English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

Britain’s threat level raised to ‘critical’ as IS claims responsibility for Tube explosion

Published

on

Britain’s threat level raised to ‘critical’ as IS claims responsibility for Tube explosion

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]No suspects identified yet for Friday’s incident that left 29 commuters injured, British PM May hints at tough measures to ensure safety of the country

As of Saturday morning, the London Metropolitan police and Scotland Yard were still trying to identify suspects for the London Tube explosion that left 29 commuters injured at Parsons Green station on Friday, even as the Islamic State reportedly claimed responsibility for the strike.

British Prime Minister Theresa May has announced that the national threat perception level has been escalated “from severe to critical” indicating that the country’s security agencies fear the possibility of another imminent attack. May has also hinted that Londoners will have to get used to seeing a posse of armed security personnel on the streets of the British capital and that she was even willing to change human rights laws of the country if they “get in the way” of protecting Britain.

The London police are currently scouring through CCTV footage of the London Tube in which the crude, apparently homemade improvised explosive device (IED) set in a white bucket went off on Friday and also footage collected from various stations on the Tube’s route.

It has not yet been ascertained whether the IS – which has on its propaganda website Amaq News claimed responsibility for the act of terror – was actually involved in the strike. The London Metropolitan Police’s Assistant Commissioner, Mark Rowley reportedly told media outfits in London that it was “very routine” for IS to claim the attack “whether or not they’ve had any previous engagement with the individuals involved.”

It is also possible that the police are looking for more than one attacker as their statements following the explosion have mentioned that they were hunting for “suspects”.

Britain’s threat level raised to ‘critical’ as IS claims responsibility for Tube explosionThe explosion on London’s Tube is bound to rekindle pointed debate about whether countries like Britain have been tough enough in fighting terrorism. The attack had triggered a sort of verbal duel between US President Donald Trump and British PM May who was also supported by other representatives of Britain’s political and security establishment.

Trump’s suggestion that the United Kingdom needed to be “more proactive” in dealing with the terrorists and his calling the strike the handiwork of a “loser terrorist” even before Britain had declared the explosion an act of terror, too did not go down well with the British government.

Although May had – hours after Trump’s ‘loser terrorist tweet’ – confirmed that the explosion was a “cowardly act of terror”, she also rebuked the US president for his remarks, albeit without expressly naming him. “I never think it’s helpful for anybody to speculate on what is an ongoing investigation,” May had said, adding: “the police and security establishment are still working to understand the full scale of this cowardly attack and identify all those responsible for it.”

Nick Timothy, a newspaper columnist who was formerly chief of staff to Theresa May, had also responded to Trump’s tweets by terming his reaction as “unhelpful”.[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][vc_column_text]While May and others in her establishment retorted to Trump’s unsolicited advice asking the UK to be more “proactive” by terming it “unhelpful” at a time of crisis, the British Prime Minister soon after announced a slew of new measures that will be rolled out to ensure safety of Londoners.

“The public will see more armed police on the transport network and on our streets, providing extra protection. This is a proportionate and sensible step which will provide extra reassurance and protection while the investigation progresses,” May said late Friday.

The British PM also announced that for the period when the threat level remains pegged at critical “military personnel will replace police personnel on guard duties on search and protected sites that are not accessible for the public… terrorism is a great challenge of our times but by standing together we will defeat it.”[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Latest world news

US ends oil sanctions waiver for Iran and Russia, impact likely on India’s energy imports

The US decision to end the Iran and Russia oil waiver may impact India’s oil imports, fuel prices and global energy markets.

Published

on

US oil tanker

The United States has decided not to extend a temporary sanctions waiver that allowed limited trade in Iranian and Russian oil, marking a shift towards stricter enforcement of economic restrictions.

The waiver, introduced in March 2026, had permitted the sale of oil already loaded on ships to stabilise global supply during heightened geopolitical tensions. However, it is now set to expire around mid-April without renewal.

US officials have indicated that the move is part of a broader strategy to increase pressure on both Iran and Russia amid ongoing conflicts and geopolitical tensions.

