English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Supreme Court directs EC to accept Aadhaar as identity proof, clarifies it’s not citizenship evidence

Published

on

Supreme Court

The Supreme Court directed the Election Commission (EC) to consider Aadhaar as a valid identity document for the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in poll-bound Bihar, while making it clear that Aadhaar cannot serve as proof of citizenship.

Currently, the Bihar SIR allows voters to submit any of 11 prescribed documents along with their enumeration forms. With the Supreme Court’s order, Aadhaar will become the 12th approved document for establishing voter identity. A bench comprising Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi emphasized that Aadhaar should be used strictly for identity verification, ensuring that only genuine citizens are included in the electoral rolls.

The Court instructed the EC to verify the authenticity of Aadhaar numbers submitted during the SIR and to ensure that illegal immigrants or individuals using forged documents are not included in the electoral rolls. The bench noted that only genuine citizens should be allowed to vote and directed the poll body to issue the necessary guidelines for Aadhaar’s acceptance. The Court also sought an explanation from the EC regarding the show-cause notices issued to officials who had earlier refused to accept Aadhaar as identity proof.

Senior advocate Rakesh Dwivedi, representing the EC, argued that adding Aadhaar might serve no practical purpose, as 99.6% of the 7.24 crore voters in Bihar’s draft electoral roll had already submitted valid documents. Nevertheless, the Supreme Court referred to the Aadhaar Act, 2016, and the Representation of the People Act, reiterating that while Aadhaar does not establish citizenship, it can serve as a reliable identity verification tool.

The Court also addressed the ongoing confusion regarding Bihar’s SIR, describing it as largely a trust issue. The Court instructed the state legal services authority to engage paralegal volunteers to help voters and political parties submit their claims and objections.

According to the EC schedule issued on June 24, the deadline for filing claims and objections ended on September 1, though the poll body stated that submissions after this date would be considered only after the final electoral roll is published on September 30. Between August 22 and 30, a total of 22,723 claims for inclusion and 1,34,738 objections for exclusion were filed.

This Supreme Court directive ensures that Aadhaar can now be used as an official identity document in Bihar’s SIR, balancing efficient voter verification with protection against misuse or fraudulent entries.

India News

Mamata Banerjee says ED raids on I-PAC have politically rejuvenated her

Mamata Banerjee led a protest rally in Kolkata after ED raids linked to I-PAC, saying political attacks only rejuvenate her and accusing the Centre of misusing agencies.

Published

on

mamta banerjee

West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee on Friday escalated her confrontation with the Centre following Enforcement Directorate (ED) raids linked to the Indian Political Action Committee (I-PAC), asserting that political attacks only strengthen her resolve.

Banerjee led a nearly 6-kilometre protest rally in Kolkata, beginning from Jadavpur and ending at Hazra, with senior Trinamool Congress leaders and party workers marching alongside her. Large crowds gathered along the route in a show of support.

Addressing party supporters after the rally, the Trinamool Congress chairperson defended her decision to enter the residence of I-PAC co-founder Pratik Jain during the ED raids on Thursday, an act that has drawn criticism from the Bharatiya Janata Party and prompted demands for an investigation.

“I did nothing illegal. I went there as the Trinamool Congress chairperson,” Banerjee said, adding that several items had already been taken away by the time she reached the premises.

Allegations of misuse of central agencies

The chief minister accused the Centre of using agencies such as the ED and the Central Bureau of Investigation for political purposes. Questioning the intent behind the raids, she said political opponents were attempting to weaken her party ahead of the 2026 West Bengal Assembly elections.

“If someone tries to kill me politically, don’t I have the right to defend myself?” she asked.

The ED action against I-PAC is linked to an alleged coal scam. Banerjee claimed that leaders from the BJP were also involved in coal-related irregularities and asserted that she possessed evidence. “I have proof on pen drives. I will release it when the time comes,” she said.

‘Politically rejuvenated and reborn’

Taking a combative tone, Banerjee said repeated attempts to target her had only made her stronger politically. “If someone tries to hit me politically, I get politically rejuvenated and reborn,” she declared.

Referring to recent political developments in other states, she alleged that central agencies had been used to destabilise elected governments elsewhere, adding that similar attempts would fail in West Bengal. She expressed confidence that the Trinamool Congress would secure a decisive mandate in the 2026 Assembly polls.

BJP hits back

The BJP accused the West Bengal government of corruption and claimed that the chief minister’s actions during the ED raids raised serious questions. Party leaders alleged that Banerjee had intimidated officials and demanded that she be made an accused in the case.

The political confrontation comes hours after several Trinamool Congress MPs, including Derek O’Brien and Mahua Moitra, were detained by Delhi Police while protesting outside Union Home Minister Amit Shah’s office. Banerjee criticised the detentions, describing the ruling party’s approach to democracy as one that demands “obedience”.

