English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

You used worse abuses than ‘crook’ for Jaitley: Jethmalani writes to Kejriwal

Published

on

You used worse abuses than ‘crook’ for Jaitley: Jethmalani writes to Kejriwal

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]While firing a fresh salvo at the Delhi chief minister, the senior advocate also alleges Jaitley made Rs 57 crore of illicit money in a cricket stadium deal

Days after he announced that he would no longer be representing Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal in the defamation case filed against him by Union Finance Minister Arun Jaitley, senior advocate Ram Jethmalani has now alleged that the AAP leader used worse abuses than a mere ‘crook’” against Jaitley during his consultations over the case.

Ram Jethmalani, peeved at Kejriwal informing the Delhi High Court that he hadn’t asked the senior counsel to use objectionable language against Jaitley, had earlier this week said that he would not be representing the Chief Minister any longer and had asked him to pay the Rs 2 crore legal fee that was due for the case.

However, known to never hold his punches, Jethmalani has now put up on his blog a copy of a letter he wrote to Kejriwal on July 20 in which urges Kejriwal to “ask your conscience how many times you used worse abuses than a mere ‘crook’ (for Jaitley). You have hundred times asked me to teach this crook a lesson (sic)”. Jethmalani has reportedly also sent a copy of this letter to Jaitley.[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][vc_column_text]The fallout between Kejriwal and Jethmalani is the result of an affidavit submitted by Kejriwal in the Delhi High Court earlier this week. In the affidavit, Kejriwal said, “Neither the defendant (Kejriwal) nor the counsel (Anupam Srivastava) briefing the senior counsel (Jethmalani) gave instructions to the senior counsel to use the objectionable words.” The reference here was to Jethmalani addressing Jaitley as a ‘crook’ while addressing the media about the proceedings in the defamation case.

When asked if he was using the objectionable word against Jaitley on the instruction of his client, Jethmalani had replied in the affirmative, prompting the Union Finance Minister to file another defamation case against Kejriwal demanding another Rs 10 crore in damages.

Jaitley had filed the first defamation suit against Kejriwal and five other Aam Admi Party leaders in 2015 after they accused him of irregularities and corruption while heading Delhi District Cricket Association (DDCA) for 13 years.[/vc_column_text][vc_row_inner css=”.vc_custom_1501325132976{padding-top: 20px !important;background-color: #aab1bf !important;}”][vc_column_inner][vc_column_text]You used worse abuses than ‘crook’ for Jaitley: Jethmalani writes to Kejriwal

Jethmalani says Jaitley made Rs 57 crore illicit money in cricket stadium deal

In the brouhaha over Jethmalani’s fresh salvo against the Delhi chief minister, a crucial new allegation that the ace lawyer and former BJP parliamentarian made against Jaitley seems to have gone unnoticed. However, given Jethmalani’s proclivity for high-octane attacks against those who don’t find favour with him, the days to come may see him revealing more details on the fresh allegations.

Almost as a parting gift to Kejriwal, the senior advocate writes towards the very end of his letter:

“Let me however tell you that Raghav Chadha and Anupam Srivastava (Kejriwal’s assistant and advocate respectively) both saw me at the last conference and pointed out two more facts to me: (1) That Jaitley had formed one more organization, Hockey India, and he has got a remuneration of Rs 3 crore for his daughter who is doing some professional work for it. (2) That Jaitley had himself approached the government for giving the cricket stadium in the name of Shyama Prasad Mukherjee and bear the cost of construction and he later changed his mind to make money by selling the corporate boxes and he has earned Rs 57 crore of illicit money. This happened only 4 days ago (July 16, since Jethmalani’s letter was written on July 20).[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

Amit Shah counters delimitation concerns, says southern states to gain Lok Sabha seats

Amit Shah assures Parliament that southern states will gain Lok Sabha seats after delimitation, countering opposition criticism during the women’s reservation debate.

Published

on

Amit Shah

Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Thursday addressed concerns over the proposed delimitation exercise, asserting in the Lok Sabha that southern states will not lose representation but instead see an increase in their number of seats.

His remarks came during a heated debate linked to the implementation of women’s reservation, where opposition parties have raised fears that population-based delimitation could reduce the political weight of southern states.

Shah rejected these claims, calling them misleading, and said the proposed framework ensures fairness while expanding the overall strength of the Lok Sabha.

Seat count to rise with expansion of Lok Sabha

The government has indicated that the total number of Lok Sabha seats could increase significantly as part of the delimitation process. In this expanded House, the combined representation of southern states is expected to rise from 129 seats at present to around 195 seats.

