English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

Doklam standoff: China scales up the rhetoric

Published

on

Doklam standoff: China scales up the rhetoric

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]China’s Foreign Minister Wang Yi on Tuesday said India has admitted to entering Chinese territory and the Doklam standoff in the Sikkim sector can only reach its logical conclusion if Indian troops ‘conscientiously withdraw’ from the area.

On Monday, spokesman for China’s Defence Ministry had warned India “not to push its luck” and “not harbour any illusions”, saying it was easier to shake a mountain that the PLA (People’s Liberation Army).

After sending out signals mainly through Chinese state-run media for some weeks, in these two days the Chinese government has come out with statements affirming them. Chinese Foreign Minister’s statement on Tuesday was his first comment, also the first by a Chinese minister, in the ongoing standoff between India and China over Doklam.

Wang Yi was quoted by news agency as making a statement to the media in Thailand’s capital Bangkok on Monday, saying: “The rights and wrongs are very clear and even senior Indian officials have openly stated that Chinese troops did not enter into the Indian territory.”

India had said they had entered Bhutan territory at a tri-junction of crucial strategic importance to India.

The brief quote in Chinese, posted on China’s Foreign Ministry’s website, added, “In other words, the Indian side admitted to entering the Chinese territory. The solution to this problem is very simple: conscientiously withdraw.”

The statement, a first by the minister, comes ahead of National Security Adviser Ajit Doval’s visit to Beijing for a BRICS summit, where he is expected to have a one-on-one bilateral meeting with his Chinese counterpart Yang Jiechi on the sidelines.

The editorial in China’s state-run Global Times, said India should not entertain high hopes of any major outcome from Doval’s visit. Describing Doval as “believed to be one of the main schemers behind the current border standoff between Chinese and Indian troops”, it said, “the Indian media is pinning high hopes on the trip to settle the ongoing dispute”.

It said, “…India’s withdrawal from Chinese territory is a precondition and a basis for any meaningful dialogue between the two sides. New Delhi should give up its illusions, and Doval’s Beijing visit is most certainly not an opportunity to settle the standoff in accordance with India’s will.”

It said the BRICS National Security Advisers’ meeting “is not a platform to address Sino-Indian border skirmishes”.

“Doval will inevitably be disappointed if he attempts to bargain with Beijing over the border disputes,” asserted the article.

Ruling out any accommodation or meeting India half-way, it said, “Indian media outlets are exploring “dignified” ways to pull back its troops. We believe that if India complies with international laws, then the withdrawal will display dignity.”

“Beijing has no obligation to coordinate with New Delhi to withdraw its troops or suspend its road construction,” it added.

It went on to indulge in some sabre rattling: “People’s Liberation Army (PLA) forces are being deployed to the border area, and will take effective countermeasures if India refuses to pull back voluntarily. The PLA is capable enough to take actions that neither Indian troops nor the government can afford.”

It said India’s voluntary withdrawal “will incur the least cost” to it. “If Beijing takes countermeasures, New Delhi will be mired in a more passive political and military situation, and face its most serious strategic setback since 1962,” said the Global Times editorial.

An opinion piece in the newspaper struck an even more strident note, talking of “teaching India a second lesson”. It said: “As India continues down this intransigent path, perhaps it is time that it be taught a second lesson.” Recalling a statement made by China’s former consul general in Mumbai, Liu Youfa, the writer said India’s troops in Doklam “could either withdraw voluntarily, be captured or may be killed when border disputes escalate”.

Chinese and Indian soldiers have been locked in a face- off in the Dokalam area of the Sikkim sector for over a month after Indian troops stopped the Chinese army from building a road in the disputed area. China claimed that they were constructing the road within their territory and has been demanding immediate pull-out of the Indian troops from the disputed Dokalam plateau. New Delhi has expressed concern over the road building, apprehending that it may put Chinese troops in a position to cut India’s access to its northeastern states.

India has conveyed to the Chinese government that the road construction would represent a significant change of status quo with serious security implications for it.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Latest world news

Trump calls PM Modi friend, says had very good conversation amid West Asia tensions

Trump described PM Modi as a friend after a 40-minute call focusing on Iran tensions, trade and strategic ties.

Published

on

Donald Trump statement

US President Donald Trump described Prime Minister Narendra Modi as a “friend” and said the two leaders had a “very good conversation” during a recent phone call held amid rising tensions in West Asia.

