English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

Iran: Europe should defy US sanctions if Trump leaves N-deal

Published

on

Iran: Europe should defy US sanctions if Trump leaves N-deal

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]In a bid to isolate US administration on nuclear deal, Iran has urged Europe to defy US sanctions if Trump administration chooses to abandon the deal known as Joint comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) signed in 2015 by Iran and five permanent Security Council members plus Germany.

Iran’s foreign minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, while talking to the UK based The Guardian and Financial Express in New York, said that Tehran will only abide by restrictions under the deal if other signatories- the UK, France, Germany, Russia and China- all remain committed to the deal and defy subsequent US sanctions. The interview was appeared in Friday edition.

Javad Zarif warned that deal will be collapsed if Europe followed Washington’s lead and Iran would emerge with more advanced nuclear technology than before the agreement was reached in 2015. “Europe should lead” Zarif suggested.

“The deal allowed Iran to continue its research and development. So we have improved our technological base,” he said. “If we decide to walk away from the deal we would be walking away with better technology.”

However he clarified, “It will always be peaceful, because membership of the NPT is not dependent on this deal. But we will not observe the limitations that were agreed on as part of the bargain in this deal.”

EU foreign policy chief, Federica Mogheirini, who was seen with head scarf while traveling to Tehran during diplomatic exercise before arriving at the 2015 deal, has recently clarified on the subject. Following a ministerial meeting on the deal at UN General Assembly at New York last week, she stressed that all the signatories, including the US, had agreed that Iran was in compliance with its obligations under the terms of the agreement and that Europe would do everything possible to keep the deal alive, even in the event of US withdrawal.

Iranian foreign minister apprehended that Trump would carry out his threat by non-certifying Iranian compliance in the forthcoming state department report to be submitted to Congress on October 15. Congress would have 60days to re-impose sanctions suspended under the deal. Zarif was quoted saying, “My assumption and guess is that he will not certify and then will allow Congress to take the decision.”

Iranian foreign minister expressed his candid observation s on Trump’s working style. He said, “I think he has made a policy of being unpredictable, and now he’s turning that into being unreliable as well.”

Zarif chose to speak on the subject after a week of US Joint chiefs of staff General Joseph Dunford admitted before Congress that US abrogation would damage its long term credibility. “It makes sense to me that our holding up agreements that we have signed, unless there’s a material breach, would have an impact on others’ willingness to sign agreements,” he reportedly said.

President Donald Trump and his administration officials have claimed that Iran was violating a line in the preface of the agreement saying the signatories anticipate the deal would contribute to regional peace and security.

Conflicting views of US and UK were made public on September 14, when the secretary of state Rex Tillerson and British Foreign secretary Boris Johnson, in a joint press conference in London, had openly expressed their views. Tillerson said the US viewed Iran as being in default of the deal’s expectations but Johnson urged the world to “have faith” in its potential to create a more open Iran.

The US official tried to relate Iran deal with other regional issues.  Tillerson emphasised that US decision about whether to end the agreement will be based a wider assessment of Iranian behaviour, including in Yemen and Syria and not just on whether Iran is complying with the strict terms of the deal.

US and its regional allies, Saudi Arabia and Israel have been alleging Iran of supporting Houthis in Yemen in their fight against Saudi led war and extending support to Syria’s Basher al-Assad in his fight against IS and Al-Nusra front like opposition groups.

President Trump, while addressing at UNGA recently had resumed his attacks on the agreement calling it “one of the worst deals I’ve ever seen.”  He claimed that Iran had “violated so many different elements, but they’ve also violated the spirit of the deal”. He did not clearly what he would do on October 15 about verifying Iran’s compliance but said his stance would be “very evident”.

However, state department spokeswoman, Heather Nauert, said on Thursday that US would continue to suspend nuclear related sanctions on the Iranian oil industry, as required by the agreement.

But at the same time she clarified, “Waiving some of those sanctions should not be seen as an indication of President Trump or his administration’s position on the JCPOA nor does the waiver give the Iranian regime a pass on its broad range of malign behaviour.”

Under the nuclear deal Iran had agreed to redesign, convert and reduce its nuclear facilities and accept the Additional Protocol in order to lift all nuclear related economical sanctions, freeing up tens of billions of dollars in oil revenue and frozen assets.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Latest world news

Trump says Iran getting more serious in talks, no decision yet on major strikes

Donald Trump says Iran is becoming more serious in negotiations with the US but insists no decision has been taken on launching major military strikes against Tehran.

Published

on

Donald Trump

US President Donald Trump has said he has not yet decided whether to authorise major military strikes against Iran, stating that Tehran has become “more serious” in its negotiations with Washington even as tensions between the two countries remain high.

Speaking to reporters in the Oval Office on Friday, Trump said discussions with Iran were continuing and suggested diplomatic efforts were showing signs of progress.

“We’re talking to them right now. I think they’re getting more and more serious as the days go by,” Trump said, adding that no final decision had been taken on launching military action.

Trump says diplomacy remains an option

Trump said the United States remained prepared for military action if required but indicated that ongoing talks could still lead to an agreement.

“We’re locked and loaded and ready to go. But we’re talking to them, so I think while we’re talking, we’ll see what comes of it. I believe they’re very serious. They should be,” he said.

