English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

Flynn’s last nail

Published

on

Flynn’s last nail

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]He is now under Pentagon lens for money received after retirement as US Army general from Russian, Dutch and Turkish interests

By Sujit Bhar

Lt Gen Michael Flynn, a retired US Army general and former National Security Adviser to President Donald Trump, is in more trouble. Apart from his exposed close links and discussions with Russia during the Republican Presidential candidate’s campaign, leading to Flynn’s resignation from his top presidential post, he is now being investigated by a Pentagon body on monies that Flynn had received after retirement as general from Russian, Turkish and Dutch interests.

This does not add credit to Trump’s position as the chief executive of the country, having positioned Flynn in one of the most sensitive government chairs despite protests and warnings from top officials. Little affects ‘duckback’ Trump, but this is a matter national security and a matter of rules being flouted.

All US top brass, including top politicians, up to the level of past Presidents, take up major consultative positions that earn them millions. They write books, do lecture tours and are paid as lobbyists for other countries. This is an accepted norm in that country and nobody raises eyebrows.

However, the situation is a little different for a retired US Army general. The US Constitution’s emoluments clause states that he may be called back to duty in an emergency. Keeping this in mind, the Pentagon advises all retiring army generals to get all foreign monies that he may receive, cleared by it.

Initial findings have indicated that Flynn had taken huge sums of money from Russian, Dutch and Turkish interests.

Now the Pentagon has said, and a Washington Post  report reveals, that Flynn had “received $ 45,000 to appear in 2015 with Russian President Vladimir Putin at a gala dinner for RT, a Kremlin-controlled media organization. He also worked as a foreign agent representing Turkish interests for a Netherlands-based company, which paid him $530,000 last fall.”

Those are big sums of money. And money, especially from Russia, which definitely is not a US “ally”, was sure to be looked upon with suspicion, even if Flynn had not decorated the National Security Adviser post thereafter.

The Democrats are delighted with this find, and the Post report says that on Thursday Democratic representative Elijah E Cummings, who is on the Oversight Committee, released for all an October 8, 2014 letter of the Defense Department that carried a clear warning from a lawyer of the department to Flynn, warning him against taking money from foreign sources without prior permission.

If the reason for Flynn’s sacking from the top government post was not enough—lying to the Vice-President about his connections with Russia and about talking sensitive matters with them—this looks like the last nail in Flynn’s political coffin.

Corruption allegations are something that politicians around the world take in their stride. They are like those minor angina stings that a pill can take care of. Hazards of the profession, they say. However, when it is about national security, and when it involves “Russia”, a country whose position in American eyes is going from bad to worse, there is a possibility of all hell breaking loose.

If that happens, Trump, too, will not remain immune. As it is his public approval rating has been falling over the weeks and his recent executive orders (especially on corporate tax cuts) have received flak from all corners, including the mainline media.

The Post report adds a layer of issues. It says that, according to Flynn’s lawyer Robert K Kelner, Flynn had informed the Defense Intelligence Agency (his department before retirement) before and after that trip. However, it is being said that the problem lies in the money received and not the trip per se. That part was not discussed.

Let us see this in the light of India-Pakistan relations. There have been instances where former Pakistani bureaucrats have earned through work in India. Television Appearances occasionally pay. However, if these were to be done under cover, especially when relation between two countries is at a low, problems are bound to arise.

Financial gratification comes through services rendered. When monies received are large, one would expect large services rendered. Just a gala dinner with President Putin cannot be the basis of a payment.

Hence the probe. Hence the ticking time bomb for President Trump. If he fails to own up to his faults and change his stance, he is sure to be clean bowled.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

Hafiz Saeed-directed terror module exposed after Pahalgam attack, Junaid Bhatt neutralised

Lashkar-e-Taiba module behind the recent Kashmir attacks has been busted with the killing of top operative Junaid Bhatt. Massive diplomatic retaliation follows.

Published

on

HAFIZ SAEED

A major counter-terror operation in Jammu and Kashmir has led to the elimination of Junaid Ahmed Bhatt, a high-ranking Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) terrorist involved in orchestrating a series of deadly attacks including the recent massacre in Sonamarg. Bhatt, classified as an ‘A+ category’ militant and originally from Kulgam, was gunned down by security forces during an encounter in Dachigam in December 2024.

