English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

Trump and Rouhani Flex Muscles on Nuclear Deal

Published

on

Trump and Rouhani Flex Muscles on Nuclear Deal

US and Iran differ apart in their views

US President Donald Trump and his Iranian counterpart Hassan Rouhani have maintained their positions intact on nuclear deal, spread of terrorism in the region and if Tehran regime was a “dictator” or most “democratic” establishment in the region. However, nuclear deal was the focal point, where both leaders shared their opinion on the “resolved but vexed” issue to the world community.

Donald Trump, on Tuesday addressed for the first time at UN General Assembly while Hassan Rouhani answered media quaries on the sensitive issues prevailing on the present US administration since January this year and even beyond: during the run-up for the Presidential elections. Both the leaders have expressed their views on situation in Syria, Iraq and other countries in the region.

President Trump spent almost ten percent of his 42,23 word-speech on Iran related issues, indicating that Iran is one of his priority areas in the US foreign policy. Trump chose to begin with describing the nature of the Iranian government as “corrupt dictatorship behind the false guise of a democracy” responsible for turning wealthy country into “an economically depleted rogue state whose chief exports are violence, bloodshed and chaos”.

He said that “longest suffering victims of Iran’s leaders are, in fact, its own people” while “its oil profits go to fund Hezbollah and other terrorists that kill Muslims and attack their peaceful Arab and Israeli neighbours.”

Trump has been actively involved in bringing Arab countries closer to Israel. His maiden foreign visit took him first to Saudi Arabia and then to Israel earlier this year. Now there is a proposal of starting direct passenger flights between Tel Aviv and Riyadh.

Trump further said that Iranian wealth, which rightly belongs to Iran’s people, also goes to shore up Basher al-Assad’s dictatorship, fuel Yemen’s civil war and undermine peace through the entire Middle East.

Then President Trump said, “We cannot let a murderous regime continue these destabilizing activities while building dangerous missiles, and we cannot abide by an agreement if it provides cover for the eventual construction of a nuclear program.”

He further said, “The Iran deal was one of the worst and most one-sided transactions the United States has ever entered into. Frankly, that deal is an embarrassment to the United States, and I don’t think you’ve heard the last of it. Believe me.”

Donald Trump, continuing his address to the world leaders at UN General Assembly, tried to gather international support to his Iran policy saying, “It is time for the entire world to join us in demanding that Iran’s government end its pursuit of death and destruction. It is time for the (Iranian) regime to free all Americans and citizens of other nations that they have unjustly detained.”

He demanded that, “Iran’s government must stop supporting terrorists, begin serving its own people, and respect the sovereign rights of its neighbours. The entire world understands that the good people of Iran want change, and, other than the vast military power of the United States, that Iran’s people are what their leaders fear the most.”  This is what causes the regime to restrict internet access, tear down satellite dishes, shoot unarmed student protesters, and imprison political reformers, he added.

Trump argued for the regime change in Tehran saying, “Oppressive regimes cannot endure forever, and the day will come when the people will face a choice. Will they continue down the path of poverty, bloodshed, and terror, or will the Iranian people return to the nation’s proud roots as a centre of civilization, culture, and wealth, where their people can be happy and prosperous once again?”

He reminded about his recent visit to Saudi Arabia and the commitment by a large number of heads of Muslim states for fighting against terrorism. He said, “The Iranian regime’s support for terror is in stark contrast to the recent commitments of many of its neighbours to fight terrorism and halt its finance, and in Saudi Arabia early last year, I was greatly honoured to address the leaders of more than 50 Arab and Muslim nations.” He said, “We agreed that all responsible nations must work together to confront terrorists and the Islamic extremism that inspires them.”

On the contrary, Iranian President Hassan Rouhani who has recently been re-elected for the second term in office remained busy with his scheduled meetings on Tuesday in New York. Most American media houses wanted to interview President Rouhani. However Iranian diplomats granted face-to-face interview to renowned CNN journalist Christiane Amanpour of Iranian origin and NBC News.

