English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

Iran: Europe should defy US sanctions if Trump leaves N-deal

Published

on

Iran: Europe should defy US sanctions if Trump leaves N-deal

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]In a bid to isolate US administration on nuclear deal, Iran has urged Europe to defy US sanctions if Trump administration chooses to abandon the deal known as Joint comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) signed in 2015 by Iran and five permanent Security Council members plus Germany.

Iran’s foreign minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, while talking to the UK based The Guardian and Financial Express in New York, said that Tehran will only abide by restrictions under the deal if other signatories- the UK, France, Germany, Russia and China- all remain committed to the deal and defy subsequent US sanctions. The interview was appeared in Friday edition.

Javad Zarif warned that deal will be collapsed if Europe followed Washington’s lead and Iran would emerge with more advanced nuclear technology than before the agreement was reached in 2015. “Europe should lead” Zarif suggested.

“The deal allowed Iran to continue its research and development. So we have improved our technological base,” he said. “If we decide to walk away from the deal we would be walking away with better technology.”

However he clarified, “It will always be peaceful, because membership of the NPT is not dependent on this deal. But we will not observe the limitations that were agreed on as part of the bargain in this deal.”

EU foreign policy chief, Federica Mogheirini, who was seen with head scarf while traveling to Tehran during diplomatic exercise before arriving at the 2015 deal, has recently clarified on the subject. Following a ministerial meeting on the deal at UN General Assembly at New York last week, she stressed that all the signatories, including the US, had agreed that Iran was in compliance with its obligations under the terms of the agreement and that Europe would do everything possible to keep the deal alive, even in the event of US withdrawal.

Iranian foreign minister apprehended that Trump would carry out his threat by non-certifying Iranian compliance in the forthcoming state department report to be submitted to Congress on October 15. Congress would have 60days to re-impose sanctions suspended under the deal. Zarif was quoted saying, “My assumption and guess is that he will not certify and then will allow Congress to take the decision.”

Iranian foreign minister expressed his candid observation s on Trump’s working style. He said, “I think he has made a policy of being unpredictable, and now he’s turning that into being unreliable as well.”

Zarif chose to speak on the subject after a week of US Joint chiefs of staff General Joseph Dunford admitted before Congress that US abrogation would damage its long term credibility. “It makes sense to me that our holding up agreements that we have signed, unless there’s a material breach, would have an impact on others’ willingness to sign agreements,” he reportedly said.

President Donald Trump and his administration officials have claimed that Iran was violating a line in the preface of the agreement saying the signatories anticipate the deal would contribute to regional peace and security.

Conflicting views of US and UK were made public on September 14, when the secretary of state Rex Tillerson and British Foreign secretary Boris Johnson, in a joint press conference in London, had openly expressed their views. Tillerson said the US viewed Iran as being in default of the deal’s expectations but Johnson urged the world to “have faith” in its potential to create a more open Iran.

The US official tried to relate Iran deal with other regional issues.  Tillerson emphasised that US decision about whether to end the agreement will be based a wider assessment of Iranian behaviour, including in Yemen and Syria and not just on whether Iran is complying with the strict terms of the deal.

US and its regional allies, Saudi Arabia and Israel have been alleging Iran of supporting Houthis in Yemen in their fight against Saudi led war and extending support to Syria’s Basher al-Assad in his fight against IS and Al-Nusra front like opposition groups.

President Trump, while addressing at UNGA recently had resumed his attacks on the agreement calling it “one of the worst deals I’ve ever seen.”  He claimed that Iran had “violated so many different elements, but they’ve also violated the spirit of the deal”. He did not clearly what he would do on October 15 about verifying Iran’s compliance but said his stance would be “very evident”.

However, state department spokeswoman, Heather Nauert, said on Thursday that US would continue to suspend nuclear related sanctions on the Iranian oil industry, as required by the agreement.

But at the same time she clarified, “Waiving some of those sanctions should not be seen as an indication of President Trump or his administration’s position on the JCPOA nor does the waiver give the Iranian regime a pass on its broad range of malign behaviour.”

Under the nuclear deal Iran had agreed to redesign, convert and reduce its nuclear facilities and accept the Additional Protocol in order to lift all nuclear related economical sanctions, freeing up tens of billions of dollars in oil revenue and frozen assets.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Latest world news

Trump says Iran agrees to never have nuclear weapons, rejects $300 billion fund claim

Donald Trump said Iran has agreed to never possess nuclear weapons under a proposed framework, while dismissing reports that the US would provide Tehran with a $300 billion reconstruction fund.

Published

on

Donald Trump statement

US President Donald Trump has said that Iran has agreed to a commitment that it will never develop or possess nuclear weapons, describing it as a central element of a proposed understanding between Washington and Tehran.

Speaking about the ongoing diplomatic efforts, Trump also rejected reports suggesting that the United States planned to provide Iran with a reconstruction or investment package worth $300 billion. He described such claims as false and said no such arrangement had been agreed.