Continue Reading

India News

Ayodhya bans online delivery of non-veg food within 15 km of Ram temple

Ayodhya authorities have prohibited online delivery of non-vegetarian food within 15 km of the Ram temple following complaints over violations in sacred areas.

Published

on

Ram Mandir

The Ayodhya district administration has imposed a ban on the online delivery of non-vegetarian food items within a 15-kilometre radius of the Ram temple, following repeated complaints about violations in religiously significant areas.

Officials said the decision was taken after residents and pilgrims raised concerns over online food delivery platforms supplying non-vegetarian items in locations falling under the Panchkosi Parikrama route, considered sacred by devotees.

Complaints against hotels and online platforms

Authorities also flagged reports suggesting that certain hotels and homestays in Ayodhya were serving non-vegetarian food and alcoholic beverages to guests, despite restrictions. Establishments have been issued strict warnings to immediately stop such practices, officials said.

The ban comes months after the Ayodhya Municipal Corporation decided in May 2025 to prohibit the sale of liquor and meat along the 14-km Ram Path, which connects Ayodhya with Faizabad. However, locals claim that liquor sales continue along the route, with more than two dozen outlets still operating.

A municipal officer said meat shops along the Ram Path, including those in Faizabad, had been removed. However, action against liquor vends requires authorisation from the district administration, leading to delays in enforcement.

Monitoring to ensure compliance

Assistant Food Commissioner Manik Chandra Singh said complaints had surfaced that non-vegetarian food continued to be delivered to tourists through online platforms despite existing restrictions.

“Following these complaints, a ban on online non-vegetarian food delivery has been imposed. Hotels, shopkeepers and delivery companies have been informed, and continuous monitoring will be conducted to ensure compliance,” Singh said.

Continue Reading

India News

Delhi assembly row spills onto streets as BJP protests Atishi’s Sikh Guru remark

The controversy over Atishi’s alleged remarks on Sikh Guru Tegh Bahadur spilled onto Delhi’s streets as BJP supporters marched against the AAP, demanding an apology and resignation.

Published

on

BJP Protest

What began as repeated disruptions inside the Delhi Assembly has now moved beyond the House, with the Bharatiya Janata Party taking its protest against Aam Aadmi Party leader Atishi to the streets of the national capital.

On Friday, hundreds of BJP supporters, including members of the party’s Sikh unit, marched towards the AAP headquarters, raising slogans against Atishi and AAP national convener Arvind Kejriwal. Heavy police deployment was seen along the protest route as demonstrators attempted to move closer to the party office, escalating the political standoff.

BJP sharpens protest over remarks in House

The BJP said the street protest reflected mounting anger over what it termed “insensitive” remarks made by Atishi during a discussion related to Sikh Guru Tegh Bahadur in the Delhi Assembly. The controversy had already led to repeated disruptions during the Winter Session.

BJP MP Kamaljeet Sehrawat described the remarks as “shocking”, stating that Guru Tegh Bahadur’s sacrifice for his community and the nation could not be spoken of lightly. She said Atishi should apologise and step down from her position.

BJP MLA Kailash Gehlot also said the issue could not be dismissed, calling the remarks highly inappropriate and serious. Former Delhi minister and BJP leader Arvinder Singh Lovely joined the protest, terming the language used in the Assembly disgraceful and insulting to India’s spiritual heritage.

BJP MP Yogender Chandolia said the party would continue pressing for accountability, alleging that the remarks amounted to an insult to Guru Tegh Bahadur during an Assembly session. He said the BJP would not tolerate such statements and reiterated the demand for Atishi’s resignation.

Tension continues inside Delhi Assembly

Even as protests unfolded outside, the confrontation inside the Delhi Assembly showed no signs of easing. Four AAP MLAs — Sanjeev Jha, Jarnail Singh, Som Dutt and Kuldeep Kumar — were marshalled out of the House amid sloganeering and repeated disruptions.

AAP leaders accused the BJP of using the controversy to avoid discussion on governance-related issues. AAP MLA Sanjeev Jha said MLAs were punished for raising questions, alleging selective action by the Speaker. Jarnail Singh echoed similar concerns, claiming democratic norms were being undermined inside the Assembly.

Speaker orders forensic examination

Amid the escalating political row, Delhi Assembly Speaker Vijender Gupta had earlier ordered a forensic examination of a video containing the alleged remarks attributed to Atishi. The matter has also been referred to the Privileges Committee, which has been directed to submit its report within 15 days.

According to the Delhi Assembly secretariat, the inquiry will examine both the authenticity and the context of the remarks as tensions continue between the BJP and the AAP.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com