English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Demonetisation valid: Supreme Court Constitution Bench approves move to demonetise Rs 1000, Rs 500 notes

Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s 2016 note ban was supported by the Supreme Court today, which ruled that the decision making process cannot be faulted merely because the proposal was made by the Central Government.

Published

on

Supreme Court

Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s 2016 note ban was supported by the Supreme Court today, which ruled that the decision making process cannot be faulted merely because the proposal was made by the Central Government.

Demonetisation cannot be invalidated due to lack of proportionality, said Justice Gavai.

The Central Board of RBI and the centre had a six-month-long conversation before the centre was obligated to act, according to the judges.

The centre’s decision to outlaw 1,000 and 500 rupee currencies in November 2016 was contested through petitions. The action caused the overnight wiping out of 10 lakh crore currencies.

The Supreme Court received 58 petitions contesting the banning of notes, contending that the government should not have made such a hasty decision and that the ban should be overturned.

The administration maintained that a case cannot be decided by the court if no real relief can be given. According to the centre, it would be like turning back the clock or unscrambling a scrambled egg.

Read Also: R Krishnakumar, former Tata Sons director, dies at 84

Chairman of the Constitution Bench will retire two days after the verdict

The five-judge bench hearing the case includes Justices S Abdul Nazeer, BR Gavai, AS Bopanna, V Ramasubramaniam and Justice BV Nagaratna. Justice S Abdul Nazeer, who is heading the constitution bench, will retire on January 4, 2023, two days after the verdict is pronounced. According to media reports, two judgments are to be read in the constitution bench, which have been written by Justice BR Gavai and Justice BV Nagaratna.

Argument in petition – no right to cancel currency

The petitioners in this case contend that Section 26(2) of the Reserve Bank of India Act does not authorise the government to completely cancel currency notes of a particular denomination. Section 26(2) empowers the Center to cancel currency notes of a particular series and not the entire currency notes.

Demonetisation implemented to deal with black money: Centre

In the Supreme Court, the government defended the decision of demonetisation, saying that it was part of planning and an effective way to deal with problems like fake currency, terror funding, black money and tax evasion. This was the biggest step in the series related to changes in economic policies. The Centre had also said that the decision of demonetisation was taken only on the recommendation of the Central Board of Directors of the Reserve Bank.

Government mentions benefits of demonetisation in court

The Centre in its reply also said that demonetisation has brought many benefits like reduction in fake notes, increase in digital transactions, detection of unaccounted income. In October 2022 alone, a digital transaction of 730 crores took place, that is, a transaction of Rs 12 lakh crores has been recorded in a month, which was 1.09 lakh transactions in 2016, i.e. about Rs 6,952 crore.

PM Modi had announced demonetisation on Nov 8, 2016

On November 8, 2016, Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced the banning of 500 and 1000 rupee notes from 12 midnight in the name of the country. At that time, the government expected that at least Rs 3-4 lakh crore of black money would come out from demonetisation. However, only Rs 1.3 lakh crore of black money came to the fore in the entire exercise.

R Krishnakumar, former Tata Sons director, dies at 84

Delhi: Woman killed after car hits her and drags her for 4 km in Kanjhawala, CCTV footage goes viral| WATCH

India News

Amit Shah counters delimitation concerns, says southern states to gain Lok Sabha seats

Amit Shah assures Parliament that southern states will gain Lok Sabha seats after delimitation, countering opposition criticism during the women’s reservation debate.

Published

on

Amit Shah

Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Thursday addressed concerns over the proposed delimitation exercise, asserting in the Lok Sabha that southern states will not lose representation but instead see an increase in their number of seats.

His remarks came during a heated debate linked to the implementation of women’s reservation, where opposition parties have raised fears that population-based delimitation could reduce the political weight of southern states.

Shah rejected these claims, calling them misleading, and said the proposed framework ensures fairness while expanding the overall strength of the Lok Sabha.

Seat count to rise with expansion of Lok Sabha

The government has indicated that the total number of Lok Sabha seats could increase significantly as part of the delimitation process. In this expanded House, the combined representation of southern states is expected to rise from 129 seats at present to around 195 seats.

Shah emphasised that no state will lose seats in absolute terms, and the exercise is designed to reflect population changes while maintaining balance across regions.

