English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Rajinikanth’s advise to Kamal Haasan: Fame, money not enough to succeed in politics

Published

on

Rajinikanth’s advise to Kamal Haasan: Fame, money not enough to succeed in politics

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]The gods of Tamil cinema shared the stage at a function in Chennai to inaugurate a memorial for iconic actor Sivaji Ganesan

With Tamil actor Kamal Haasan actively considering his political debut, here’s a piece of advice from the state’s undisputed superstar – Rajinikanth – that he can’t risk ignoring: “To be successful in politics, just name, fame and money are not enough.”

Rajinikanth and Kamal Haasan – the two Gods of Tamil cinema – came together on a common stage on Sunday in Chennai for the inauguration of a memorial dedicated to another iconic and still vastly popular Tamil actor – Sivaji Ganesan.

The function, organised by the AIADMK-led Tamil Nadu government, which has been at the receiving end of Haasan’s strident criticism for the past few years, was being keenly looked forward to as the state’s electorate has been guessing about the next move of Rajinikanth and Kamal Haasan – both speculated to enter the political fray soon.

While Haasan has been open about his ambition to join electoral politics and even float his own party, having said recently that “if elections are held in Tamil Nadu today, I will be there”, Rajinikanth’s foray into politics has remained a matter of conjecture though the superstar has indicated that he might take the plunge.

But on Sunday, it was clearly Rajinikanth who stole the show – taking digs at his friend and fellow actor of nearly five decades.

Citing the example of the late thespian Sivaji Ganesan, who despite his massive success in cinema failed to become a formidable political force in the state even after being with various political parties – including the Congress, DMK, Janata Party and floating his own outfit, the Thamizhaga Munnetra Munnani- Rajinikanth took some not so-veiled digs at Haasan.

“Sivaji (Ganesan) has left a lesson not just in cinema but also in politics. He started his own political party, fought and lost (elections) from his own constituency. This was not an insult to him, but the people of that constituency, Rajini said.

The Tamil superstar then went on to add: “The message is that to be successful in politics, just name, fame and money are not enough. There is something beyond that.”

Admitting that he didn’t know what was required to be a successful politician, Rajinikanth added: “Only electors know what it takes for actors to become successful politicians. I don’t know for sure. I think Kamal Haasan knows it.”

The actor then took a swipe at Haasan, saying that “even if I ask him (about what it is that is needed to succeed in politics), he won’t share it with me now,” adding that “he may have told me if I had asked him two months ago”.

While Rajinikanth predictably gave no clear hints on whether or not he would be taking the much anticipated plunge into electoral politics, he didn’t shy away from putting Haasan in a spot.

“I told him (Kamal) that you’re my elder brother in the film industry and you should tell me what is needed for an actor to succeed in politics. And he says, ‘come with me, I will tell you’,” Rajinikanth said, indicating that Haasan had perhaps asked him to join the political outfit he plans to float.

Tamil Nadu has had a rich history of cinema marrying politics. Though Sivaji Ganesan may not have been successful in his political innings, his contemporary, the legendary MG  Ramachandran, not only floated the AIADMK after walking out of the M Karunanidhi-led DMK, but also went on to become the state’s chief minister.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

DU VC Prof Yogesh Singh entrusted with additional charge of AICTE Chairman

Published

on

By

Prof. Yogesh Singh, Vice Chancellor of the University of Delhi, has been entrusted with the additional charge of the post of Chairman, AICTE till the appointment of a Chairman of AICTE or until further orders, whichever is earlier.

It is noteworthy that AICTE Chairman Prof. TG Sitharam was relieved of his duties after his term ended on December 20, 2025. According to a letter issued by the Ministry of Education, Government of India, on Monday, Prof. Yogesh Singh’s appointment is until the appointment of a regular AICTE Chairman or until further orders whichever is earlier.

Prof. Yogesh Singh is a renowned academician with excellent administrative capabilities, who has been the Vice-Chancellor of University of Delhi since October 2021. He has also served as the Chairperson of the National Council for Teacher Education. In August 2023, he was also given the additional charge of Director of the School of Planning and Architecture (SPA).

Prof. Yogesh Singh served as the Vice-Chancellor of Delhi Technological University from 2015 to 2021; Director of Netaji Subhas Institute of Technology, Delhi from 2014 to 2017, and before that, he was the Vice-Chancellor of Maharaja Sayajirao University, Baroda (Gujarat) from 2011 to 2014. He holds a Ph.D. in Computer Engineering from the National Institute of Technology, Kurukshetra. He has a distinguished track record in quality teaching, innovation, and research in the field of software engineering.

Continue Reading

India News

Goa nightclub fire case: Court extends police custody of Luthra brothers by five days

A Goa court has extended the police custody of Saurabh and Gaurav Luthra, owners of the nightclub where a deadly fire killed 25 people, by five more days.

Published

on

Luthra brothers

A court in Goa on Monday extended the police custody of Saurabh Luthra and Gaurav Luthra, the owners of the Birch by Romeo Lane nightclub, by five more days in connection with the deadly fire incident that claimed 25 lives on December 6.

The order was passed as investigators sought additional time to question the two accused in the case linked to the blaze at the Anjuna-based nightclub.

Owners were deported after fleeing abroad

According to details placed before the court, the Luthra brothers had left the country following the incident and travelled to Thailand. They were subsequently deported and brought back to India on December 17, after which they were taken into police custody.

Advocate Vishnu Joshi, representing the families of the victims, confirmed that the court granted a five-day extension of police custody for both Saurabh and Gaurav Luthra.

Another co-owner sent to judicial custody

The court also remanded Ajay Gupta, another owner of the nightclub, to judicial custody. Police did not seek an extension of his custody, following which the court passed the order, the victims’ counsel said.

The Anjuna police have registered a case against the Luthra brothers for culpable homicide not amounting to murder along with other relevant offences related to the fire incident.

Continue Reading

India News

Delhi High Court issues notice to Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi in National Herald case

Delhi High Court has sought responses from Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi on the ED’s plea challenging a trial court order in the National Herald case.

Published

on

The Delhi High Court has sought responses from Congress leaders Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi on a petition filed by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in connection with the National Herald case. The petition challenges a trial court order that refused to take cognisance of the agency’s prosecution complaint.

Justice Ravinder Dudeja issued notices to the Gandhis and other accused on the main petition, as well as on the ED’s application seeking a stay on the trial court’s December 16 order. The high court has listed the matter for further hearing on March 12, 2026.

The trial court had ruled that taking cognisance of the ED’s complaint was “impermissible in law” because the investigation was not based on a registered First Information Report (FIR). It observed that the prosecution complaint under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) was not maintainable in the absence of an FIR for a scheduled offence.

According to the order, the ED’s probe originated from a private complaint rather than an FIR. The court further noted that since cognisance was declined on a legal question, it was not necessary to examine the merits of the allegations at that stage.

The trial court also referred to the complaint filed by BJP leader Subramanian Swamy and the summoning order issued in 2014, stating that despite these developments, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) did not register an FIR in relation to the alleged scheduled offence.

The ED has accused Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi, late Congress leaders Motilal Vora and Oscar Fernandes, Suman Dubey, Sam Pitroda, and a private company, Young Indian, of conspiracy and money laundering. The agency has alleged that properties worth around Rs 2,000 crore belonging to Associated Journals Limited (AJL), which publishes the National Herald newspaper, were acquired through Young Indian.

The agency further claimed that Sonia and Rahul Gandhi held a majority 76 per cent shareholding in Young Indian, which allegedly took over AJL’s assets in exchange for a Rs 90 crore loan.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com