West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee on Monday intensified her attack on the Election Commission over voter roll revisions, alleging that a large number of names have been deleted without due process as the state heads towards elections.

Addressing party workers, Banerjee claimed that 40,000 voters’ names were removed from her constituency alone, alleging that the deletions were carried out unilaterally and without giving voters a chance to be heard.

“In my constituency they have deleted 40,000 voters’ names unilaterally… Even a murderer gets a chance to defend himself,” she said.

Allegations against election officials

The chief minister directly accused an election official, alleging political bias and irregular conduct in the revision process. She claimed that voter names were being removed while officials sat in Election Commission offices, calling the process illegal.

“They cannot do it, it is illegal. 58 lakh names have been unilaterally deleted,” she said, echoing claims earlier made by Trinamool Congress leader Abhishek Banerjee.

Banerjee also alleged that individuals described as “micro-observers” had been appointed illegally, claiming they had no role under the Representation of the People Act and were linked to the BJP.

‘Alive but marked dead’

In a dramatic moment during her address, the chief minister asked those present who had been marked as deceased in the voter lists to raise their hands.

“See, they are alive but as per the Election Commission they are dead,” she said.

She further alleged that names were being deleted under the category of “logical discrepancy,” adding that even noted economist and Nobel laureate Amartya Sen had earlier been questioned regarding the age of his mother.

Questions over timing of voter roll exercise

While stating that she did not oppose the Special Intensive Revision process in principle, Banerjee questioned the timing of the exercise.

“I have no problem with SIR, but why do it on the eve of elections? Why not after elections?” she asked.

Reiterating confidence in her party’s organisational strength, the chief minister said she was prepared to fight the issue politically and democratically.

The Supreme Court on Tuesday delivered strong observations against Meta, the parent company of WhatsApp, over the messaging platform’s 2021 privacy policy, warning that it would not tolerate any compromise of citizens’ privacy.

A bench led by Chief Justice Surya said the court would not allow the sharing of user data in a manner that exploits Indians, remarking that privacy protections under the Constitution must be followed. “You can’t play with privacy… we will not allow you to share a single digit of our data,” the Chief Justice said during the hearing.

The matter relates to a plea challenging the law tribunal’s decision that upheld a ₹213 crore penalty imposed by the Competition Commission of India (CCI) on WhatsApp, while also permitting certain data-sharing practices for advertising purposes.

Court questions accessibility of privacy policy

During the hearing, the court raised concerns about whether WhatsApp’s privacy policy could realistically be understood by large sections of the population, particularly those who are poor or not formally educated.

The bench questioned if users such as roadside vendors, rural residents, or people who do not speak English would be able to comprehend the policy’s terms. It also expressed scepticism about the effectiveness of opt-out clauses, stating that even legally trained individuals find such policies difficult to understand.

Describing the alleged data practices as potentially exploitative, the court said it would not allow private information to be taken without genuine and informed consent from users.

The Chief Justice also cited a personal example, suggesting that users often begin seeing advertisements shortly after exchanging sensitive messages on WhatsApp, such as medical conversations, raising questions about how user data is being utilised.

Arguments from government and Meta

Appearing for the government, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta criticised WhatsApp’s data-sharing practices, calling them exploitative and commercially driven. In response, the Chief Justice said that if companies cannot operate in line with constitutional values, they should not do business in India.

Senior advocates Mukul Rohatgi and Akhil Sibal, appearing for Meta and WhatsApp, countered the allegations by asserting that all WhatsApp messages are end-to-end encrypted and that the company cannot read message content.

Background of the case

In November 2024, the CCI ruled against WhatsApp over its 2021 privacy policy, holding that the company had abused its dominant market position by effectively forcing users to accept the updated terms.

The watchdog objected to WhatsApp making continued access to messaging services conditional on permitting data-sharing with other Meta platforms, leading to the imposition of a ₹213 crore fine. Meta has deposited the penalty.

In January 2025, Meta and WhatsApp challenged the CCI order. Later, in November 2025, the law tribunal lifted a five-year restriction on data-sharing while maintaining the financial penalty.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Sunday welcomed US President Donald Trump’s decision to lower tariffs on Indian goods, describing the move as one that unlocks significant opportunities for cooperation between the two countries.

Minutes after President Trump announced the reduction on his social media platform, the Prime Minister took to X to express his appreciation, calling the development a boost for “Made in India” products entering the US market.

“Delighted that Made in India products will now have a reduced tariff of 18 per cent,” PM Modi said, thanking President Trump on behalf of India’s 1.4 billion people.

The Prime Minister said he had a “wonderful” conversation with President Trump and underlined the broader significance of the decision, noting that closer economic cooperation between the world’s two largest democracies benefits people on both sides.

PM Modi also said that when two major economies work together, it opens doors for mutually beneficial growth, adding that India supports President Trump’s efforts aimed at global peace, stability, and prosperity. He said he looked forward to strengthening the partnership further.

President Trump, while announcing the tariff reduction, described the move as a “trade deal” and referred to PM Modi as a close friend and a respected leader.

Trade signals positive momentum

The US India Strategic Partnership Forum described the tariff reduction as an important and positive first step in strengthening bilateral trade relations.

While the detailed terms of the agreement are yet to be finalised, the announcement reflects political intent on both sides to move towards a broader US-India bilateral trade agreement. Such an agreement is expected to address issues related to tariffs, market access, non-tariff barriers, and trade across multiple sectors.

How tariffs on Indian goods evolved

The latest decision comes after months of tariff fluctuations on Indian exports to the US.

Timeline of key developments

• April 2, 2025: The US imposed a 26% reciprocal tariff on several Indian imports as part of global tariff actions.
  
• April 10, 2025: The tariffs were paused for 90 days, with a 10% duty retained on all US imports.
  
• July 31, 2025: A 25% tariff was announced on Indian goods, along with a warning linked to India’s purchase of Russian oil.
  
• August 7, 2025: Tariffs were raised to 50%, the highest imposed on any US trade partner at the time.
  
• February 2, 2026: The US announced a reduction in tariffs on Indian goods to 18%.
  

The latest rollback marks a significant easing of trade tensions and sets the stage for deeper engagement between India and the United States.