English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest Politics News

India ignores US warnings to sign S-400 air defence system deal with Russia

Published

on

India ignores US warnings to sign S-400 air defence system deal with Russia

India and Russia signed the USD 5 billion S-400 air defence system deal among a total of eight pacts, in New Delhi today (Friday, October 5), after wide ranging talks between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Vladimir Putin who is on a two-day visit to India.

The signing of defence deal between the two countries comes amid warnings from US.

India and Russia signed eight pacts in areas ranging from space, nuclear energy, railways and space. A crucial MoU was signed between Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO) and the Federal Space Agency of Russia ‘ROSCOSMOS’ on cooperation on India’s ambitious human space mission project Gaganyaan.

The two countries have also set a target of $30 billion bilateral trade by 2025.

The deal for purchase of five S-400 missile defence systems could result in US sanctions under the Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act (CAATSA) instituted by the US Congress on arms purchases from Russia. The US has urged its allies to forgo transactions with Russia, warning that the S-400 missile defence system that India wanted to buy would be a ‘focus area’ for it to implement punitive sanctions against a nation undertaking ‘significant’ business deals with the Russians. American lawmakers, however, have allowed the possibility of a presidential waiver.

The S-400 air defence missile system is seen as crucial for India in the case of a two-front war. India was considering buying 5 units. Indian military analysts say the S-400 surface-to-air missiles would be used to protect large cities or other strategic areas such as oilfields from aerial attacks.

A bulk of India’s military equipment is of Soviet/Russian origin — including the nuclear submarine INS Chakra, the supersonic Brahmos cruise missile, MiG and Sukhoi fighters, the Il transport aircraft, the T-72 and T-90 tanks, and the Vikramaditya aircraft carrier, reported The Indian Express.

While India has a long history of signing big ticket defence deals with Russia, this deal comes at a time of increased friction between the US and Russia and New Delhi’s own deepening defence cooperation with Washington. Just weeks ago, New Delhi and Washington signed several breakthrough security co-operation agreements that enabled transfers of sensitive US military equipment to India.

On the eve of Putin’s visit, Washington made a last-ditch attempt to discourage India from proceeding with the deal.

“We urge all allies and partners to forgo transactions with Russia that would trigger sanctions under Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act,” said a US state department official, adding that the Trump administration’s decision to sanction the Chinese military for buying Russian fighter jets and missiles “underscores the seriousness of our resolve on this issue”.

The US has warned the deals could attract sanctions under the CAATSA law that restricts defence purchases from Russia, Iran and North Korea. US officials have stated that under CAATSA, it is payments and not signing of deals that triggers the sanctions. But as per procedure, when a deal is signed payment to the tune 10-15 per cent of the contract value is made.

“In this deal, 15 per cent advance payment would be done,” an official has confirmed adding that payments would be through rupee-rouble exchange.

Putin visit

Russian President Vladimir Putin arrived in India on Thursday for the two-day annual India-Russia bilateral summit. He held official talks with Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Friday, after which the leaders delivered a joint statement.

The Russian head of the state, who was accompanied by a high-level delegation, was received by External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj in New Delhi yesterday. PM Modi had hosted a private dinner for the Russian president at his official residence at 7, Lok Kalyan Marg on Thursday night, and both leaders talked about a host of issues.

Speaking on Indo-Russia ties, PM Modi said to the Russian President: “We must continue cooperation in international organisations.” He added that there will be an increase in ties between the two countries after today’s discussion, and help increase peace and stability in this world in these challenging times. “I can say with full confidence, that our friendship is unique,” he said as he concluded his speech.

“Your visit has helped our ties. Today, the decisions we have taken will give impetus to our relations. From trade, investment, technology and energy, to economic cooperation, our relations are now diversified,” PM Modi said. “We have taken ties beyond the conventional dimension. Russia has always stood by India,” he added.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi said that Russia can become our partner in the new and renewable energy sector. He said that the world has changed but the relationship between India and Russia has remained same and the trade between the two countries has risen to 20 per cent in 2017-18.

“We don’t leave a chance to meet each other. The world is changing, but the friendship between India and Russia never changed,” said PM Modi at India-Russia Business Summit. He said that over the previous years, India’s ties with Russia are at a new high.

Talks with President Putin have given new direction to the bilateral strategic partnership, Modi said in a press statement after the 19th India-Russia annual summit.