The remarks come as discussions continue over a broader framework aimed at easing tensions between the two countries. According to Trump, the understanding would ensure that Iran remains without nuclear weapons while opening the door for future engagement if the terms are respected.

Questions remain over final agreement details

Despite Trump’s comments, several aspects of the proposed arrangement remain unclear because the full text of the agreement has not yet been made public.

Reports indicate that negotiations have involved discussions on sanctions relief, access to frozen assets and potential economic measures linked to Iran’s compliance with future commitments. However, the exact scope of these provisions has not been officially confirmed.

Another key issue is how compliance would be monitored. Details regarding inspections, verification mechanisms and the handling of Iran’s existing nuclear materials have yet to be fully explained.

Further negotiations expected

Officials have suggested that discussions on technical nuclear matters could continue even after the signing of an initial memorandum of understanding. Such talks would likely focus on implementation and verification measures.

The proposed framework is being closely watched internationally, as any agreement between the United States and Iran could have significant implications for regional stability and global non-proliferation efforts.

For now, Trump has maintained that the core objective remains clear: ensuring that Iran never acquires a nuclear weapon while denying reports that Washington has committed to a multibillion-dollar reconstruction fund.

Continue Reading

LATEST SPORTS NEWS

USA start FIFA World Cup 2026 with dominant 4-1 victory over Paraguay

The USA opened their FIFA World Cup 2026 journey with a dominant 4-1 victory against Paraguay, earning three valuable points in Group D.

Published

on

The United States kicked off their FIFA World Cup 2026 campaign in impressive fashion, securing a commanding 4-1 victory over Paraguay in their Group D opener at SoFi Stadium in Los Angeles.

Playing in front of a passionate home crowd, the hosts delivered an attacking display to collect all three points and make an early statement in the tournament. The match also marked a significant occasion as the USA hosted part of the World Cup opening festivities before turning attention to the action on the pitch.

The Americans took control early and maintained pressure on Paraguay throughout the contest. Their attacking movement and clinical finishing helped them establish a comfortable lead, while Paraguay struggled to contain the hosts’ pace and creativity in the final third.

USA seize control after fast start

The United States settled quickly and found success going forward, creating several opportunities through quick passing and aggressive pressing. Their attacking approach paid off as they built momentum and gradually stretched Paraguay’s defence.

Paraguay attempted to respond and managed to get on the scoresheet, but the South American side found it difficult to match the intensity shown by the hosts. The USA continued to create chances and added further goals to put the result beyond doubt.

With the victory, the United States moved to the top section of Group D and gained an important boost in confidence ahead of their upcoming fixtures in the tournament.

Strong opening result for hosts

A winning start is particularly important in a World Cup campaign, and the USA achieved exactly that with a comprehensive performance. The result gives the hosts valuable momentum as they prepare for the next stage of group play.

For Paraguay, the defeat means they will need a strong response in their remaining group matches to keep their hopes of progressing to the knockout rounds alive.

The FIFA World Cup 2026 is being jointly hosted by the United States, Canada and Mexico, with the tournament featuring an expanded format and more participating teams than previous editions.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Jaishankar raises deaths of three Indian sailors with Marco Rubio, lodges strong protest

External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar conveyed India’s strong protest to US Secretary of State Marco Rubio over an attack that killed three Indian sailors, stressing that lethal action against commercial shipping is unjustified.

Published

on

External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar on Saturday spoke with Marco Rubio and conveyed India’s strong protest over recent attacks on commercial vessels in the Gulf that resulted in the deaths of three Indian sailors.

According to reports, Jaishankar told Rubio that the use of lethal force against commercial shipping was not justified and underlined India’s serious concerns regarding the safety of civilian seafarers operating in the region. The conversation came days after three Indian mariners were killed in an attack on the Palau-flagged tanker Settebello near the Oman coast.

The incident has triggered diplomatic engagement between New Delhi and Washington. India had earlier summoned a senior US diplomat to register its concerns and seek accountability following the attack. The Ministry of External Affairs has emphasized that actions endangering civilian shipping undermine maritime safety and stability in a strategically important region.

India reiterates concern over maritime safety

India has stressed the importance of protecting civilian seafarers and ensuring the security of international maritime commerce. Officials have expressed concern over multiple incidents involving Indian crew members in West Asian waters in recent days.

The deaths of the three sailors have also sparked calls within India for stronger diplomatic efforts to safeguard Indian nationals working aboard commercial vessels in conflict-affected maritime zones.

Background of the incident

The attack involved the tanker Settebello, which was operating near Oman when it was struck during ongoing tensions linked to the conflict involving Iran and maritime operations in the Gulf region. Initial reports indicated that Indian crew members were among those affected, and later confirmations established that three Indian sailors had died in the incident.

India has maintained that civilian shipping should not become a target and has continued diplomatic outreach to ensure the safety and welfare of Indian seafarers working across global shipping routes.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com