English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

How the Khattar government abdicated its duties of maintaining order

Published

on

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Despite imposition of curfew in Panchkula, Haryana’s Manohar Lal Khattar government allowed over 1.5 lakh followers of Dera chief Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh to converge in the town before the special CBI court declared the Godman guilty of raping and sexually exploiting 2 of his followers in 2002. The resulting riots claimed the lives of 32 people, damaged property worth crores of rupees and the mayhem spread to Delhi, Punjab, Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh

As Haryana was burning, on Friday, and the wildfire spread to the neighbouring states of Punjab, Delhi and Rajasthan, the Punjab and Haryana High Court hit out at the Manohar Lal Khattar government. “You (Haryana government) allowed the city to burn for political gains. It seems the government has surrendered to agitators,” the court had said.

The indictment by the Punjab and Haryana High Court that came in light of the widespread violence that began as soon as a special CBI court in Panchkula declared Dera Sachha Sauda chief Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh guilty of raping two of his followers in 2002, is reason enough to recount how Haryana’s Khattar government capitulated before the Dera goons and allowed them to unleash mayhem.

The complete collapse of Haryana’s law and order machinery that was witnessed on Friday soon after the pronouncement of the verdict against the rapist Godman was perhaps as much a result of the manner in which the Khattar government tried to mislead people and even the court’s on the gravity of the situation in Panchkula.

Around 11.30 am on Friday, over three hours before the Panchkula CBI court declared its verdict, the Khattar government’s Advocate General BR Mahajan had claimed before the Punjab and Haryana High Court that with the exception of two spots – a “public park” and “community hall” – most Dera followers had been evacuated from Panchkula.

Dera terror: How the Khattar government abdicated its duties of maintaining order

The High Court had clearly directed the Haryana government “not to shy away” from using “any kind of weapon” to deal with persons indulging in arson, loot and violence. However, when the mayhem began – police personnel – a majority of them wielding lathis and not weapons – and even companies of the Army that had been called in to prevent any untoward incident, were seen fleeing their posts when the Godman’s followers clashed with them, torched vehicles and beat up media persons.

The Haryana government, especially Khattar who had appealed for calm a short while before the verdict – disappeared when the violence began. While the High Court was prompt enough to announce that properties owned by Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh’s Dera Sachha Sauda will be attached to recover and compensate for the financial losses caused by the riots, officials of the Khattar government and ministers like Anil Jain were still crying helplessness, insisting “what can we do”.

It is no secret that the BJP owes its landslide victory in the Haryana assembly polls in 2014 that enabled the appointment of first-time MLA Khattar as the chief minister in part due to Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh which had appealed to the state’s electorate to vote for the saffron party. The camaraderie between Khattar, his party’s ministers and MLAs and the Dera chief too was a very public one. Soon after the BJP had won Haryana in 2014, 19 of its newly-elected MLAs led by the party’s national general secretary Kailash Vijayvargiya had made a public spectacle of parading before the now-convicted-of-rape Godman to pay their respects.

Through the week before the rape verdict, Khattar government had allowed Dera followers to march to Panchkula, their numbers constantly swelling as Fridayapproached. Khattar’s cabinet colleague Rambilas Sharma, his bureaucracy and even the state police kept insisting that the marching mob comprised of “peaceful followers of the Dera”.

The High Court, which on Friday, slammed the Khattar government of “complete collusion” with the Dera followers in allowing them to wreak havoc had earlier hit out at the administration for issuing two “shoddy” Section 144 CrPC orders, in which the Panchkula district administration ordered that they shall only bar entry of people “moving with weapons”. The state government had later amended the orders and barred “assembly of five or more persons in Panchkula” – but asFriday’s mayhem firmly established, even these orders were not implemented.

Dera terror: How the Khattar government abdicated its duties of maintaining order

Despite imposition of curfew, the Khattar government’s police allowed the Dera chief – who also enjoys a Z+ category security cover given by the government – to drive from Sirsa to the Panchkula court in a convoy of over 100 vehicles, filled with his rabid followers who further incited the mob en route.

Three days prior to the rape verdict, Haryana’s Additional Chief Secretary (Home) Ram Niwas had said, “We are totally prepared to deal with any situation. Nobody shall be allowed to breach the peace. Preventive arrests shall be made, if required”. Last week, the Chief Secretaries and police chiefs of both Punjab and Haryana met Union Home Secretary Rajiv Mahrishi in New Delhi and apprised him of the situation in both the states. Both the States also sought paramilitary support.

It is pertinent to point out that although there were reports of arson in Congress-ruled Punjab too after the verdict, no casualties were reported from the state – a sharp contrast to what unfolded in Haryana.

