A heated exchange erupted between Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah and Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) president Mehbooba Mufti on Friday over Abdullah’s proposal to revive the Tulbul Navigation Barrage project on Wullar Lake, following the suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT).
Mufti labelled Abdullah’s comments as “irresponsible” and “recklessly provocative,” while Abdullah retorted that Mufti’s criticism stemmed from her “desperate pursuit” of publicity and an intent to appease certain factions across the border, ignoring the IWT’s “historic injustice” to the people of Jammu and Kashmir.
In a Thursday post on X, Abdullah questioned whether work could resume on the Tulbul Navigation Barrage, stalled since the 1980s due to Pakistan’s objections under the IWT.
He wrote, “The Wullar Lake in North Kashmir hosts the Tulbul Navigation Barrage, initiated in the early 1980s but abandoned under Pakistan’s pressure citing the IWT. With the treaty now temporarily suspended, can we restart this project?”
He highlighted that the project could enable year-round navigation on the Jhelum River, boost commercial trade, employment, and tourism, and enhance downstream power generation, particularly in winter.
The Tulbul project, also known as the Wullar Lake project, aims to regulate water release from Wullar Lake during the lean months of October to February to support continuous navigation on the Jhelum. The IWT, which governed water-sharing between India and Pakistan, was placed in abeyance last month following the 22 April 2025 Pahalgam terror attack.
On Friday, Mufti criticised Abdullah’s proposal on X, calling it “deeply regrettable.” She stated, “At a time when India and Pakistan have narrowly averted all-out war, with Jammu and Kashmir suffering immense loss of life and destruction, such remarks are not only irresponsible but dangerously inflammatory.”
Mufti argued that “weaponising” water, a vital resource, was inhumane and risked escalating a bilateral issue into an international one, adding, “Our people deserve peace as much as anyone else in the nation.”
Abdullah responded sharply on X, accusing Mufti of refusing to recognise the IWT as a “betrayal” of Jammu and Kashmir’s interests due to her “craving for cheap publicity” and desire to “placate” certain groups across the border.
He wrote, “Opposing an inherently unfair treaty is not warmongering—it’s about rectifying a historic wrong that deprived our people of their rightful access to our water resources.” Abdullah reaffirmed his long-standing opposition to the IWT, pledging to continue advocating for the region’s rights.
The spat underscores lingering tensions over water resource management and regional priorities in Jammu and Kashmir, amplified by the recent ceasefire and the strategic implications of the IWT’s suspension.