State-wise projections shared in Parliament

During his address, Shah also provided indicative figures for individual southern states, suggesting notable increases in representation. According to the projections:

  • Tamil Nadu could see its seats rise substantially
  • Kerala, Telangana, and Andhra Pradesh are also expected to gain additional seats
  • Karnataka’s representation may increase as well

These figures were presented to counter the argument that delimitation would disproportionately favour northern states.

Political debate intensifies over linkage with women’s quota

The delimitation exercise has been closely linked to the rollout of women’s reservation, which proposes one-third seats for women in Parliament and state assemblies.

Opposition leaders have questioned this linkage, arguing that tying reservation to delimitation could delay its implementation and raise federal concerns. Some leaders have also warned that the move could impact national unity if apprehensions among states are not addressed.

The government, however, maintains that the reforms are necessary to ensure equitable representation and to align the electoral system with demographic realities.

Centre dismisses ‘false narrative’ on southern states

Shah reiterated that concerns about southern states losing influence are unfounded. He said the delimitation process will increase representation across regions and described the criticism as a “false narrative” aimed at creating confusion.

The issue is expected to remain a key flashpoint as Parliament continues discussions on the women’s reservation framework and related legislative changes.

Continue Reading

India News

PM Modi assures no discrimination in women’s quota, delimitation debate intensifies in Parliament

PM Narendra Modi has assured that women’s reservation will be implemented without discrimination, amid a heated debate over delimitation in Parliament.

Published

on

PM modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has assured that there will be no discrimination in the implementation of women’s reservation, as Parliament witnessed a sharp debate over the proposed linkage between the quota and delimitation exercise.

During the ongoing special session, the government reiterated its commitment to ensuring fair representation while addressing concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the timing and structure of the legislation.

The proposed framework aims to reserve 33 percent of seats for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. However, its implementation is tied to a fresh delimitation exercise, which is expected after the next census.

Opposition questions timing and intent

Opposition leaders have raised concerns that linking the women’s quota to delimitation could delay its implementation. They argue that the process of redrawing constituencies may push the actual rollout further into the future.

The issue has triggered a broader political confrontation, with multiple parties questioning whether the move could alter representation across states.

Some critics have also alleged that the delimitation exercise could disproportionately benefit certain regions based on population, a charge the government has rejected.

Government reiterates commitment to fair implementation

Responding to these concerns, the Centre has maintained that the reforms are necessary to ensure accurate and updated representation based on population data.

Leaders from the ruling side have repeatedly emphasized that the process will be carried out transparently and without bias. The assurance that there will be “no discrimination” is aimed at addressing fears among states and opposition parties.

The debate marks a key moment in Parliament, with both sides engaging in intense exchanges over one of the most significant electoral reforms in recent years.

Continue Reading

India News

Give all tickets to Muslim women, Amit Shah says, attacking Akhilesh Yadav on sub-quota demand

A sharp exchange between Amit Shah and Akhilesh Yadav in Parliament over sub-quota for Muslim women highlights key divisions on women’s reservation implementation.

Published

on

A heated exchange broke out in Parliament during discussions on the women’s reservation framework, with Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav locking horns over the demand for a sub-quota for Muslim women.

The debate unfolded as the government pushed forward key legislative measures to implement 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies.

Akhilesh Yadav argued that the proposed reservation must ensure representation for women from marginalised communities, including Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and Muslim women. He said that without such provisions, large sections could remain excluded from political participation.

He also questioned the timing of the bill, alleging that the Centre was avoiding a caste census. According to him, a census would lead to renewed demands for caste-based reservations, which the government is reluctant to address.

Government rejects religion-based quota

Responding to the demand, Amit Shah made it clear that reservation based on religion is not permitted under the Constitution.

He stated that any proposal to provide quota to Muslims on religious grounds would be unconstitutional, firmly rejecting the idea of a separate sub-quota for Muslim women within the broader reservation framework.

The government has maintained that the existing framework already includes provisions for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) women within the overall reservation structure.

Wider political divide over implementation

The issue of sub-categorisation within the women’s quota has emerged as a major flashpoint, even as most opposition parties broadly support the idea of women’s reservation.

Samajwadi Party leaders reiterated that their support for the bill depends on inclusion of OBC and minority women, while the government continues to defend its constitutional position.

The debate is part of a broader discussion during the special Parliament session, where multiple bills linked to delimitation and implementation of the women’s quota are being taken up.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com