Shah emphasised that no state will lose seats in absolute terms, and the exercise is designed to reflect population changes while maintaining balance across regions.

State-wise projections shared in Parliament

During his address, Shah also provided indicative figures for individual southern states, suggesting notable increases in representation. According to the projections:

  • Tamil Nadu could see its seats rise substantially
  • Kerala, Telangana, and Andhra Pradesh are also expected to gain additional seats
  • Karnataka’s representation may increase as well

These figures were presented to counter the argument that delimitation would disproportionately favour northern states.

Political debate intensifies over linkage with women’s quota

The delimitation exercise has been closely linked to the rollout of women’s reservation, which proposes one-third seats for women in Parliament and state assemblies.

Opposition leaders have questioned this linkage, arguing that tying reservation to delimitation could delay its implementation and raise federal concerns. Some leaders have also warned that the move could impact national unity if apprehensions among states are not addressed.

The government, however, maintains that the reforms are necessary to ensure equitable representation and to align the electoral system with demographic realities.

Centre dismisses ‘false narrative’ on southern states

Shah reiterated that concerns about southern states losing influence are unfounded. He said the delimitation process will increase representation across regions and described the criticism as a “false narrative” aimed at creating confusion.

The issue is expected to remain a key flashpoint as Parliament continues discussions on the women’s reservation framework and related legislative changes.

Continue Reading

India News

PM Modi assures no discrimination in women’s quota, delimitation debate intensifies in Parliament

PM Narendra Modi has assured that women’s reservation will be implemented without discrimination, amid a heated debate over delimitation in Parliament.

Published

on

PM modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has assured that there will be no discrimination in the implementation of women’s reservation, as Parliament witnessed a sharp debate over the proposed linkage between the quota and delimitation exercise.

During the ongoing special session, the government reiterated its commitment to ensuring fair representation while addressing concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the timing and structure of the legislation.

The proposed framework aims to reserve 33 percent of seats for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. However, its implementation is tied to a fresh delimitation exercise, which is expected after the next census.

Opposition questions timing and intent

Opposition leaders have raised concerns that linking the women’s quota to delimitation could delay its implementation. They argue that the process of redrawing constituencies may push the actual rollout further into the future.

The issue has triggered a broader political confrontation, with multiple parties questioning whether the move could alter representation across states.

Some critics have also alleged that the delimitation exercise could disproportionately benefit certain regions based on population, a charge the government has rejected.

Government reiterates commitment to fair implementation

Responding to these concerns, the Centre has maintained that the reforms are necessary to ensure accurate and updated representation based on population data.

Leaders from the ruling side have repeatedly emphasized that the process will be carried out transparently and without bias. The assurance that there will be “no discrimination” is aimed at addressing fears among states and opposition parties.

The debate marks a key moment in Parliament, with both sides engaging in intense exchanges over one of the most significant electoral reforms in recent years.

Continue Reading

India News

Give all tickets to Muslim women, Amit Shah says, attacking Akhilesh Yadav on sub-quota demand

A sharp exchange between Amit Shah and Akhilesh Yadav in Parliament over sub-quota for Muslim women highlights key divisions on women’s reservation implementation.

Published

on

A heated exchange broke out in Parliament during discussions on the women’s reservation framework, with Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav locking horns over the demand for a sub-quota for Muslim women.

The debate unfolded as the government pushed forward key legislative measures to implement 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies.

Akhilesh Yadav argued that the proposed reservation must ensure representation for women from marginalised communities, including Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and Muslim women. He said that without such provisions, large sections could remain excluded from political participation.

He also questioned the timing of the bill, alleging that the Centre was avoiding a caste census. According to him, a census would lead to renewed demands for caste-based reservations, which the government is reluctant to address.

Government rejects religion-based quota

Responding to the demand, Amit Shah made it clear that reservation based on religion is not permitted under the Constitution.

He stated that any proposal to provide quota to Muslims on religious grounds would be unconstitutional, firmly rejecting the idea of a separate sub-quota for Muslim women within the broader reservation framework.

The government has maintained that the existing framework already includes provisions for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) women within the overall reservation structure.

Wider political divide over implementation

The issue of sub-categorisation within the women’s quota has emerged as a major flashpoint, even as most opposition parties broadly support the idea of women’s reservation.

Samajwadi Party leaders reiterated that their support for the bill depends on inclusion of OBC and minority women, while the government continues to defend its constitutional position.

The debate is part of a broader discussion during the special Parliament session, where multiple bills linked to delimitation and implementation of the women’s quota are being taken up.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com