English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest News

“SPG Bill will restore its original intent,” Amit Shah defends amendment

Published

on

Amit Shah

Amid uproar over the amendment to the Special Protection Group (SPG) Act and the recent withdrawal of top level SPG cover to the Gandhi family, Home Minister Amit Shah accused the previous governments of amending the original law and “diluting” it and told the Lok Sabha today that the SPG (Amendment) Bill will restore the law’s original intent to protect only the prime minister and former prime minister.

He also clarified that security for the Gandhis had “not been removed but replaced”.

According to the proposed amendment, the SPG commandos will protect only the prime minister; and former prime ministers and their families will not get the coveted SPG security cover.

The SPG, an elite force of 3,000, is now tasked with protecting only Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

“The term ‘Special’ indicates its special purpose. Many countries have such elite and compact cover exclusively for their respective heads of state. There is a misconception that the SPG is only about physical protection. It is not just physical security but also about covering the prime minister”s office, his health and communications as well,” he said.

The amendment states that the period of protection for former prime ministers and their immediate families will be capped at five years when in the past it could be extended based on threat perception.

While introducing the SPG (Amendment) Bill, 2019 in the lower House on Monday, Union Minister of State for Home G Kishan Reddy said in the existing Act there is no cut-off period for the SPG cover.

“In such a scenario, there can be severe constraint on resources, training and related infrastructure of the SPG. This can also impact the effectiveness of the elite force in providing adequate cover to the principle protectee,” the bill says.

But the Congress is demanding that SPG cover should be provided to former prime ministers and their family members for the rest of their lives.

“Security is provided on the basis of a threat perception and assessment. Based on the security assessment, a level of cover is provided – be it X or X+, Y or Y+, Z or Z+ and so on. But my question is that is a threat assessment 100% accurate? Can there not be an incident despite of the security assessment?” Congress leader Manish Tewari asked.

He added that in countries such as the US, Secret Service guards former presidents for the rest of their lives.

Earlier this month, the SPG cover to the Gandhi family – Sonia Gandhi and her children, Rahul Gandhi and Priyanka Gandhi Vadra was withdrawn.

The government had said that the decision was based on a “reassessment” of their threat perception.

All three Gandhi family members now have Z+ category security. Z+ security means each of the Gandhis will be guarded by around 100 personnel of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF).

The move provoked a furious response with party leaders accusing the centre of “playing with the lives” of the Gandhis. The Gandhi family, which has seen the assassination of two members, has always been among India’s most protected.

Former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s SPG cover was withdrawn in August.

The SPG was set up in 1985 for the security of prime ministers after the assassination of former Prime Minister Indira Gandhi by her security guards a year before.

After the assassination of former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi in 1991, the SPG Act was amended to provide security to former prime ministers and their families for 10 years.

In 2003, the Vajpayee government amended the law again to bring down the automatic protection for 10 years to one year — or more depending on the level of threat as decided by the centre.

During the Vajpayee regime, the SPG cover of former PMs such as HD Deve Gowda, IK Gujaral and PV Narasimha Rao were withdrawn.

However, Vajpayee himself enjoyed SPG protection until his death last year. Under the current SPG Act, family members of an incumbent or former PM can decline security cover. Manmohan Singh’s daughters declined SPG cover after his tenure ended.

The SPG is highly trained in physical efficiency, marksmanship, combat and proximate protection tactics and is assisted by all central and state agencies to ensure foolproof security. The SPG offers an Advance Liaison Team that screens places that the protectees will visit.

India News

Meta to face Indian parliamentary panel over Zuckerberg’s election remarks

Published

on

Mark Zuckerberg

Social media giant Meta will soon be summoned by India’s Parliamentary Standing Committee on Communication and Information Technology over CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s comments regarding the 2024 Indian general election. Nishikant Dubey, BJP MP and chairman of the panel, stated that Meta would be held accountable for allegedly spreading misinformation.

“Misinformation in a democratic country damages its image. The organization must apologize to the Parliament and the people for this mistake,” Dubey said in a post on X.

Zuckerberg, during a January 10 podcast, referred to the global erosion of trust in governments post-Covid. He claimed that in 2024, major elections worldwide, including India’s, saw incumbents losing power, linking this trend to factors such as inflation, economic policies, and pandemic handling.

