Senior leader and NCP chief Sharad Pawar’s comments on the Adani issue will not have any impact on opposition unity in Maharashtra which will remain united in their fight against the BJP, Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Sanjay Raut said on Saturday.
In a statement in response to Pawar’s stand on the Adani issue and Opposition’s demand for a JPC probe into the matter, Raut said they’ve known Nationalist Congress Party supremo’s position on billionaire industrialist Gautam Adani from the very beginning and his disagreement on whether there should be a JPC probe or a Supreme Court inquiry in the matter, is the veteran politician’s own viewpoint.
However, Raut said, Pawar’s comments do not in any way mean there are any differences in the opposition unity, adding that Pawar may have a different view on the issue but “Shiv Sena will stand where the entire opposition is standing.”
Sanjay Raut said Pawar is one of the tallest leaders of the opposition and has earned the right to have his own views on issues in a democracy.
Raut’s comments came in response to Sharad Pawar coming out in support of the embattled Adani Group, saying that the damning report published by US-based short seller Hindenburg Research against the conglomerate “seems targeted.”
In an interview, Pawar said that the Adani issue was blown out of proportion in the Parliament which led to a complete washout of the second leg of the Budget Session as hardly any business was conducted.
The senior leader said that whenever such an issue is given too much importance, the cost is borne by the country’s economy and as such it seems the report against the Adani Group was “targeted”, adding that it seems that a single individual business group of a country was targeted to further an agenda.
In complete contrast to his other Opposition allies, including the Congress, who have been adamantly demanding a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) probe into the Adani issue, the veteran politician in an interview with NDTV said that he does not agree with other allies on this matter.
Pawar said the Supreme Court had already ordered a probe into the Hindenburg report by setting up a committee consisting of a retired apex court judge, an economist, an administrator and an expert—who have been directed to conduct an inquiry within a specified time frame.
He added that the JPC probe had no significance anymore since the Supreme Court has ordered an inquiry and cannot be swayed unlike a JPC which would consist majorly of ruling party members, and as the probe is being asked against the ruling party itself, a parliamentary probe has a lesser chance of finding the truth.