English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest News

Aarushi murder case: Allahabad HC acquits Talwars

Published

on

Aarushi murder case: Allahabad HC acquits Talwars via benefit of doubt

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]After nine years of a harrowing experience, with their only child, Aarushi (then 14), murdered, her parents Rajesh and Nupur Talwar were acquitted on Thursday (October 12) of charges of murdering her and their domestic help Hemraj.

A division bench of the Allahabad High Court, comprising Justices AK Mishra and BK Narayana used the provision of the benefit of doubt to quash the conviction of the parents of Arushi, saying they could not be held guilty on the basis of the evidence on record.

The decision of the court was based on the fact that the CBI had failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt the guilt of the Talwars in a case that has for long intrigued the entire nation and has been the source of a book and even a Bollywood movie.

Aarushi murder case: Allahabad HC acquits Talwars via benefit of doubt

Arguments for and against the Talwars have been keenly followed by the public, with different sections of the media also putting forth their views. This was, possibly, the most awaited non-political verdict of the last decade.

The order brought much awaited relief to the Talwars. “We have got justice,” was Nupur Talwar’s first reaction to court’s verdict. Aarushi’s grandfather said he was grateful to the court and that he always knew the Rajesh and Nupur Talwar weren’t guilty.

The court accepted the argument of the Talwars’ counsel that the case had been built entirely around circumstantial evidences that failed to conclusively prove the Talwars as the perpetrators of the crime.

The case had, in fact, been closed by the CBI in 2009, which filed a closure report citing “insufficient evidence” on December 29 that year. However, on February 9, 2011 the trial court had rejected this CBI’s closure report and summoned the Talwars again to face murders charges.

In November 2013 the court sentenced the couple to life imprisonment. The allegation was of murder, of destruction of evidence with common intent and additionally, on Rajesh, of giving a false statement to the police.

This was the verdict that the Allahabad High Court on Thursday quashed.[/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1507815178742{padding-top: 10px !important;padding-right: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;padding-left: 10px !important;background-color: #d3d3d3 !important;border-radius: 10px !important;}”]“Aarushi murder case saw some of the worst reportage from Indian media”

India Legal’s sister concern APN discussed the acquittal of Aarushi’s parents, Rajesh and Nupur Talwar by the Allahabad High Court on Thursday (October 12). Dissecting the controversial murder case, Rajshri Rai, Editor-in-Chief, APN welcomed the decision of the Allahabad High Court and slammed the media for the obfuscation of the facts while reporting the case.

She recalled that while reporting the case nine years ago, the media houses engaged in misreporting of facts just to garner more and more TRP. The reporting which was done during this case was the worst reporting ever done in the history of Indian journalism, she said.

She said the media houses were totally devoid of responsible reporting and the facts were concocted to suit the tastes and preferences so as to grab more and more eyeballs. “Many theories were propounded by the media houses that were against the Talwars thereby adjudging them as accused. After this verdict the media should do some self-introspection as far as the reporting is concerned.”

She recalled that she was editing the Views on News magazine at that point on time (another publication from the group) and the magazine devoted a whole issue on the murder case and exposed how the media trial was going on.

Vinay Rai, Managing Editor, APN said that it was entirely the District police’s fault and irresponsibility as the police took over 24 hours to search the dead body of Hemraj.

Happy faces

Meanwhile, the decision of the Allahabad High Court to acquit Rajesh and Nupur Talwar, parents of murdered teenage girl Aarushi, was welcomed almost everywhere.

The following are some reactions:

DR Maurya, Jailor, Dasna Jail

“Rajesh and Nupur Talwar are happy, and said that they have got justice.”

(It is pertinent to mention here that the two were restless all through last night, continually enquiring with their lawyers and others as the possibility of the outcome. They got little sleep).

Lawyer of Rajesh & Nupur Talwar

“We are expecting that they will be out of jail tomorrow (Friday).”

CBI

“We are waiting for the copy of the judgment. We will decide on our next course of action after studying it.”

Vikram Singh (former DGP, UP) 

“Being the citizen of India, we welcome this decision. If the CBI has any objection, doors are open for appeal.”

Justice Bhavar Singh, Former Judge, Allahabad High Court

“Allahabad High Court has acquitted the Talwars, because the conviction was on the basis of circumstantial evidence.”

