English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

Trump got Trumped: Covid-19 pandemic effect

When Microsoft’s co-founder Bill Gates warned about future pandemics in a 2015 TED talk, many Americans believed that it was a normal warning from the billionaire philanthropist.

Published

on

Covid-19 Hospital

By Mantosh Sharma

When Microsoft’s co-founder Bill Gates warned about future pandemics in a 2015 TED talk, many Americans believed that it was a normal warning from the billionaire philanthropist. Gates said, “If anything kills over 10 million people in the next few decades, it’s most likely to be a highly infectious virus rather than a war.” He continued, “We’ve actually invested very little in a system to stop an epidemic, we’re not ready for the next epidemic.”

The US government had received a formal notification about the outbreak of Covid-19 in China on January 3.

The government did not take the threat seriously. It delayed a response and showed no acknowledgement of the threat. It took six whole weeks for a proper response from the government. On January 31, the US banned foreigners who recently visited China. On February 29, travel restrictions expanded to Iran and an advisory for South Korea and Italy. By March 11, the US actually suspended most travel from Europe. During this time, the virus was infecting the USA, and by March 16, 2020, the United States of America had the most infections in the world.

Professor Ooi Eng Eong, the Deputy Director of the Emerging infectious Diseases Program Duke-NUS Medical School, said, “To put it bluntly, the US was unprepared for it. They held on to a very optimistic view. That this was an Asian problem that wouldn’t reach them.”

Had the tests occurred in January, with effective communication for everyone, as it was a shared risk, the US would have been in a different position.

It just took a few weeks for the coronavirus to jump from 2 million to 3 million cases, and it is now approaching 7 million cases with more than 200,000 deaths worldwide. The University of Washington Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, IHME Model, predicted that the country would witness more than 208,000 deaths by November. On March 31, Dr. Deborah Birx, the coordinator of the White House coronavirus task force, presented the following chart:

However, the current death numbers are higher than projected for the outbreak with intervention.

The pandemic response was fractured, disorganised, politicised and lacked cohesiveness, as well as containing inadequate contact tracing. The government did not act early enough. Cases in countries like South Korea, Hong Kong and Taiwan were much less in the initial months as compared to the US. These countries tested citizens earlier and regularly, contact tracing was used and there was a political will of consistent messaging about the pandemic. The US tested fewer people and their policy to counter the pandemic was full of confusion and misdirection.

As recently as July 4, President Donald Trump said, “99% of Covid-19 cases are harmless.” However, medical stats suggest otherwise. 15-20% of cases need hospitalisation and nearly half of them need ICU with permanent injuries after sustaining the virus.

Anthony Fauci

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) suggested that the pandemic could affect 8 trillion dollars off from economic growth. Covid-19 has devastated service sectors, small businesses, daily wagers, hospitality and the travel industry. There were multiple revised estimates for economic contraction for 2020. It was ranging from 5% to 20% in 2020.


US President Donald Trump

Covid-19 rattled Trump’s presidency and it was the crisis of confidence in the government. His biggest narrative and talking point was the strength in the US economy, booming stock markets and the record-level unemployment rate. He was able to boast about it not only to his voter base but also to the established Republican base as well. It has given him an overarching power to sell himself to all small pockets of resistance in his own party. This also gave him the political capital to engage with Europe as well as other trading and strategic defence partner-states around the world.

Secondly, Trump dealt with the Covid-19 pandemic like he did with his adversaries. There is the predictive way of dealing his earlier crisis like the Russian collusion in his election and the firing of a few of his appointees who became adversaries. He first denied the allegations and later ridiculed, defamed, and downplayed the credibility of the messenger. Michael Cohen, John Bolton, John Kelly, Omarosa Manigault Newman, Jerome Powell, Anthony Scaramucci, Jeff Sessions, Rex Tillerson, and a few more have all gone through the same treatment. They all were praised by Trump while being hired and then thrown barbs at when they were fired.

The handling of the pandemic was on a similar pattern. Here are a few statements made by President Trump about the coronavirus cases.

On January 22, he said, “We have it totally under control – it’s going to be just fine.”

On February 24, he said, “The coronavirus is very much under control in the USA – the stock market is starting to look very good to me.”

On February 28, he said, “It is going to disappear. One day, it’s like a miracle, it will disappear.”

Again, dealing with the pandemic as his political enemy, he falsely created hope. He stockpiled millions of doses of hydroxychloroquine without any scientific evidence that it works. He purposely did not wear masks as a political notion, suggesting to his political base for the defiance of establishment.

