English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest Politics News

Debate on anti-triple talaq Bill stalled in Rajya Sabha again amid Opposition uproar

Published

on

Debate on anti-triple talaq Bill stalled in Rajya Sabha again amid Opposition uproar

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

Consensus evades on the passage of the Bill with just one day left before the winter session of Parliament concludes, Opposition presses for RS select panel

For a second day in a row and with just one sitting of Parliament’s winter session left, the Rajya Sabha failed to discuss the controversial Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Bill on Thursday.

With the Opposition demanding that the Bill, which was passed by the Lok Sabha last week, be sent to a select committee of the House for further discussions and the Centre insisting that it be passed, Rajya Sabha deputy chairman PJ Kurien was forced to adjourn the House proceedings.

The curtailed winter session of Parliament is scheduled to end on Friday. With no consensus between the Treasury and Opposition Benches on the fate of the Bill that seeks to make instant triple talaq a cognizable offence punishable with a three year jail term, it is now becoming increasingly evident that the legislation may not be enacted into a law within the winter session.

[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][vc_column_text]Sources said that the government, which finds itself in a minority in the Rajya Sabha, may finally be forced to concede to the Opposition’s demand for referring the Bill to a select committee of the House. In such an eventuality, the select committee will have to present its report on the Bill before the Budget Session of Parliament, thereby delaying the enactment of the Bill by at least another 3 months.[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][vc_column_text]

On Friday, the Bill had been listed for consideration and passage by the Rajya Sabha. However, sparring members of the House from the Treasury and Opposition Benches failed to end the continuing logjam over the legislation.

At around 5 pm Rajya Sabha deputy chairman PJ Kurien allowed Leader of the House Arun Jaitley to make a statement on the two motions moved by Opposition members Anand Sharma and SS Ray which had sought the Bill be referred to a select committee.

While Jaitley claimed that the motions had been moved in violation of parliamentary norms – arguing that a 24 hour notice for moving the motion had not been submitted by the members and that they had only partly listed the proposed members for the panel without naming anyone from the Treasury Benches, both Sharma and Ray refuted these charges.

Sharma and Ray asserted that they had been permitted by Rajya Sabha chairman Venkaiah Naidu to move the motion – a point accepted by Kurien – and that while they had not proposed names of members from the Treasury Benches for the panel, they had made it clear in the House while moving the motion on Wednesday that the government should propose names from its end. Ray even claimed that they he had asked the Centre to suggest names for the select committee but that his request was went unanswered. Trinamool Congress MP Derek O’Brien immediately got up to claim that Ray’s submission had exposed the BJP.

Kurien claimed that he has accepted the motion moved by Sharma and Ray while also taking into account the reservations expressed by Jaitley but since there was no consensus in the House on whether the two motions can be moved or not, parliamentary rules did not permit him to allow a discussion on the Bill.

The Rajya Sabha deputy chairman then tried to move to the next order of business – a resolution moved by Congress MP T Subbarami Reddy against the Goods and Services Tax (Compensation to States) Amendment Ordinance, 2017 – but the ruckus created by MPs from the ruling and Opposition camps over his decision to not allow a discussion on the Bill forced him to adjourn the proceedings till Friday.

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

Himanta Sarma accuses Sonia, Rahul of provoking unrest over Vande Mataram row

Assam CM Himanta Biswa Sarma criticised Sonia and Rahul Gandhi over the Vande Mataram controversy and accused Congress of provoking unrest.

Published

on

Himanta sharma

Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma on Monday criticised Congress leaders Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi over the controversy surrounding the rendition of Vande Mataram at the party headquarters in New Delhi on Independence Day.

Sarma questioned how the Congress would govern if it returned to power, alleging that the conduct of its senior leaders during the national song had raised concerns.

“During Vande Mataram, the way Sonia Gandhi behaved and the song was stopped midway clearly indicates that if Congress mistakenly comes to power, the country will face a worse situation,” Mr Sarma said.

The Assam Chief Minister also accused Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi of encouraging protests in the name of Gen Z.

“Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi have almost taken a decision to oppose the country in the name of Gen Z. They are provoking people to protest and trying hard to create a bad environment in the country,” he said.

Sarma further alleged that such actions could contribute to instability in the country.

“I am not bothered about these things, but these people are working against the country and provoking the people of the country to protest and bring anarchy,” he said.

What triggered the Vande Mataram controversy

The political row erupted after footage from the Congress Independence Day programme on August 15 surfaced on social media. The video showed senior Congress leaders, including Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi and Mallikarjun Kharge, during the rendition of Vande Mataram.

BJP leaders have interpreted gestures seen in the footage as an attempt to interrupt the national song. The Congress, however, has rejected that interpretation.

