English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

Trump and Rouhani Flex Muscles on Nuclear Deal

Published

on

Trump and Rouhani Flex Muscles on Nuclear Deal

US and Iran differ apart in their views

US President Donald Trump and his Iranian counterpart Hassan Rouhani have maintained their positions intact on nuclear deal, spread of terrorism in the region and if Tehran regime was a “dictator” or most “democratic” establishment in the region. However, nuclear deal was the focal point, where both leaders shared their opinion on the “resolved but vexed” issue to the world community.

Donald Trump, on Tuesday addressed for the first time at UN General Assembly while Hassan Rouhani answered media quaries on the sensitive issues prevailing on the present US administration since January this year and even beyond: during the run-up for the Presidential elections. Both the leaders have expressed their views on situation in Syria, Iraq and other countries in the region.

President Trump spent almost ten percent of his 42,23 word-speech on Iran related issues, indicating that Iran is one of his priority areas in the US foreign policy. Trump chose to begin with describing the nature of the Iranian government as “corrupt dictatorship behind the false guise of a democracy” responsible for turning wealthy country into “an economically depleted rogue state whose chief exports are violence, bloodshed and chaos”.

He said that “longest suffering victims of Iran’s leaders are, in fact, its own people” while “its oil profits go to fund Hezbollah and other terrorists that kill Muslims and attack their peaceful Arab and Israeli neighbours.”

Trump has been actively involved in bringing Arab countries closer to Israel. His maiden foreign visit took him first to Saudi Arabia and then to Israel earlier this year. Now there is a proposal of starting direct passenger flights between Tel Aviv and Riyadh.

Trump further said that Iranian wealth, which rightly belongs to Iran’s people, also goes to shore up Basher al-Assad’s dictatorship, fuel Yemen’s civil war and undermine peace through the entire Middle East.

Then President Trump said, “We cannot let a murderous regime continue these destabilizing activities while building dangerous missiles, and we cannot abide by an agreement if it provides cover for the eventual construction of a nuclear program.”

He further said, “The Iran deal was one of the worst and most one-sided transactions the United States has ever entered into. Frankly, that deal is an embarrassment to the United States, and I don’t think you’ve heard the last of it. Believe me.”

Donald Trump, continuing his address to the world leaders at UN General Assembly, tried to gather international support to his Iran policy saying, “It is time for the entire world to join us in demanding that Iran’s government end its pursuit of death and destruction. It is time for the (Iranian) regime to free all Americans and citizens of other nations that they have unjustly detained.”

He demanded that, “Iran’s government must stop supporting terrorists, begin serving its own people, and respect the sovereign rights of its neighbours. The entire world understands that the good people of Iran want change, and, other than the vast military power of the United States, that Iran’s people are what their leaders fear the most.”  This is what causes the regime to restrict internet access, tear down satellite dishes, shoot unarmed student protesters, and imprison political reformers, he added.

Trump argued for the regime change in Tehran saying, “Oppressive regimes cannot endure forever, and the day will come when the people will face a choice. Will they continue down the path of poverty, bloodshed, and terror, or will the Iranian people return to the nation’s proud roots as a centre of civilization, culture, and wealth, where their people can be happy and prosperous once again?”

He reminded about his recent visit to Saudi Arabia and the commitment by a large number of heads of Muslim states for fighting against terrorism. He said, “The Iranian regime’s support for terror is in stark contrast to the recent commitments of many of its neighbours to fight terrorism and halt its finance, and in Saudi Arabia early last year, I was greatly honoured to address the leaders of more than 50 Arab and Muslim nations.” He said, “We agreed that all responsible nations must work together to confront terrorists and the Islamic extremism that inspires them.”

On the contrary, Iranian President Hassan Rouhani who has recently been re-elected for the second term in office remained busy with his scheduled meetings on Tuesday in New York. Most American media houses wanted to interview President Rouhani. However Iranian diplomats granted face-to-face interview to renowned CNN journalist Christiane Amanpour of Iranian origin and NBC News.

Rouhani also met with heads and editors-in-chief of several  media houses and foreign policy elites and interacted polite interaction on a wide range of issues.

He will address the UN General Assembly on Wednesday local time. New York is nine and half hours behind New Delhi time.

Reacting to Trump’s threat of exiting the nuclear deal, known as Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), President Hassan Rouhani told NBC News, “The exiting of the United States from such an agreement would carry a high cost, meaning that subsequent to such an action by the United States of America, no one will trust America again.”

He further elaborated about the long diplomatic exercise culminating into the nuclear deal signed in 2015 saying, “Every word was analyzed many times by countries involved before its ratification, so if the United States were to not adhere to the commitments and trample upon this agreement, this will mean that it will carry with it the lack of subsequent trust from countries towards the United States because the greatest capital that any country has is trust and credibility.”