Rouhani also met with heads and editors-in-chief of several  media houses and foreign policy elites and interacted polite interaction on a wide range of issues.

He will address the UN General Assembly on Wednesday local time. New York is nine and half hours behind New Delhi time.

Reacting to Trump’s threat of exiting the nuclear deal, known as Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), President Hassan Rouhani told NBC News, “The exiting of the United States from such an agreement would carry a high cost, meaning that subsequent to such an action by the United States of America, no one will trust America again.”

He further elaborated about the long diplomatic exercise culminating into the nuclear deal signed in 2015 saying, “Every word was analyzed many times by countries involved before its ratification, so if the United States were to not adhere to the commitments and trample upon this agreement, this will mean that it will carry with it the lack of subsequent trust from countries towards the United States because the greatest capital that any country has is trust and credibility.”

He clarified about Iran’s intention in case US withdraws from the nuclear deal saying, “We can easily go back to previous conditions if counterparts were to not live up to their commitments. But you do know fairly well that Iran will not be the initiator of this return to that path,” he assured. Moreover he dismisses the US apprehensions about probable nuclear weapons program saying, “So we will never go towards production of nuclear weapons, just as in the past we never intended to go towards that path nor did we ever. It has always been peaceful.”

During his meeting with Editors in-Chief of American media houses, Iranian President was quoted saying, “Therefore, whatever happens in the JCPOA, Iran is victorious. Of course, if the United States exits the agreement, it will suffer losses and if it stays, it will benefit. We are ready for any situation and we have no problem to continue our journey, but if the United States wants to withdraw its commitment, it means that the agreement is undermined, in which case, Iran may choose another way”.

Rouhani referred to the recent presidential election in Iran and said: “People’s turnout by 73% shows that Iran is run based on people’s will and democracy”.  He further said, “The attendance of 41 million Iranians at the ballot boxes was the best response of the Iranian nation to the threats of some countries and the words of Trump, and Iranians showed that they believe in their system and democracy and choose their officials at the ballot box”.

Iranian President clarified that the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the supervisory agency in all of its seven quarterly reports has emphasised that Iran has fully complied with its obligations. “Therefore if the US government breaks this obligation, it will bear all the losses and responsibilities and will show that Iran is a country that adheres to its obligations and that America is a country that no one can trust, because it may agree some day and, with the coming of another government, all those agreements will be violated”.

It would be rather useful to recall that George Bush-II had announced billions of dollars for promoting anti Tehran regime forces to overturn the Iranian government. Disturbances after re-election of Mehmoud Ahmedinejad in 2009 as country’s President were seen as part of the Washington strategy.

Syria and Iraq have also been matters of different strategies pursued by Washington and Tehran. Both governments claim of heir important contribution in fighting against IS and other terror groups in Iraq. However, US claims of supporting  to anti-Bashar al-Assad elements except IS in Syria. Russia and Iran support Bashar al-Assad regime in Damascus.

Latest world news

Israel-Lebanon ceasefire to begin within hours as Trump announces 10-day truce

Israel and Lebanon may begin a 10-day ceasefire within hours after a proposal announced by Donald Trump amid ongoing tensions.

Published

on

Donald Trump

A temporary halt in hostilities between Israel and Lebanon is expected to begin within hours after US President Donald Trump announced a proposed 10-day ceasefire between the two sides, amid ongoing tensions in the region.

According to his statement, the ceasefire is likely to take effect around 5 p.m. Eastern Time, although independent confirmation from both sides is still awaited.

The development follows discussions involving Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Lebanese President Joseph Aoun, with mediation efforts led by the United States.

Officials indicated that the proposed truce is aimed at creating a limited window to reduce violence and potentially pave the way for broader diplomatic engagement. The situation along the Israel-Lebanon border has remained tense in recent weeks, with escalation linked to the activities of Hezbollah.

Diplomatic efforts have intensified in recent days, with discussions facilitated by the United States, including the involvement of US Secretary of State Marco Rubio. However, details of the agreement and the extent of coordination between the parties remain unclear.