The issue has since become a political flashpoint, with BJP leaders accusing the Congress of disrespecting Vande Mataram.

A complaint seeking action against Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi over the alleged disruption is also being examined by the Delhi Police.

Continue Reading

India News

BJP unveils 64-member national team with 3 former CMs, 18 MPs and 10 women

The BJP’s new 64-member national team includes three former chief ministers, 18 sitting MPs and 10 women, with representation from 23 states and Union Territories.

Published

on

The BJP’s new 64-member team of national office bearers brings together former chief ministers, sitting MPs, women leaders and representatives from different social and regional groups as the party prepares for the 2029 Lok Sabha election.

The team, headed by BJP national president Nitin Nabin, includes three former chief ministers, 18 sitting MPs and 10 women leaders. More than 40 per cent of the members belong to deprived communities, according to the details of the appointments.

Northeast gets special focus

The new organisational team includes leaders from 23 states and Union Territories, giving the party’s national leadership a broad geographical representation.

The Northeast has received particular attention, with three leaders from Tripura, Assam and Nagaland included in the team. The BJP’s North-East Coordination Cell will also continue to function under the leadership of Sambit Patra.

The team includes four tribal representatives, with one each from West Bengal, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra and the Northeast. Two of these representatives are women.

Three members from Uttar Pradesh, Tamil Nadu and Madhya Pradesh represent the Scheduled Castes in the new team.

Representation across communities

The BJP’s national office bearers also include 10 experienced women leaders from different parts of the country.

The team has representation from different religious communities, including one Sikh, two Christians, one Muslim, one Jain and one Parsi member, alongside Hindu leaders.

Former chief ministers and MPs add experience

The organisational team brings considerable administrative and political experience, with former Rajasthan Chief Minister Vasundhara Raje, former Uttarakhand Chief Minister Tirath Singh Rawat and former Tripura Chief Minister Biplab Kumar Deb among the members.

Four leaders with previous experience in the Union government and one sitting Union minister are also part of the team.

The new national office bearers include 18 sitting Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha members, bringing legislative experience and their connection with constituencies to the organisation.

Professionals and younger leaders add to the team

The team also brings together people from varied professional and academic backgrounds. It includes two professors, four practising doctors, as well as PhD holders, engineers, chartered accountants and lawyers.

The appointments to various Morchas are expected to bring organisational experience, fresh energy and domain expertise to the BJP’s national team.

Continue Reading

India News

Shehzad Poonawalla steps down from BJP, says personal and financial pressures led to decision 

Shehzad Poonawalla has resigned from the BJP, citing pressing financial and personal circumstances, and said he will move to the private sector.

Published

on

Shehzad Punawalla

Shehzad Poonawalla on Monday resigned from the BJP, citing what he described as pressing financial and personal circumstances.

The BJP’s national spokesperson said he had first submitted his resignation on July 30. However, the party did not accept it at the time and asked him to reconsider his decision.

Poonawalla has now reiterated his decision to step down as the BJP’s national spokesperson and relinquish his primary membership of the party.

In his resignation letter to BJP president Nitin Nabin, Poonawalla said that after “long and hard contemplation”, he had decided to seek relief from his organisational responsibilities and active primary membership.

He also referred to developments involving certain individuals in recent days, saying they had reinforced his earlier decision. He did not name anyone in his letter.

Shehzad Poonawalla thanks BJP leadership

Poonawalla said he was touched that the BJP had initially declined to accept his resignation and expressed gratitude towards the party leadership.

He thanked Prime Minister Narendra Modi, BJP president Nitin Nabin, Home Minister Amit Shah, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh and BJP General Secretary (Organisation) BL Santosh for the platform and opportunities he received during his five years with the party.

Poonawalla said his decision to leave was not driven by any sense of hurt and described his sentiments towards the party leadership with “gratefulness, love, affection, and highest regard”.

He said that his decision was linked to pressing financial and personal circumstances and that he would move into the private sector.

At the same time, Poonawalla said he would continue to support Prime Minister Modi’s vision and work, as well as that of the BJP, wherever possible.

“I am only leaving the Vyavastha not the Vyakti or Vichar,” he said.

Shehzad Poonawalla’s political journey

A lawyer, Poonawalla began his political career with the Congress before later joining the BJP.

He came into prominence in 2017 after publicly questioning the Congress’s internal election process. He alleged that the process was rigged in favour of Rahul Gandhi for the post of party president.

Poonawalla subsequently left the Congress and joined the BJP, where he became one of the party’s prominent representatives in television debates.

On July 30, he had also changed his bio on X, removing the reference to himself as “BJP National Spokesperson” while retaining his description as a lifelong follower of Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com