The statement was swiftly fact-checked by Union Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw, who clarified that India’s 2024 general elections reaffirmed public trust in the NDA led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

“As the world’s largest democracy, India conducted its 2024 elections with over 640 million voters. People reaffirmed their trust in the NDA under PM Modi’s leadership. Zuckerberg’s claim is factually incorrect,” Vaishnaw posted on X.

He also highlighted Modi’s governance during Covid, emphasizing free food for 800 million citizens, 2.2 billion free vaccines, and economic recovery efforts that positioned India as a fast-growing economy. Vaishnaw expressed disappointment in Meta for allowing such misinformation, urging the platform to prioritize factual reporting.

While the BJP saw a slight dip in seats during the 2024 elections, the NDA comfortably retained power with its allies’ support. This marked Modi’s historic third consecutive term as Prime Minister, making him only the second Indian leader after Jawaharlal Nehru to achieve this milestone.

The controversy surrounding Zuckerberg’s remarks underscores the growing scrutiny of social media platforms in influencing political discourse and the need for accountability in the digital space.

Continue Reading

India News

Army vehicle accident in J&K claims two soldiers’ lives, two others injured

Published

on

Two soldiers were tragically killed and two others injured when an Army vehicle skidded off the road and plunged into a gorge in Jammu and Kashmir’s Bandipora district on Saturday.

The accident took place near the SK Payen area, leaving the soldiers with serious injuries. The injured personnel were promptly rushed to a nearby hospital for treatment, while the loss of the two soldiers has left the entire region in mourning.

This unfortunate incident follows another similar tragedy that occurred just a month ago in Poonch. In that accident, five soldiers lost their lives, and five others were injured when their truck fell into a 300-foot gorge. The Army’s White Knight Corps paid tribute to the fallen soldiers, sharing a statement on social media expressing their deepest condolences for the “brave soldiers” who had been serving on operational duty in the Poonch sector.

The latest loss has drawn widespread expressions of grief from political leaders. Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah expressed his sorrow, while Congress leader Rahul Gandhi offered his heartfelt tributes to the martyrs. He also wished for a swift recovery for the injured soldiers and extended his deepest condolences to their grieving families.

These two incidents highlight the ongoing risks faced by soldiers in the line of duty, and the sacrifices made in protecting the nation. Authorities are continuing their investigation into the cause of the accident, while the military community comes together to mourn the tragic losses.

Continue Reading

India News

Aligarh man’s journey ends in arrest as Pakistani woman declines marriage proposal

Published

on

India-Pakistan International Border

A 30-year-old Indian man, Badal Babu, from Uttar Pradesh’s Aligarh district, is in judicial custody in Pakistan after illegally crossing the border to meet his Facebook friend, only to be rejected. The woman, identified as 21-year-old Sana Rani, told authorities she has no interest in marrying him.

The arrest took place in Mandi Bahauddin, a district in Pakistan’s Punjab province, roughly 240 kilometers from Lahore. Babu was detained under sections 13 and 14 of Pakistan’s Foreign Act for entering the country without proper documentation.

A Facebook friendship turns sour

According to Punjab police officer Nasir Shah, the duo had been friends on Facebook for over two and a half years. Babu, in love with Rani, decided to cross the border illegally to propose. However, Rani’s statement to the police made it clear she had no intention of marrying him.

Shah added, “Babu crossed into Pakistan illegally and reached Maung village, where he was apprehended. Whether he met Rani in person remains unclear.”

Family under scrutiny

Reports suggest that intelligence officials questioned Rani and her family about her relationship with Babu. Although there is speculation that Rani may have given her statement under duress, this remains unconfirmed.

Legal proceedings begin

Babu, who narrated his “love story” to authorities, was presented in court, which placed him in judicial custody for 14 days. His next hearing is scheduled for January 10.

A familiar tale across borders

Babu’s story echoes previous cross-border romances fostered through social media or online games.

  • In a widely publicized case, Indian woman Anju traveled to Pakistan to marry Nasrullah, converting to Islam before tying the knot.
  • Similarly, Seema Haider, a Pakistani woman, crossed into India via Nepal to marry her PUBG friend after bringing her four children along.
  • Last year, 19-year-old Pakistani girl Iqra Jiwani married Indian national Mulayam Singh Yadav in Nepal after meeting him online.

While these cases highlight the unifying power of social media, they also underscore the legal and personal challenges of navigating cross-border relationships.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com