A TIMELINE OF EVENTS

May 16, 2008

Aarushi Talwar, 14, the only child of dentists Rajesh and Nupur Talwar of flat no. L-32 Jalvayu Vihar in Noida, was found dead in her bedroom, her throat slit. The immediate suspect in the murder was Hemraj, family’s domestic help.

May 17

The Hemraj murder angle became suspect with his dead body found, lying in a pool of blood on the terrace of the flat. The door of the terrace was locked from inside.

May 18

Noida police’s observation reveals that the two murders were done with surgical precision. They suspect that it was done by an insider, with outside attack ruled out.

May 19

With Hemraj dead, the Talwars’ former domestic help, Vishnu Sharma, was named as a suspect.

May 21

Delhi police joins the probe.

May 22

The suspect range of the police increases and the police say it could be a case of honour killing. Aarushi’s friends are questioned, following which the parents are identified as suspects.

May 23

Immediately afterwards, Rajesh Talwar was arrested for double murders.

June 1

With the case getting murkier, the CBI takes over from Noida police.

June 13

Krishna, another domestic help of the Talwars is arrested.

June 20

Lie detector test on Rajesh Talwar.

June 25

Second lie detector test conducted on Nupur Talwar, with the first proving inconclusive.

June 26

CBI says it is a “blind case”. Rajesh’s bail appeal refused by Ghaziabad magistrate.

July 11

Servant Vijay Mandal arrested, Rajesh Talwar gets bail.

February 15-20, 2009

Narco-analysis tests on Rajesh Talwar.

December 29

CBI team files a closure report citing “insufficient evidence.”  Servants get clean chit, but Talwars remain prime suspects.

February 9, 25, 2011

Trial court rejects CBI’s closure report and summons Aarushi’s parents to face murder charges.

February 21

Talwars approach Allahabad High Court for quashing trial court summons.

March 18

Allahabad HC dismisses the plea.

March 19

The couple approaches the Supreme Court.

January 9, 2012

Supreme Court says the bail granted to Rajesh Talwar by the lower court would continue and that he should appear before the Ghaziabad Magistrate on February 4 to face trial along with Nupur.

November 26, 2013

The couple is convicted for the double-murder and sentenced to life imprisonment by a special CBI court in Ghaziabad.

12 October 2017

Allahabad High Court division bench quashes trial court verdict and declares the Talwars innocent by virtue of the benefit of doubt.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Entertainment

Kapil Sharma warned by MNS for referring to Mumbai as Bombay on Netflix show

Published

on

Bollywood comedian Kapil Sharma has come under the radar of the Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) after the use of the term Bombay instead of Mumbai on his Netflix show The Great Indian Kapil Show. MNS spokesperson Ameya Khopkar issued a warning, stating that the usage of the city’s former name could hurt the sentiments of its residents and demanded that the correct name, Mumbai, be used.

The controversy arose during an episode featuring actress Huma Qureshi, her brother Saqib Saleem, and the Shetty sisters. While talking about her bond with Saqib, Qureshi referred to the city as Bombay, explaining that she felt at home with him despite not being originally from the city. This comment drew criticism from the MNS, who have historically been vocal about protecting the identity and pride of Mumbai.

In a post on X, Khopkar stated in Marathi, that even though 30 years have passed since Bombay was officially renamed Mumbai, the term Bombay is still frequently used by celebrity guests on The Kapil Sharma Show, Delhi-based Rajya Sabha MPs, show anchors, and in many Hindi films. He noted that the name change was officially recognized by the Maharashtra government in 1995 and by the Central Government in 1996, preceding similar renamings in other major cities such as Chennai, Bengaluru, and Kolkata.

Khopkar further emphasized the seriousness of the matter during a media interaction in Mumbai. He stated that Sharma had been working in Mumbai for many years and described the city as his land of work. He added that the people of Mumbai admire him and watch his shows, and warned that the city and its residents should not be insulted, cautioning Sharma against repeating the mistake.

He added that if the reference had been made unintentionally, the mistake should be corrected immediately. Khopkar stated that all guests on the show, including celebrities and the host, should be informed in advance to refer to the city as Mumbai. He warned that if this is not followed, the MNS would launch a strong agitation.