This predictable instinct of his personality inadvertently positioned Donald Trump against the pandemic politically. His logic was that if you cannot win, talk it down and hence he started talking Covid-19 down.

When Covid-19 destroyed his economic narrative and political capital to bargain on international trade and alliances, he turned over to cultural issues, seeking refuge in his political base playing with racial tension. Two sections were being targeted, rural-supporter Republicans, and white-suburban moderates and independents.

Former White House Communications Director for Trump, Anthony Scaramucci, has summed up on a Yahoo Finance live video program very well, “It’s a racist move and it’s designed to help him with his base,” “If you go through his internal polling numbers, he is down double-digits in most of the swing states that he needs to win. So when he’s saying nonsense like liberate Minnesota or liberate Michigan, he’s trying to rile up his base. His only play right now is to get the people that voted for him last time to turn out in higher levels than in 2016.”

In 2016, he had positioned himself against illegal immigrants in the USA, proposed to build the wall on the Mexico border. However, in 2020 he had to find another ghost enemy, to position himself and his base against something to distract people from the pandemic-related political fallout. Hence, the China trade rivalry was brought into as a recent talking point. After the approval rating dropped, failure to contain the pandemic and economic disaster needed a diversion for the 2020 election. China must pay for the damage and he bashed Biden and China.

Thirdly, overplay with his political base and not much effort to expand beyond to other segments of society had rattled traditional Republicans who voted for him in 2016. They think another four years of Trump’s presidency may harm the Republican Party in the future. The Lincoln Project, Republican Voters Against Trump, a new super PAC, Right Side PAC, and veterans of the McCain and Bush campaigns are targeting anti-Trump Republicans to support Joe Biden in the November election. Cindy McCain, the widow of the Republican Party nominee, endorses Biden for President. This has strengthened Biden.

The President’s response in handling of the pandemic has eroded confidence in a section of voters who voted for him in 2016. Trump led in the senior citizens’ group over (Hilary) Clinton by 7 points. The new poll is suggesting Joe Biden has a lead around 10 point among registered voters. (Washington Post/ABC poll). This is the same for young women voters. Similarly, for younger voters, campus life and job prospects were shattered due to the pandemic. A recent CNN poll is showing Biden leading by over 20 points among voters under the age 34. Younger voters helped Democrats in 2018 to take over the house.

According to the NBC News polling average, The RealClearPolitics general election polling average and FiveThirtyEight’s national polling tracker gave Biden a 7-8 point advantage. Florida, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, North Carolina and Arizona are in trouble. Even Georgia is showing a small lead for Biden by Fox News. Arizona is breaking more in favour of Biden. Trump’s standing on independents and seniors have eroded due to the pandemic and the civil unrest created by the killing of George Floyd.

Perhaps, Trump has realised this. His recent political conspiracy theory on mail-in ballot fraud is another political divergence narrative to make the adverse election outcome questionable, hence doubtful.

However, American democratic institutions are independent and very powerful. The comments made by FBI Director Christopher Wray on the President’s conspiracy theory on mail-in ballots in the 2020 election sums it up. “Now, we have not seen, historically, any kind of coordinated national voter fraud effort in a major election, whether it’s by mail or otherwise.”

If the statistical trend continues, as it is, in the next 40-50 days we may witness a big reversal in the 2020 US Presidential election in favour of Biden. There is a chance of a landslide victory in electoral votes as witnessed in 1980 when Republican Ronald Reagan defeated incumbent Democrat Jimmy Carter with 489/49 electoral votes.

LATEST SPORTS NEWS

USA start FIFA World Cup 2026 with dominant 4-1 victory over Paraguay

The USA opened their FIFA World Cup 2026 journey with a dominant 4-1 victory against Paraguay, earning three valuable points in Group D.

Published

on

The United States kicked off their FIFA World Cup 2026 campaign in impressive fashion, securing a commanding 4-1 victory over Paraguay in their Group D opener at SoFi Stadium in Los Angeles.

Playing in front of a passionate home crowd, the hosts delivered an attacking display to collect all three points and make an early statement in the tournament. The match also marked a significant occasion as the USA hosted part of the World Cup opening festivities before turning attention to the action on the pitch.

The Americans took control early and maintained pressure on Paraguay throughout the contest. Their attacking movement and clinical finishing helped them establish a comfortable lead, while Paraguay struggled to contain the hosts’ pace and creativity in the final third.

USA seize control after fast start

The United States settled quickly and found success going forward, creating several opportunities through quick passing and aggressive pressing. Their attacking approach paid off as they built momentum and gradually stretched Paraguay’s defence.