The situation remains fluid, and the success of the ceasefire will depend on adherence by all sides involved. The conflict has already led to significant humanitarian and geopolitical consequences, including displacement and disruption in affected areas.

While the proposed ceasefire is being seen as an important step toward de-escalation, broader negotiations involving regional stakeholders are expected to be necessary for any lasting resolution.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

US ends oil sanctions waiver for Iran and Russia, impact likely on India’s energy imports

The US decision to end the Iran and Russia oil waiver may impact India’s oil imports, fuel prices and global energy markets.

Published

on

US oil tanker

The United States has decided not to extend a temporary sanctions waiver that allowed limited trade in Iranian and Russian oil, marking a shift towards stricter enforcement of economic restrictions.

The waiver, introduced in March 2026, had permitted the sale of oil already loaded on ships to stabilise global supply during heightened geopolitical tensions. However, it is now set to expire around mid-April without renewal.

US officials have indicated that the move is part of a broader strategy to increase pressure on both Iran and Russia amid ongoing conflicts and geopolitical tensions.

What the waiver did and why it mattered

The short-term waiver allowed millions of barrels of oil—estimated at around 140 million barrels—to enter global markets, helping ease supply shortages and prevent sharp price spikes.

It also enabled countries like India to purchase discounted crude oil from Russia and resume limited imports from Iran after years of restrictions.

Impact on India

India, one of the world’s largest oil importers, is expected to feel the impact of the decision in several ways:

  • Reduced access to discounted oil
    India had been buying cheaper Russian crude and recently resumed Iranian imports under the waiver. Its end may limit these options.
  • Potential rise in fuel costs
    With fewer discounted supplies available, India may need to rely more on costlier sources, which could increase domestic fuel prices.
  • Supply diversification pressure
    India may need to explore alternative suppliers in the Middle East, Africa, or the US to maintain energy security.
  • Geopolitical balancing challenge
    The move adds pressure on India to align with US sanctions while managing its own economic interests.

Global energy market concerns

The end of the waiver comes at a time when global oil markets are already under stress due to conflict in West Asia and disruptions in key routes like the Strait of Hormuz.

Analysts warn that tightening sanctions could:

  • Reduce global oil supply
  • Increase price volatility
  • Intensify competition among major buyers like India and China

Bigger picture

The US decision reflects a broader shift from temporary relief measures to stricter enforcement of sanctions, even if it risks tightening global energy markets.

For India, the development highlights a recurring challenge—balancing affordable energy access with geopolitical realities.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Sanctioned tanker fails to breach US blockade, turns back near Strait of Hormuz

A US-sanctioned tanker failed to cross the Hormuz blockade and turned back, underscoring rising tensions and disruption in global shipping routes.

Published

on

A US-sanctioned oil tanker failed to break through a newly imposed American naval blockade and was forced to turn back near the Strait of Hormuz, highlighting growing tensions in the region.

The vessel, identified as the Rich Starry, reversed its course after attempting to exit the Gulf, according to shipping data. The development comes just days after the United States enforced restrictions on ships linked to Iranian ports.

The blockade was announced by Donald Trump following the collapse of recent diplomatic talks with Iran. The move aims to restrict maritime traffic associated with Iranian trade.

Officials said that during the first 24 hours of enforcement, no vessel successfully crossed the blockade. Several ships, including the sanctioned tanker, complied with instructions from US forces and turned back toward regional waters.

The tanker is reported to be linked to a Chinese company previously sanctioned for dealing with Iran. It was carrying a cargo of methanol loaded from the United Arab Emirates at the time of the incident.

The situation underscores the rising risks in one of the world’s most critical oil transit routes. The Strait of Hormuz typically handles a significant share of global energy shipments, but traffic has sharply declined due to ongoing geopolitical tensions.

The blockade, which applies specifically to vessels travelling to or from Iranian ports, has added further uncertainty for shipping companies, insurers and global energy markets.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com