He clarified about Iran’s intention in case US withdraws from the nuclear deal saying, “We can easily go back to previous conditions if counterparts were to not live up to their commitments. But you do know fairly well that Iran will not be the initiator of this return to that path,” he assured. Moreover he dismisses the US apprehensions about probable nuclear weapons program saying, “So we will never go towards production of nuclear weapons, just as in the past we never intended to go towards that path nor did we ever. It has always been peaceful.”

During his meeting with Editors in-Chief of American media houses, Iranian President was quoted saying, “Therefore, whatever happens in the JCPOA, Iran is victorious. Of course, if the United States exits the agreement, it will suffer losses and if it stays, it will benefit. We are ready for any situation and we have no problem to continue our journey, but if the United States wants to withdraw its commitment, it means that the agreement is undermined, in which case, Iran may choose another way”.

Rouhani referred to the recent presidential election in Iran and said: “People’s turnout by 73% shows that Iran is run based on people’s will and democracy”.  He further said, “The attendance of 41 million Iranians at the ballot boxes was the best response of the Iranian nation to the threats of some countries and the words of Trump, and Iranians showed that they believe in their system and democracy and choose their officials at the ballot box”.

Iranian President clarified that the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the supervisory agency in all of its seven quarterly reports has emphasised that Iran has fully complied with its obligations. “Therefore if the US government breaks this obligation, it will bear all the losses and responsibilities and will show that Iran is a country that adheres to its obligations and that America is a country that no one can trust, because it may agree some day and, with the coming of another government, all those agreements will be violated”.

It would be rather useful to recall that George Bush-II had announced billions of dollars for promoting anti Tehran regime forces to overturn the Iranian government. Disturbances after re-election of Mehmoud Ahmedinejad in 2009 as country’s President were seen as part of the Washington strategy.

Syria and Iraq have also been matters of different strategies pursued by Washington and Tehran. Both governments claim of heir important contribution in fighting against IS and other terror groups in Iraq. However, US claims of supporting  to anti-Bashar al-Assad elements except IS in Syria. Russia and Iran support Bashar al-Assad regime in Damascus.

Latest world news

S Jaishankar defends Russian oil imports, says it won’t end Ukraine war

S Jaishankar defended India’s Russian oil purchases, saying the Ukraine war can only be resolved through dialogue, diplomacy and negotiations

Published

on

External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar has defended India’s continued purchase of Russian crude oil, saying that stopping the trade would not bring an end to the war in Ukraine.

Speaking to the media during his official visit to Kyiv, Jaishankar said the conflict, now in its fifth year, can only be resolved through dialogue, diplomacy and negotiations. He was responding to questions about Western pressure on India to reduce its purchases of Russian energy.

“This conflict, which is today in its fifth year, will not be solved because somebody is buying or not buying oil or alumina or minerals or metals or fertiliser,” Jaishankar said. He added that dialogue, diplomacy and negotiation were the way to resolve the conflict.

Jaishankar stresses India’s energy security

Jaishankar also highlighted the challenge of ensuring energy security for India’s 1.4 billion people amid difficult global energy conditions.

He said India respects Ukraine’s perspective on the issue but expects other countries to respect New Delhi’s position as well.

India imports around 88 per cent of its crude oil requirement from overseas. According to the report, about one-third of those imports currently come from Russia.

Western pressure over Russian oil

Jaishankar’s comments came amid continued pressure from Western countries over India’s purchases of Russian crude.

The United States and the United Kingdom have backed the argument that restricting Russia’s energy revenues could reduce the funds available to support its military operations in Ukraine.

Last month, the US Senate passed a bipartisan bill that could allow President Donald Trump to impose tariffs of up to 100 per cent on goods from countries, including India and China, that continue importing Russian oil and gas.

India remains a major buyer of Russian crude

Russia has remained India’s largest source of crude oil despite pressure from Washington. However, Indian imports of Russian crude declined in August after reaching record levels in June and July.

Before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, Russian crude accounted for only around 0.2 per cent of India’s crude imports. After Western countries moved away from Russian oil following the invasion, India emerged as the largest buyer of discounted Russian crude.

India imported around 2.1 million barrels of Russian crude per day in August, according to data cited in the report. That represented more than 40 per cent of India’s crude imports, down from around 2.6 million barrels per day in June and July.

Russian exporters increasingly rely on Asian buyers

Russia has also become more dependent on Asian markets after European sanctions disrupted its traditional energy trade.

Countries such as India and China have emerged as important buyers of Russian crude. Continued demand from Indian refiners has helped Russian exporters maintain significant volumes despite restrictions affecting Western shipping, insurance and financial services.