Paraguay attempted to respond and managed to get on the scoresheet, but the South American side found it difficult to match the intensity shown by the hosts. The USA continued to create chances and added further goals to put the result beyond doubt.

With the victory, the United States moved to the top section of Group D and gained an important boost in confidence ahead of their upcoming fixtures in the tournament.

Strong opening result for hosts

A winning start is particularly important in a World Cup campaign, and the USA achieved exactly that with a comprehensive performance. The result gives the hosts valuable momentum as they prepare for the next stage of group play.

For Paraguay, the defeat means they will need a strong response in their remaining group matches to keep their hopes of progressing to the knockout rounds alive.

The FIFA World Cup 2026 is being jointly hosted by the United States, Canada and Mexico, with the tournament featuring an expanded format and more participating teams than previous editions.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Jaishankar raises deaths of three Indian sailors with Marco Rubio, lodges strong protest

External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar conveyed India’s strong protest to US Secretary of State Marco Rubio over an attack that killed three Indian sailors, stressing that lethal action against commercial shipping is unjustified.

Published

on

External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar on Saturday spoke with Marco Rubio and conveyed India’s strong protest over recent attacks on commercial vessels in the Gulf that resulted in the deaths of three Indian sailors.

According to reports, Jaishankar told Rubio that the use of lethal force against commercial shipping was not justified and underlined India’s serious concerns regarding the safety of civilian seafarers operating in the region. The conversation came days after three Indian mariners were killed in an attack on the Palau-flagged tanker Settebello near the Oman coast.

The incident has triggered diplomatic engagement between New Delhi and Washington. India had earlier summoned a senior US diplomat to register its concerns and seek accountability following the attack. The Ministry of External Affairs has emphasized that actions endangering civilian shipping undermine maritime safety and stability in a strategically important region.

India reiterates concern over maritime safety

India has stressed the importance of protecting civilian seafarers and ensuring the security of international maritime commerce. Officials have expressed concern over multiple incidents involving Indian crew members in West Asian waters in recent days.

The deaths of the three sailors have also sparked calls within India for stronger diplomatic efforts to safeguard Indian nationals working aboard commercial vessels in conflict-affected maritime zones.

Background of the incident

The attack involved the tanker Settebello, which was operating near Oman when it was struck during ongoing tensions linked to the conflict involving Iran and maritime operations in the Gulf region. Initial reports indicated that Indian crew members were among those affected, and later confirmations established that three Indian sailors had died in the incident.

India has maintained that civilian shipping should not become a target and has continued diplomatic outreach to ensure the safety and welfare of Indian seafarers working across global shipping routes.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Three Indian sailors killed after US strike on tanker off Oman coast, confirms Sonowal

Three Indian sailors who went missing after a US strike on the oil tanker MT Settebello off Oman have been confirmed dead, Union Minister Sarbananda Sonowal said.

Published

on

Three Indian seafarers who had been reported missing following a US military strike on an oil tanker off the coast of Oman have been confirmed dead, Union Shipping Minister Sarbananda Sonowal said on Thursday. The bodies of all three sailors have been recovered and identified.

The incident involved the Palau-flagged oil tanker MT Settebello, which was carrying 28 crew members, including 24 Indian nationals and four foreign nationals. According to reports, the vessel came under attack in the Gulf of Oman after US forces alleged that it had failed to comply with instructions and was transporting Iranian oil.

Three missing sailors confirmed dead

The deceased sailors have been identified as deck cadet Aditya Sharma, engine fitter Shivanand Chaurasiya and chief engineer Patnala Suresh. They were initially reported missing after the attack while 21 other Indian crew members were rescued. Sonowal described the development as a tragic loss and expressed condolences to the families of the victims.

The minister stated that the bodies had been located and identified following search and recovery efforts conducted after the strike.

Vessel carried 24 Indian nationals

MT Settebello had a crew comprising 24 Indians, two Pakistanis, one Ukrainian and one Russian. The tanker was operating in the Gulf of Oman when it was targeted. The US military has said the vessel was struck because it was allegedly violating restrictions related to Iranian oil shipments.

The attack has drawn strong reactions in India due to the loss of Indian lives and concerns over the safety of civilian seafarers operating in a conflict-affected maritime region.

India lodged diplomatic protest

Before the deaths were confirmed, India had formally raised the issue with the United States and sought clarification over the attack. The Ministry of External Affairs summoned a senior US diplomat and conveyed concerns regarding the safety of Indian crew members aboard commercial vessels.

The latest development marks a tragic conclusion to the search for the three missing sailors and is likely to intensify concerns over maritime security in the Gulf region.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com