India and Russia are committed to cooperating in the fight against terrorism, Modi said.

PM Modi said the meeting in Sochi made it possible to have detailed discussions today. India gives priority to ties with Russia. In this fast-changing world, our relations are more relevant, he added.

PM Modi had met Putin in Sochi for their first informal summit after Putin’s re-election in May. During the meeting, Modi had Putin had talked defence, and cooperation between the countries. They reiterated the significance of their military, security and nuclear energy ties. They had agreed to work together through multilateral organisations such as the United Nations, SCO, BRICS and G-20. In July, the two met on the sidelines of the BRICS Summit in Johannesburg. They had held comprehensive discussions on bilateral issues of mutual interest, especially in trade, investment, energy, defence and tourism.

President Putin said the two countries have agreed to step up cooperation in combating the menace of terrorism and drug trafficking.

“Our relations go beyond military hardware and military exchanges. We paid attention to humanitarian response mechanisms,” Putin said addressing the press.

He also extended an invite to PM Modi to Vladivostok for a business summit in September 2019.

Putin said: “We will strengthen cooperation in industry and investment, agriculture, medicine, pharmaceuticals etc. A Russian railways company will help India build modern railroads, Russia will assist India in exploring outerspace, etc.  For decades, Russia and India has been cooperating in the area of defence.  Russia and India concur at international platforms on key issues, including coordination at UN, BRICS, SCO and G20. We will combat terrorism threats, drug trafficking and transborder crime.”

Russia pitched for Indian energy companies to invest in its country. Putin said he and Modi have discussed in detail Kudankulam nuclear power plant in Tamil Nadu – the fourth and fifth units of the plant are being constructed and the fourth and fifth will be constructed next. He adds that according to India’s agreement with Russia, 12 units will be built in the next 20 years.

Mutual trade grew by 21% last year exceeding USD 9 billion, and this year it has been 20%, said Putin. “If we proceed moving at this pace, we will reach our goal faster,” he said. He invited Modi to Russia as its main guest at the Vladivostok Forum in Sept 2019.

President Putin said India is where Russia finds friendship, mutual respect and sympathy. The joint statement outlines plans and prospects for a long time, he added. The documents signed today aim to develop ties between the countries.

India News

Yogi Adityanath’s do namoone remark sparks Akhilesh Yadav’s jab on BJP infighting

Yogi Adityanath’s ‘do namoone’ comment in the UP Assembly has been countered by Akhilesh Yadav, who termed it a confession of BJP’s internal power struggle.

Published

on

Yogi Adityanath

Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath’s recent “do namoone” comment in the state Assembly has triggered a sharp political exchange, with Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav turning the remark into an attack on the Bharatiya Janata Party’s alleged internal discord.

The comment was made during a heated Assembly discussion on allegations of codeine cough syrup smuggling in Uttar Pradesh. Opposition members had accused the state government of inaction, claiming that timely steps could have saved the lives of several children. Rejecting the allegation outright, Adityanath said that no child in the state had died due to consumption of the cough syrup.

While responding to the opposition benches, the Chief Minister made an indirect jibe, saying there were “two namoone”, one in Delhi and one in Lucknow. Without naming anyone, he added that one of them leaves the country whenever there is a national debate, and suggested that a similar pattern applied to the Samajwadi Party leadership. The remark was widely interpreted as being aimed at Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi and Akhilesh Yadav, a former Uttar Pradesh chief minister and current Lok Sabha MP

Akhilesh Yadav calls remark a ‘confession’

Akhilesh Yadav responded swiftly on social media, calling Adityanath’s statement a “confession” that exposed an alleged power struggle within the BJP. He said that those holding constitutional posts should maintain decorum and accused the ruling party of bringing its internal disputes into the public domain. Yadav posted his response shortly after the Chief Minister shared a video clip of the Assembly remarks online.

The Samajwadi Party has, on several occasions, claimed that there is a tussle between the Uttar Pradesh government and the BJP’s central leadership. Party leaders have cited the appointment of deputy chief ministers and certain bureaucratic decisions as evidence of attempts to curtail the Chief Minister’s authority.