Jaishankar, meanwhile, maintained that the Ukraine conflict requires a diplomatic solution rather than an attempt to resolve it through decisions by individual countries over oil purchases.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Nepal seeks climate compensation from India, China and US for deadly floods

Nepal has sought climate compensation from India, China and the US after a devastating flash flood killed more than 1,100 people and left nearly 4,500 missing.

Published

on

Nepal has sought climate-related compensation from India, China and the United States following the devastating flash floods that struck the country last week.

Nepal Foreign Minister Shishir Khanal said the country wants its diplomatic approach to move beyond conventional disaster aid towards what he described as justice and compensation. He argued that major greenhouse gas emitters have a responsibility towards vulnerable countries facing severe climate-related losses.

The flash flood struck the Bhotekoshi River basin on August 26 after a high-altitude glacial collapse along the Tibet-Nepal border. The disaster sent water, rocks and debris downstream, affecting villages across at least three districts.

More than 1,100 bodies have been recovered, while nearly 4,500 people remain missing, according to the report.

Nepal seeks accountability from major emitters

Khanal said Nepal’s contribution to global greenhouse gas emissions is “virtually negligible”, yet the country is facing severe consequences associated with global warming, including glacier melt and extreme mountain disasters.

He said Nepal considers the response to such climate-related losses a matter of “legal and moral liability” rather than charity.

According to Khanal, Nepal intends to raise the issue at international forums and seek compensation for climate-related losses suffered by vulnerable countries.

He also highlighted the importance of Himalayan glaciers for South Asia’s water security, saying their disappearance could have consequences for billions of people dependent on rivers including the Ganges and Trishuli.

Nepal’s finance ministry has also sent a formal climate compensation claim letter to its international partners, Khanal said.

India has backed climate equity

India has consistently highlighted the principle of climate equity and pointed to its relatively low per capita greenhouse gas emissions.

New Delhi has argued that climate responsibilities should consider countries’ historical emissions, development requirements and respective capacities. India has also supported efforts to address loss and damage suffered by vulnerable developing countries.

India maintains that developed nations should provide financial resources to countries dealing with the effects of climate change.

Nepal approaches loss and damage fund

Nepal has formally approached the board of the Fund for Responding to Loss and Damage for urgent financial assistance following the August 26 flash flood.

The fund was established at COP27 in 2022 and operationalised at COP28.

A letter jointly signed by Nepal’s Finance Minister Swarnim Wagle and Forests and Agriculture Minister Geeta Chaudhary sought an urgent response to the disaster, citing extensive loss of life, displacement and destruction of homes and critical infrastructure.

The letter said the full extent of the economic and non-economic losses was yet to be determined, but preliminary information indicated that the impact had exceeded Nepal’s immediate response capacity.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Bank of America VP Erin Piacenti killed in New York stabbing

Bank of America vice-president Erin Piacenti, 32, was fatally stabbed in an apparently random attack in New York’s Times Square.

Published

on

Bank of America vice-president Erin Piacenti was fatally stabbed in New York City’s Times Square in what authorities described as a random and unprovoked attack.

Piacenti, 32, was among two people stabbed in the incident near West 42nd Street and Seventh Avenue on August 31. She was taken to a hospital but later died from her injuries. The other victim, a 68-year-old man, survived and was reported to be in stable condition.

Who was Erin Piacenti?

Piacenti worked as a vice-president at Bank of America in its business selection and conflicts unit. She was also a graduate of the University of Pennsylvania and Fordham Law School.

According to reports, Piacenti was a new mother and had recently returned to work following maternity leave. She had also recently marked her second wedding anniversary with her husband.

Bank of America expressed shock and sadness over her death, describing Piacenti as a valued colleague and extending condolences to her family and loved ones.

What happened in Times Square?

The stabbing took place at around 4:24 pm local time, according to the New York Police Department.

Police identified the alleged attacker as 49-year-old Pamela Cisneros. Authorities said she was carrying two large knives and attacked two people before confronting responding officers.

Police attempted to stop Cisneros, including using Tasers, but she continued advancing towards officers with the knives. Officers then opened fire, and Cisneros was later pronounced dead.

New York Police Commissioner Jessica Tisch said the attack appeared to be random and unprovoked. Police also said Cisneros had a documented history of mental health issues. The motive remains under investigation.

Bank of America reacts to employee’s death

Bank of America said it was “shocked and deeply saddened” by Piacenti’s death and said she would be greatly missed.

The bank’s security teams are also supporting the police investigation and addressing security concerns involving its offices and employees.

Piacenti’s death has left her family, colleagues and friends mourning the loss of a young professional who had recently returned to work after becoming a mother.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com