Module operated under Lashkar leadership

Bhatt was a pivotal figure in a Lashkar-e-Taiba module that, according to intelligence reports, functions under the direct command of Lashkar chief Hafiz Saeed and his deputy Saifullah, both believed to be operating from Pakistani soil. The group reportedly receives not only ideological motivation but also strategic support from Pakistan’s military establishment and the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI).

While the module includes a majority of foreign operatives, several local elements and overground workers from the Kashmir Valley assist the network by providing shelter and logistical support. Following coordinated attacks, the group’s operatives often go underground, using forest cover to evade security operations until fresh instructions arrive from handlers across the border.

Brutality of Pahalgam attack unveiled

The group’s involvement came into focus after the chilling Pahalgam attack, where terrorists targeted civilians at three different locations in the scenic Baisaran valley. In the gruesome assault, five people were shot dead at a single spot, two were gunned down in an open field, and more were targeted near a fenced enclosure. Survivors recounted that the attackers even engaged them in short conversations before opening fire, pointing to a calculated and cold-blooded execution.

The Jammu and Kashmir Police have released sketches of three suspects in the case. Two of them, identified as Hashim Musa alias Suleman and Ali Bhai alias Talha, are believed to be Pakistani nationals, while the third, Abdul Hussain Thokar, is a local from Anantnag. Authorities have announced a cash reward of ₹20 lakh for credible leads aiding in their arrest. A suspected hideout used by the module has also been uncovered in forested terrain nearby.

High-level security response and diplomatic measures

In response to the escalating threat, India’s top security panel—the Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS)—held an emergency meeting chaired by Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The panel, which included senior figures like Home Minister Amit Shah and National Security Adviser Ajit Doval, rolled out a series of stringent countermeasures.

From May 1, both India and Pakistan will downsize their diplomatic missions, slashing staff numbers from 55 to 30. Military and intelligence personnel from Pakistan stationed at its High Commission in Delhi have been ordered to leave India within a week, while Indian representatives in Islamabad will also be withdrawn.

Further, the SAARC Visa Exemption Scheme for Pakistani nationals has been suspended, and all existing visas under this provision have been revoked. Pakistani citizens residing in India under the scheme have been directed to exit the country by May 1. The Attari-Wagah border crossing has also been closed indefinitely. India has additionally suspended the Indus Waters Treaty of 1960.

Massive protests were witnessed outside the Pakistan High Commission in Delhi, as demonstrators demanded justice and accountability. Demonstrations have also spread across Jammu and Kashmir and other parts of India, underlining the widespread public outrage against the Pahalgam attack.

Continue Reading

India News

India writes to Pak, suspends Indus Water Treaty over cross-border terror

India suspends the Indus Water Treaty with Pakistan, highlighting repeated treaty violations and continued terror threats post-Pahalgam attack.

Published

on

Indus river waters suspended by India after Pakistan terror link

India has officially suspended the Indus Water Treaty with Pakistan, citing continued cross-border terrorism as the key reason. The decision was communicated on Thursday evening through a formal letter sent by the Union Ministry of Water Resources to Pakistan’s Water Resources Secretary, Syed Ali Murtuza.

The treaty, brokered by the World Bank in 1960, had survived multiple wars and diplomatic stand-offs between the two nations. The latest move follows the Pahalgam massacre, where 26 tourists were gunned down by militants in Jammu and Kashmir. The incident has triggered a series of non-military retaliatory measures by India.

India cites changing realities and treaty breaches

The letter emphasized that honoring a treaty in good faith is a fundamental obligation, but that has been undermined by sustained cross-border terrorism originating from Pakistan, specifically targeting the Indian Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir.

It further stated that several fundamental changes have occurred since the treaty’s execution — including shifts in population demographics, clean energy priorities, and altered assumptions around water-sharing. India accused Pakistan of failing to engage in negotiations despite repeated requests, thereby breaching key provisions of the treaty.

Home ministry to hold high-level meet on treaty decision

A key meeting to review the implications of the suspension is scheduled at Union Home Minister Amit Shah’s residence, with Jal Shakti Minister CR Patil and other senior ministers expected to participate. The decision was finalized during a Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS) meeting chaired by Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

This marks the first time India has suspended the treaty — a bold move even amid previous crises, signaling a shift in New Delhi’s approach to bilateral water diplomacy.