Adityanath has consistently dismissed these claims, maintaining that he holds the post because of the party’s trust in him. The latest exchange has once again brought the narrative of BJP infighting into political focus, even as both sides continue to trade barbs ahead of key electoral contests

Continue Reading

India News

Sonia Gandhi calls weakening of MGNREGA a collective moral failure, targets Centre in op-ed

Sonia Gandhi has accused the Centre of weakening MGNREGA, calling it a collective moral failure with serious consequences for crores of working people.

Published

on

Sonia Gandhi

Congress Parliamentary Party chairperson Sonia Gandhi has sharply criticised the Central government over what she described as the steady dismantling of rights-based legislation, with a particular focus on the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA).

In a recent opinion article published in a leading English daily, Sonia Gandhi argued that MGNREGA was envisioned as more than a welfare measure. She said the rural employment scheme gave legal backing to the constitutional right to work and was rooted in Mahatma Gandhi’s idea of Sarvodaya, or welfare for all.

Calling its weakening a serious failure, she wrote that the decline of MGNREGA represents a “collective moral failure” that will have lasting financial and human consequences for crores of working people across India. She stressed that safeguarding such rights-based frameworks is crucial at a time when, according to her, multiple protections are under strain.

Concerns raised over education, environment and land laws

Sonia Gandhi also flagged concerns beyond rural employment. Referring to education policy, she claimed that the Right to Education has been undermined following the National Education Policy 2020, alleging that it has led to the closure of around one lakh primary schools across the country.

On environmental and land-related legislation, she stated that the Forest Rights Act, 2006, was weakened through the Forest (Conservation) Rules, 2022. According to her, these changes removed the role of the gram sabha in decisions related to the diversion of forest land.

She further alleged that the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act has been significantly diluted, while adding that the National Green Tribunal has seen its authority reduced over the years.

Warning on agriculture and food security laws

Touching upon agriculture reforms, Sonia Gandhi referred to the now-repealed three farm laws, claiming they were an attempt to deny farmers the right to a minimum support price. She also cautioned that the National Food Security Act, 2013, could face similar threats in the future.

Reiterating her central argument, she urged unity to protect statutory rights, stating that the erosion of such laws has implications that extend well beyond policy, affecting livelihoods and dignity on the ground.

Continue Reading

India News

Renaming MGNREGA removes core spirit of rural employment law, says Shashi Tharoor

Published

on

Shashi Tharoor

Congress MP Shashi Tharoor has strongly criticised the renaming of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), saying the move strips the rural employment programme of its core essence. His remarks came after Parliament cleared the Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) Bill, also referred to as the VB-G RAM G Bill.

Speaking to media, Tharoor said the decision to remove Mahatma Gandhi’s name from the scheme “takes out the heart” of the rural employment programme that has been in place for years. He noted that the identity and philosophy associated with Mahatma Gandhi were central to the original law.

Tharoor also objected to the way the new name was framed, arguing that it unnecessarily combined multiple languages. He pointed out that the Constitution envisages the use of one language in legislation, while the Bill’s title mixes English and Hindi terms such as “Guarantee”, “Rozgar” and “Ajeevika”, along with the conjunction “and”.

‘Disrespect to both names’

The Congress leader said that inserting the word “Ram” while dropping Mahatma Gandhi’s name amounted to disrespecting both. Referring to Mahatma Gandhi’s ideas, Tharoor said that for Gandhi, the concepts of Gram Swaraj and Ram Rajya were inseparable, and removing his name from a rural employment law went against that vision.

He added that the name of Lord Ram could be used in many contexts, but questioned the rationale behind excluding Mahatma Gandhi from a programme closely linked to his philosophy of village self-rule.

Protests over passage of the Bill

The VB-G RAM G Bill was passed by the Lok Sabha on December 18 and cleared by the Rajya Sabha in the early hours of December 19 amid protests from Opposition members. Several MPs opposed the manner in which the legislation was pushed through, with scenes of sloganeering and tearing of papers in the House.

Outside Parliament, members of the Trinamool Congress staged a sit-in protest near Samvidhan Sadan against the passage of the Bill. Congress also announced nationwide protests earlier this week, accusing the government of weakening rights-based welfare schemes.

Despite opposition criticism, the government has maintained that the new law will strengthen rural employment and livelihood security. The Bill raises the guaranteed employment from 100 days to 125 days per rural household and outlines a 60:40 cost-sharing formula between the Centre and states, with a higher central share for northeastern, Himalayan states and certain Union Territories.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com