Dera terror: How the Khattar government abdicated its duties of maintaining order

In the three years of his government, this is the third instance when Khattar’s mal-governance has cost the state heavily. In November, 2014, six people died during the 14-day standoff between police and followers of another self-styled Godman – Sant Rampal of Satlok Ashram in Hisar. Then in February 2016, 30 persons were killed in another police-public clash during the violent Jat agitation. Each time, Khattar has issued appeals for calm and they have failed to have any effect on the mobs which his administration has conveniently allowed to gather despite prohibitory orders.

Dera terror: How the Khattar government abdicated its duties of maintaining order

Even after the violence began, the Haryana police preferred to worry more for the rapist Godman Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh’s safety and comfort – flying him to a well-appointed government guest house with five-star amenities in Rohtak. It was only after a media outcry over this special treatment that the police surreptitiously moved the convict to the Rohtak jail. All along, in total violation of establish convention, the Dera chief was accompanied by a woman, whose identity could not be established but who, unofficially, the cops claim was his daughter.

If Khattar and his government abdicated their responsibilities of maintaining law and order, the Narendra Modi-led central government didn’t fare much better.

Almost as if the Union and Haryana government’s ministers and officials were following a pre-written script, Union home secretary Rajiv Meharshi described the tense situation as “serious but not yet out of control” on Friday evening. By the time Meharshi made this comment, 14 deaths had already been reported, the violence had already spread to the neighbouring states, coaches of at least two trains (one in the national capital’s Anand Vihar Railway station), several buses and public transport vehicles, buildings and government property had been gutted by arsonists. But according to the Union home ministry which is supposedly the guardian of the country’s internal security, the situation was “still not out of control”. Did the home secretary Meharshi not know the extent of the violence or was he deliberately underplaying it?

Union home minister Rajnath Singh, who was then on his way to brief Prime Minister Narendra Modi about the situation, insisted on Friday evening that the Haryana government “cannot be blamed” for the riots.

It was after around 8 pm on Friday night that news began doing the rounds of Narendra Modi being upset with Khattar – the man who was handpicked by the Prime Minister to become chief minister despite his inexperience of administration. At 8.18 pm, by when over 28 deaths had been confirmed, Modi appealed for peace through his Twitter handle. The Haryana government had suspended internet services even before the verdict came but then these appeals for peace, as had already become evident during the day, were perhaps only for public consumption.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

National Herald row reignites BJP-Congress face-off amid ED chargesheet

BJP has reignited its attack on the Gandhi family, accusing them of a corporate conspiracy in the National Herald case, while Congress dismisses the ED action as a political vendetta by the Modi government.

Published

on

A political slugfest has erupted once again between the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the Congress following the Enforcement Directorate’s (ED) chargesheet naming Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi in the alleged money laundering case tied to the now-defunct National Herald newspaper. The BJP has termed the case a textbook example of “corporate conspiracy,” while the Congress has decried the move as an act of “political vendetta” by the Narendra Modi-led central government.

BJP questions Gandhi family’s property acquisition through Young India Ltd

Senior BJP leader Ravi Shankar Prasad, addressing a press briefing, accused the Congress of orchestrating a corporate arrangement to transfer property into the Gandhi family’s hands. He highlighted that in 2008, after the National Herald ceased publication, the Congress gave ₹90 crore to Associated Journals Limited (AJL), the newspaper’s publisher — a transaction he claims violates the norms as political parties are barred from funding private entities.

AJL reportedly failed to repay the loan, after which a non-profit entity, Young India Limited (YIL) — in which Sonia and Rahul Gandhi each hold a 38% stake — acquired the company’s shares and, by extension, its properties across several Indian cities. Mr. Prasad questioned YIL’s charitable work and highlighted that a token amount of ₹50 lakh was paid to AJL before the remaining loan was written off.

“This is the Gandhi model of development,” Prasad said, alleging that the arrangement enabled the Gandhi family to take control of property worth thousands of crores.

BJP expands attack to Robert Vadra

The BJP leader also took aim at Priyanka Gandhi Vadra’s husband, Robert Vadra, citing alleged irregularities in land transactions. “Another member buys land for ₹3 crore and sells it for ₹58 crore. The country should learn from this Gandhi model,” he remarked sarcastically.

Congress fights back, terms case a political smokescreen

The Congress has launched protests across the country in response to the BJP’s remarks and the ED’s chargesheet. Senior leader Pawan Khera likened the current actions to pre-Independence times, stating, “Back then, the British hated National Herald, the Gandhi family and the Congress — today the RSS has taken that place.”