The US President also warned that Iran would face a “much higher level” of strikes if negotiations failed, while reiterating that preventing Tehran from developing a nuclear weapon remained his key red line.

The United States has said its military operations are aimed at preventing Iran from closing the strategically important Strait of Hormuz. Iran, meanwhile, has carried out retaliatory strikes on US bases, with four American service members reported killed.

Reports claim Trump discussed large-scale military operation

Trump’s remarks came after media reports suggested he met senior advisers to discuss the possibility of a large-scale military operation against Iran. Another report said he was considering a “massive attack”, although Trump did not confirm those reports during his interaction with journalists.

He also acknowledged that the prolonged conflict, which he had earlier expected to last only a few weeks, was approaching its fifth month and had become a political challenge ahead of the US midterm elections scheduled for November.

Trump issues warning over support for Iran

Trump also addressed reports claiming that Russia and China were providing intelligence or military support to Iran. He said both Chinese President Xi Jinping and Russian President Vladimir Putin had assured him they would not arm Tehran.

“I think they wouldn’t want to have me disappointed,” Trump said.

In a separate post on his Truth Social platform, Trump warned Moscow and Beijing against supplying weapons to Iran, saying such a move would not be in their interests.

He further stated that Xi had assured him during their meeting in Beijing in May that China would not provide weapons to Iran, while Putin had conveyed a similar position despite the ongoing war in Ukraine.

Continue Reading

India News

For second time, US strikes ship with Indian crew near Strait of Hormuz

Published

on

By

Strait of Hormuz

The United States Central Command (CENTCOM) has said that an oil tanker carrying Indian crew was drifting with its engine switched off near the Strait of Hormuz before it was struck by US forces.

A CENTCOM spokesperson said the vessel had stopped due to engine failure and was drifting after its crew repeatedly sought additional time to carry out repairs. US officials said the tanker was struck only after it failed to comply with directives issued by US forces enforcing a blockade on vessels allegedly transporting Iranian oil. The military said the strike was aimed at disabling the ship by targeting its engine room rather than sinking it.

The incident involved a tanker carrying Indian seafarers near the Gulf of Oman, close to the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s busiest maritime trade routes. The strike triggered a fire onboard, prompting rescue efforts by Omani authorities and maritime agencies. Indian authorities closely monitored the situation and coordinated with local officials regarding the welfare of the crew members.

The incident has drawn concern in India, with the government emphasising the safety of Indian nationals working aboard commercial vessels in the conflict-hit region. The Ministry of External Affairs has remained in touch with the authorities concerned as tensions between the United States and Iran continue to pose risks to international shipping.

In June, three Indian sailors were killed in a US strike on another oil tanker. The Strait of Hormuz handles a significant share of the word’s oil trade, and the latest incident has renewed concerns over the security of merchant vessels operating in the region. Maritime experts have warned that escalating hostilities could further disrupt commercial shipping and endanger civilian crews navigating one of the world’s most strategically important waterways.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Trump announces phased tariff of up to 200% on generic drug imports, India may face impact

US President Donald Trump has announced a phased tariff plan on imported generic medicines, raising duties to 200% after three years, a move that could affect India’s pharmaceutical exports.

Published

on

Donald Trump

The United States has announced a phased tariff plan for imported generic medicines that could have implications for pharmaceutical exporters, including India. US President Donald Trump said the policy is intended to encourage companies to shift generic drug manufacturing to the United States by imposing steep tariffs after a two-year transition period.

The announcement is particularly important for India, one of the world’s largest suppliers of affordable generic medicines and a major exporter to the US market.

Trump outlines phased tariff plan

In a post on his Truth Social platform, President Trump said the new policy will take effect from August 1, 2026. Under the plan, imported generic medicines will continue to attract zero tariffs for the first two years.

Beginning in the third year, the tariff will increase to 100%, before rising further to 200% thereafter.

Trump said the measure is designed to encourage pharmaceutical companies to establish manufacturing facilities in the United States instead of relying on imports.

He added that companies choosing not to invest in US-based production during the transition period would face the higher tariff rates. According to Trump, the existing policy governing patented, branded and innovative medicines will remain unchanged.

Why India could be affected

India is widely regarded as the “pharmacy of the world” because of its large-scale production and export of generic medicines.

Indian generic drugs account for nearly 40% of the US generic medicine market by volume. According to a Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI) report, India exported pharmaceutical products worth USD 9.7 billion to the United States during the 2024-25 financial year, representing around 38% of the country’s total pharmaceutical exports of USD 25.8 billion.

However, the immediate impact of the newly announced tariff policy on Indian pharmaceutical companies remains uncertain.

Existing trade agreement and industry concerns

India and the United States struck a trade pact in February that states India would receive negotiated outcomes regarding generic pharmaceuticals and pharmaceutical ingredients.

Despite that provision, previous tariff threats by Trump had already raised concerns within the pharmaceutical industry over the future of affordable medicine exports from India.

Indian pharmaceutical companies supply a wide range of generic medicines used to treat conditions including hypertension, diabetes, depression, cancer, infectious diseases and mental health disorders.

According to a Financial Post report cited in the source material, around 65% of birth control pill prescriptions in the United States during 2024 were manufactured by two India-based companies — Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and Lupin Ltd.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com