What the waiver did and why it mattered

The short-term waiver allowed millions of barrels of oil—estimated at around 140 million barrels—to enter global markets, helping ease supply shortages and prevent sharp price spikes.

It also enabled countries like India to purchase discounted crude oil from Russia and resume limited imports from Iran after years of restrictions.

Impact on India

India, one of the world’s largest oil importers, is expected to feel the impact of the decision in several ways:

  • Reduced access to discounted oil
    India had been buying cheaper Russian crude and recently resumed Iranian imports under the waiver. Its end may limit these options.
  • Potential rise in fuel costs
    With fewer discounted supplies available, India may need to rely more on costlier sources, which could increase domestic fuel prices.
  • Supply diversification pressure
    India may need to explore alternative suppliers in the Middle East, Africa, or the US to maintain energy security.
  • Geopolitical balancing challenge
    The move adds pressure on India to align with US sanctions while managing its own economic interests.

Global energy market concerns

The end of the waiver comes at a time when global oil markets are already under stress due to conflict in West Asia and disruptions in key routes like the Strait of Hormuz.

Analysts warn that tightening sanctions could:

  • Reduce global oil supply
  • Increase price volatility
  • Intensify competition among major buyers like India and China

Bigger picture

The US decision reflects a broader shift from temporary relief measures to stricter enforcement of sanctions, even if it risks tightening global energy markets.

For India, the development highlights a recurring challenge—balancing affordable energy access with geopolitical realities.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Sanctioned tanker fails to breach US blockade, turns back near Strait of Hormuz

A US-sanctioned tanker failed to cross the Hormuz blockade and turned back, underscoring rising tensions and disruption in global shipping routes.

Published

on

A US-sanctioned oil tanker failed to break through a newly imposed American naval blockade and was forced to turn back near the Strait of Hormuz, highlighting growing tensions in the region.

The vessel, identified as the Rich Starry, reversed its course after attempting to exit the Gulf, according to shipping data. The development comes just days after the United States enforced restrictions on ships linked to Iranian ports.

The blockade was announced by Donald Trump following the collapse of recent diplomatic talks with Iran. The move aims to restrict maritime traffic associated with Iranian trade.

Officials said that during the first 24 hours of enforcement, no vessel successfully crossed the blockade. Several ships, including the sanctioned tanker, complied with instructions from US forces and turned back toward regional waters.

The tanker is reported to be linked to a Chinese company previously sanctioned for dealing with Iran. It was carrying a cargo of methanol loaded from the United Arab Emirates at the time of the incident.

The situation underscores the rising risks in one of the world’s most critical oil transit routes. The Strait of Hormuz typically handles a significant share of global energy shipments, but traffic has sharply declined due to ongoing geopolitical tensions.

The blockade, which applies specifically to vessels travelling to or from Iranian ports, has added further uncertainty for shipping companies, insurers and global energy markets.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Jaishanakar discusses Middle East crisis with Kuwait and Singapore counterparts, focus on Indian community

Jaishankar holds talks with Kuwait and Singapore counterparts on West Asia tensions, highlights Indian community safety.

Published

on

India’s External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar held discussions with his counterparts from Kuwait and Singapore amid the ongoing crisis in West Asia, focusing on regional developments and the safety of Indian nationals.

In separate telephonic conversations, Jaishankar exchanged views with Kuwait’s Foreign Minister Sheikh Jarrah Jaber Al-Ahmad Al-Sabah and Singapore’s Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan. The discussions come at a time of heightened tensions in the Middle East region.

According to details shared by the minister, his conversation with the Kuwaiti counterpart primarily revolved around the evolving regional situation and the well-being of the Indian community residing in Kuwait.

He described the interaction as a constructive exchange, highlighting India’s continued attention to the safety and interests of its citizens abroad during the crisis.

In a separate interaction with Singapore’s foreign minister, Jaishankar said the two sides discussed the ongoing conflict in West Asia and its broader implications.

The talks reflect India’s ongoing diplomatic engagement with key global partners as tensions in the Middle East continue to escalate, impacting regional stability and international concerns.

The latest outreach is part of a series of high-level communications by India aimed at closely monitoring developments in the region while safeguarding its strategic and humanitarian interests.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com