The call, which lasted around 40 minutes, comes shortly after developments in the ongoing Iran-related conflict and diplomatic efforts in the region. During the conversation, both leaders discussed key issues including regional security, trade, and bilateral cooperation.

The interaction marks one of the first high-level engagements between the two leaders following recent ceasefire-related developments involving the United States and Iran. The evolving situation in West Asia, including concerns around stability and global energy routes, was a significant focus of the discussion.

Officials indicated that the leaders also reviewed progress in India-US ties and reiterated their commitment to strengthening the strategic partnership across multiple sectors.

The phone call reflects continued coordination between New Delhi and Washington as geopolitical tensions persist in the Middle East, with both sides maintaining close communication on global and regional issues.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Israel-Lebanon ceasefire to begin within hours as Trump announces 10-day truce

Israel and Lebanon may begin a 10-day ceasefire within hours after a proposal announced by Donald Trump amid ongoing tensions.

Published

on

Donald Trump

A temporary halt in hostilities between Israel and Lebanon is expected to begin within hours after US President Donald Trump announced a proposed 10-day ceasefire between the two sides, amid ongoing tensions in the region.

According to his statement, the ceasefire is likely to take effect around 5 p.m. Eastern Time, although independent confirmation from both sides is still awaited.

The development follows discussions involving Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Lebanese President Joseph Aoun, with mediation efforts led by the United States.

Officials indicated that the proposed truce is aimed at creating a limited window to reduce violence and potentially pave the way for broader diplomatic engagement. The situation along the Israel-Lebanon border has remained tense in recent weeks, with escalation linked to the activities of Hezbollah.

Diplomatic efforts have intensified in recent days, with discussions facilitated by the United States, including the involvement of US Secretary of State Marco Rubio. However, details of the agreement and the extent of coordination between the parties remain unclear.

The situation remains fluid, and the success of the ceasefire will depend on adherence by all sides involved. The conflict has already led to significant humanitarian and geopolitical consequences, including displacement and disruption in affected areas.

While the proposed ceasefire is being seen as an important step toward de-escalation, broader negotiations involving regional stakeholders are expected to be necessary for any lasting resolution.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

US ends oil sanctions waiver for Iran and Russia, impact likely on India’s energy imports

The US decision to end the Iran and Russia oil waiver may impact India’s oil imports, fuel prices and global energy markets.

Published

on

US oil tanker

The United States has decided not to extend a temporary sanctions waiver that allowed limited trade in Iranian and Russian oil, marking a shift towards stricter enforcement of economic restrictions.

The waiver, introduced in March 2026, had permitted the sale of oil already loaded on ships to stabilise global supply during heightened geopolitical tensions. However, it is now set to expire around mid-April without renewal.

US officials have indicated that the move is part of a broader strategy to increase pressure on both Iran and Russia amid ongoing conflicts and geopolitical tensions.

What the waiver did and why it mattered

The short-term waiver allowed millions of barrels of oil—estimated at around 140 million barrels—to enter global markets, helping ease supply shortages and prevent sharp price spikes.

It also enabled countries like India to purchase discounted crude oil from Russia and resume limited imports from Iran after years of restrictions.

Impact on India

India, one of the world’s largest oil importers, is expected to feel the impact of the decision in several ways:

  • Reduced access to discounted oil
    India had been buying cheaper Russian crude and recently resumed Iranian imports under the waiver. Its end may limit these options.
  • Potential rise in fuel costs
    With fewer discounted supplies available, India may need to rely more on costlier sources, which could increase domestic fuel prices.
  • Supply diversification pressure
    India may need to explore alternative suppliers in the Middle East, Africa, or the US to maintain energy security.
  • Geopolitical balancing challenge
    The move adds pressure on India to align with US sanctions while managing its own economic interests.

Global energy market concerns

The end of the waiver comes at a time when global oil markets are already under stress due to conflict in West Asia and disruptions in key routes like the Strait of Hormuz.

Analysts warn that tightening sanctions could:

  • Reduce global oil supply
  • Increase price volatility
  • Intensify competition among major buyers like India and China

Bigger picture

The US decision reflects a broader shift from temporary relief measures to stricter enforcement of sanctions, even if it risks tightening global energy markets.

For India, the development highlights a recurring challenge—balancing affordable energy access with geopolitical realities.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com