Calling the case baseless, Congress leader Sachin Pilot said, “There has been no exchange of funds or transfer of property rights. This case is politically motivated, and the Modi government is attempting to silence the voice of the Opposition.” He affirmed that the party has full faith in the judiciary and will fight the case legally.

Continue Reading

India News

Priyanka Gandhi accompanies Robert Vadra to ED office for second day in Gurugram land probe

Robert Vadra, husband of Congress MP Priyanka Gandhi, appeared before the ED for the second day in the Gurugram land case.

Published

on

Robert Vadra Priyanka Gandhi

Congress MP Priyanka Gandhi Vadra accompanied her husband Robert Vadra to the Enforcement Directorate (ED) office on Wednesday as he appeared for questioning for the second consecutive day in connection with the Gurugram land case.

Mr Vadra, the brother-in-law of Lok Sabha Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi, was seen exchanging a hug with Ms Gandhi before entering the ED office. He is under scrutiny in a money laundering probe linked to a 2008 land deal in Manesar-Shikohpur area, now known as Sector 83 of Gurugram.

Focus of the probe: land deal from Congress tenure in Haryana

The investigation stems from a land transaction executed by Skylight Hospitality Pvt Ltd, a company in which Mr Vadra was formerly a director. In February 2008, Skylight purchased 3.5 acres of land from Onkareshwar Properties for ₹7.5 crore. At that time, Haryana was governed by a Congress-led administration under then Chief Minister Bhupinder Singh Hooda.

In September 2012, four years after the acquisition, Skylight sold the same land to real estate developer DLF for ₹58 crore. The deal later drew public attention after senior IAS officer Ashok Khemka, who was then heading the Land Consolidation and Land Records department in Haryana, cancelled the land mutation, citing violations of the State Consolidation Act and procedural discrepancies.

Haryana Police registered an FIR to examine the deal in 2018, further intensifying the legal scrutiny.

ED questions Vadra under PMLA

On Tuesday, Mr Vadra was questioned for nearly five hours by the ED under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), during which his statement was recorded. The businessman has consistently maintained that the case is part of a political vendetta and emphasized that he has cooperated fully with all investigative agencies, submitting numerous documents over the years.

Calling for a closure to what he described as a decades-old matter, Mr Vadra said cases like these should not be allowed to drag on indefinitely.

Continue Reading

India News

Congress slams PM Modi, Amit Shah after ED files chargesheet against Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi

The ED’s chargesheet has accused the Congress leaders of money laundering under Sections 3 and 4 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act.

Published

on

The Congress on Tuesday hit out at Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Union Home Minister Amit Shah after the Enforcement Directorate’s (ED) chargesheet against Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi, and others in the National Herald case.

Labelling it a blatant act of vendetta politics, the grand old party also condemned the seizure of the newspaper’s assets as a “state-sponsored crime disguised as justice,” vowing to fight back against what it calls an attempt to silence its leadership.

In a fiery statement on X, Congress general secretary in charge of communication Jairam Ramesh accused PM Modi and Shah of orchestrating a campaign of intimidation. “Filing chargesheets against Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi, and others is nothing but the politics of vendetta gone wild,” Ramesh posted. “Seizing National Herald’s assets is a mockery of the rule of law.”

Hitting out at Shah, the Congress leader accused him of going “completely berserk.” He asserted that the Indian National Congress and its leadership refuse to be silenced, stating: “Satyameva Jayate.”

The ED’s chargesheet has accused the Congress leaders of money laundering under Sections 3 and 4 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act.

Alongside Sonia and Rahul, it names Congress figures Suman Dubey and Sam Pitroda. Special Judge Vishal Gogne reviewed the document for cognisance, scheduling further proceedings for April 25, with the filing handled by ED’s special public prosecutor, N.K. Matta.

Ramesh asserted that the Congress remains undeterred, promising, “We will not be silenced, and the truth will triumph.” The chargesheet reignites a long-standing legal battle tied to the National Herald, a newspaper associated with the Congress since India’s independence era.

The Delhi Rouse Avenue Court has scheduled a hearing for arguments on the ongoing National Herald case for April 25, 2025.

During a recent session, the presiding judge stated, “The present prosecution complaint shall next be taken up for consideration on the aspect of cognisance before this court on April 25, 2025, when the special counsel for the ED and the investigating officer will ensure the production of case diaries for the court’s examination.”

The prosecution complaint, lodged under Sections 44 and 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) of 2002, pertains to allegations of money laundering, as outlined in Section 3, in conjunction with Section 70, and is punishable under Section 4 of the same act, as per the report.

This case has garnered significant attention, following a complaint filed by BJP leader Subramanian Swamy against Congress leaders Sonia and Rahul, their associated companies, and other individuals involved.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com