The Great Indian Kapil Show has recently been renewed for a third season. Its first two seasons, comprising 13 episodes each, premiered in 2024, featuring a mix of Bollywood celebrities and entertainers. The controversy marks one of the few instances where the city’s political groups have publicly intervened over the naming of Mumbai on popular entertainment platforms.

Continue Reading

Latest News

Indian-origin motel manager beheaded in the US

Published

on

In a horrifying incident in Dallas, Texas, an Indian-origin motel manager, Chandra Nagamallaiah, was brutally beheaded by a guest following an argument over a malfunctioning washing machine. The gruesome attack was carried out by 37-year-old Yordanis Cobos-Martinez in front of Nagamallaiah’s wife and children, leaving the family traumatized.

According to court records and affidavits, the confrontation began when Nagamallaiah reportedly told Cobos-Martinez not to use a broken washing machine at the Downtown Suites motel. The suspect became enraged, partly because the manager relied on a woman present for translation instead of speaking directly to him. Surveillance footage later revealed Cobos-Martinez producing a machete and repeatedly stabbing and cutting Nagamallaiah, despite the efforts of his wife and child to intervene.

The affidavit details that the victim tried to flee to the motel’s front office while screaming for help, but the attacker followed him and continued the assault. Cobos-Martinez removed Nagamallaiah’s key card and cellphone before ultimately beheading him. Disturbing footage reportedly shows the suspect kicking the severed head across the ground before throwing it into a trash bin.

Cobos-Martinez, a Cuban national with a long criminal history, including convictions for grand theft, carjacking, false imprisonment, and sexual offenses, was arrested shortly after the attack. Authorities found him a block away wearing a blood-soaked T-shirt, along with the victim’s key card and cellphone. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials noted that Cobos-Martinez should not have been in the country at the time, as previous attempts to deport him to Cuba were unsuccessful due to his criminal record.

The Department of Homeland Security described the beheading as unthinkable and stated that the case highlights the critical need for strict immigration enforcement. A witness to the attack told NBC DFW that they could not explain what they saw, describing the suspect as appearing there and not there at the same time, emphasizing the surreal and terrifying nature of the crime.

This shocking incident has left the Dallas community and Nagamallaiah’s family in deep distress, as authorities continue their investigation into the motive and circumstances surrounding the brutal murder.

Continue Reading

India News

AAP MP Sanjay Singh accuses J&K authorities of house arrest, Farooq Abdullah condemns move

Published

on

Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) MP Sanjay Singh on Thursday accused Jammu and Kashmir Lieutenant Governor Manoj Sinha of placing him under house arrest while he was in Srinagar to protest the detention of the party’s sole J&K MLA, Mehraj Malik.

Singh climbed the gate of a government guest house in Srinagar to meet National Conference (NC) chief Farooq Abdullah and later shared visuals of the interaction on social media. He said it was a very sad thing that Abdullah, who has served multiple terms as Chief Minister of Jammu and Kashmir, came to meet him at the guest house after learning about his alleged house arrest but was not allowed to do so. Singh further questioned the authorities’ actions, asking whether if this is not dictatorship, then what it is.

Malik, the MLA from Doda Assembly seat, has been detained under the Public Safety Act (PSA) on charges of disturbing public order. This marks the first instance of a sitting lawmaker being booked under the PSA, which allows authorities to detain individuals without charge or trial for up to two years. Singh alleged that Mr. Malik’s detention was retaliation for raising people’s issues in his constituency.

Abdullah also condemned the attempts to stop Singh from holding his protest. In a statement to news agency ANI, he said that preventing Singh from exercising his right to protest was absolutely wrong and accused the Lieutenant Governor Sinha of misusing his powers. He stressed that the right to protest is guaranteed by the Constitution of India, noting that Jammu and Kashmir being a union territory gives the LG significant authority, which, according to him, was being used for the wrong purposes. Abdullah questioned whether it was necessary to prevent Singh from speaking and asserted that this is not an autocracy, there is a constitution here.

Abdullah drew parallels with the recent unrest in Nepal, where protests led to the resignation of Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli, and cautioned that India must safeguard its Constitution to prevent similar circumstances. He urged the LG to uphold constitutional principles, warning that failure to do so could risk unrest, and emphasized the need to take care of the Constitution before such a fire breaks out in the country.

Other opposition leaders, including AAP chief Arvind Kejriwal and Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut, also expressed concern over the move, condemning what they described as an infringement on democratic rights.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com