Pakistan reacts strongly, warns of consequences

Pakistan responded with a sharp warning, stating that any attempt to block or divert Indus waters would be treated as an “act of war.” Islamabad also announced retaliatory measures: reducing Indian diplomatic presence, closing airspace to Indian flights, shutting the Wagah border, and expelling Indian Defence, Naval, and Air Advisers from Islamabad.

The Indus River system is vital to Pakistan’s agriculture, electricity production, and drinking water — making the treaty’s suspension a significant setback.

Pahalgam attack at the center of escalation

The diplomatic flashpoint originated from the terror attack in Pahalgam, where gunmen linked to a Lashkar-e-Taiba offshoot opened fire on tourists in the Baisaran area, killing 26 people. Often referred to as “mini Switzerland,” the scenic spot turned into a tragedy site, prompting public outrage and swift government action.

India responded by cancelling all visas issued to Pakistani nationals, including medical visas, and closed the Attari-Wagah border. While there was no immediate military retaliation discussed, past responses like surgical strikes and air raids following the Uri and Pulwama attacks keep that option open.

In a speech in Bihar’s Madhubani, Prime Minister Modi vowed to track and punish those responsible for the Pahalgam attack. He declared that terrorism will not go unpunished and justice will be pursued to the “ends of the earth.”

Continue Reading

Latest world news

India expels Pakistanis, cuts diplomatic ties after Pahalgam attack, five key steps include Indus treaty suspension

India has suspended the Indus Waters Treaty and revoked visas for Pakistani nationals after 26 tourists were killed in a terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir’s Pahalgam.

Published

on

India suspends Indus Waters Treaty, cancels visas after Pahalgam terror attack

India has launched a firm diplomatic and strategic response against Pakistan following the devastating terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir’s Pahalgam that left 26 people dead, including a foreign national. Authorities have linked the attack to Pakistan-based group The Resistance Front, a proxy of the proscribed Lashkar-e-Taiba.

Major measures announced by India

A day after the attack, the Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS), India’s highest decision-making body on national security, convened to assess the situation. Based on the investigation findings and identified “cross-border linkages,” a series of significant measures were unveiled:

Suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty: The treaty, signed in 1960 and brokered by the World Bank, has withstood multiple wars between India and Pakistan. India has now placed the agreement in abeyance, halting the flow of water from the Indus, Jhelum, Chenab, Ravi, Beas, and Sutlej rivers to Pakistan. This move has the potential to severely impact water availability for millions in Pakistan.

SAARC Visa Exemption Scheme (SVES) visas cancelled: All SVES visas issued to Pakistani nationals have been revoked. Those currently in India under this scheme must leave within 48 hours. India will no longer issue such visas to Pakistani citizens.

Closure of Attari-Wagah border crossing: The Attari Integrated Check Post has been shut with immediate effect. Individuals already in India with valid endorsements can return to Pakistan via the same route only until 1 May 2025.

Reduction in diplomatic staff and withdrawal of defence advisors: Both countries will downsize their respective high commissions. India will reduce its personnel in Islamabad from 55 to 30. Defence officials, including naval and air advisers, have been declared persona non grata and must exit within a week.

Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri emphasized that these steps are intended to hold accountable not only the perpetrators but also those enabling terrorism. “The CCS resolved that justice will be pursued relentlessly,” Misri added, referencing the recent extradition of Tahawwur Rana as an example of India’s uncompromising stance.

Political and strategic context

Water Resources Minister CR Paatil lauded the decision to suspend the treaty, noting that such steps had been considered in the past, especially after incidents like the 2019 Pulwama attack. The treaty has long been viewed as a symbol of rare bilateral cooperation, but its suspension marks a dramatic shift, signaling India’s growing impatience with what it perceives as Pakistan’s continued use of terrorism as a state tool.

The move comes amid mounting warnings from water experts about Pakistan’s looming water crisis, driven by overpopulation, climate change, and mismanagement. The disruption in river flows from India could intensify that crisis, adding pressure on Islamabad.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com