of the campaign. Nearly 47,000 volunteers have registered so far, with a target of reaching one lakh volunteers. The programme plans to take awareness activities to around 10 lakh schools and colleges.

The government has also launched new television advertisements against drug use, redesigned the Narcotics Control Bureau website and laid the foundation stones for NCB zonal complexes in Lucknow and Dehradun.

Mr Shah linked the anti-drug campaign to Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s vision of a developed India by 2047, arguing that protecting the country’s young population from narcotics is essential to that goal.

Continue Reading

India News

J&K Assembly uproar over Maharaja Hari Singh, Sheikh Abdullah holidays

A holiday row over Maharaja Hari Singh and Sheikh Mohammad Abdullah triggered an uproar in the Jammu and Kashmir Assembly, with BJP and NC members raising competing slogans.

Published

on

The Jammu and Kashmir Assembly witnessed a heated exchange on Tuesday over public holidays associated with Maharaja Hari Singh and Sheikh Mohammad Abdullah, with members of the ruling National Conference (NC) and BJP raising slogans in support of the respective leaders.

The issue was raised a day before the September 23 public holiday marking Maharaja Hari Singh’s birth anniversary.

NC legislator Abdul Majid Larmi demanded that the holiday for Maharaja Hari Singh’s birth anniversary be withdrawn if the public holiday for Sheikh Mohammad Abdullah’s birth anniversary was not restored.

The demand led to an uproar in the House, with BJP members raising slogans in support of Maharaja Hari Singh and accusing the NC of insulting his legacy. NC legislators responded with slogans supporting Sheikh Abdullah.

What happened over the holiday issue

The Centre withdrew the public holiday marking Sheikh Abdullah’s birth anniversary after the abrogation of Article 370 in 2019. His birth anniversary is observed on December 5.

The government also discontinued the public holiday on July 13, which was observed as Martyrs’ Day in the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir.

In contrast, September 23, Maharaja Hari Singh’s birth anniversary, is now observed as a public holiday in Jammu and Kashmir.

PDP members also joined the discussion and demanded the restoration of the July 13 public holiday.

Speaker says he has no power over holidays

As slogan-shouting continued in the Assembly, Speaker Abdul Rahim Rather attempted to calm the members.

The Speaker said that the authority to declare or withdraw public holidays did not fall within his jurisdiction.

Why July 13 was observed as Martyrs’ Day

July 13 was traditionally observed as a public holiday in Jammu and Kashmir. Official functions were held at the Martyrs’ Graveyard to commemorate the 22 people killed during the 1931 uprising against the Dogra monarchy under British rule.

Following the abrogation of Article 370 and the bifurcation of the erstwhile state into two Union Territories in 2019, July 13 was removed from the list of public holidays. Official commemorations and ceremonial police tributes were also discontinued.

The 1931 killings and the unrest that followed led to the appointment of two commissions to examine grievances of the Muslim community in Kashmir and eventually contributed to limited political reforms.

The first Assembly elections in Jammu and Kashmir were held in 1934, although the Maharaja retained extensive powers over key matters at the time.

Continue Reading

India News

Odisha SIR: Over 20 lakh voters removed from electoral roll

Odisha’s final electoral roll has been published after the Special Intensive Revision, with 20.56 lakh electors removed following verification.

Published

on

SIR

The Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Odisha has been completed, with the final electoral roll published after a verification process that resulted in the removal of 20.56 lakh electors.

According to Odisha Chief Electoral Officer S Gopalan, the SIR exercise began on May 30, 2026. At the beginning of the exercise, the electoral roll had 3,13,99,000 electors.

During the first phase, 20.12 lakh voters were removed for various reasons. This included 8.32 lakh electors who were found to be dead, 8.08 lakh who had permanently shifted, 2 lakh who were absent and 1.58 lakh who had duplicate entries.

Notices issued during verification

After the draft electoral roll was published on July 5, further verification was carried out for voters whose details could not be mapped or contained discrepancies.

Around 13 lakh electors whose details could not be mapped in the 2002 roll were issued notices. Another 45.37 lakh electors with logical errors in their entries also received notices.

In total, 58.36 lakh electors were issued notices during this process. Following hearings, 24,000 were found ineligible and removed from the roll.

Claims and objections processed

The electoral authorities also received claims and objections during the revision.

Around 57,000 Form 7 applications were received. Of these, 20,000 were found to be valid and the corresponding names were removed.

At the same time, eligible voters were added to the final roll. Around 2.74 lakh Form 6 applications and 16,000 Form 8 applications resulted in about 2.90 lakh additions.

After the verification, deletions and additions, Odisha’s final electoral roll stood at 3,16,32,754 electors.

The final roll includes about 1,61,30,000 male voters, 1,54,99,000 female voters and 2,774 third-gender electors.

Continuous updating resumes

With the completion of the SIR exercise, the regular process of updating the electoral roll has resumed.

According to the Odisha CEO, voters can now use Forms 6, 7 and 8 to apply for inclusion, deletion or corrections in the electoral roll. Applications can be submitted online or through Booth Level Officers.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com